Europe's Military Attacking Russian Ships Globally

Unknown European powers have started a global wolfpack-style war sinking Russian oil tankers probably with an intention to damage Russian oil sales. Selling oil help Russia pay for its special military operation to recover land lost to the west during the 1991 carpet bagging era following the Soviet collapse.

Russian ships have been sunk in the Black Sea off the coast of Senegal, West Africa in recent days. That escalation to a global battle changes things significantly; risking Russian responses that could be attacks on England, France or Germany- the most likely perpetrators of the expansion of the theater of war.

With Russian military forces making slow, steady progress advancing toward the Dnepro River- a simple demarcation line to end the conflict, the Trump administration has sought to bring both sides to agreement on ending the war, yet the Western powers backing Ukraine have no intention of allowing peace to occur unless it is on their terms. Regardless of the fact that a neutral Ukraine with reduced exterior borders where Russia and the West could resume East-West trade and normal commerce would be best for all concerned, the corruption of Ukraine's government and surreptitious will of the Western European traditional powers to own all of Ukraine and intimidate Russia with military forces on Russia's border such that they support Ukraine's war efforts vociferously have continued the death machine of thousands locked into combat.

Peace with Russia can only occur with international recognition of a reduced Ukraine and Russia recovering its former Ukraine lands and a neutral, demilitarized Ukraine that poses no threat to East or West. Ukraine as the middle ground or borderland should recover quickly enough and prosper from international trade. The alternative of moving further down the road to global disaster is a reprehensible one. If Russia chooses to retaliate by sinking western ships arriving at European ports that alone could begin a collapse of the world economy and swift advance toward nuclear war. One feels that European leadership have their heads up their arses regarding the opportunity cost of pursuing the course of fomenting continued war instead of peace.

It may be that the rampant godless atheist trend of Europe away from faith has naturally brought the leaders to cluster into claves of violence and aggressive expansion Eastward toward Russia. They may feel entitled with natural exuberance such that developing hegemony over Russia and its vast natural resources is their right. U.S. Presidents have not, since the end of the Cold War, perhaps with the exception of President Trump, recalibrated their view and opinion of European military and political increase and unification, They tended to be blind to the implicit dangers of a very large, recrudescent European military that has a history of being the source of all global wars tamed only a little by the devastation of Europe in the two World Wars of the 20th century.

Euros and Zelnski Rely on U.S. Chumpery to Continue the War in Ukraine Indefinitely

 Zelenski and European political war mongers think President Trump is a chump not to be taken seriously in regard to ending the Ukraine war. They expect to deface Trump's 28 point peace plan to their satisfaction and alter the points adding measures to the effect that Russia must capitulate and withdraw all forces from Ukraine or else.

The basic problem with securing peace quickly is that Euros reinforce Zelenski and each expect the U.S. leadership to be spineless sycophants providing full support for the war on Russia in Ukraine as was President Biden. President Biden provided political and military fellatio to Ukraine and Europe can’t believe President Trump won’t really continue those policies. Neither realize that the negotiation is largely between President Trump and Russia. The Europeans are interested, crazy, war mongering coaches for Ukraine and fans that whole-heartedly want the war to continue even if Ukraine is losing.

President Trump has it within his power to end the war himself simply by recognizing Russian ownership of Donbas and Crimea and ending sanctions on Russia with a promise from President Putin to stop the war at whatever military lines it has in combat contact with Ukraine if and whenever the Ukraine government does plead for peace. That is, Russia will not continue the fight over the Dnepro River just because Ukraine has agreed to quit fighting.

Without U.S. military support, intelligence and sanctions Ukraine will continue to lose the war- only faster. European perfidy relies on the N.A.T.O. treaty to snair the U.S.A. on the wrong side of a conflict with Russia over Ukraine at some point in the future I would think via clever, calculated, planning and trickery. After the Cold War, building up N.A.T.O. to such a large, unnecessary size that it would make the United States a junior partner obligated to do Europe's bidding was a foreseeable mistake. I noted that problem a decade or two ago. European leadership was always latent war mongers even when they were beaten down after W.W. 1 and 2. War is in their political genome.

European military forces of the E.U. always were a potential enemy of the United States that would need to be offset by an alliance with Russia. It hasn't reached that point yet. It is not reasonable to suppose that U.S. and E.U. political choices would always be in agreement. Wars can occur between powerful nations and armies sometimes. The potential change of allies to adversaries can happen quickly. Scaling back N.A.T.O. to a size that would not present a threat to the United States if it turned to the dark side of the force would rectify a problem that has increased the past three decades.

