Euros and Zelnski Rely on U.S. Chumpery to Continue the War in Ukraine Indefinitely

 Zelenski and European political war mongers think President Trump is a chump not to be taken seriously in regard to ending the Ukraine war. They expect to deface Trump's 28 point peace plan to their satisfaction and alter the points adding measures to the effect that Russia must capitulate and withdraw all forces from Ukraine or else.

The basic problem with securing peace quickly is that Euros reinforce Zelenski and each expect the U.S. leadership to be spineless sycophants providing full support for the war on Russia in Ukraine as was President Biden. President Biden provided political and military fellatio to Ukraine and Europe can’t believe President Trump won’t really continue those policies. Neither realize that the negotiation is largely between President Trump and Russia. The Europeans are interested, crazy, war mongering coaches for Ukraine and fans that whole-heartedly want the war to continue even if Ukraine is losing.

President Trump has it within his power to end the war himself simply by recognizing Russian ownership of Donbas and Crimea and ending sanctions on Russia with a promise from President Putin to stop the war at whatever military lines it has in combat contact with Ukraine if and whenever the Ukraine government does plead for peace. That is, Russia will not continue the fight over the Dnepro River just because Ukraine has agreed to quit fighting.

Without U.S. military support, intelligence and sanctions Ukraine will continue to lose the war- only faster. European perfidy relies on the N.A.T.O. treaty to snair the U.S.A. on the wrong side of a conflict with Russia over Ukraine at some point in the future I would think via clever, calculated, planning and trickery. After the Cold War, building up N.A.T.O. to such a large, unnecessary size that it would make the United States a junior partner obligated to do Europe's bidding was a foreseeable mistake. I noted that problem a decade or two ago. European leadership was always latent war mongers even when they were beaten down after W.W. 1 and 2. War is in their political genome.

European military forces of the E.U. always were a potential enemy of the United States that would need to be offset by an alliance with Russia. It hasn't reached that point yet. It is not reasonable to suppose that U.S. and E.U. political choices would always be in agreement. Wars can occur between powerful nations and armies sometimes. The potential change of allies to adversaries can happen quickly. Scaling back N.A.T.O. to a size that would not present a threat to the United States if it turned to the dark side of the force would rectify a problem that has increased the past three decades.

After W.W. 2 N.A.T.O. allies of the United States were not remotely as powerful as the U.S. military. That balance is changing; even with the encouragement of recent U.S. Presidents. Ending the Ukraine war and normalizing relations with Russia is good for the U.S.A. and Russia. The Euros say that land shouldn't be taken by force. Yet when Russia was so weak after the end of the Cold War and Ukraine so tempting for the west they took it en passant from Russia the rightful owner. Euros and N.A.T.O. had so much military force advantage they did not need to use force; still Ukraine was in effect taken by force from Russia the rightful owner. Sharing Ukraine with Russia is the only remedy to prevent continuing battle and needless killing. Russia knows it cannot get a fair hearing in any European 'World Court'. If the World Court judicial composition were switched to operations by BRIC nations every five years or so the verdicts probably would be different. Force de majeure is the only remedy when the judiciary is completely corrupt like a European based World Court that hasn't any legal authority over nations anyway.

Pres Trump's Peace Plan for Ukraine May Actually Work

 President Trump’s peace plan for ending the Ukraine war is nearing a critical phase where it might actually have a chance of fulfillment in spite of opposition from select European leaders urging the war to continue until the cows come home. President Trump has, in effect, instructed pro-war leaders to hold their horses with the war material supplied by the boat, ship and trainload to Ukraine, and let the war burn out along a reasonable final line in the Donbas and Crimea. He would have each nation resume normal relations with the world and begin hiring construction workers to build Ukraine and Donbass and for farmers to grow grain; for medical personnel to return to treat hundreds of thousands of maimed humans, and for young attractive Ukraine women to return to their country and stop advertising themselves on the internet for international wife prospects on the low low. 

https://suno.com/s/IGGgVhO2F06nQ72P

The Ukraine parliament may be in a process of ridding itself of corrupt leaders embroiled in a corruption scandal. A change of government may bring about an end to the war if it is willing to sign off on sharing Ukraine with its historically rightful owner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL1Gq3gxUxg

