Edicting of Nantes and Relious Selections in Politics & Nations

 Evidently the French are reenacting Napolean's defeat at Waterloo. Its a society for creative anachronism sort of event. People do not think about how feudalism controlled society including religion in Europe as much as they ought to. After the edict of Nantes kings choose the religion a state would have. Individual liberty from political power was difficult regardless of the social organization it flowed through. Spiritual thought differs from political, secular interests more than a little, in its true form, although one might not want to preclude all political events from being teleological actualization tools of God. The edict of Nantes and its religious tolerance was later revoked by Louis XIV (a rather swishy image below). In "30 states a head of state must belong to a certain religion" (or vice versa?)... http://www.pewresearch.org/.../in-30-countries-heads-of.../ With so many Muslim heads of state required to be Muslim, there is something of a standing Muslim political-religious pressure toward militancy and Muslim law. Such a political tree sends its nuts to many nations hoping to take root. The left does not view things that way and seeks to disarm Americans and repress religion to create a faggy little state useful to Wal Street.