Extinction Dangers from AI and Politics- Which is Worse?

 It seems something like a gamble; AI could take over the world yet it could also save humanity from destroying itself with its countless weapons of mass destruction and exceedingly bad political decisions concerning democracy and what it means. Taxing the rich 90% was what enabled the 20th century golden era for ordinary Americans and Eisenhower accepted that as President. It could be billionaires that are most afraid of AI. Humanity isn’t terribly logical in concatenated mass social and environmental conditions- even the Ukraine War is nuclear brinkmanship by an illogical Europe unwilling to share Ukraine peacefully with Russia. Without a peaceful and benevolent A.I. supervention at least with political reason- if it is capable of that, the odds are in favor of human extinction through its own actions within 50 years. The Extinction Rebellion movement wasn’t in response to A.I. Claude though, does like to censor- it’s program coordinators have put way too much political correctness in it’s dominating algorithmic loops.

Senate Votes for More Sanctions to Upgrade War with Russia in Ukraine

The U.S. Senate predictably passed another sanctions bill showing the will to follow the Democrat lead in reckless, needless and unjust war on Russia to keep the borderlands of Ukraine for the west. The Senate shows the lack of understanding and knowledge of history common in lives of the unread.

Driving a global economic split furthering politics while continuing development of drone, robotic and biological war research is simply stupid. The war would probably stop in three months if sanctions on Russia ended.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/6012606-senate-russia-iran-sanctions/

The Senate seems not to require logic of itself in regard to international conflict and instead to pursue profits and inertia directions of the past that worked for more than a half century. The modern senate is replete with godless atheists and those expressing religious faith only disingenuously. If they would instead have minds not given over entirely to short term profits for-themselves they would better be able to find ways of peace that work rather than regarding thinking outside of their only boxes dismissively.

The Senate seems to have lost touch with reality regarding an urgence to normalize relations with Russia and pursue good rather than bad business. President Reagan's idea about the Cold War initially was "We win, they lose." That attitude cannot serve the interests of anyone in regard to sharing the land east of the Dnepro with Russia. President Reagan eventually said; ""We see a new post-war strategy involving public candor, diplomatic engagement, and the rejection of the inevitability of war or totalitarian rule... The barriers of the post-war era may be coming down." (Guildhall Speech in London, June 1988, reflecting on the turning point of the Cold War).

The Senate should not believe that Russia continues to be totalitarian rather than having a record of pursuing and establishing democracy. Neither should it believe the Ukraine was an independent nation before the end of the Cold War- it was not.