After W.W. 2 N.A.T.O. allies of the United States were not remotely as powerful as the U.S. military. That balance is changing; even with the encouragement of recent U.S. Presidents. Ending the Ukraine war and normalizing relations with Russia is good for the U.S.A. and Russia. The Euros say that land shouldn't be taken by force. Yet when Russia was so weak after the end of the Cold War and Ukraine so tempting for the west they took it en passant from Russia the rightful owner. Euros and N.A.T.O. had so much military force advantage they did not need to use force; still Ukraine was in effect taken by force from Russia the rightful owner. Sharing Ukraine with Russia is the only remedy to prevent continuing battle and needless killing. Russia knows it cannot get a fair hearing in any European 'World Court'. If the World Court judicial composition were switched to operations by BRIC nations every five years or so the verdicts probably would be different. Force de majeure is the only remedy when the judiciary is completely corrupt like a European based World Court that hasn't any legal authority over nations anyway.

Zelensk Government Negotiates Like Saddam Hussein's Iraq

 Ukraine's Zelenski and the parliament remind me of the wise guy issues the U.S.A. had in negotiations for various matters with Sodom Hussein's Iraq. Ukraine is ostensibly an ally though one that primarily flies a skull and crossbones favored by England, Poland, France, Germany and a few other nations. The United States is the chump footing the bill for the Ukraine war and the host of corrupt politicians and business people making a fortune from the senseless conflict.

Zelenski's latest ploy is to ditch Pres. Trump's 28 point peace plan that Mr. Trump requires Zelenski to sign by the 27th of November or lose American military and intelligence contributions. 

The method to extend that deadline is his disavowal of his power as President of Ukraine that was extended during martial law to avoid elections and saying only the parliament has the power to make laws to enable peace negotiations to exist with Russia. The parliament probably isn't willing to negotiate or enable negotiations while the corrupt are profiting.

The Zelenski government can play a wise guy version of who's on first fairly well for a disingenuous neo-ally/nephew/shill of various powers that want to expand into former Russian lands like Ukraine. President Trump will probably need to let his deadline play out rather than continue an interminable succession of delays in ending the war. President Putin has already said the 28 point plan can form the basis for a peace settlement, albeit with some possible tweaking. It is a good deal for Russia and more than West Ukraine needs.

Auto-Refueling Military Vehicles Won't Rely on Vulnerable Fuel Supply Logistics

 There are substantial differences between W.W. II and the Ukraine conflict about 80 years later obviously.  Logistics, weapons technology, communication and political configurations have changed a lot. Here is a video with more background on the German military posture compared to that of the American during World War Two.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dprFSZBTVj8

One might learn something from that regarding the  military posture of the United States today with so much manufacturing having shifted offshore and the industrial base half located in China and elsewhere. Solar rechargeable electric vehicles perhaps with auxiliary fuel cells may be a sustainable mass produced military vehicle for foreign militaries that reduce cost and reliance on fuel logistics down the road. Already the rise of drones and solar-power AI drones are changing the realities of equipment that might survive mass air and ground attack from drones. Fuel supply vehicles would be especially difficult to defend making self-fueling military vehicles de rigeur in the future.

EU Expansion into Ukraine is H.I.V. for U.S. and Global Security

 The European Union is seeking a way to bring Ukraine into the European Union as a non-voting member in order to continue Europe’s eastward economic expansion even as President Trump is seeking to wind down the war in Ukraine. As was understood in the 1990s increasing the size and power of N.A.T.O. would become a threat to RUssia and the United States too as Europe in the absence of the Soviet Union worked at cross- purposes to peace.

Europe does not have a history of peace- quite the opposite. Those living in generations after the Second World War have recently forgotten the lesson that a peaceful Europe was only a response to it's massive destruction eighty years ago. Europe had little choice besides being peaceful as the Soviet Union/Russia and the U.S.A. were victors with massive nuclear weapons stockpiles. Removing the eastward threat and putting N.A.T.O. on steroids elicited a return of the European proclivity for power through force.

The EU quest for power and wealth through war and economic leverage was bound to become in conflict with the United States eventually. When European interests of expansion and escalating to the mythical state of global thermonuclear war run into conflict with American and Russian interests, conflict ensues. Creating a monster size European centered N.A.T.O. was simply organizing a large scale potential future adversary for the United States. It was not good or intelligent policy.

Europe still relies on the United States for nuclear weapons and some defenses against very unlikely military threats from Russia and China. It is very improbable that in a normal circumstance of positive economic and political relations without the Ukraine conflict that Russia or China would think of moving toward an adversarial military posture with Europe. Taiwan is a potential conflict area yet the scale of economic damage to China in that event might be as great as the scale of damage in Ukraine, so China would probably opt for peaceable cooperation with Taiwan and the West as a practical affair. Attacking Europe in the event of an attack on Taiwan is also less than a rational choice for Chinese leadership to make.

Europe though is leveraging the N.A.T.O. relationship to the maximum extent to drift mine its way eastward. The EU and European N.A.T.O. members generally are fanatics about eastward expansion into the former Russian Ukraine and using the power of the UNited States to guarantee the war. Because that war is not in U.S. interests, nor in the interests of global peace and economic progress, in addition to undermining global food, environmental and nuclear security, the EU is like H.I.V. attacking the United States security and economic status globally. Building up that monster E.U. and N.A.T.O nearly inevitably assured that European and American interests eventually would be at loggerheads.

