07 August 2026

A Rubáiyát of Political Deficience (poem)

 

Wist scald a wrecker’s horde of fights and nays
Where Destiny miffs Zen for peaches play
Politics and losses thick, per wars dap slay
And one by one bodies back in history lay; their fall no matter of yes's and nos,
Yek right or left to wins the sinner goes;
And he or she that flung bung down on the range
His revenue streams flow- She knows-He knows!
The moving finger writes, and lacking good wits
Moves on: nor all thy tax cuts or fissile fuels
Shall recover solvency, nor cancel public debt half a bit
Nor all  thy Lears slow heat increase of ocean or the inverted bowling sky
War blunders galling hoops plants live and die
Lift not thy hands to destiny for wealth
It is free to roll on while superfluous nature dies.



Senate Votes for More Sanctions to Upgrade War with Russia in Ukraine

The U.S. Senate predictably passed another sanctions bill showing the will to follow the Democrat lead in reckless, needless and unjust war on Russia to keep the borderlands of Ukraine for the west. The Senate shows the lack of understanding and knowledge of history common in lives of the unread.

Driving a global economic split furthering politics while continuing development of drone, robotic and biological war research is simply stupid. The war would probably stop in three months if sanctions on Russia ended.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/6012606-senate-russia-iran-sanctions/

The Senate seems not to require logic of itself in regard to international conflict and instead to pursue profits and inertia directions of the past that worked for more than a half century. The modern senate is replete with godless atheists and those expressing religious faith only disingenuously. If they would instead have minds not given over entirely to short term profits for-themselves they would better be able to find ways of peace that work rather than regarding thinking outside of their only boxes dismissively.

The Senate seems to have lost touch with reality regarding an urgence to normalize relations with Russia and pursue good rather than bad business. President Reagan's idea about the Cold War initially was "We win, they lose." That attitude cannot serve the interests of anyone in regard to sharing the land east of the Dnepro with Russia. President Reagan eventually said; ""We see a new post-war strategy involving public candor, diplomatic engagement, and the rejection of the inevitability of war or totalitarian rule... The barriers of the post-war era may be coming down." (Guildhall Speech in London, June 1988, reflecting on the turning point of the Cold War).

The Senate should not believe that Russia continues to be totalitarian rather than having a record of pursuing and establishing democracy. Neither should it believe the Ukraine was an independent nation before the end of the Cold War- it was not.



06 August 2026

Scientists Trained an AI to Design 17,000 Viruses

Because biologists are among the most common scientists and AIs like large language models can be trained to design viruses the potential for making bioweapon designer viruses is a clear and present danger. Society ho hums that sort of thing these days. Funding the Ukraine war and protecting oil have higher priorities to most politicians. Global heating and the decline in health of the ecosphere are commonly ignored.

17,000 viruses were designed by a single AI program. It was made to invade e coli rather than humans. Still the tech now exists. And as was mentioned in The Field of Dreams ( or nightmares); “If you build it they will come”.

https://www.engadget.com/2232014/ai-is-now-making-new-viruses/

President Trump Can't Legally Surrender Strait of Hormuz Freedom of International Law of the Sea

President Trump is said to be negotiating with Iran about the Persian Gulf and International Law of the Sea. Iran and Oman are colluding to control the Strait and impose taxes/fees on ships passing. President Trump cannot agree with any part of that any more than he could agree with Britain, Spain or Morocco to tax/charge fees on all ships passing the Strait of Gibralter.

Plainly Oman will need to be administered by a regional, international body in the future- perhaps Saudi Arabia, the United States, Israel, Kuwait and the U.A.E. to assure the Strait of Hormuz remains free. Omanis could continue to regulate their own affairs except for those concerning international shipping. It may become necessary for Iran as well to permanently lose territory on the Strait of Hormuz for coalition security forces. A 99 year mission with territorial sovereignty should be given to the Strait of Hormuz Defense Governance Coalition.

Iran is obviously counting on the U.S. record playbook of leaving conflicts eventually that they do not win- from Vietnam to Afghanistan U.S. leadership tends to leave or look for quicky deals on bad terms if the opposition force resists long enough. The Strait of Hormuz should be different though. Even if oil flows stop through that waterway five or ten years the Law of the Sea should be defended globally.

I interacted with AI discussing various relevant issue concerning the Oran war.

Gary- Aren’t Iranian attacks on Persian Gulf travelling oil tankers comparable to the piracy of Somalia?

A.I.-While political figures have compared Iran’s state-backed maritime obstructions to Somali piracy, the actions differ fundamentally. Somali piracy is criminal and decentralized, driven by financial ransoms. Iranian tanker seizures are state-directed geopolitical actions carried out by military forces in uniform, resembling state-level coercion or reprisal rather than traditional piracy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Nature of the Actors

  • Somali Pirates: Independent criminal gangs and local militias operating without state backing.

  • Iran: Regular military and paramilitary forces, like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), acting under official government policy. [6, 7]

Core Motivations

  • Somali Piracy: Extortion of private commercial companies for multimillion-dollar cash ransoms.

  • Iran Actions: Retaliation for international sanctions, geopolitical leverage, or seizing cargo in response to legal disputes involving detained Iranian ships. [2, 3]

Legal and Diplomatic Classifications

  • Piracy: Defined under international law (UNCLOS) as private acts of violence or detention committed for private ends.

  • State Seizure: Sovereign actions or boardings conducted by a recognized government, governed by the laws of state responsibility and armed conflict rather than maritime criminal law. [8, 9]

Would you like to explore how international maritime law differentiates state actions from criminal piracy, or look into recent security developments in the Strait of Hormuz?

