Government Should Get Out of the Marriage Business

Fox news is the most recent corrupting corporate media outlet of sycophancy on the homo hijacking of marriage (homos want to get all the good federal benefits) made for raising kids. Homosexuals were not repressed or enslaved in comparison to black slaves -the need for liberation is pure bunk; many politicians such too as it is. Before government grew large and invented income taxes there was no desire for queers to pretend to be married like men and women. The U.S. Government ought to step aside and let states quit regulating the marriage business. If marriage for the protection of women and children is economically obsolete it is just another corrupt regulatory practice big government won't let go of. They would rather be a state church of godless immorality with bureaucrat priests.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/06/01/its-time-for-republican-party-leaders-to-embrace-marriage-equality.html

Counting on Americans to be  without sense and unable to resist corporate power that will give up any national sovereignty and roll over liked doped mutts on queer marriage may be something Fox would expect of government-yet not all Americans are as worthless as the U.S. Government is on morality. Even the Republican Party may have some brain capacity left over that is able to think of things besides dollar signs. Christians with wrong eschatological views such as pre-tribulationism should not roll over on the issue either and say that its just the kingdom of the anti-Christi building to take over the world and don't worry we will be helicopter-raptured out so pleas, hurry with the doom and corruption!

Marriage was a thing people did before government started taking things over and regulating them. Marriage was a real relationship between men and women-it was a fact rather than a definition or spaced out sort of 'definition' that could be reallocated with sufficient social brainwashing and a ubiquitous and corrupt broadcast media. 

Marriages in religious settings existed before any government could become corrupt enough to try to 'redefine' it as just relationships between people that sex up one another on a more or less permanent basis. Government corruption of establishments like marriage are an indication that it is time for the government to go itself, or disencumber itself of its corporate martinets.

Reducing human population and concentrating wealth requires degradation of little rival things like families and inheritance of DNA lines. The ultra rich probably want human DNA to be nothing besides product they can control and phase out the obsolete humans with quaint ideas about marriage and religion. 

Considering this issue further, it may not be a matter of jellyfish character of the populous. The media and rich simply have so much power they are absolutely corrupt and trampling on the grapes of wrath as the saying goes. Big government is the problem this time. Of course retarded bureaucrats and community organizers are a problem of equal stature. The idiots believe that all things must be equal and distributed equally except wealth.

If marriage is obsolete because of economic and social reason then the government should deregulate the mess instead of becoming an agitator for immorality and unnatural liaisons. Government could just step back and return to the era when marriages were private affairs. The only logical role for government today would be to protect children and that can be done without government defining marriage and regulating it.

Deregulation of marriage might recognize that the role of government in supporting traditional marriage is dead. Religious marriages could still exist of course in accord with one's beliefs. Government would only register the D.N.A. of children when born and require that parents be financially liable for their welfare until they reach the age of emancipation. Regardless of who is living together as a couple or in a group marriage, genetic parents would still have the legal obligation to financially support children, and the children would automatically receive 10% or whatever of each parent's estate when they bite the dust.

Furthermore, people that live with a birth parents in adult sexual relations would also be financially responsible for any children living in the home regardless of who the birth parents are. If a boyfriend shacks up with a single Mom for more than a month or so he would incur a monthly financial obligation to pay for the kids that would accrue rather like a rental and rental debt arises and follows the debtor regardless of his eventually moving out.

The U.S. Government should not start corrupting marriage and promulgating new and corrupting social relations that aren't really its business. With birth control, serial marriages and divorces, federal welfare supports and so forth women may have reached the point whereat marriage is no longer a necessity. Instead of discriminating against group marriages and polygamists marriage should just be deleted from government regulatory functions. Adults living together with whomever without a federal or state certificate would be fine. Church people could still have church marriages for those following their articles of faith and duties. Children would have government protection etc. It makes better sense than the lunacy of homosexual marriage.