President Trump Keeps the Tomahawks Belted and Moves Toward Peace

 Narrowly avoiding a decision that would have ramped up the prospects for World War Three, President Trump today in a meeting with Ukraine's President Zelensky rejected giving the nuclear-weapons-capable longer range Tomahawk weapons to Ukraine that wanted to attack Russia with them. The war needs to end rather than escalate. So President Trump agreed to meet with Russia President Putin in Hungary and talk about ending the conflict. President could himself nearly end the war by stopping adding weapons fuel to the fire. ending sanctions in Russia, recognizing Ukraine land presently held by Russia as Russian and stipulating that Ukraine will not be permitted to become a N.A.T.O member on Russia's border. President Putin would only need to agree to halt the war along present lines of combat contact and to not attack Ukraine any more except where N.A.T.O. member military personnel present an armed threat with troop build-ups in Ukraine.

https://www.axios.com/2025/10/17/trump-zelensky-tomahawk-missiles-white-house

Trump May Advance the World Closer to Nuclear Holocaust Thursday with Liberal Tomahawk Attacks on Russia

 Apparently President Trump is as much of a lunatic for escalating the Ukraine conflict to potential World War Three as former President Biden. Liberal tomahawks attacks on Russia are mad. Tomahawk missiles can be used to deliver nuclear weapons. And with American operators and intelligence launching the weapons into Russia it is not at all unthinkable that Russia may respond with attacks on Europe and the United States. If the attacks are non-nuclear then it is probable that Russian counterattacks would be non-nuclear. If one remembers how flimsy the U.S. economy was demonstrated to be physically after 9-11, President Trumps insane decision to escalate the worth is a bad prospect for a stable, healthy economy for the remainder of his term. 

The question now moves more toward one of; will civilization exist to survive the Trump administration? If the choice is to demure on upgrading the insane conflict continued because the west is unwilling to stop the war by recognizing Russia's political requisites for Ukraine regarding land, security and ending sanctions, there would be hope. President Trump's brain is itself the fuse that can end the war peaceably within a month or continue the Democrat preference to advance a Napoleonic delusion about Russia, Ukraine and history and develop a tighter, closer relation to hell on Earth for humanity.

Russia Can't Stop War Easily Before N.A.T.O./EU/USA Agree to Terms

 Russia cannot easily stop its offensive movement in Eastern Ukraine to retake land lost at the end of the Cold War to the West before the West agrees to terms with Russia. The reason is simple; if Russia stops the offensive the Ukraine offense, western forces would have the opportunity to  rebuild forces to attack Russians on the eastern front.

  One wonders with game theory logic if Russia need attack rather slowly so as not to actually complete its 'Special Military Operation' too soon. If it were to reach Kiev the same situation that requires the west to agree to peace after the war is over would still prevail. Russia would need to slowly move toward the Western border of Ukraine and stop there. I would guess that is not an ideal spot for Russia or the West since it might be like expecting a Honey badger and a Python to be good friends and neighbors.

So it is possible the war may drag on for years with various U.S. presidents developing new rhetoric and new reasons to send more money or add new sanctions for the war effort in Ukraine. Maybe President Putin of Russia will provide new risk incentives to bring the Western powers to reach an agreement that protects Russian security in the Eastern part of the borderland that is Ukraine.

Europeans can have the Lebensraum (living space) they want at the expense of Russia at the end of the Cold War 1.0 by making investment and peace with Russia profitable for Russia as well as themselves. Russia might allow business investment and foreign residents to buy small partials of first rate Siberian acreage with forests eventually if those migrants don't seem to be a threat.

Game theory models of the Ukraine conflict with European leadership two-dimensional worldviews tend to lead toward escalation and nuclear events far more than deescalation ir peace. France for example just sent commando frogs (French seals) to detain a Russian oil tanker offshore. The gross ignorance of European leaders should be an eye opener for Americans that don't want to be dragged into the mass incineration party of thermonuclear or even tactical atomic warfare with or without beryllium coated radioactive pills.

Destruction of Russian Oil Productiom Likely to Benefit China

Ukraine’s continuing destruction of Russian oil refineries is causing shortages and driving up the price of gas to consumers. If Ukrainian drones continue to wreak havoc on Russian oil production it is possible that the Kremlin may seek relief and import hundreds of thousands of Chinese workers and engineers to repair devastated oil infrastructure in exchange for a deal such as a full share of free fuel from fuel production facilities  brought back online.

   If China can get Russian oil and gas for a quarter of the present market cost, that would be a boon for the Chinese economy. It would also reduce the unemployment rate in China

It may slso simulate new deals to build  pipelines across Afghanistan to India in addition to those planned for China.