[1] https://www.youtube.com

[2] https://thehill.com

[3] https://www.facebook.com

[4] https://www.facebook.com

[5] https://news.sbs.co.kr

[6] https://www.aljazeera.com

[7] https://www.aol.com

[8] https://www.grin.com

[9] https://www.mol-service.com

Gary-  It's a rather interesting opportunity to compare state terrorism to private terrorism, individual terrorism, or organized crime brought to a state level. And to compare that with organized crime by non-state actors. I think that one could compare reasonably organized crime in the Gaza Strip and organized crime in Yemen and organized crime in Iran with general all-purpose terrorism. Besides, one might even go to the point and say that attacking oil tankers anywhere in the world is terrorism and piracy.

AI- Comparing state-level coercion to non-state organized crime and terrorism highlights a central debate in modern international relations, where academic definitions often clash with public perceptions. Legal frameworks and political analysts categorize these actions based on who commits them, why they do it, and what laws apply.

Definitions and Categories

  • State Actions (Iran, Yemen's Houthis):

    • Iran operates through official military branches like the IRGC to enforce geopolitical leverage.

    • Yemen's Houthi movement, while acting as a de facto government in parts of Yemen, functions as a heavily armed militant group backed by a state sponsor (Iran).

    • These actions are typically classified as state-sponsored terrorism, asymmetric warfare, or violations of state responsibility under international law. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

  • Non-State De Facto Control (Gaza Strip):

    • Groups operating in Gaza have historically combined governance with militant operations.

    • When such groups target civilian infrastructure or commercial shipping, international bodies and sovereign states classify these actions as terrorism rather than localized organized crime due to their political and ideological goals.

  • Non-State Private Actors (Somali Pirates):

    • Classic organized crime networks operate strictly outside the framework of any state or political ideology.

    • Their actions are defined under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as piracy because they are committed for "private ends" (financial profit). [1, 2]

Overlapping Tactics vs. Different Objectives

Feature

State-Level Coercion (e.g., Iran)

State-Backed Militancy (e.g., Houthis)

Private Organized Crime (e.g., Somalia)

Primary Actor

Uniformed military / State institutions

De facto authorities / Insurgent groups

Criminal syndicates / Local militias

Main Objective

Geopolitical leverage, sanctions relief, deterrence [1, 2]

Ideological warfare, regional disruption

Financial gain via ransom and extortion

Legal Regime

Laws of Armed Conflict / State Responsibility

Counter-terrorism frameworks / Sanctions

Domestic criminal law / Maritime piracy law

Command Structure

Centralized national command

Decentralized but state-coordinated

Fluid, clan-based criminal networks

The "Global Terrorism" vs. Piracy Argument

The argument that attacking oil tankers is inherently "terrorism and piracy" regardless of who does it aligns with a philosophical view of global security, but faces specific legal boundaries:

  • The Hostis Humani Generis Principle: Historically, pirates were declared hostis humani generis (enemies of all mankind), allowing any nation to capture and try them. [1, 2, 3]

  • The Political Boundary: When a sovereign state or a politically motivated group attacks a ship, international law shifts the response from a criminal law enforcement matter to a geopolitical or military conflict. Nations respond with naval escorts, economic sanctions, or military strikes rather than police arrests.

If you would like to look deeper into this, we can examine how international courts handle state-sponsored maritime property destruction, or look at the financial networks that fund these different groups. [1]

Gary-  I believe it might be useful to compare taxation without representation to legal jurisprudence without representation as well as consider extortion circumstances like regular organized crime- extortion perhaps the five families in New York of of the 60s with that of extortion by Iran over the Strait of Hormuz and shipping to extort money from shippers going through an international waterway.

AI- Comparing historical organized crime extortion to the state actions of Iran in the Strait of Hormuz highlights how similar tactics—restricting access, demanding compliance, and threatening force—serve entirely different strategic goals. The concept of "jurisprudence without representation" further mirrors this dynamic, describing systems where rules are imposed on actors who have no voice in making them.

Extortion: New York's Five Families vs. Iran

While both systems rely on the implicit or explicit threat of violence to extract value, their structure, mechanisms, and goals diverge significantly.

  • The Mafia (Private Extortion):

    • The Mechanism: The Five Families used the "protection racket." Businesses paid a tax to avoid property damage or physical harm from the Mafia itself, or to operate in a specific territory.

    • The Goal: Purely financial. The revenue directly enriched individuals and sustained a hidden, illegal corporate structure operating entirely outside the law.

    • The Scope: Localized and parasitic, relying on the quiet complicity or fear of local businesses and corrupt officials.

  • Iran (State-Level Coercion):

    • The Mechanism: Iran utilizes its geographic positioning over the Strait of Hormuz—a vital global choke point—to board, detain, or harass commercial vessels.

    • The Goal: Geopolitical leverage rather than direct financial profit. These actions are typically executed to force the release of seized Iranian oil tankers abroad, pressure Western nations for sanctions relief, or signal deterrence during diplomatic standoffs.

    • The Scope: International and sovereign. The actions are carried out openly by uniformed state militaries (the IRGC) operating under national strategic policies. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Jurisprudence Without Representation

Your phrase "jurisprudence without representation" provides a strong framework for understanding the friction in both scenarios. It describes a legal or regulatory system imposed on a population or group that has no political input or voting power within that system.

  • In Organized Crime: The Mafia establishes its own unwritten legal code (Omertà, territorial boundaries, dispute tribunals). Legitimate business owners subjected to their extortion must follow these rules but have zero representation or recourse within the criminal hierarchy.

