Will Republicans Become Another Party of Censorship to Grease Conquest of Greenland?

 Democrats censored social media in order to control news and antipathetic political opinions; if Republicans did that too would they be worth electing to office even if their opposition party are lunatics?

The U.S.A. is sorely in need of a third party based on citizen's rights and free speech, security to own private property and a balanced federal budget. Some societies pay off massive debt through war. President Trump may envision Greenland as being worth 38 trillion dollars and valuable for paying off U.S. public debt. If Greenland was independent and able to manage its own natural resources that would be more honest and even virtuous than the U.S. beating up a nation with a tiny (comparative) population of 57,000. That way seems cowardly and dishonorable. The U.S. should be a champion of the disadvantaged rather than conqueror.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgx8w4pgk0o

A third party has difficulty arising when wealth backs the two major parties. Fundamentally the American democracy is a plutocracy. In my opinion the Democratic Party lost its way completely during the late Sen Ted Kennedy with brain cancer era, and moved toward socialism while beginning the process of abandoning national interests for special interests and globalism over U.S. nationalism. Socialism still perhaps has a planetary goal of transforming the world into a communist utopia. The party of Tip O'Neill became the party of Karl Mark. Republicans became sycophants of the 1% also cutting taxes and piling up public debt to equal Democrats- that is an ancient tactic to transfer wealth to the rich and cut services and support to the poor. England's war against the United States piled up debt that wasn't paid down until the 20th century. Hitler's massive public spending to build up Germany virtual necessitated a war of conquest to pay down debt; that didn't work out well for Germany.

Break Glass in Event of War with Denmark Over Greenland

 In case President Trump was serious about taking over Greenland militarily (maybe he just means to sign a defense treaty providing for Greenland's defense) there should be an off-ramp from the war road to one of peace- this is my thought on that bizarre and unlikely scenario of war.

War with Denmark over Greenland is a terrible prospect. Combatting Danish Viking stealth longships would be tough naval battles to win. Ship to ship battles at sea are grim for boarding parties with giant waves and snow making the fight treacherous. Instead of taking out battle axes and venturing up fjords of Greenland the Trump admin could consider helping Greenland get independence. A special relationship could form wherein citizens of both sovereign nations sign treaties for free trade and rights to visa free freely travel and ability to purchase property and work in their friendly neighbor nation. Many Americans hope to spend time on the beautiful beaches of Greenland.

Pres Trump Should Court Greenland with Snow Cones and Chocolate

Getting Congress to pass a Baffin Bay Resolution to enable a military entry to Greenland after an attack by Greenlanders on a U.S. Naval warship wouldn't have much credibility. President Trump need go about the acquisition through constitutional means. That means Greenland need chose to petition Congress to join the U.S.A.  Buy them something they need like a vast supply of snow cones and they might. want to become Americans.

Alternatively he might approach the security criterion through some sort of 100 year agreement for management as in developing the Panama canal  (the Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty) . Technically the United States does not have a history of expanding through force. President Trump needs to sound better and more lawful in his intentions. To go about taking Greenland through force would be an impeachable offense as a high crime. There is no reason for the President to create his own vulnerability.