   While the West drives Russia east in this major realignment of global economics Ukraine is being reduced to rubble, Oreshnik missiles are being deployed to Belarus and President Trump has flip flopped to believe a war against Rusdia in Ukraine can be one. The conflict does continue to escalate toward Worrld War Three.

https://youtu.be/AMyzP1HsIjw?si=IfMepmLQDZyUNal7Jeff Sachs on the War Situation

Emperor Zelensky with No Hummingbirds to Send Young Women and Old Men to Battle

Apparently the Ukraine hasn’t  any hummingbirds. That may be an explanation for why Emperor Zelensky is cruel enough to send young women ages 18 to 24 into the front line of battle as combat infantry. He also plans to send old men over 60 there as well.

I had no idea that hummings don’t live in the old world. They are found only in the new world. Sadistic royalty sending women and old men to be splattered in battle should be sure to go with them.

Russian Drones Cross into Poland

 A few dozen Russian drones entered Polish air space in a significant escalation of the conflict between N.A.T.O. and Russia, perhaps to signal to N.A.T.O. that they are ready for World War Three. N.A.T.O. members preponderantly have supplied weapons to Ukraine as well as intelligence and personnel support for decades. Europe's political structures make escalation to the worst case war level routine historically. America has followed that jackassery since Bill Clinton was President.

When N.A.T.O. cruise missiles attacked the Donetsk a day ago in an effort to kill Russian military personnel at a regional headquarters Russia was perhaps prompted to retaliate by attacking the route the N.A.T.O. supplied cruise missiles took to attack Russia- The Donbas is regarded by Russia as a part of Russia; Poland is the primary supply hub for the entry of implements of war into the Ukraine. The N.A.T.O. attack had strategic military value and perhaps required a substantive response.

It is improbable that the drone missions to Poland did significant damage as N.A.T.O. air defenses were activated and in no way depleted from previous attack. It is possible the drones were launched by Ukraine to trick Donald Trump into aggressive support for Ukraine.   https://suno.com/s/nGoRgj1dUov8heNv  Free Space

The likely consequence is that the morons in Western leadership will continue to regard the prospect of W.W. Three as a bluff until it occurs, and then try to win a nuclear war. It is still not too late to settle the conquest peacefully by sharing Ukraine with Russia, ending sanctions and demilitarizing the place except for a self-defense  o in the western portion. N.A.T.O. troops stationed in Ukraine will not be acceptable to Russia.

N.A.T.O. Chief Wears Blinders for Ukraine (Ukrajina -The Borderland)

It was Poland that gave the name 'the borderland'- Ukrajina in the 1700s to the area today known as Ukraine

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/02/17/lets-call-ukraine-by-its-proper-name/

N.A.T.O. Chief Mark Rutte insists Ukraine is an independent country and has a right to have troops stationed there or join N.A.T.O. because it "is an independent country" and doesn't understand that is what the fight is about. Leadership that seems retarded or intentionally ignorant is not encouraging for the west that would like to see the issue peacefully resolved.

Russia is in opposition to foreign troops being stationed in the borderlands, and is opposed to the borderlands becoming part of N.A.T.O. Russia also wants part of the borderlands to be recognized as a part of Russia based on historical precedent. And the retarded leader of N.A.T.O. has zero understanding of the Russian position and simply asserts that Ukraine is entirely western and independent in an 'it all is ours' viewpoint regarding the big pie of chips called the borderlands that will need to be shared peaceful and profitably between Russia and the West if the potential for World War Three is to be reduced.

https://suno.com/s/HYcjlYkPqMmdyHg8 End of Days Part 2 (a song)

Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin are not at some point after a few hundred thousand more people are killed in the war going to give the pile called the borderlands entirely to the West, It just isn't going to happen. Until the west recognizes that fact the world economic and political schism is going to continue and possibly even grow and that is not in anyone's interest.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=RUTTE+IS+INSANE

Consider the Batan Island base? Marines have put Nmesis missiles there to control Luzon Strait. They are good for 115 miles. Batan is the northernmost populated island in the Philippines. Technically it is a good place to have a circumference kill zone on Chinese incursions into the south China and Philippine Seas. That island was the first place the Japanese attacked in W.W. II, so it is another example of Generals fighting the last battle as if the next would be like it. While China would like to dominate the fisheries, oil and seafloor mining opportunities in the area, it isn't too likely to be of much significance in event of W.W. 3. President Trump isn't a dummy, yet his strategic outlook is probably more a factor of his economic outlook than developed with strategic military considerations. Europe for example would be far more secure with peace in Ukraine- sharing it with Russia, than pursuing a complete our way or no way policy of conquest in Ukraine over all Russian claims.

