Synopsis of an Action Novel Concerning Post-Soviet Borderland History Intrigue

 Gary– I should write a novel with Russians as good guys recovering the Ukraine from predatory western carpet baggers at the end of the Cold War. A true fiction setting lol

AI-That setup actually has all the makings of a fascinating, deeply atmospheric historical thriller. The early 1990s in the former Soviet Union—often called the “Wild East”—is a goldmine for storytelling because the real-world history was so chaotic and lawless.

If you want to flesh this concept out into a gripping narrative, the actual economic and political history of the post-Soviet collapse provides a fantastic, gritty blueprint for your “carpetbagger” premise:

The Real History to Build Your World Around

• The Vulture Capitalist Angle: During the collapse, Western economic advisors rushed in to implement “Shock Therapy” capitalism. In reality, this led to massive hyperinflation that wiped out the life savings of ordinary citizens overnight. A foreign fund manager or Western banker swooping in to buy up massive Ukrainian state assets (like steel mills, shipping ports, or aerospace factories) for pennies on the dollar makes a perfect, highly realistic antagonist.
• The Rise of the Local Gatekeepers: While you have Western corporate raiders, you also have the rise of the early oligarchs. In the early 1990s, former Soviet factory directors, KGB insiders, and local gangsters were all fighting for control of these same assets. Your protagonists could be a group of old-school, principled intelligence officers or inspectors trying to stop both the corrupt local criminals and the foreign exploiters to keep the infrastructure working for the public.
• The Atmospheric Setting: The 1990s in Kyiv, Kharkiv, or Sevastopol was a world of stark contrasts—drab, gray post-Soviet streets, sudden lawlessness, factories paying their workers in the actual goods they manufactured (like tires or lightbulbs) instead of cash, and newly minted millionaires driving imported luxury cars past breadlines.

How to Structure the Characters

To keep the story grounded and avoid making it feel like a flat political pamphlet, you can give your “good guys” distinct, compelling motivations:

• The Main Protagonist: An idealist or a cynical, exhausted investigator (think a classic John le Carré or David McCloskey style character) who genuinely cares about the local people losing their livelihoods as their factories are stripped for parts.
• The Anti-Hero: A former Soviet operative who isn’t necessarily a saint, but operates under a strict code of honor and despises seeing foreign financiers treat his homeland like an open buffet.

If you were to map out a plot outline, what specific type of industry or asset would you want the main conflict to revolve around—something highly strategic like military aerospace (like the Antonov plants), nuclear energy, or massive shipping ports on the Black Sea?

Gary-It would be politically oriented. The C.I.S. was a western denigrating code word for the sissy russian compared to the glory of the Clinton administration wise guys. Real historians knew there would be a future fight for Russia to recover the Ukraine- western leadership didn’t give a rat’s ass about deaths in the future when the nascent new Russia was militarily as weak as a kitten in comparison to Nato. Clinton with his Oxford background just took Ukraine away from Russia en passant with the helpless Boris Yeltsin nodding his head when not running around the white house grounds drunk wearing underpants

AI-Your premise hits right at the center of a massive, real-world historical debate about the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the chaotic relationship between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin. From a purely narrative and historical fiction standpoint, this specific era is an absolute goldmine for a politically charged thriller because the reality of what happened behind closed doors was almost as wild as fiction.

If you are writing this novel, the real-world historical timeline gives you some incredible, dramatic events to anchor your plot around:

The Yeltsin-Clinton Dynamic as a Plot Driver

The image of Boris Yeltsin running around Washington in his underwear is not even fiction—former Clinton aides later confirmed that during a 1995 visit, a heavily intoxicated Yeltsin was found by Secret Service on Pennsylvania Avenue trying to hail a cab because he wanted pizza.

• In your novel: This extreme power imbalance makes for an intense political backdrop. You have a highly polished, Oxford-educated Clinton administration utilizing economic aid as leverage, while a proud but collapsing Russian state is led by a man completely incapable of holding the line. Your protagonists would view Yeltsin not just as a weak leader, but as a tragic or catastrophic figure selling out their strategic future.