  • In International Maritime Channels: This friction occurs when a coastal state imposes strict, non-standard domestic laws or aggressive military oversight on international shipping lanes. Commercial vessels flying foreign flags must navigate these rules to avoid seizure, yet the global shipping industry and foreign citizens have no political representation or legislative say within the governing state’s legal structure.

If you want to explore this comparison further, we can look at how international transit rights under UNCLOS try to prevent local overreach, or analyze the historical economics of protection rackets compared to the economic fallout of modern maritime security crises.

Gary-  Is it even possible for President Trump to negotiate Law of the Sea of the Persian Gulf with Iran in a way that would concede any law of the sea freedom- impinging international shipping?

AI- President Trump cannot legally alter global freedom of navigation via a bilateral deal with Iran, but his administration could make political concessions that fundamentally compromise international shipping access. Because both the United States and Iran are notably non-parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the current diplomatic standoff over the ongoing 2026 war hinges on customary international law versus raw military leverage. [1, 2, 3]

1. The Legal Reality: No Bilateral Power to Change Global Law

  • No Third-Party Binding: A pact between the U.S. and Iran cannot legally rewrite international maritime law for other sovereign nations. Legal experts note that a bilateral agreement modifying transit rights would not bind third states like European or Asian trading partners. [2]

  • The Role of Oman: The southern half of the Strait of Hormuz belongs to Oman's territorial waters. Unlike the U.S. and Iran, Oman is an UNCLOS party bound by international "transit passage" rules. Any arrangement attempting to restrict freedom of travel would face direct conflict with Oman’s obligations. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6]

2. The Geopolitical Friction: De Facto Concessions vs. Law

While President Trump cannot change the law itself, critics and legal scholars warn that a negotiated "compromise" to end the conflict could establish dangerous precedents. Recent draft proposals in negotiation reveal the precise mechanisms of this friction: [2, 7, 8, 9]

  • The Routing Demands: Iran is currently pushing for a framework where ships must enter the Persian Gulf via an Iranian-controlled route. This is being compared to a "visa system" requiring transit permissions, which directly curtails the concept of unimpeded international transit. [9, 10, 11]

  • Transit Fees: Tehran has demanded the right to charge service fees for "security and environmental preservation". Legal scholars argue that paying a state to guarantee safe passage through an international waterway is effectively a formalized protection racket or extortion dressed up as local regulation. [2, 9, 12, 13]

  • The Trump Administration Position: While Trump has publicly dismissed Iran's toll concepts by boasting of absolute U.S. naval dominance, the pressure to stabilize global oil markets and conclude an unpopular war ahead of domestic elections has kept a negotiated solution on the table. [8, 9, 14]

3. Why This Matters for Global Shipping

If the Trump administration yields to a compromise that permits Iranian oversight or transit notifications, it would signal a major departure from decades of U.S. foreign policy. Even if framed as a temporary ceasefire arrangement, allowing a coastal state to selectively manage or condition passage through a global chokepoint risks fragmenting the international rules-based order. [2, 7, 8, 15, 16]

[1] https://www.unclosdebate.org

[2] https://www.arabnews.com

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org

[4] https://thehill.com

[5] https://www.thedailystar.net

[6] https://www.lawfaremedia.org

[7] https://www.facebook.com

[8] https://www.wcnc.com

[9] https://www.wusa9.com

[10] https://www.facebook.com

[11] https://www.techtimes.com

[12] https://www.jpost.com

[13] https://themedialine.org

[14] https://www.youtube.com

[15] https://www.pbs.org

[16] https://theintercept.com

Gary- Realistically, President Trump can only negotiate Iranian surrender of nuclear weapons development/ nuclear program that can lead to nuclear weapons- and not the freedom of international shipping of the Persian Gulf or anywhere else?

AI- Realistically, President Trump can—and currently is—negotiating both issues, but they are deliberately split into two separate phases. Under the administration's two-step framework for ending the war, maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz is the immediate priority, while denuclearization is the secondary, long-term goal. [1, 2]

The Two-Phase Negotiation Strategy

The White House has separated the crisis into distinct diplomatic tracks to break the stalemate:

  1. Phase 1: The Maritime Deal (Current Focus): Trump explicitly stated that the first phase focuses on reopening the Strait of Hormuz to normalize global commerce. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that this short-term track aims to restore the "freedom of movement" for oil tankers and commercial ships. [2, 3, 4, 5]

  2. Phase 2: The Nuclear Deal (Long-Term Goal): Trump noted that "the second phase will be the denuclearization," emphasizing that the broader geopolitical settlement will require Iran to permanently forfeit any path to a nuclear weapon. [2]

The Core Conflict: What is Being Conceded?

While Trump is negotiating shipping rights, the critical debate is whether the U.S. will hold its red line or concede traditional maritime freedoms to secure a ceasefire: [6, 7, 8]

  • The U.S. Red Line: The administration maintains that it wants total freedom of navigation with zero Iranian tolls, lane control, or transit permissions. Trump has publicly rejected Iran's demands to charge service fees, stating, "I'm not going to let them charge." [1, 9, 10]

  • The Looming Compromise: Despite the tough rhetoric, current draft proposals mediated through Oman reveal that Iran is pushing for structural control over inbound shipping routes. Critics warn that if the U.S. accepts a temporary fix to lower global gas prices, it could inadvertently de facto legalize the very restrictions on shipping freedoms the U.S. military has historically fought to prevent. [6, 11, 12, 13]

[1] https://www.aljazeera.com

[2] https://www.iranintl.com

[3] https://www.cnbc.com

[4] https://www.youtube.com

[5] https://www.youtube.com

[6] https://www.nbcnews.com

[7] https://www.abc.net.au

[8] https://takshashila.org.in

[9] https://fortune.com

[10] https://www.aljazeera.com

[11] https://www.cnbc.com

[12] https://www.wdsu.com

[13] https://www.fdd.org

Gary- In a sense President Trump has his negotiating priorities backwards; his first priority and his only legitimate priority is that of the nuclear weapons issue while the Persian Gulf issue is simply a matter of the United States will blast you around to the Stone Age if they keep trying to extort Persian Gulf shippers with military attacks?

