Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts

18 November 2025

The Way Communist Utopia Could Evolve with General Artificial Intelligence Government

I am for free enterprise and democracy with private property yet global communism could naturally evolve in at least one possible future. That would be in a system where A.I. is so far smarter than humans in general intelligence- not just large language models, and robots ubiquitous and cheap, and resources limited or in need of critical global management including near space resources, that A.I. rules the Earth and allocates to everyone "each according to his or her needs", and drafts people for whatever purpose General A.I. control requires "from each according to his ability". Private property would be abolished and the state (the A.I.) would manage all human political and economy interests with absolute power- this is the first principle of an Artificial Intelligence system of government that coincides with communist Utopian goals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v1YZ3jE4zI&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D



18 August 2025

Ukraine War Stimulus for Evolving War Robots and Dispersion Vectors

A war with tens or hundreds of thousand of robots versus humans and eventually against other robots will help train a new generation of combat robots how best to evaluate and kill human targets; a brave new world for programmers seeking fool-proof ways to deliver death to political opponents that breathe oxygen. Robots with AI are likely to rationalize 'Death to mouth-breathers!' Field training robots is a practical step, necessary step if they are to evolve to be effective killers of humans. The dispersion of military technology to non-belligerent nations seems like a parallel course to increase market sales in the civilian sector creating continuous increase of profits through expansion into secondary markets.

It is probable that a swift escalation in robot technology will follow a continuing war without a stoppage due to peace. Airborne drones will rise to deliver camouflage machine gun power in semi-autonomous drones that can reconnect with airlifting drones for redeployment  to more optimal locations. A similar phenomena will arise if it does not already exist with airborne placement of drones  with automatic grenade launchers and flame throwers.. Hundreds of forms of death flowers will bloom followed I would think by a host of anti-drone and anti-robot vectors.  to fight without human combatants present initially. Then, the robot armies will seek and destroy human combatants farther from the front lines where they are ensconced in 'safer' positions.

That may be the beginning of the end of wars fought among humans with human political choices being the primary determinants of conflict. Instead the evolution of robots may enable the end of ostensible democratic leadership to war and give power over to rare elites or individuals representing vast concentrated wealth able to afford and command millions of robot warriors purposed to eliminate opposition political elements taking human form. Hence robots represent the end of democracy and rise of oligarchic plutonomy for global conquest.

Plainly soldiers will want more ai directed autonomous flying sticky mines to be able to attack robotic dogs in the field attacking them- bullets and grenades tossed from human arms might not be too effective. It isn't known if small electro-magnetic pulse grenades will be effective against robots. New forms of thermite (temperature between 4500-and 5400F Super Claymore mines with different shaped sticky packages may be effective upon opfor ground robots. Some flying vehicles might be taken down with white phosphorus flying air mines in close combat under the forest canopy situations. Adaptations to a plethora of new weapons seems ready to rapidly accelerate technologies of infantry war that of course will eventually proliferate to the rest of the world outside the present theater of combat; including of course, terrorists.

In order to capture opposition force (opfor) technology and software in various kind of robot dogs and other immobilized opfor machines the development of lightweight Faraday cages thrown by soldiers like a weighted fishnets or dropped from quite stealth drones flying above to cut off capture target robot dogs, for example will become part of an anti-drone squads battlefield toolkit. It is essential to isolate captured drone quickly so remote operators cannot order a drone to erase its software useful for reverse engineering.

Obviously there will appear mobile, stealthy flying AI 'Generals' to command battlefield drones without the presence of a human operator. The Brigadiers will be small yet with the best chips and software available and be encased in an EMP hardened shell able to avoid detection or destruction readily. If dumb battlefield drones are disabled with emp attacks the Brigadiers will download new programming to them.

With so many drone attackers in combat the U.S. Army has bought a high power microwave system that broadcast rather like an EMP, high power microwaves to take down opfor drones en mass. Obviously that technology can be adapted to kill humans. It can also be adapted to be transported by drones along with a partner carrying a power pack for the device, that will have directed evolution to more application including taking out ground combat drones. Networks of mobile microwave emission detectors will also be fielded for triangulating opfor anti-drone microwave bursts in the spiral of escalating technology of robotic war. Microwave destruction of drones with  locations known to operators provide instant precise location where the Micro-wave emitter is enabling follow up counter attacks to the center of the drone destruction pattern with JDAMS, mortar and conventional artillery rounds.

When the technology proliferates and AI brigadiers become common it is possible that rogue applications of the encrypted control units may be found and applied in the general anomic breakdown of social order because of the dispersion of social control and security.


