Lorentz Invariance Applies to Nothingness (Darkness) Moving F.T.L. in Experiment

 At first thought, I would guess that the darkness inside light waves travelling faster than light would be an apparent effect if relativity and Lorentz covariance applies in all reference frames. I have no idea how darkness or nothingness can be set within a reference frame anywhere without mass, energy or substance.

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-found-something-that-can-move-faster-than-light-the-darkness-inside-it

Nothingness should be the same in all reference frames- of course one has the perennial Parmenides criterion of volume of being and nothingness to consider.

I think it possible that gravity is an emergent property of some force acting on quantum particles. Yet it could be that spacetime is warped by mass because something about nothingness travelling faster than light. TIme also need be considered in all of the scenarios as it is a transition from relationship A to B and there may be a delay in the propagation of force/energy allocation that creates the warping distribution of the allocation of mass/energy regarded as existing as space-time.

Groks comment on the above...

Grok- "The article you linked describes a fascinating recent experimental confirmation (published in Nature in early 2026) of a long-predicted phenomenon: optical vortices, or "dark points" (phase singularities) embedded inside light waves, where the electromagnetic field intensity drops to exactly zero due to destructive interference in the wave's twisted, corkscrew-like structure. These aren't literal "holes" carrying nothingness as a substance, but null points in the light field—places where the light waves perfectly cancel each other out, creating a tiny core of darkness amid the surrounding brightness.

Researchers (led by Ido Kaminer at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology) observed these vortices in a 2D material (hexagonal boron nitride) supporting slow-moving phonon polaritons—hybrid light-vibration waves that behave like light but propagate ~100 times slower, making the ultrafast dynamics easier to capture with high-resolution electron microscopy. As pairs of oppositely charged singularities approached each other, their paths in spacetime forced them to accelerate dramatically, with some trajectories appearing to exceed the speed of light in vacuum right before they annihilated. This matches 1970s theoretical predictions about wave vortices in general (not just light).

You're spot-on that this is an apparent effect fully compatible with special relativity and Lorentz covariance. Nothing with mass, energy, or information is actually traveling faster than c (the speed of light in vacuum). The "motion" of the dark point isn't a physical object or signal zipping through space—it's a geometric feature of how the overall wave pattern evolves over time. Think of it like a shadow sweeping across a wall faster than light (a classic analogy): the shadow's edge can outrun c because it's just the changing boundary of illuminated vs. dark regions, not any causal influence or energy transfer. The same holds for the scissors paradox (where the intersection point of closing blades can appear superluminal). Lorentz invariance is preserved because the underlying Maxwell's equations (or the wave equation here) are relativistic, and no reference frame sees a violation of causality.

On your point about "darkness or nothingness" in a reference frame: this isn't substantive "nothingness" with independent existence or a frame of its own. In quantum field theory, even the vacuum isn't empty (it has fluctuations), but classically here, the dark point is just a mathematical zero in the field amplitude at a given spacetime coordinate. You can define a reference frame where the vortex is at rest, or moving at any speed—including superluminal in appearance—without issue, because it's not a particle or wave packet carrying observable quantities. The field equations ensure consistency across inertial frames. Parmenides' distinction between "being" (what exists) and "nothingness" is philosophically evocative, but physics treats these singularities as emergent features of the being (the light field), not a separate ontological category. Nothingness isn't "set within" a frame like a substance; it's the absence defined relative to the surrounding wave.

Your speculation on gravity as an emergent property of quantum forces is a live area of research—ideas like entropic gravity (where gravity arises from information/entropy gradients at the quantum level) or induced gravity from quantum vacuum effects have been explored since the 1980s. However, this particular vortex phenomenon doesn't directly imply spacetime warping via FTL nothingness. The experiment happens in essentially flat spacetime (no strong gravity), and the FTL appearance is purely kinematic in the wave dynamics, not a source of curvature. General relativity already explains mass-energy curving spacetime via the Einstein field equations; any "delay in propagation" you mention is already baked into the light-cone structure of causality (forces and signals can't outrun c). Time as a "transition from A to B" aligns with relational views of spacetime (e.g., in some quantum gravity approaches), but the warping distribution of mass-energy is what defines the geometry—no extra FTL nothingness layer is needed or observed.