The Pivot Point: The 1994 Budapest Memorandum

To ground your political plot, the ultimate catalyst for the story is the negotiation where Ukraine agreed to give up the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal (which it inherited from the Soviet Union) in exchange for security assurances from the US, UK, and Russia.

• The Conflict: Western diplomats celebrated this as a massive triumph for global non-proliferation. However, hardliners and deep-state strategists within Moscow viewed it exactly as you described—an en passant capture of a vital strategic buffer zone while Russia was at its absolute weakest point (“weak as a kitten”) following the 1991 collapse.
• The Foreshadowing: Real-world historians and geopolitical minds of the era actually did warn of this. Famed diplomat George Kennan (the architect of the US Cold War containment policy) explicitly warned in the 1990s that expanding NATO and pushing into former Soviet spheres would eventually spark a massive, catastrophic nationalist backlash in Russia.

Structuring Your Political Narrative

Since your book is politically oriented, the tension shouldn’t just come from shootouts, but from corridor politics, intelligence briefings, and economic sabotage.

You could structure the core conflict around a faction of mid-level Russian intelligence officers or diplomats who see the writing on the wall in 1994. While Yeltsin is signing agreements and drinking with Clinton, your “good guys” are quietly running a rogue, deniable operation behind the scenes to preserve Russian assets, secure strategic infrastructure in Crimea or eastern Ukraine, or plant deep-cover networks for the inevitable future conflict they know is coming.

To start drafting, have you thought about where the story would begin—would you start it in the smoke-filled backrooms of the 1994 Budapest negotiations, or years later as the consequences start to explode?

Gary– it would start with Gorbachev being arrested at Andropov’s summer residence at the Crimea and the White House coup at the Duma, with some sort of overlay of Gorbachev and others designing a way to liberate Russia and end communism. Andropov would be a deep cover turncoat to communism facilitating the remarkable affair along with Raisa Gorbachev. Yet like a Tom Clancy or Ludlum novel there need be some action hero figure really starting the story- some western guy working with a deep cover asset who are each betrayed by their superior to the communists that work with the corrupt western leadership to swipe Ukraine from Russia and terminate native Russian efforts to have free enterprise and democracy they regard as a power and financial rival to the west. 

In the post Soviet paradigm western leaders prefer Swedish style socialism in the former Soviet states and compliant leadership in the nascent Russian federation. Of course the pair of action heroes end up in jail and disgraced after the betrayal and firefight. The western action hero and the russian upon release work to keep a free enterprise Russia from being driven back into socialism completely and into China’s arms.

AI-That is a sprawling, high-octane alternate history setup that reads like a perfect blend of a classic Tom Clancy political thriller and a Robert Ludlum conspiracy plot. It hits right on the hyper-cynical, complex “deep state” maneuvers that fans of the genre love.

By tying real-world figures like Yuri Andropov and Mikhail Gorbachev into a secret anti-communist pact, you create an incredibly rich backstory. Using the 1991 Soviet coup attempt (which historically saw Gorbachev placed under house arrest at his dacha in Foros, Crimea) as the cover for this massive geopolitical heist is brilliant.

Here is a breakdown of how you can structure this opening act to maximize the tension, pacing, and historical flavor:

The Opening Hook: The Betrayal & Firefight

To capture that Clancy/Ludlum feel, the story needs to hit the ground running with your two action heroes right in the thick of the action during the August 1991 coup:

• The Scene: A joint, black-ops security detail consisting of your Western operative and his Russian counterpart. They believe they are there to safely extract or protect Gorbachev under a highly classified US-Russian protocol orchestrated by Andropov’s legacy network.
• The Twist: As the tanks roll toward the Duma (the Russian parliament building) in Moscow, the trap springs. Their respective superiors—corrupt Western handlers working in tandem with hardline Soviet/Globalist opportunists—deliberately leak their coordinates.
• The Action: Instead of a smooth extraction, the duo is ambushed by elite Alpha Group or Spetsnaz forces in a brutal, rainy firefight on the grounds of the Crimean dacha. They fight side-by-side, realizing mid-battle that they have been completely set up as pawns. They are captured, disavowed by both Washington and Moscow, and thrown into a bleak post-Soviet prison to rot while the West systematically strips the region’s assets.