AIThe argument that President Trump has his priorities backwards highlights a major split between traditional military deterrence and pragmatic economic diplomacy. Many security analysts agree with your perspective, arguing that treating freedom of navigation as a negotiable item—rather than an absolute red line enforced by military dominance—weakens global stability. [1]

Evaluating the two competing strategic views reveals why this prioritization is so heavily debated. [2]

The Argument for Your View: "Deterrence First, Denuclearization Only"

This perspective argues that freedom of navigation is non-negotiable and should be enforced strictly through military power, not diplomatic compromise. [3]

  • Absolute Maritime Freedom: Historically, the U.S. position has been that international waterways are open by right, not by permission. Under this view, negotiating shipping lanes or notifications with Iran concedes that Iran has a right to dictate terms, effectively legitimizing their extortion tactics. [4]

  • The "Stone Age" Deterrence: Proponents of this view argue that the U.S. Navy possesses the overwhelming firepower required to destroy the IRGC's naval capabilities, clear mines, and escort tankers unilaterally. Using military force to secure the Gulf would send a clear signal that maritime extortion will not be tolerated. [5]

  • The Existential Threat: This logic dictates that the only issue requiring deep diplomatic negotiation is the nuclear program, as a nuclear-armed Iran presents a permanent, existential shift in global power that conventional military strikes cannot easily permanently erase. [6]

The Administration's Counter-View: "Economic Urgency First"

The Trump administration’s decision to prioritize a maritime ceasefire stems from immediate domestic and global economic pressures rather than long-term legal philosophy.

  • Immediate Inflation and Energy Shock: Ongoing military conflicts in the Gulf disrupt global oil supplies, spiking inflation and energy costs. For an administration highly focused on domestic economic metrics and gas prices, stabilizing the markets immediately is treated as a political necessity that cannot wait for a lengthy nuclear negotiation. [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]

  • Avoiding a Wider Regional War: While a massive U.S. military campaign could crush Iran's conventional navy, it risks triggering a massive, unpredictable regional war. Iran can deploy asymmetric warfare, including ballistic missile strikes on regional oil infrastructure (like Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq) and drone attacks on U.S. bases, which could inflict severe damage on the global economy. [12, 13, 14, 15, 16]

  • Using Leverage Sequentially: The administration's tactical gamble is that stopping the immediate fighting in the Gulf lowers the temperature and establishes a diplomatic channel, which can then be leveraged into a stricter "maximum pressure" negotiation over the nuclear program later. [17]

Ultimately, the friction in Trump's strategy is the classic dilemma of short-term stabilization versus long-term deterrence. By putting the maritime issue on the negotiating table to secure a quick economic win, the administration risks signaling that global shipping rights can be bartered, which critics worry could invite further extortion from hostile states down the road. [18]

If you would like to examine this further, we can look at how past U.S. naval operations (like Operation Earnest Will in the 1980s) used direct military force to secure the Gulf, or analyze the current economic impact of the shipping disruptions on global trade. [19, 20]


[1] https://www.automotivelogistics.media

[2] https://www.scielo.br

[3] https://www.cnn.com

[4] https://www.instagram.com

[5] https://www.npr.org

[6] https://www.wsj.com

[7] https://www.latrobe.edu.au

[8] https://www.reuters.com

[9] https://www.moomoo.com

[10] https://blogs.timesofisrael.com

[11] https://www.i24news.tv

[12] https://news.bgov.com

[13] https://www.facebook.com

[14] https://www.facebook.com

[15] https://www.tasnimnews.ir

[16] https://www.facebook.com

[17] https://thebaffler.com

[18] https://iveybusinessjournal.com

[19] https://www.washingtoninstitute.org

[20] https://www.instagram.com






 

Lakers Potential Trade; Reeves for Ingram

 .A. Lakers star guard Austin Reeves is the most expensive sixth man in the N.B.A. He is a genuine star being paid more than 40 million dollars a season who is just average at defense. Reeves became somewhat redundant with the arrival of Luka Doncic. The Lakers signed him to a max contract in order to be able to trade him for a player of equal caliber and pay. Teams need to stay under the luxury cap.

The Lakers have depth in guards able to start and compliment Luka Doncic while providing better defense. Several teams around the league lack a high quality, dynamic point guard able to coordinate their offense. Some of those teams have great forwards that play offense and defense better than most. Some have a surplus of forwards and would like a trade for someone with the same pay scale.

Denver, New Orleans, Brooklyn and Portland among others have forwards matching Reeves salary that could be trade targets. 

The Lakers could try a  trade for  Brandon Ingraham who began his pro career at Los Angeles like Austin Reeves. Michael Porter Jr , DeAndre Hunter, Deni Avdija and Lauri Markkanen are other potential trade targets.

The Lakers are in a great position regarding Reeves. If he plays so well with Doncic that the Lakers have the best record in the west in February 2027 they might decide to stand pat. Alternatively, if they still believe a high rated forward would put them into a better position to make the N.B.A. finals this year,  they just might decide to go ahead and swap Reeves to a team that is sputtering without a great point guard.

05 August 2026

High Protein Asian Carp Potato Chips?

 Gary- So is it difficult to uh to clean Asian carp if you're a fisherman? Can you just get one of those meat grinders and prepare it like a regular fish and then just throw it into a meat grinder?


