Globalists like Cruz' classical economic liberalism. Goldman Sachs financed his Senate recognizing him as a cadre of classic capitalist liberalism. He also got support from Wisconsin's Theocratic party sub-unit of the Republican Party. The theocrats should form their own party and take 15% of the vote each Presidential election. Republicans could recover and not have the internal conflict each Presidential cycle.
Theocrats aren't aware that Reagan was a populist before being conservative. Reagan's populism gave him victories rather than his conservatism. Trump is a populist that theocrats and classical liberals disdain. Yet the people like him. If Republicans want to seem to support democracy the leadership should support Trump.
Barry Goldwater was soundly trounced because he wasn't a populist. G.W. Bush was elected only riding Reagan's coat tails. If Trump's populism is subverted the Republican prospects will dwindle.
Classical economic liberalism of capitalism regards all people as consumers, producers and market participants. Goldman Sachs might not finance a national conservative, yet Cruz was just fine for them.
There isn't anything fundamentally wrong with classical economic liberalism except that in a pure form for it regards the globe as one market and political boundaries as hindrances. That isn't good for nation conservators and properties of national political rights such as those of the U.S. Constitution at all.
The globalist managers of U.S. politics are happy with either the Clintons or Cruz as each are simply different product packaging of the same classical economic liberalism. That goes for Cruz' Canadian birth, Hispanic heritage and religious moral conservative characteristics selected to dupe American conservatives into supporting actual economic liberalism that has very different moral values that are scientifically, Skinerianish and detached from anything except abstract velocity of money concerns.
Classical economic liberalism of capitalism regards all people as consumers, producers and market participants. Goldman Sachs might not finance a national conservative, yet Cruz was just fine for them.
There isn't anything fundamentally wrong with classical economic liberalism except that in a pure form for it regards the globe as one market and political boundaries as hindrances. That isn't good for nation conservators and properties of national political rights such as those of the U.S. Constitution at all.
The globalist managers of U.S. politics are happy with either the Clintons or Cruz as each are simply different product packaging of the same classical economic liberalism. That goes for Cruz' Canadian birth, Hispanic heritage and religious moral conservative characteristics selected to dupe American conservatives into supporting actual economic liberalism that has very different moral values that are scientifically, Skinerianish and detached from anything except abstract velocity of money concerns.
No comments:
Post a Comment