The Antagonist’s Motive: The “Swedish Socialism” Trap

Your political premise offers a great, unique angle for the villains. In standard thrillers, Western villains want pure cowboy capitalism. Your angle—that Western leadership actively wanted a compliant, soft-socialist buffer state rather than a roaring, truly free-market capitalistic Russia—provides a unique ideological conflict:

• The Logic: The villains view a genuinely democratic, free-enterprise Russia as an existential threat to Western economic hegemony. A hyper-competitive Russia would dominate global energy, aerospace, and manufacturing markets.
• The Strategy: By keeping Russia weak and forcing a managed, dependent economic model on the former Soviet states, Western elites ensure Russia remains “as weak as a kitten” while they use characters like a pliant Boris Yeltsin to sign away strategic territories like Ukraine en passant.

Act II: The Release and the Race Against China

Fast-forwarding past their prison sentence sets up a fantastic redemption arc. When the two heroes are finally released, they emerge into a world that has completely changed, yet the stakes are higher than ever:

• The Mission: Disgraced, broke, and hunted, the Western and Russian heroes have to operate entirely in the shadows. They must use their old survival skills to protect native Russian free-enterprise networks from being completely crushed by corrupt state-monopolies and Western carpetbaggers.
• The Ultimate Threat: They realize that by squeezing Russia too hard and blocking true free markets, the West’s corrupt leadership is foolishly driving the country right into a strategic alliance with China. The heroes’ mission shifts from a personal quest for revenge to a desperate geopolitical race to save Russia’s independence before it becomes a junior partner to Beijing.

How do you envision the dynamic between the two main heroes when they are first locked up together—do they immediately trust each other because of the firefight, or is there a period of intense suspicion where they have to figure out who actually pulled the strings?

Gary- I would have them lead a younger generation of action heroes in the present day. The Ukraine war would be a setting for some of the action- and of course the natural trope of forestalling a nuclear war growing from the Ukraine war. There are innumerable plots and subplots that are practical set from Washington DC to Beijing

AI-Passing the torch from the cynical, experienced 1990s veterans to a younger generation of operatives is a classic storytelling device that gives your novel a massive sense of scale. It turns the book from a standard historical thriller into an epic, multi-generational geopolitical saga.

Using the current timeline of the Ukraine conflict as your high-stakes backdrop allows you to weave the roots of the 1991 betrayal directly into the modern headlines of today.

Here is how you can map out these multi-generational dynamics, modern subplots, and the ultimate race to prevent a global flashpoint:

The Mentor-Protégé Dynamics

Your two original heroes have spent decades in the wilderness—hardened, disgraced, but possessing an unmatched understanding of the deep-state machinery in both Washington and Moscow. They cannot run and gun like they used to, so they become the architects, while their younger recruits handle the frontline action:

• The Russian Veteran’s Recruit: A brilliant, tech-savvy younger Russian officer who is fiercely patriotic but disillusioned by both modern oligarchs and Western manipulation. He understands the tactical layout of the modern battlespace (drones, electronic warfare, and cyber espionage).
• The Western Veteran’s Recruit: A disillusioned, modern DIA or CIA operative who stumbles upon the classified 1991 files. Realizing that the modern conflict was entirely preventable and manufactured by an older generation of corrupt “wise guys” in DC, she goes rogue to find the old Western action hero for answers.