Auto-Refueling Military Vehicles Won't Rely on Vulnerable Fuel Supply Logistics

 There are substantial differences between W.W. II and the Ukraine conflict about 80 years later obviously.  Logistics, weapons technology, communication and political configurations have changed a lot. Here is a video with more background on the German military posture compared to that of the American during World War Two.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dprFSZBTVj8

One might learn something from that regarding the  military posture of the United States today with so much manufacturing having shifted offshore and the industrial base half located in China and elsewhere. Solar rechargeable electric vehicles perhaps with auxiliary fuel cells may be a sustainable mass produced military vehicle for foreign militaries that reduce cost and reliance on fuel logistics down the road. Already the rise of drones and solar-power AI drones are changing the realities of equipment that might survive mass air and ground attack from drones. Fuel supply vehicles would be especially difficult to defend making self-fueling military vehicles de rigeur in the future.

President Trump Keeps the Tomahawks Belted and Moves Toward Peace

 Narrowly avoiding a decision that would have ramped up the prospects for World War Three, President Trump today in a meeting with Ukraine's President Zelensky rejected giving the nuclear-weapons-capable longer range Tomahawk weapons to Ukraine that wanted to attack Russia with them. The war needs to end rather than escalate. So President Trump agreed to meet with Russia President Putin in Hungary and talk about ending the conflict. President could himself nearly end the war by stopping adding weapons fuel to the fire. ending sanctions in Russia, recognizing Ukraine land presently held by Russia as Russian and stipulating that Ukraine will not be permitted to become a N.A.T.O member on Russia's border. President Putin would only need to agree to halt the war along present lines of combat contact and to not attack Ukraine any more except where N.A.T.O. member military personnel present an armed threat with troop build-ups in Ukraine.

https://www.axios.com/2025/10/17/trump-zelensky-tomahawk-missiles-white-house

Russia Can't Stop War Easily Before N.A.T.O./EU/USA Agree to Terms

 Russia cannot easily stop its offensive movement in Eastern Ukraine to retake land lost at the end of the Cold War to the West before the West agrees to terms with Russia. The reason is simple; if Russia stops the offensive the Ukraine offense, western forces would have the opportunity to  rebuild forces to attack Russians on the eastern front.

  One wonders with game theory logic if Russia need attack rather slowly so as not to actually complete its 'Special Military Operation' too soon. If it were to reach Kiev the same situation that requires the west to agree to peace after the war is over would still prevail. Russia would need to slowly move toward the Western border of Ukraine and stop there. I would guess that is not an ideal spot for Russia or the West since it might be like expecting a Honey badger and a Python to be good friends and neighbors.

So it is possible the war may drag on for years with various U.S. presidents developing new rhetoric and new reasons to send more money or add new sanctions for the war effort in Ukraine. Maybe President Putin of Russia will provide new risk incentives to bring the Western powers to reach an agreement that protects Russian security in the Eastern part of the borderland that is Ukraine.

Europeans can have the Lebensraum (living space) they want at the expense of Russia at the end of the Cold War 1.0 by making investment and peace with Russia profitable for Russia as well as themselves. Russia might allow business investment and foreign residents to buy small partials of first rate Siberian acreage with forests eventually if those migrants don't seem to be a threat.

Game theory models of the Ukraine conflict with European leadership two-dimensional worldviews tend to lead toward escalation and nuclear events far more than deescalation ir peace. France for example just sent commando frogs (French seals) to detain a Russian oil tanker offshore. The gross ignorance of European leaders should be an eye opener for Americans that don't want to be dragged into the mass incineration party of thermonuclear or even tactical atomic warfare with or without beryllium coated radioactive pills.

Ukraine War Likely to Rollover into 2026

 Apparently the Ukraine war will continue on to roll over into 2026.  Zelensky and Putin have antipathetic goals and are talking past one another. N.A.T.O. members preponderantly want to occupy Ukraine with proxies regardless of how the war concludes in order to make it an advanced base for potential future military engagements. President Trump hasn't a wood for the trees forest gumption to stop selling weapons to Ukraine in some form because of potential proplits. That decision is decisive, enabling Ukraine to hang on with the illusion they have a chance to fulfill N.A.T.O. goals of making Ukraine something like a Non-Official-Agent (NOC) of N.A.T.O. given certain defense assurances from N.A.T.O.; having things their way like a vast, sumptuous mountain of Whoppers. 