The U.S. Government has been rebuilding many old, abandoned airfield for a possible war with China this last year in the S.W. Pacific region. Many airfields would make it harder for China to take all of them out. Aircraft will need places to land to refuel and rearm in event of war. The U.S.A. has developed a more new battle doctrine for that combat theater yet of course even that advanced theoretical paradigm is changing a lot, perhaps so far as to become obsolete, as a result of Ukraine war development of drone technology for war. I am sure that DARPA is working on a plethora of A.I. self-regulating drones for attacking various targets negating the need for human operators in some cases. Island and bases may be neutralized by undersea refueled drones as well. Just as air tankers refuel aircraft in flight, sub-sea tanker mini-subs may be developed to refuel amphibious drones as well as undersea drones. All of this is of course a Field of Morons paradigm, rather than a Field of Dreams. Yet is is the way political leaders are driven by power and financial pressures and incentives.

The longer the Ukraine conflict continues the more the Eastern Block will deploy there own systems positioned to defrappe the Western Block that will be deploying counter-system. It is all very good for defense contracting business. This progression deserves a Ludlum title at least- like the Aquitaine Progression or The Parsifal Mosaic, though it reminds me of the perennial war between Oceana and some other power that went on interminably in Orwell's 1984. With the rise of A.I. that sort of scenario may evolve and people will become more isolated, conditioned by the daily hate and surveilled by the state. It needs to slip over a world population slowly, with subterfuge, rather than to be forced upon them.

9-11 demonstrated the fragility of major American cities to attacks with high explosives from the air. The Ukraine War has shown how drones take out conventional ground forces and the way cities are destroyed. Casualties and property damage from even a conventional war with China would really set back the U.S. economy with destruction of thousands of urban core buildings, power and communications centers. Drones will be vectored to the U.S. mainland from a number of different approaches perhaps, while the U.S. attacks China with cargo ships full of drones. China would be equally devastated with perhaps 200 million dying from starvation and disease as secondary effects becoming collateral casualties resulting from loss of economic infrastructure and food supply disruption plus disease. It is important to have peace in Ukraine directly sharing it with Russia and retiring Zelensky. Continuing escalation doesn't lead to a good place for east or west. President Trump needs to withdraw all support from Ukraine and reestablish relations with Russia if he wants to make a difference, and of course he can't do that.

Europe has a lengthy history of fighting interminable, internecine wars. There is no reason to slacken hold of the reins America held until recently on that following WW 2. President Trump does not understand that European leadership would venture right up to and over the edge given the vacuum of US leadership globally since President Clinton.

On leaders cooperating; it isn't certain at all about who the leaders really are or even the structure. It could be a plutonomy. European history indicated they war until they can't- when they have left things in ruins. Cooperation is possible though.Look up the prisoners dilemma, and the diner;' dilemma- a pair of philosophically illuminating theory examples that is applicable to leadership in Europe with some modifications

Trump Continues Biden-Graham Approach to Global Trade Isolation via the Ukraine War

 When the leaders of China, Russia, India and 17 other nations met in Beijing recently to discuss a new world order with themselves as the core alternative to the U.S. led world order that has prevailed during the post World War Two era, it was prompted as a response to sanctions President Trump has placed upon nations helping Russia break sanctions from the west. Sanctions to redress compiled U.S. trade imbalance and stimulate domestic American production were a synthetic combination of basic trade realignment and sanctions created on Russia and its numerous allies for asserting historical rights in Ukraine militarily.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/09/02/xi-china-sco-military-parade-russia-putin-kim-jong-un-north-korea/

President Trump failed to reverse the Biden-Lindsay Graham approach to complete support for West Ukraine and war on Russian Eastern Ukraine and that policy is predictably bearing fruit. In the history of the world and the United States following the second world war the emerging nations of the world have long aspired to rise to a standard of living equal to the west, while American led western business sought global markets to invest in. After the end of the Cold War a new world of markets for sales and production arose with the west investing in emerging economies heavily.

Russia for a time received much U.S. and western investment and was on track to become a full member of the western led global economy even while India and China were developing to such an advanced stage as to aspire to be rivals for world leadership in economics. Russia China and India developed or redeveloped nuclear military capabilities, and when Russia invaded Eastern Ukraine in response to the west reneging on promises not to expand N.A.T.O. apparently in an effort to created economic and military hegemony over Russia- possibly with the idea that Ukraine could be a lever not only for military purposes, but to help with continuing domination of the world economy by militarily degrading Russia and intimidating China into compliance with Western trade criteria forced upon it, a crucible was made that brought BRIC nations to support Russia and finally seek economic independence from the West.