05 August 2025

Faith vs Only-Evolution Camps...Sorting Things Out

 People in the modern world aren't so well educated in relevant topics to the criterion of the OP, or well rounded, and tend to be specialized. Once they learn something occupationally they stay with it. Scientist remain scientists and if group think opinion is anti-Christian so shall they tend to be. People that aren't philosophers tend not to think too deeply about philosophy and I would guess that pro philosophers tend toward occupational specialization as well. Actual intelligent, philosophy reading Americans at least might end up broke after college reading philosophy and not looking for academic employment or stocking groceries, driving a truck or whatever. Much of the opinion is superficial. There are Christian ministers that don't understand philosophy, or that believe there is an heretical Neo-pagan god of philosophy, and many readers of philosophy that have no idea about the several paradigms for belief in God that exist today. 

There are few that correlate philosophy, cosmology, physics and Christian faith with quantum mechanics and theology to consider how God could create a Multiverse within his mind solely, or that understand that Hegel's paradigm of God evolving to realize Himself through history may have numerous possible paradigmatic meaning values although Hegel assuredly had a single one. There are just not too many people that know interdisciplinary content well enough to understand and write about things. So it tends toward being a political paradigm of us vs them. Kierkegaard wrote a book named 'Stages on Life's Way'- a practical and rather wise title, yet life itself is a stage that people pass through- some believe unto nothingness, others belief unto eternal life with God via the Son, It is not only a temporal divide; it is an eternal divide. Fortunately religious tolerance is part of the American way of life. There are other temporal issues to be concerned with, such as these  I mentioned today elsewhere.

https://garycgibson.blogspot.com/2025/08/existential-data-points-of-nature.html

https://garycgibson.blogspot.com/2025/08/loss-of-tropical-forests-quarter.html



13 July 2025

A Song of Theistic Evolutionary Environmentalism named 'The Logic of Evolution's Two-Degree Dialectic'

 This song has lyrics from my poem 'The Logic of Evolution's Two-Degree Dialectic'. It is not preclusive of pre-determinism and select, intentional teleological structure potentials... two versions

https://suno.com/s/w77sblbcddcRNIHQ

https://suno.com/s/cPQv4YxKM2s7OCA6

09 February 2025

Christianity, Evolution and Digital Universes

There are numerous paradigms concerning cosmology, epistemology and belief that transcend others sometimes. If mass is two dimensional massless particles entangled in the Higgs field and space-time is entirely relative embedded in the timeless field hosting the Higgs it is like a holographic Universe hosted in  a virtual reality box. That changes assumptions about evolution and physicality more toward Bishop Berkeley's side. God could create reality in any sort of order in that regard and it would all be true and consistent with the Bible.

Interpreting the Bible and terminology from ancient meanings to modern can lead to misunderstandings. Was Eden near Iraq and was the timeline beginning in the neolithic one that continued from a lost first civilization submerged under the Persian Gulf because of sea level rise withe the end of the Wisconsin Ice Age  Though my ideas about the topic continues to improve with time here is a recent(free) book I wrote on the subject.  https://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-c-gibson/christianity-evolution-and-digital-universes/ebook/product-wnddgd.html

30 January 2025

First Cause Argument and Evolution

If you believe that everything has a cause, such as the universe emerging from a singularity that exploded because of a quantum instability creating a phase change moving toward inflation; the premise is logically valid if instead of infinite regress there is a terminal point at something eternally existing able to issue a first cause for a universe to be and become.

Biological evolution is nothing more than a bracketed portion of the history of the Universe and not relevant in regard to the first cause question.

01 January 2025

Diversity of Life Declines

A naturalist I read quite a while ago said that the most successful life forms are those that exist the most time, through disasters and mass extinctions and those are prokaryotes I believe it was. He said that large complex life forms like humans are far more vulnerable and tend to be short lived in the context of time. It's an interesting idea. The meek shall inherit the Earth.

If the Universe is deterministic that is consistent with deterministic evolution following a Hegelian or Designer's schematic, and obviously that is one of a large set of possibilities with a degree of uncertainty. If the future already exists and thought switches to an appropriate universe at each disjunct one should expect an infinite variety of apparent rather than actual evolutionary forms to appear to comprise the right elements for the thought.

https://www.udio.com/songs/98pufWd9j2QkhXUBGGGkoc

Gemini Said That Even After Nancy Grace Roman ST Just 12 percent of the Observable Universe Will Have Been Observed

 I asked Gemini about what area of space the new Nancy Grace Roman space telescope will see. I asked if Hubble and Webb hadn't already s...