The final denouement of the conflict, if not nuclear war, may be Russian military forces finally stopping at the Dnepr with extreme global tension the zeitgeist, on the brink of World War Three, with a cease-fire agreed to by both sides (three or four sides including Donald Trump and N.A.T.O.-Europe) settling nothing. That would be comparable to the armistice at the end of World War One between Germany and the allies, that set the machinery for W.W. Two into motion. When those atop the leader pole are in conflict everyone below feels the pain.

Of course it would be a far more complex post-war situation with something like a Star Wars Revenge of the Clones, A.I. General Intelligence, Drone Wars economy building to an unbounded, non-recognizable anomic, protracted adverse economic circumstance in complete disregard for the need to transition to a global new foundation of ecological-economic synergy.

https://suno.com/s/9QA6eovDt3HtqckO The Dog is Leader of Man (song)

National Guard in Chicago to Reduce Crime and Bully the Homeless as a Substitute for Peace in Ukraine

 President Trump plans to deploy the National Guard in Chicago in the near future in order to cut down on felony crime. He also plans to remove the homeless, yet the federal government should at least offer free relocation services with some legal place for the homeless to go if they want. The homeless may already be at their wit's end and don't know where else to go besides the mean, dirty, neo-toxic streets of an inner city. 

Politicians like to solve one problem while creating another. Politicians tend to triage problems and solve those most valuable to themselves first while discounting the problems they create as externalities. The superior politician (borrowing a Confucian term here lol) solves two problems simultaneously; creating none. 

The President may want a distraction from his flip flop on Ukraine peace policy to one supporting continuing Western expansion of N.A.T.O. toward Russia's borders. Securing the globe for the increase of the rich and plutonomy can begin at home though, if it isn't working so well in Ukraine.

It would be wrong for the nation to be too callous in its treatment of homeless U.S. citizens. The homeless lifestyle isn't as secure or comfortable as that which the President and his social mileau enjoy at Key Largo. The violent crimes reason for the deployment is sufficient. Twenty eight thousand violent crimes in 2024 was a lot for one year and one city and of course there are other felony crimes besides violent ones the deployment of National Guardsmen may be able to serve to reduce quantitatively.

Chicago has roughly a half a million illegal aliens living there. The National Guard may filter out some of those numbers of an internal proletariat and relocate them, yet it is the lawful homeless of concern. The poor shouldn't be trampled on by the advantaged yet neither should they foul the streets and security of those living there. If President Trump doesn't wish to be remembered as something like a cold-blooded billionaire mo'fo trying to bring plutonomy to a city near you, while bull-shipping about ending the Ukraine War and cutting taxes for the rich he will need to find a more compassionate conservatism in regard to the nation's homeless population. For a poor American to have no legal place to exist- even to breathe or sleep, in addition to being difficult, is a circumstance imposed by a state that is wicked and being upgraded for the benefit of AI, robots and those that own them; It is an existential threat to human existence.

Two Stooges (not three) Meet in Anchorage Friday for Beer and to End Ukraine War; Sorta, Possibly

 Presidents Trump and Putin will meet in Anchorage this Friday without the presence of the notorious political lunatic of Ukraine named Big Vlod Zelinsky to piss on the two-man collusion to end a war.

The Ukraine war makes a lotta money for a lotta people supplying weapons. I am not one of those so I don't care if they stop. There is the vermin factor to consider. The conflict seems like an activity of human vermin biting one another.  It could lead to nuclear war and that would be fine with me if the rats were the only victims. Because atomic war would involve a lot of other people including me, I would like the vermin to quit protracting the war and return the world to a less precipitous level of brinksmanship that can be found with universal peace.

All that wonderful killing technology is employed to fight over real estate that could be peacefully divided. Russia gets Crimea, Donetsk, Donbas and a few other areas and Ukraine gets to keep the land west of the Dnepr beyond Judge Roy Beans Saloon (if they built the replica south of Kiev finally).