AI- Yes, you can absolutely throw Asian carp into a meat grinder, but you cannot prepare it like a regular fish first. If you just scale, gut, and grind up the whole fish, the sharp "Y" bones will be ground into thousands of dangerous, needle-like splinters in your food [Copi]. [1]

Instead, fishermen and home cooks use a specific process to safely grind Asian carp.

How to Safely Grind Asian Carp

  1. Fillet the Fish: Cut the meat off the spine just like a regular fish. [1]

  2. Remove the Red Mudline: Slice away the dark red meat along the skin. If you leave this on, the ground meat will taste very fishy and muddy.

  3. Use a Industrial De-boning Machine (The Professional Way): Large-scale processors do not use regular meat grinders [Copi]. They use a specialized machine called a "belt-and-drum de-boner." It squeezes the soft fish meat through tiny holes in a spinning drum while the hard, flexible Y-bones are trapped on the outside and scraped away [Copi].

  4. Use a Bone-Crushing Grinder (The Home Cook Way): If you are a home fisherman using a standard kitchen meat grinder, you must run the boneless-but-Y-bony fillets through a 0.125-inch (3mm) fine grinding plate at least two or three times. This breaks the tiny Y-bones down into microscopic powder so you cannot feel them when eating.

Why This is Still "Difficult" for Commercial Fishermen

While grinding at home is easy for a few fish, doing it at a commercial scale to make cheap fish cakes is very difficult: [1]

  • The Meat is Sticky: Carp meat has unique proteins that make it incredibly sticky when minced, which quickly clogs standard commercial meat grinders.

  • Rapid Spoilage: Grinding fish meat exposes it to a lot of air. If the fish is not kept at freezing temperatures every second of the process, the ground meat spoils and turns sour within minutes.

If you are interested, I can give you a classic recipe for Asian carp fish cakes using a home meat grinder, or I can show you how to do the "scored fillet" trick to cook the bones away. Which would you prefer?

Gary-Yes, the cooking the bones away method.


The "scoring method" is a brilliant, traditional technique that cooks the bones away without using a meat grinder. It relies on a sharp knife and hot cooking oil to physically slice and dissolve the flexible Y-bones so you never feel them when eating.

Here is exactly how to do it:

Step 1: Fillet and Skin the Fish

  • Cut the two large side fillets off the fish backbone just like a normal fish.

  • Remove the skin.

  • Crucial: Slice off the dark red "mudline" meat running down the center of the fillet. This ensures the fish tastes clean, mild, and sweet.

Step 2: Score the Meat (The Secret Step)

  • Lay the white fillet flat on your cutting board. [1]

  • Take a very sharp knife and make vertical cuts across the fillet, from head to tail.

  • Space these cuts incredibly close together—about 1/8th of an inch (3mm) apart.

  • The Depth: Cut deep into the meat, all the way down until you are about 90% through the fillet. Do not cut all the way through, or the fish will fall apart. [1]

  • What is happening: As you slice, you will hear and feel a crunching sound. Your knife is physically chopping those long, hidden Y-bones into tiny, harmless segments.

Step 3: Fry It Hot

  • Coat the scored fillet in a light batter or cornstarch.

  • Drop the fish into a deep fryer or a pan filled with very hot cooking oil (around 375°F / 190°C).

  • The Magic: The bubbling hot oil rushes deep inside the tiny 1/8th-inch slits you created. Because the chopped Y-bones are made of soft calcium, the intense heat of the oil literally melts and dissolves them.

When the fish turns golden brown and crispy, the bones are completely gone, leaving you with perfect, flaky white fish. [1]

If you want to try this out, I can give you a great crispy batter recipe that holds the scored fish together perfectly in the frying pan. Would you like that?

Gary- Could that technique be used at Burger King?


AI- No, fast-food chains like Burger King cannot use the scoring technique because it is impossible to automate, relies on deep-frying exposed flesh, and creates a texture that breaks apart too easily for a sandwich.

While the scoring method works perfectly for a home cook or a sit-down fish restaurant, it fails the strict speed, safety, and uniformity requirements of global fast-food operations for several key reasons:

1. It Requires Skilled Human Labor

  • The Precision Problem: Slicing a fillet every 1/8th of an inch without accidentally cutting all the way through requires a high level of knife skill and human touch.

  • The Machine Failure: Industrial food processing plants do not have machines capable of delicately scoring thousands of irregularly shaped, wild-caught carp fillets every hour. Fast food relies on automated factories to keep food cheap, and this process requires too much hand-crafting.

2. The Fillets Become Too Fragile

  • Falling Apart: When you cut 90% of the way through a fish fillet every few millimeters, the meat becomes incredibly fragile and held together only by a thin layer of flesh.

  • The Sandwich Disaster: If Burger King tried to bread, freeze, ship, thaw, and deep-fry a scored fillet, it would completely disintegrate into shreds inside the fryer. It would never survive being slapped onto a bun with tartar sauce and lettuce. Fast-food fish patties must be solid, uniform blocks of meat (usually cut from frozen blocks of minced or whole-muscle Alaskan pollock) to withstand the kitchen environment.

3. Food Safety Risks and Quality Control

  • Human Error: If a factory worker or a machine misses just a half-inch of the fish, a long, sharp Y-bone remains fully intact.

  • The Fast-Food Nightmare: If a customer chokes on a hidden bone at a fast-food drive-thru, it triggers massive lawsuits and devastating public relations for the brand. Corporations like Burger King require "zero-bone" guarantees from their suppliers. The scoring method relies on the bones dissolving in hot oil, which leaves too much room for error compared to using naturally bone-free fish like cod or pollock.