The maladroit U.S. leadership in regard to the Ukraine war that followed the Clinton administration’s carpet bagging approach to taking all of Ukraine for the west and not sharing it with its historical owner-Russia prompted the military reconquista effort by Russia and aggressively promoted the unification of BRIC nations, North Korea and Iran and many others in a compact both formal and informal to stand against the power of the west. Compelling a major world political and economic schism in order to try to assert Western hegemony over the Ukraine and the globe was a stupid policy approach. With cooperation with Russia and China instead of belligerency the United States and Europe would have enjoyed decades of prosperity and stability. As it stands the West faces major economic challenges; the U.S. has vast left and right wing generated public debt and a global trading production and competition with the younger, more populous and very hard working, intelligent Eastern and BRIC nations as adversaries rather than partners. Even as that occurs the Trump administration has taken up the Biden-Graham militarism policy of supplying weapons to Ukraine in order to continue the conflict in Ukraine.

Continuing support for the Ukraine war will continue to stimulate the East and BRICs to build an economic house of self-reliance apart from the west. And of course with the vast scale of the India and China production and trade markets it is inevitable that the west will continue to defect to trade with the Eat and BRICs and not cohere within sanctions on Eastern allied nations in trade. 

President Trump’s betrayal of his own campaign promises to swiftly end the Ukraine war was his own worst betrayal of his own policies that might have rectified global trade to a natural free flowing status normalizing relations with Russia without forcing Russia Eastward in very tight new economic, military and trade agreements. A future U.S. president will need to try to rectify the failed Trump isolationist policies, yet in the interim there may be additional economic disadvantages that compile and present new additional challenges to repair.

Police Come to Chicago or the Ukraine War Might Die (a poem)

 

The homeless life isn’t like a welcome home
to a good wife with a smile, dinner and fate
without a job or the numbers
to turn opportunity’s tumblers
they don’t know the right code to find home

   An alien land where being is illegal
there is no space for the race
made of Denisovans, and Neanderthal's strong gals
the humans were three part unplaced
on an uncharted world without homes

    Bedding down in silence
fires of time roaring
beasts outside prowling
turning primates into dark loamings
a gestalt of cave art brought homeless home

   Graffiti entreaties of turf marked up walls
doped, crazy socials saw nothing, no call
line-ups for cops, soup kitchens or billionaire fops
it all made the same sort of sense for insensible loam
hidden below asphalt now, nowhere is home.

https://suno.com/s/K9TzFZxX6I6F3URF  the poem as a song

National Guard in Chicago to Reduce Crime and Bully the Homeless as a Substitute for Peace in Ukraine

 President Trump plans to deploy the National Guard in Chicago in the near future in order to cut down on felony crime. He also plans to remove the homeless, yet the federal government should at least offer free relocation services with some legal place for the homeless to go if they want. The homeless may already be at their wit's end and don't know where else to go besides the mean, dirty, neo-toxic streets of an inner city. 

Politicians like to solve one problem while creating another. Politicians tend to triage problems and solve those most valuable to themselves first while discounting the problems they create as externalities. The superior politician (borrowing a Confucian term here lol) solves two problems simultaneously; creating none. 

The President may want a distraction from his flip flop on Ukraine peace policy to one supporting continuing Western expansion of N.A.T.O. toward Russia's borders. Securing the globe for the increase of the rich and plutonomy can begin at home though, if it isn't working so well in Ukraine.

It would be wrong for the nation to be too callous in its treatment of homeless U.S. citizens. The homeless lifestyle isn't as secure or comfortable as that which the President and his social mileau enjoy at Key Largo. The violent crimes reason for the deployment is sufficient. Twenty eight thousand violent crimes in 2024 was a lot for one year and one city and of course there are other felony crimes besides violent ones the deployment of National Guardsmen may be able to serve to reduce quantitatively.

Chicago has roughly a half a million illegal aliens living there. The National Guard may filter out some of those numbers of an internal proletariat and relocate them, yet it is the lawful homeless of concern. The poor shouldn't be trampled on by the advantaged yet neither should they foul the streets and security of those living there. If President Trump doesn't wish to be remembered as something like a cold-blooded billionaire mo'fo trying to bring plutonomy to a city near you, while bull-shipping about ending the Ukraine War and cutting taxes for the rich he will need to find a more compassionate conservatism in regard to the nation's homeless population. For a poor American to have no legal place to exist- even to breathe or sleep, in addition to being difficult, is a circumstance imposed by a state that is wicked and being upgraded for the benefit of AI, robots and those that own them; It is an existential threat to human existence.

Trump Ukraine Peace Effort Failing; A Big Beautiful Sham

 President Trump's peace effort with the Ukraine war seems to be failing and instead is leading toward nuclear war. Reportedly the administration is working on security guarantees for Ukraine making them an informal ward of N.A.T.O. providing the full package of weapons, cash, foreign forces etc. President Putin has visited his country's strategic nuclear war development center and informal reports indicate that nuclear war may follow Ukrainian missile attacks on Russian cities and other targets deep inside the nation.

President Trump appears to be another stooge of those forces that control White House puppets of the Deep State. The threat of assassination may be what the President fears. That ear-marking shot may not have been an accident. Matthew Crook, like Lee Harvey Oswald and Jeffrey Epstein, was conveniently killed. Dead men tell no tales.