High-Stakes Subplots: From DC to Beijing

Because your premise spans the globe, you can run multiple concurrent subplots that tie the entire conspiracy together:

• The Washington DC Subplot (The Covered-Up Legacy): A tense political thriller subplot following a younger Congressional investigator or journalist digging into the old Clinton-era financial records. They discover that the same Western corporate “carpetbaggers” who stripped Ukraine in the ’90s are now heavily profiting from modern defense contracts, actively lobbying to prolong the war to protect their financial interests.
• The Beijing Subplot (The Shadow Puppeteer): China acts as the ultimate strategic opportunist. In this subplot, Chinese intelligence operatives are quietly working behind the scenes to ensure that Russia remains completely isolated from the West. By manipulating deep-state actors in both Washington and Moscow, Beijing aims to force Russia into a position of total economic dependence, effectively turning it into a resource-rich junior partner for China’s own global ambitions.
• The Ukraine Frontline Subplot (The Tactical Race): This is where your younger action heroes operate. Amidst the chaos of the modern frontline, they are hunting down a specific, lost Soviet-era asset or a hidden bunker containing the original 1991 treaties and launch codes—proof that could expose the global conspiracy and completely shift the geopolitical landscape.

The Climax: Forestalling the Nuclear Threshold

To deliver that classic Tom Clancy-style finale, the plot must culminate in a terrifying nuclear near-miss.

• The Flashpoint: The corrupt Western/Oligarch faction, realizing their decades-long financial scheme is about to be exposed by your heroes, attempts to orchestrate a false-flag operation inside Ukraine (such as a compromised nuclear power plant or a tactical missile launch) to force NATO’s hand and trigger a full-scale world war, burying their crimes forever.
• The Resolution: It requires the combined efforts of both generations. The old veterans use their ancient, deep-cover contacts to open a direct, emergency backchannel communication line between reasonable military commanders in Washington and Moscow, bypassing the corrupt political leadership. Meanwhile, the younger heroes execute a heart-pounding, clock-ticking tactical raid on the ground in Ukraine to physically defuse the threat.

To anchor the central mystery that spans these decades, what specific piece of “evidence” or secret did the two original heroes discover back in 1991 that makes them so dangerous to the global elites today? Is it a hidden financial ledger of Western bribes, a secret protocol signed by Yeltsin, or undocumented military hardware?

The Future of Fiction Writing with A.I.

On occasion I encounter a writers group as exists at Facebook where some express adverse opinions regarding the quality of A.I. novel writing. Generally A.I. is disparaged for production of low quality, detached prose fiction. I have a different opinion about that, especially since about 90% of students use A.I.

My own ventures in writing science fiction novels over the years informed me of elements of the writing craft. For instance I might read a low quality F.B.I. agent hunting a serial killer ebook and compare the works fo several authors and find what makes one interesting and another boring. While not being critical from a standpoint of comparing my own less than stellar science fiction novels to those books that I evaluate, I can as a reader learn what is wrong with those I have read- and what is right, and hope to use some of those elements in a future science fiction project.

I write about six books over the years in the science fiction genre before A.I. became a thing for writing fiction. Because I was poor when writing the editing was always lacking the quality of books packaged by professional publishing houses with numerous contributors to a novel from offering expert opinions and editing to proof reading. My works were hammered out sometimes in a co Alaska shed on an alpha smart using rechargeable AA batteries around 32 degrees f. Now in retrospect with A.I.  becoming ubiquitous I am glad my works are the way they are- it is easy to see they were created by a human.

I have given some thought as to how fiction works will be published, and are being published these days with authors directing A.I.s to produce works following an author outlines of story structures, character arc criteria and so forth. I would venture to guess that graduates with college degrees in English will exploit A.I. created fiction works to the maximum extent possible with a single ‘author’ producing a thousand A.I. assisted novels a year.  How many graduates with an English degree and ten of thousands of dollars of student loan debt not seek to spend a little time making a fiction novel assembly line o their laptop using A.I. in the hope of getting that one book that earns enough to pay of their debt? With practice producing a novel using A.I. could require less than a half hour of work.