Trump and Putin should agree to end the war together with Trump stopping any support including Starlink, weapons, cash, loans, military advice, Satellite pictures etc that keep Ukraine  a bellicose belligerent and Putin stipulating that he would go any farther militarily than the agreed on real estate east of the Dnepr. Obviously N.A.T.O. should stay out of Ukraine and should repay then United States for all of the money it sent there since the Clinton era.

Human idiots that cannot find a way to conclude the war should just find a high cliff overlooking the sea, take their armies with them and run off of it together, everyone wearing a 30 lb lead weight belt. The float test of truth could determine the moral victor in the Ukraine war, and those survivors could have their pick of a good acre of land on whatever side of the Dnepr they choose and a free, self-service burial plot of `1/4/ acre with that generous space for civilian relatives lost in the conflict, adjoining their one-acre mini-ranches.

Israel Gave Palestinian Gaza Rule Part of the Oslo Accord a 20 Year Trial

After two decades of incessant Palestinian attacks on Israel it seems Israel has run out of patience for tolerating an interminable conflict and has decided to reoccupy the Gaza Strip. It is an understandable choice by Prime Minister Netanyahu. Having the terror organization Hamas with a quasi legitimate governing status for most of that time has enabled the development of a vast underground terror cache of missiles and other weapons frequently used to attack Israel. Evidently the October 2023 invasion by Hamas to kill and kidnap Israelis from Israel and the years long refusal of Hamas to return living hostages or surrender to end the need to interminable war in the Gaza sometimes aided and abetted by external forces like the Houthis of Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iran has brought the strategic Israeli need to change the context of the conflict of international war upon Israel.

https://www.euronews.com/2025/08/04/netanyahu-says-decision-made-for-full-occupation-of-gaza

The loss of civilians in the Gaza as casualties of the conflict is of course terrible. Simultaneously Christians and Druze are being killed in Syria as a part of the broader Muslim assertiveness through death for increasing empowerment. Syria is now led by a former member of Al Qa’eda, and like Ukraine’s Prime Minister has probably employed tawfiq (lying deceit) to trick President Trump into partially supporting their personal objectives of power through killing antipathetic persons.

It is a paradox that half of the Muslim world is developing almost cordial relations with the west while the other half is a hotbed of terrorism. When Israel develops the Gaza into a kind of beach resort and allows vetted Palestinian civilians to return there will still be conflict and terrorism by Hamas. However the underground base of Hamas terror weapons and equipment will no longer exist and the Gaza will no longer serve as a base with moderate impunity to attack Israel from. Hamas never participated in the Oslo accords and obviously has no respect for them as the Palestinian Authority once professed to have following the P.L.O.’s acceptance of the Accords. Given political sovereignty over the Gaza, Palestinians used it as a base for direct attacks on Israel.

In the future there may be a different path to a Palestinian return to the Gaza through a number of channels after peaceful, normalized relations exist between Palestinians and Jews. Until that time, if terror continues through new and traditional sources it is unlikely that Israel will want to try again a one-hand clapping approach to peace by giving the Gaza to the next generation of terrorists. No one should should expect a codicil to the 1994 Oslo Accord.

Pres Trump Kowtowed (磕头) to the European View of the Ukraine War

 President Trump has decided to become a war monger and eschew ending the conflict with reason. Basically he is surrounded by Europhiles that want Ukraine for-themselves at the expense of Russia. The President fails to understand that his position, and that of Europe is to demand that Russians unconditionally surrender Ukraine, and all of the Russian lands East of the Dnepr River that weren't allocated, in a way, by Bill Clinton to Russia.

https://suno.com/s/Pq7J8tuIjGULX8tI

Russia will never surrender Ukraine to the west. One can adumbrate all of the legal arguments one wants in support of the theft of Ukraine from Russia and it will never change the plain fact that Russians regard Ukraine as part of Russia. To expect Russian to surrender Ukraine by accepting a specious cease-fire is complete b.s. The war will end one of two ways like as not. One, Russia recaptures all of the land east of the Dnepro taken by the west, or two, nuclear conflict.

President Trump can play the idiot and keep throwing fuel onto the fire and show that he is not capable of independent reasoning as was President Reagan, or he can stop listening to Europeans that want as much of Russia as possible for themselves in their paranoid yet avaricious desire to wimp Russia as a weakling that will finally relinquish Ukraine, go on trial, pay reparations and be poor with sanctions lasting a lifetime. There is a delusional party in the conflict and it isn't Russia.