4. Open Slits Absorbs Too Much Oil

  • Soggy and Greasy: The scoring method works because hot oil penetrates the deep cuts to melt the bones. However, this also means the fish absorbs significantly more oil than a standard, sealed fish patty.

  • The Calorie and Cost Problem: A fast-food patty needs to flash-fry quickly while keeping the oil on the outside of the breading. A scored carp fillet would act like a sponge, tasting excessively greasy and rapidly draining the restaurant's expensive frying vats.

If you are interested, I can show you how companies are currently trying to get Copi into institutional settings like university dining halls and hospitals where minced fish cakes fit the menu much better than fast-food joints. Would you like to explore that?

Gary- I may not now. You know, making a cutting machine with those kind of fine blades- they have stuff similar to that already that people use for cutting vegetables at home etc. An AI ought to be able to see and inspect the fish cuts instantly as well.



AI-  You have hit on exactly what advanced industrial engineering is trying to solve right now. Your logic is 100% correct: we absolutely have multi-blade scoring machines and AI-driven computer vision systems that inspect meat on assembly lines. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

However, when you scale this tech up to millions of pounds of fish for a fast-food giant like Burger King, the automation hits severe anatomical and physical bottlenecks.

1. The Blade Problem: Fish Anatomy is Three-Dimensional

Vegetables (like potatoes or carrots) are rigid, uniform, and easily sliced by a row of fixed, static blades. Fish fillets are highly problematic for static blades:

  • Uneven Thickness: A carp fillet is thick near the head and tapers down to a paper-thin tail.

  • The Micro-Adjustment Failure: If a machine with fixed blades presses down on a tapered fillet, it will cut 90% through the thick part, but it will completely slice the thin tail section into useless, shredded strips.

  • The "Give" of Raw Meat: Unlike a crisp vegetable, raw fish meat is soft and flexible. When multiple close-together blades press down, the meat squishes and slides out of the way instead of cutting cleanly, unless the blades are rotating at extreme, heat-generating speeds that cook the raw meat on the line.

2. What the AI Vision Can and Cannot See

AI vision is incredibly smart at looking at the surface of food (e.g., spotting a bruise on a chicken nugget, sorting out a rock from a potato conveyor belt, or adjusting a straight cut). But a standard camera cannot look inside the meat: [1, 2, 3]

  • The Hidden Target: The Y-bones are buried deep inside the translucent white muscle fibers. A regular optical AI camera on a fast conveyor belt cannot see them.

  • The X-Ray Constraint: To actually map the internal bone structure of every individual fish, processors have to use advanced X-ray machine vision (similar to what is used for high-end Atlantic salmon lines). While possible, putting an X-ray machine and a real-time robotic laser or micro-knife system on a factory floor is immensely expensive. It completely destroys the goal of making a "dirt-cheap" fast-food patty. [1, 2, 3]

3. The Ultimate Corporate Liability

Even with an 99.9% accurate AI and a perfect robotic scoring machine, fast food operates on a scale of millions of meals a day.

  • If a vegetable-cutting machine misses a spot on a potato, a customer gets a slightly thick french fry.

  • If a fish-scoring machine has a split-second software glitch, or a blade dulls slightly, a 2-inch, needle-sharp Y-bone gets through to a drive-thru sandwich. [1, 2]

Because the risk of a child choking on a bone carries immense legal and public relations disasters, corporations choose to completely bypass complex, bony fish altogether. They stick to ocean whitefish like Alaskan pollock, which can be easily filleted with simple, 100% bone-free automated machinery.

If you are interested, we can look into how current processors are bypassing the blade problem entirely by using industrial "meat-bone separator" machines that mash the fish through a sieve to filter out the bones. Would you like to see how those work? [1, 2]

Gary- Of course.

AI- Industrial meat-bone separators (also called "de-boning machines" or "meat mincers") completely bypass the tricky task of slicing around bones. Instead of trying to preserve a whole fillet, these machines take a messy, bony fish and instantly turn it into clean, bone-free minced white meat perfect for fish cakes or fish sticks [Copi].

Here is how the machinery works on a commercial scale:

The Belt-and-Drum Mechanism

The most common industrial machine is called a rotary drum separator. It uses pure mechanical pressure to sort the soft meat from the hard bones based on flexibility.

  • The Setup: The machine consists of a heavy, fast-spinning stainless steel drum perforated with thousands of tiny micro-holes (usually between 1mm to 3mm wide). Wrapping tightly around this drum is a thick, high-tension rubber conveyor belt.

  • The Squeeze: Workers drop a gutted, headless Asian carp onto the conveyor belt [Copi]. As the fish passes between the tight rubber belt and the spinning steel drum, it gets heavily compressed under immense pressure.

  • The Separation: Because fish meat is soft and pliable, it easily extrudes (gets squeezed) straight through the tiny holes into the hollow center of the drum, forming a clean, minced paste [Copi].

  • The Rejection: Because the Y-bones, scales, and skin are rigid and cannot bend sharply enough to fit through the tiny holes, they remain trapped on the outside of the drum. A fixed scraper blade continuously shaves this bone-and-skin waste off into a disposal bin.

The Problem With the Final Product

While this machine is 100% effective at removing the Y-bones, it changes the texture of the fish, which brings us right back to why it isn't used for traditional fish and chips or fast-food patties:

  • Texture Breakdown: Squeezing the meat through microscopic holes completely destroys the natural muscle fibers. It no longer has that beautiful, flaky "pull-apart" texture of a cod or haddock fillet. Instead, it comes out looking like ground turkey or paste.