Macron and Merz; Mini-Napoleon and Mini-Hitler Fear-Mongers?

 Approximately near Poland's eastern border, the 23rd longitude east is a good, non-threatening demarcator for troops from countries once commanded by Napoleon and Hitler. If Merz and Macron would keep their military forces well away from that line or passing beyond the Carpathian mountains Russia should be far less threatened by Western military encroachment. Ukraine is on the Russian side of the Carpathians and is called the borderlands historically, for good reason.

It is disquieting to have the return of militarism with France and Germany after the end of the Cold War. Macron is something like Napoleon and Merz more than a little like Adolph Hitler, yet of course without a semblance of charisma. One might wish they were not aggressive and assertive regarding Ukraine, as they are, as if it is a play-ground for the west and a field testing lab for western military weapons.

I need stipulate that Ukraine is nothing like Formosa/Taiwan strategically. The Communist Chinese might like that island nation with a history of independence to be theirs, yet like the Falkland Island in relation to Argentina, it isn't like to happen except through a slow evolution as China and Taiwan have peaceful and prosperous futures working together. Unification is a possibility though not a necessity.

Alternatively Taiwan is well defended and has good allies. mainland communists are not likely to attempt a military takeover because they would lose Shanghai and Beijing in the process most likely. A major war would perhaps bring half a billion Chinese to the brink of starvation within a couple of months as on-time deliveries of production fail. China has far more to lose than it has to gain with war against a well defended island with strong allies.

Ukraine on the other hand was historically part of Russia and the Soviet Union occupying Russia for hundreds of years, usually, except for a brief interregnum of Germany taking it over. German militarism is always a latent, recrudescent possibility- as is that of France, when they believe the time is opportune. Because President Trump isn't assertive enough publicly in his quest for peace, and not strong or eloquent enough to speak publicly about the proper role of N.A.T.O. with American support in defending Europe, delusional fears about Russia posing a threat to Europe have been present since the Obama administration.

The Cold War 35 years ago yet there were some that continued to fear the Soviets and Russia and sought expansion and takeover of the power vacuum vacated by the Soviets.  Russia obviously would rise in time after reorganization of government and economics from a communist to a free enterprise basis. It would reasonably expect to emerge as the former Russia with most of it's possessions intact- including Ukraine. It did not expect to retake places occupied by the Soviet Red Army during the final years of the Second World War and made part of the East Bloc Warsaw Pact.

The West and the United States are quite well able to defend Europe from a non-existent threat of a Russian assault. It is challenging to envision Russian marine skydivers parachuting from 15,000 feet in numbers sufficient to capture England, or to imagine Russian commandos storming over the Alps any time soon with the skill of General Suvorov in escaping Western forces going over the Alps. It is true that Russians are capable of hitting Poland if the poles were asleep and fearful enough to stay deep in bunkers hoping passing Russian tankers would not notice them yet that seems improbable. Jews at least would put up stiff resistance as they did to the Nazis in the Warsaw ghetto during W.W. 2.

Russian knows that a general war would follow an invasion of Western Europe and that their casualties might exceed those the Nazis inflicted during world war 2- perhaps 20 to 40 million dead, with devastated cities, and the west is aware that nukes might be involved and more than a billion people globally would perish from famine and pestilence such as can exist in a mass produced, interlocked global economic sphere. Russians are not really as stupid as Europeans seem to believe they are. The problem exists in European imagination and the wish to have military power over Russia via Ukraine. It is a major stumbling block for the European leadership psyche apparently. Without European and American support Ukraine would already have returned to being Russian.

It is time now for at least President Trump to be realistic knowing that Europeans and the puppet President of Ukraine Zelensky aren't. Just say know to war and accept the fact that peace is better. The west need trust and welcome Russia fully into the global economy. One day it could be a full part of a tax free American-European-Russian trading block.

Two Stooges (not three) Meet in Anchorage Friday for Beer and to End Ukraine War; Sorta, Possibly

 Presidents Trump and Putin will meet in Anchorage this Friday without the presence of the notorious political lunatic of Ukraine named Big Vlod Zelinsky to piss on the two-man collusion to end a war.

The Ukraine war makes a lotta money for a lotta people supplying weapons. I am not one of those so I don't care if they stop. There is the vermin factor to consider. The conflict seems like an activity of human vermin biting one another.  It could lead to nuclear war and that would be fine with me if the rats were the only victims. Because atomic war would involve a lot of other people including me, I would like the vermin to quit protracting the war and return the world to a less precipitous level of brinksmanship that can be found with universal peace.

All that wonderful killing technology is employed to fight over real estate that could be peacefully divided. Russia gets Crimea, Donetsk, Donbas and a few other areas and Ukraine gets to keep the land west of the Dnepr beyond Judge Roy Beans Saloon (if they built the replica south of Kiev finally).