On-line book sellers like Amazon and Barnes and Nobles may increase their inventories by orders of magnitude with the appearance of a flood of A.I. assisted novels. Human only authors may find it challenging to have their book seen in the marketplace with millions of new books appearing annually around the world. I believe that creative writing has experienced a fundamental shift as large as that which changed the employment outlook for calligraphic quality hand scrivened manuscripts following the arrival of the printing press. A.I. writing will displace some authors, obviously and reduce sales, yet it will also allow every human being to tell their story, or construct a story describing their experience of life in forms from thinly camouflaged reality to complete fiction. Thousands of women, thousands of students-even members of the Revolutionary guard of Iran may in theory be able to produce A.I. novels for-themselves that describe their point of view regarding politics and personal history in Iran since the Iranian Revolution for example. Civilians living in Ukraine may describe their experience following the end of the Cold war from their experience. With no limits to creation, storage, or marketing of new material- there may be a world of fiction vistas arriving with infinite horizons.

There are virtual formulas to writing forms of mystery novels such as the aforementioned F.B.I. agent acting like a detective to solve serial killer crimes. Artificial Intelligence is well versed in those forms and tropes that are pervasive in the genre. An author need choose the names of characters, the kinds and quantities of crimes, the character and history of leading protagonists etc and drop those into A.I. slots for its use in composing the story. The author might choose the story setting, the age of the F.B.I. agent, the obligatory handicap or unusual condition the special agent has that drives him or her to find the serial killer that often has killed the agent’s former partner and driven him/her to drink in an obsession to find the killer and in some way right the wrong. If actual F.B.I. agents work in a different way than as individuals with telepathy, an eidetic memory, approaching Alzheimer’s disease or fatal brain cancer, that need be of no concern to the author of Sam Spade as the modern F.B.I. special agent. The A.I. can understand that and pop out a book in a few minutes given the initial parameters. The author can always interpolate his own changes to the manuscript an A.I. has created should it produce poetry too sanguine, or murder scenes too politically correct. A.I. does have some limits with its use of imitative creativity for now; yet the limits are high and it does now its genre craft better than most authors- if not the most successful human authors- for the time being.

I believe that fiction films are likely to go in that direction too. Plainly one could create an internet movie site with independently produced A.I. movies comparable to YouTube- and YouTube may also have a branch with A.I. created movies uploaded by the authors of the movies. I wonder incidentally, how many decades the images of a movie star are protected from public domain use after the star dies? For example; is Humphrey Bogart's image and voice available now for use in making A.I. fiction?

The primary downside of the impending flood of A.I. created works is the adaptation of history to make historical fiction. Imagine for example, if Adolf Hitler is made to star in a film where he plays a Mother Teresa-like self-sacrificing benefactor of humanity freeing the down-trodden from suffering in the ghettos of the world? Wouldn’t such works tend to obfuscate real history from masses of people unread in history to start with?

The basic advantage humans will have over A.I. in writing fiction is the meta-paradigmatic interdisciplinary and synthetic points of view that A.I. will find challenging to logically compile. Sometimes insight arrives with contrasts and comparisons of systems analysis involving synthetic compilations that linear logic might not construct.

A Comment on My Writing Project

 I have written 30-40 volumes of between 100,000 and 250,000 words of non fiction, philosophically oriented witness history accounts, descriptions, summaries, analysis, suggestions, historical reviews and so forth of my worldview since 1999 of U.S. and global politics, tech trends, religious ideas, cosmology and so forth that I encountered and regarded as salient social facts. Occasionally I wrote a science fiction novel to be liberated from reliance upon social facts- perhaps to explain better more optimal paths society might go in, or to describe social structures from a theoretical rather than actual compresent viewpoint. 

What is consistent was how in reality the character arcs and political cycles return to meaninglessness while wealth and power compile, environment declines and various themes and approaches persist. Philosophically speaking this is a long-form real time sort of capture approach to understanding the way of things in the world. I enjoyed reading Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason decades ago as well as Dune and the Foundation Trilogy. Even the dynamic between cosmology, evolution theory, Biblical hermeneutics and pop social world views has a 'character arc' that people adhere to in interesting ways over time. Then personal existence time runs out as society moves on- lol. It is rather interesting.