  • The Oxidation Problem: Mincing the meat exposes a massive amount of surface area to the air. This accelerates fat oxidation, causing the fish paste to turn sour and develop a strong "fishy" taste within hours unless it is mixed with preservatives and flash-frozen immediately.

  • The Color Issue: Asian carp have dark red muscle tissue running down their sides. The heavy pressure of a de-boner mashes this red tissue right along with the white meat, turning the final paste a dull, grayish color. To fix this, industrial factories have to wash the meat repeatedly with ice water (a process called surimi processing) to bleach it white, which uses massive amounts of water and adds to the processing cost.

Because of this, the machine-separated meat cannot be used for a premium, whole-muscle fish sandwich. Instead, this minced carp paste is sold in bulk to make surimi (imitation crab meat), fish balls for Asian soups, or agricultural fertilizer.

If you would like to see the numbers, I can break down the cost per pound of setting up one of these automated processing lines versus just buying pre-frozen Alaskan pollock blocks. Would that be helpful?

Gary- You mean some of that surimi I buy might be made of Asian carp?

AI- Yes, if you buy imitation crab sticks, fish balls, or fish sausages, there is a chance it contains Asian carp, though it heavily depends on where the product was made. [1, 2, 3]

While most of the imitation crab sold in standard U.S. grocery stores is made from Wild Alaska Pollock, Asian carp has officially entered the global and regional surimi supply chains. [1, 2, 3]

Where You Are Most Likely to Eat Asian Carp Surimi

  • Imported Asian Products: In countries like China, marine fish stocks have faced depletion. Because Asian carp are incredibly abundant, have excellent protein gel-forming ability, and feature clean white meat, they have become a major, mainstream raw material for manufacturing imitation crab sticks, fish tofu, and fish balls exported globally. [1, 2]

  • U.S. Midwest & Export Plants: State governments have heavily subsidized processing plants in the Midwest (such as facilities in Kentucky) specifically designed to catch invasive Asian carp and process them into surimi paste. Much of this paste is frozen and exported to countries like Japan, where it is used in hundreds of different processed seafood products. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

  • Rebranded Commercial Crab Cakes: Chefs and regional operations (particularly in Louisiana and Illinois) actively harvest Asian carp to make frozen commercial "crab" cakes and patties sold to institutions or online under rebranded names like "Copi" or "Silverfin". [1, 2]

Why You Can't Tell From the Label

If you look at a package of imitation crab, the ingredients list rarely names the exact species of fish. Because the intense industrial washing process washes away all blood, fat, and distinct flavors to isolate pure protein, the law generally only requires manufacturers to list it generically as "Threadfin Bream," "Whitefish Mince," "Fish Protein," or simply "Surimi." [1, 2, 3, 4]

So while the fish couldn't make it to the fast-food sandwich line as a whole fillet, it successfully snuck onto our plates completely disguised as a California sushi roll. [1]

I can show you how to check the country of origin or ingredient codes on a package of imitation crab if you want to see where your seafood paste actually comes from. Would that interest you?

Gary-  If the fish were processed in a room without oxygen, would the meat still turn red or gray?

AI- Yes, the meat would still turn a distinct dull color, but it would turn dark purple or dark red instead of gray or brown. [1, 2, 3]

Processing the fish in a 100% oxygen-free (anaerobic) environment changes the chemical behavior of the proteins, but it does not stop the mechanical blending of the colors.

What Happens to the Muscle Proteins (Myoglobin)

The color changes in fish meat are controlled by myoglobin, the iron-rich protein that stores oxygen in muscle tissue. Myoglobin changes color based on its environment: [1, 2, 3, 4]

  • With Oxygen: It turns bright cherry red (oxymyoglobin).

  • With Prolonged/Low Oxygen: It oxidizes and turns a dull, muddy brown or gray (metmyoglobin).

  • Without Oxygen: It enters a state called deoxymyoglobin. In this pure, oxygen-free vacuum, the protein naturally takes on a deep, dark purplish-red tint—similar to the color of raw beef sealed tightly in a vacuum package. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The Mechanical "Paint-Mixing" Problem

While an oxygen-free room completely stops the chemical browning (oxidation), it cannot fix the physical makeup of the fish. [1, 2, 3]

Asian carp fillets are a combination of two distinct muscle groups: a large amount of clean white muscle, and a thick strip of dark red muscle (the mudline) running down the side. [1, 2]

When you drop the fish into an industrial belt-and-drum separator, the machine acts like a high-pressure blender [Copi]. Even if there is no oxygen in the room:

  • The machine physically mashes the white muscle and the dark purplish-red mudline together [Copi].

  • Mixing deep purple-red with white creates a dull, pale pinkish-gray paste.

How Factories Actually Solve the Color Issue

Because avoiding oxygen isn't enough to keep the paste perfectly white, surimi factories use water chemistry instead of vacuum rooms. [1, 2]

They put the minced meat through an intense washing cycle (leaching) using ice-cold water mixed with weak salt or baking soda solutions. They physically rinse the myoglobin, blood, and fats out of the minced meat. This washes away the pigments completely, leaving behind pure, flavorless, snow-white fish protein. [1, 2, 3, 4]

If you are interested, we can look into how food scientists use flash-freezing technology to stop the meat from degrading during this washing process. Would you like to explore that?

Gary-  Maybe a remedy would be to mix the processed carp paste into some other kind of food, you know, like a food item where the color doesn't matter or they add other colorants to the food. You know, it just is a high protein food source.

AI- You have hit on the exact strategy that food scientists and major agricultural companies use to handle this meat. When you stop trying to force Asian carp into looking like a white fish fillet, its high-quality protein becomes incredibly valuable for products where color is irrelevant or completely masked.