When Ukraine declared independence in 1991 Russia was too disorganized and weak to contest that, and Russia was under the military threat of N.A.T.O. when it dropped it's guard to end communism and the Soviet power. Ukraine was part of Russia- it wasn't a colony, before the communists took over everywhere. And Russia is fighting to get it back, as Abraham Lincoln and U.S. Grant fought a civil war with secessionists to keep the United States intact. President Putin has resisted European colonization of Ukraine for more than a decade. Like American revolutionaries Putin is resisting a tremendous world power in Russia's battle against N.A.T.O. forces of imperialism. Some believe the United States never really understood the Vietnam conflict or the Iranian Majlis either when they choose to overthrow the prime minister with a coup and restore the imperial power of the Shah of Iran in 1953.

https://nypost.com/2025/07/14/us-news/first-lady-melania-trump-helped-convince-president-to-get-tough-on-russia-he-says/

The President and Congress Seek Brainless Continuation of Ukraine War

 The Congress and President Trump are moving toward more weapons for Ukraine and more sanctions on Russia as of that would do anything besides protract the conflict another year or more. The President apparently never had a realistic grasp of the history of the conflict and simply believed his charisma and power could end the conflict and develop a peaceful, prosperous bilateral economic relationship with Russia. Yet Mr Trump is no Reagan and lacks the faith and optimism, much less realism required to go against the conventional, dysfunctional war policies of the rich weapons manufacture and sales sycophants in government.

If the President actually wanted to end the war he should elucidate what his position is regarding a permanent peaceful resolution of the conflict. Presently his ideas seem to be rather secret. Without public disclosure of what his criteria are there is no reason to trust him at all as competent peace developer with Russia.

Since Vietnam the United States generally escalates conflicts and continues them indefinitely at great cost in lives and dollars, and usually without a successful outcome. Congress and Presidents seem to be content with copious bloodshed and trillions added to public debt while letting the conflict evolve to a bad end. There is no reason to believe the Ukraine war will turn out any different, and President Trump seems to have lost his energy for peaceful thought in preference for the usual bloody approach Democrats love.

There are real land settlements that need be made public and understood. Russia’s requirements are well known in that respect. They also want a normalized international situation without sanctions, reparations demands and war crimes trials after a permanent peace if actualized.

Russia wants a pacified West Ukraine that does not join N.A.T.O. and caps its military to a defense force of some kind comparable to that of Japan after the end of World War Two I would guess.

To recognize and accept those basic conditions is requisite for peace. Otherwise the disingenuity of President Trump with someone to blame in Moscow turning about to accept new sanctions and weapons renders the administration even more untrustworthy internationally. Seeming to be deceptive and untruthful is not a way to bring anyone to have enough trust to bring a realistic, peaceful end to the war.

The President’s strong point against war was a moral point in his favor, and frankly he can use moral points in his favor. Instead the President and Majority Leader Thune seem to be airhead sycophants of death and moral corruption insofar as they could strongly advocate clear and acceptable terms to Russia that would bring an end to the war next month. Dragging out that conflict the rest of the year may be appealing to the Antifah crowd and various elements of what has evolved into a neo-terrorist Democrat Party domestically yet it takes Republicans down a dark, descending path of Stygian, chthonic realms of moral darkness through tunnels of political doom cheered on by amoral, godless ghouls of original sin that the right-minded do not know or love.

The West is half of the problem; and 100% of the cause of war from the Russian point of view. Russia is pushing back against the western push eastward in the only way that works with the west; force. Realpolitik adapted for the present would acknowledge that and draw a line in Ukraine that each side can live with.

https://suno.com/s/2tvzvwDMbSlCLc82

Ukraine is Source of Evil and Division for the West

 Western Europe hasn’t any vital interests in Ukraine. Their false belief they have a security need to stop Russia at the 1991 boundary or Russia will invade all the way to the English Channel is entirely delusional. Fundamentally European leaders are convincing themselves Russia is a threat to the west in order to sublimate their attempt to bully Russia into relinquishing its historical right to some if not all of Ukraine. European leaders want to swell the European Union and to make N.A.T.O. into their personal military tool.