In short, the darkness-inside-light result beautifully illustrates how relativity allows certain patterns to seem superluminal without breaking the universe's rules. It doesn't challenge the speed limit for anything that could transmit information or influence events causally. Your broader thoughts on emergence, reference frames, and Parmenidean being/nothingness touch on deep foundational questions that physicists and philosophers still debate—e.g., whether gravity is truly fundamental or arises from deeper quantum relational structures. This experiment doesn't resolve those, but it does show how even "nothing" in a wave can reveal universal wave behaviors across physics (sound, fluids, superconductors, etc.). "

Faster Than Light Travel via TheTimeless Two-Dimensional Support Structure of the 4-D Universe

 The wormhole idea may have started with Einstein and Rosen (ER) critiquing quantum mechanics; they regarded it as an incomplete theory.. They believed that quantum entanglement could hypothetically be explained by a wormhole between entangled quantum particles. Plainly that opens the way to fiction paradigms for star trek transporters sending people through shaped quantum wormholes.

A modern theory that may surpass the Lamda Cold Dark Matter CDM model is one that has space-time and all of the contingent-entangled Universe being comparable to an illusion that occurs on or from an underlying timeless realm. Today some believe it could be explained by the four-dimensional universe being somewhat like a physical projection or phenomenon from an underlying two-dimensional field. That is the Universe of four dimensions is comparable to an illusion or phenomenon made because the field fluctuations of the two dimensional field yield waves that become entangled at points as particles and so the extra dimensions exist in the entangled state.  The new criterion would allow star-trek style transporters to relocate travelers anyplace in the Universe instantly. In a sense they would exploit quantum entanglement to disentangle themselves from local spacetime and reappear in another. More about that below.

ER=EPR stimulated, as I understand it, further ideas about wormholes between black holes and white holes. I hate to think about the way time is affected between the black hole and white holes in the wormholes. Some opinion based on ER is that the black white hole vector is the only form that wormholes could exist in space-time. One need put an asterisk next to many “only place” ideas obviously for they are difficult to prove.

There are other theories today about gravity and black holes instead of quantum gravity theories. One is that singularities don’t really exist in black holes and instead they stop reducing at a certain size and spew out their mass through the wormhole and white hole on the other end.

Quantum entropy is a new explanation for gravity that obviously isn’t proven yet. Yet it could provide another opportunity for faster-than-light-travel theory. One should be able to use a star trek transporter to reduce an individual to an unentangled state and bounce the information down to the timeless two-dimensional place that uplifts the contingent universe of four dimensions. Space-time in that timeless two-dimensional realm is quite different (no time and no distance in comparison to the four dimension realm). Then one need return the disentangled quanta to a different location in the Universe.

Here is some information about quantum entropy gravity theory summarized by Gemini-

“The "quantum entropy theory of gravity" is a framework that proposes that gravity can be derived from quantum relative entropy, a measure of how different two quantum states are. This approach attempts to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity by treating gravity as an emergent phenomenon arising from the differences in information content between spacetime and matter. 

Entropy and Gravity:

The core idea is that gravity isn't a fundamental force but rather a consequence of the increasing disorder (entropy) within a system. In this framework, the geometry of spacetime is related to a quantum operator, and the difference between the natural spacetime metric and the metric induced by matter fields is quantified by quantum relative entropy. 

Bridging Quantum and General Relativity:

By linking gravity to quantum information, this theory aims to reconcile the two seemingly incompatible theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity. 

Modified Einstein Equations:

The entropic action leads to modified Einstein equations that, under certain conditions, reduce to the familiar equations of general relativity. However, it also predicts a small, positive cosmological constant, which aligns better with the observed accelerated expansion of the universe than other existing theories. 

The G-field:

The theory introduces a G-field, an auxiliary field acting as a Lagrangian multiplier, which plays a crucial role in the modified gravity equations and potentially offers new insights into dark matter. 

Emergent Gravity:

This approach suggests that gravity might be an emergent phenomenon, meaning it arises from the collective behavior of smaller, more fundamental constituents of spacetime.”