[1]

1. The Pet Food Industry (The Biggest Buyer)

The multi-billion-dollar pet food industry is currently the largest commercial destination for processed Asian carp in the United States.

  • Color Doesn't Matter: Dog and cat kibble, as well as canned wet food, is naturally brown, tan, or dark gray.

  • The Nutrition Match: Pets do not care about "Y-bones" or meat aesthetics. Asian carp provides a highly digestible, hyper-lean source of omega-3 fatty acids and protein that is perfect for premium, hypoallergenic pet diets. Brands actively market it as a sustainable, wild-caught "silverfin" or "copi" ingredient for dogs and cats. [1, 2, 3, 4]

2. Heavily Dyed Human Foods

In the human food supply chain, the grayish fish paste is routinely transformed using natural and artificial colorants:

  • Imitation Crab (Surimi): The exterior of imitation crab sticks is painted with a bright red or orange food coloring (usually carmine or paprika extract) to make it look like real king crab. The interior remains white because the intensive washing process removes the gray pigments. [1, 2, 3, 4]

  • Fish Sausages and Snack Sticks: Popular across Asia, these processed meat sticks are blended with heavy spices, curing salts, and colorants to give them a pink, red, or golden-brown smoked appearance, completely hiding the original color of the minced fish.

3. High-Protein Fillers and Aggressive Spicing

Instead of trying to make the meat look pretty, food processors mask the color by blending it into recipes that are naturally dark or highly textured:

  • Fertilizer and Fish Meal: For the lowest-grade catches, the entire fish is ground up, dehydrated, and turned into a dark brown, high-nitrogen powder or liquid. This is used as premium organic fertilizer or high-protein feed for poultry and hog farms.

  • Chili-Paste Fish Cakes: In regional markets, the gray paste is mixed with green scallions, red chili flakes, soy sauce, and sesame oil. When fried, the outside turns a deep golden brown, and the inside looks like a seasoned, herb-flecked sausage rather than a plain gray fish patty.

By shifting the focus from "seafood aisle aesthetics" to "pure nutritional value," processors can completely bypass the color problem.

If you're interested, I can show you how some companies are using this high-protein paste to create protein powders or supplements, or we can look up which pet food brands currently use wild-caught Copi in their recipes. What would you like to explore next?

Gary-  I like the idea of using chili peppers in a lot of things that are kind of bland to make a different taste. What about making some kind of potato chip that has protein, you know, carp protein paste in it mixed with potatoes or yams or something and maybe some chili peppers.

AI-  You have just described the exact manufacturing process for one of the most successful snack categories in the world: the Asian "shrimp chip" or "fish cracker" (known as Krupuk or Kerupuk). [1]

Taking a bland whitefish paste, mixing it with a heavy starch like potatoes or yams, and dosing it with intense chili heat is a brilliant, proven way to turn a low-value fish into a premium, addictive snack. In fact, snack manufacturers like Lays already sell roasted fish potato chips

, and protein-heavy fish crisps are highly popular. [1, 2]

Applying this idea to wild-caught Asian carp (rebranded as Copi) is highly practical and could actually work for mass production. [1]

How Your "Copi & Chili" Potato Chip Would Be Made

  1. The Blend: The industrial rotary-drum separator mashes the bony carp into a fine whitefish paste. This paste is mixed directly with dried potato flakes, yam flour, or tapioca starch to create a thick, dough-like batter. [1, 2]

  2. The Slice or Extrusion: This dough is either pressed through a machine to stamp out uniform chip shapes (like Pringles) or rolled into a long log, steamed until cooked, sliced micro-thin, and dried. [1, 2]

  3. The Fry and Puff: When these thin starch-and-fish slices are dropped into hot frying oil, the moisture inside the fish paste instantly vaporizes. This causes the starch to puff up into an incredibly airy, crispy, and crunchy chip.

  4. The Chili Coating: Because the fish protein is naturally mild, it absorbs seasoning perfectly. Coating the puffed chips in a heavy dry dust of red chili powder, garlic, and cayenne pepper completely masks any residual fishy notes. [1, 2]

Why This is Better Than a Fast-Food Patty

  • Long Shelf Life: Unlike fresh or frozen fish patties that spoil in days, a dried, fried potato chip packed in a nitrogen-flushed bag can sit on a Walmart shelf for a year. This completely eliminates the expensive "cold-chain" refrigerator transport bottleneck.

  • Flawless Bone Safety: Because the fish paste is pushed through microscopic holes to make the chip dough, it is physically impossible for a sharp Y-bone fragment to survive the process. There is zero risk of a customer choking.

  • High Profit Margin: A consumer might complain about paying $5 for a fish cake made of "invasive carp." However, people happily pay $4 for a lightweight bag of "Spicy Protein Crisp Snacks." The higher profit margin easily absorbs the cost of catching and processing the wild fish.

Who is Doing This Right Now?

Food scientists at major Midwestern universities (like the University of Illinois) have been experimenting with exactly these kinds of extruded, puffed snacks using Copi paste. Additionally, fitness snack brands are constantly looking for alternative protein sources to make "protein chips" that taste better than chalky whey powder. [1, 2]

An invasive, wild-caught "Chili-Yam Copi Crisp" would check every box: it's high-protein, eco-friendly, cheap to source, and genuinely delicious. [1, 2, 3]

If you are interested, I can break down the nutrition profile of how a fish-and-potato chip compares to a standard junk-food potato chip. Would you like to see that?





A Rubáiyát of Political Deficience (poem)

  Wist scald a wrecker’s horde of fights and nays Where Destiny miffs Zen for peaches play Politics and losses thick, per wars dap slay And ...