Trump and Putin should agree to end the war together with Trump stopping any support including Starlink, weapons, cash, loans, military advice, Satellite pictures etc that keep Ukraine  a bellicose belligerent and Putin stipulating that he would go any farther militarily than the agreed on real estate east of the Dnepr. Obviously N.A.T.O. should stay out of Ukraine and should repay then United States for all of the money it sent there since the Clinton era.

Human idiots that cannot find a way to conclude the war should just find a high cliff overlooking the sea, take their armies with them and run off of it together, everyone wearing a 30 lb lead weight belt. The float test of truth could determine the moral victor in the Ukraine war, and those survivors could have their pick of a good acre of land on whatever side of the Dnepr they choose and a free, self-service burial plot of `1/4/ acre with that generous space for civilian relatives lost in the conflict, adjoining their one-acre mini-ranches.

Republicans Also Seem to Support Homicide to Concentrate Wealth

Donald Trump, Condolezza Rice and House Speaker Johnson have expressed support for fueling the war machine in Ukraine to keep homicide rolling. Reason contradicts their choice to fail to share Ukraine with Russia and select homicide as a way to get it all for the .01% of the rich.

   The Cold War ended because Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev could trust enough to meet halfway and flip the Soviet Union to free enterprise. A new nation was conceived that broke apart into former Soviet Republics and Russians were bilked out of Ukraine that is the deep cause of war at present.

https://suno.com/s/9txYEbzBg8rKCEuL

  The Ukraine war in effect is a Russian civil war with the parent country overthrowing the rebels supported by the rich of the west. Most people of Earth if asked would probably say they are against the war.

  President Reagan knew that trust and common decency were necessary in making good political relationships that transcend the necessity of conflicts the inferior sort of man and woman require to exist. There is a better way of political life that eschews homicide as the go to choice in international relations that neither Democrats or Republicans can understand. Peace with Russia keeping the East Bank of the Dnepr should be established directly and regions normalized with full ecological economic progress going ahead in East and West Ukraine.

 Government is supposed to be of the people, by the people and for the people; not if the rich, by the rich and for the rich that regard humans as inferior tools for exploitation and dehumanization.

 

The President and Congress Seek Brainless Continuation of Ukraine War

 The Congress and President Trump are moving toward more weapons for Ukraine and more sanctions on Russia as of that would do anything besides protract the conflict another year or more. The President apparently never had a realistic grasp of the history of the conflict and simply believed his charisma and power could end the conflict and develop a peaceful, prosperous bilateral economic relationship with Russia. Yet Mr Trump is no Reagan and lacks the faith and optimism, much less realism required to go against the conventional, dysfunctional war policies of the rich weapons manufacture and sales sycophants in government.

If the President actually wanted to end the war he should elucidate what his position is regarding a permanent peaceful resolution of the conflict. Presently his ideas seem to be rather secret. Without public disclosure of what his criteria are there is no reason to trust him at all as competent peace developer with Russia.

Since Vietnam the United States generally escalates conflicts and continues them indefinitely at great cost in lives and dollars, and usually without a successful outcome. Congress and Presidents seem to be content with copious bloodshed and trillions added to public debt while letting the conflict evolve to a bad end. There is no reason to believe the Ukraine war will turn out any different, and President Trump seems to have lost his energy for peaceful thought in preference for the usual bloody approach Democrats love.

There are real land settlements that need be made public and understood. Russia’s requirements are well known in that respect. They also want a normalized international situation without sanctions, reparations demands and war crimes trials after a permanent peace if actualized.

Russia wants a pacified West Ukraine that does not join N.A.T.O. and caps its military to a defense force of some kind comparable to that of Japan after the end of World War Two I would guess.

To recognize and accept those basic conditions is requisite for peace. Otherwise the disingenuity of President Trump with someone to blame in Moscow turning about to accept new sanctions and weapons renders the administration even more untrustworthy internationally. Seeming to be deceptive and untruthful is not a way to bring anyone to have enough trust to bring a realistic, peaceful end to the war.

The President’s strong point against war was a moral point in his favor, and frankly he can use moral points in his favor. Instead the President and Majority Leader Thune seem to be airhead sycophants of death and moral corruption insofar as they could strongly advocate clear and acceptable terms to Russia that would bring an end to the war next month. Dragging out that conflict the rest of the year may be appealing to the Antifah crowd and various elements of what has evolved into a neo-terrorist Democrat Party domestically yet it takes Republicans down a dark, descending path of Stygian, chthonic realms of moral darkness through tunnels of political doom cheered on by amoral, godless ghouls of original sin that the right-minded do not know or love.

The West is half of the problem; and 100% of the cause of war from the Russian point of view. Russia is pushing back against the western push eastward in the only way that works with the west; force. Realpolitik adapted for the present would acknowledge that and draw a line in Ukraine that each side can live with.

https://suno.com/s/2tvzvwDMbSlCLc82