President Obama’s Subtle War on Women Through Corrupt Federal Courts

When President Obama said that with homo marriage ‘you can marry whoever you love’ he expressed executive contempt for thousands of years of human reason building up the institution of marriage around procreation and protection of women as vulnerable child bearers. To the President marriage is nothing more than a federal legal term like a joint partnership or corporation that ought to be used by any legal adult with whoever. Yet it isn’t as simple as that.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/applause-618293-going-climate.html

Marriage reflects a rational biological content comprising procreation in heterosexual reproduction. It isn’t just a legal arrangement. There are laws against marrying close relatives for instance even if one loves them (meeting the President’s criteria) because of the biological consequences of inbreeding. Marriage laws that are implicitly designed to support heterosexual reproduction cannot just be applied existentially to any adult.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/10/alimony-women-increasingly_n_1506394.html

The unintended consequences of ending the human institution of marriage and reworking it to be an encumbering legal partnership with rights of inheritance and so forth expanded to include homosexuals would be implicitly structured without equality for heterosexuals and homosexuals. Laws against incest would remain to stop the President’s existential paradigm for marriage. Laws against bestiality would remain so democrats can’t marry the dog they love or the burro the bought in Mexico, and the social bias that one sex has an obligation to pay child support or alimony payments after divorce would stop in order that heterosexuals are discriminated against. Since it is unreasonable to find that one partner of a same sex marriage has an implicit biological, sexed obligation to pay alimony to ‘the weaker sex’ plainly there is a biological foundation for marriage that would end in order that marriage laws apply equally to queers, steers and heterosexuals. That is a war on women.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/kentucky-same-sex-marriage-ban-rejected-by-federal-judge-1404306317

The Federal Courts that are forcing homosexual marriage upon the states seem like a generation of legalists that used too much L.S.D. or cocaine.  Who needs respect when they have the power of military terror to dominate and define social reality? They seem spaced and incorrigibly corrupt and unworthy of social respect. That isn’t a good thing. It is challenging to revolt in the modern world where the Federal Government has so much power and so many goons ready to kill for its pay and ‘really good benefits’, yet the founders in today’s business climate would have found most of Wall Street supporting the British Torrie establishment instead of a minority of radicals. 

With the Federal monopoly on nuclear weapons revolt is effectively impractical, so the inertia of evil corrupt power just rolls on running roughshod over the sentiments of perhaps more than a hundred million Americans. When the republic grew up the Federal Government didn't have a large standing army and vast military power including nuclear weapons and N.S.A. surveillance to intimidate the population into docility. Instead the D.C. government had to actually listen to the people to get them to support government objectives. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely (Acton).

http://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=united-states-of-america

http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/07/02/4215359/comparison-of-privacy-reports.html

The thing is, none of that was necessary. A new institution especially for queers could have been created that would not have attacked marriage. Maybe that’s a result of insiders seeking to reduce the population forcibly. I regard the preference for moral corruption rather than social education as a bad policy choice.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/29/blame-the-obama-doctrine-for-iraq.html

Besides the empirical result of created a new Caliphate in the Middle East from Iraq and Syria President Obama as attacked American moral significantly. Debatably he has organized international terrorism better than Osama Bin Laden although unintentionally and domestically he has attacked marriage vigorously seeking to end it as a viable procreative institution. Happy Fourth of July.