European leaders probably believe that tactically they can defeat Russia in a war of attrition. They also know that Russia won’t attack N.A.T.O. countries supplying Ukraine with military support because that would obligate the U.S.A. as a N.A.T.O. member to get involved to defend them and that is the short route to nuclear war. the duplicity is another reason why Western Europe is not actually facing a Russian invasion threat- who wants nuclear war even in Russia?

Europe is the primary power block protracting the Ukraine War presently. That wrong choice will damage the European economy as it has that of the United States; the conflict is one more problem exacerbating global trade issues and warping the obsolete criterion of neo-liberalism Europe flourished with.

Someone in Ukraine was exchanging emails with the last attempted assassin of President Trump at a golf course in Florida. The suspect asked for a rocket propelled grenade and to have it delivered to the U.S.A. Ukraine is a nexus of problems for the world- a wrench in the economic works of the United States, Europe and even China and Japan. Ending the war directly and making permanent new boundaries more or less, approximately with East Ukraine beyond the Dnpro Russian and West Ukraine a state without N.A.T.O. membership, although individual European states could still sign treaties with West Ukraine is in the economic and existential interests of Europe and the United States.

American Democrats have chosen a bizarre allegiance to Ukraine in recent years that is not well founded. Europeans should not take that fact blow smoke in their eyes through which they see a vast left-wing diamond of wealth in Ukraine within their grasp. It would profitable to all and save many live if the war were wrapped up and filed in history as a waste of life and good sense directly.

End Ukraine War Even if Zelensky Wants to Keep it Going

 If President Trump wants the Ukraine war to end he should stop supporting it militarily. Zelensky will play him for as long as he can wile seeking to replace American support with European support. When he achieves a significant amount of European based intelligence and weapons supplies he will have no reason to stop the conflict until a Russian sabotage and reconnaissance squad knocks o his door and asks him to.

President Trump should get some kind of understanding with President Putin where he will stop the Russian advance if and when American stops supplying Ukraine with the means to continue the conflict and Russia begins a quick advance into Ukrainian positions in the aftermath. President Trump needs to know that Russia won’t simply seek to conquer all of Ukraine.

President Trump can well approach ending the war without the cooperation of Ukraine. If Russia agrees to stop after achieving select territorial goals that President Trump can accept, such as are located on the East bank of the Dnepr, and Ukraine though essentially defeated will not quit hostilities, it may be necessary to bring in some other military forces- possibly those of Vietnam or Kenya to reinforce Russian positions along the settled border that Ukraine won’t accept. The United States could place sanctions on Ukraine until they recognize the new Russia-Ukraine border.

Zelensky and Putin both should be honest and forthright with President Trump. President Trump needs to apply realpolitik to military parameters to bring the war to an end even though Senators Schiff and Schumer may not like it.

Guarantee Ukraine Security with Peace

 European and Ukrainian security will be guaranteed with peace and renormailzed economic relations and development rather than continued adversarial relations. To draw down the knife fight both sides need put away the blades.

Deng Xiaoping compared the process of Chinese economic development to "crossing the river by feeling the stones". Developing peace is a comparable process that requires people to take an affirmative first step and continue walking across the water though they can't see what is below.

Peace between superpowers is based to a certain extent on trust. Like the value of the dollar based on nothing more than the faith and credit of the United States rather than gold or some other material, peace can only be as strong as trust and respect for other nations. One need put effort into building peace and renormalizing relations between Europe, Russia and the United States directly.

At the super-power level trust needs to be the deterrent to war. When each side can obliterate each other there is no value in engaging in battle at a conventional scale that easily can get beyond control resulting in the end of human civilization. Clemenceau wanted to guarantee the peace for ending World War One, and it wasn't, and World War Two grew to fruition. That paradigm is however anachronistic. There is no Maginot Line that will prevent World War Three.

The West and Russia Need to Share Ukraine

Germans and Poles have fought with Russia over Ukraine for hundreds of years. For most of history Ukraine was Russian. Communist revolutionaries are the middle term that Democrats believe makes Ukraine not Russian. They are wrong about that. Sharing Ukraine with the west is a good deal for the west. Crimea though is Russia's Florida. Any intelligent human and maybe some chimps would know Russia would never give it up.