Zelensky Sides with Russia on Building Earth-Launched Anti-Satellite Weapons

 Europeans have continuously fueled the martial law President of Ukraine with weapons transfers, weapons development technology and so forth in the escalation of the Ukraine conflict. Now the martial law President for Life Zelenskyy wants anti-satellite weapons in order to strike Russia’s quasi Starlink network that is gradually being assembled in low Earth orbit. Much of the west including the United States had expressed the wish for a ban on such weapons and to have a moratorium on development because blasting satellites in orbit would create dangerous space debris. Russia, India and North Korea want to develop such systems because of some tactical or strategic paradigm for war.

Ukraine has accelerated development and proliferation of low cost, effective weapons technology that will be replicated in other wars now and in the future; jeopardizing world peace more than usual. At some point even Europe might have an interest in settling the war instead of throwing more gas onto the fire since the weapons systems may find their way onto their cities down the road. Ukraine’s weapons systems are affordable for many nations and terrorist actors unlike high-end aircraft and carriers that only nations with vast public debt can afford.

Creating debris in orbit to collide with future space missions and existing satellites is quite a bad idea. ELon Musk should pledge to turn off Ukraine’s Starlink access if it blows up satellites in orbit. The use of anti-satellite technology would set a very bad precedent for the security of all of those satellites that unite the global economy so far as it is united.

Gemini wrote-“There is no comprehensive international treaty banning the development, possession, or use of anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons, but the U.S. and several allies have pledged a voluntary ban on destructive, direct-ascent ASAT testing that creates debris. While the 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in orbit or on celestial bodies, conventional space weapons remain legally unregulated, creating a push for new international norms. Arms Control Association +3

Current Status of ASAT Bans and Limitations

• Voluntary Testing Ban (2022): The United States announced a ban on destructive direct-ascent ASAT missile testing in April 2022, aiming to establish a new international norm against tests that create dangerous orbital debris.
• Coalition Supporters: Several countries have joined the U.S. in this voluntary moratorium, including Canada, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and New Zealand.
• Opposing Nations: Russia, China, India, and North Korea have not signed onto this ban and have previously tested or expressed opposition to such restrictions.
• The Outer Space Treaty (1967): This foundational treaty bans placing nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction (WMD) into orbit or on celestial bodies (such as the Moon). It does not specifically prohibit conventional weapons, such as lasers, kinetic kill vehicles, or earth-based missiles that target satellites. Arms Control Association +4

Types of Space Weapons

• Destructive Direct-Ascent ASATs: Missiles launched from Earth to destroy satellites (e.g., China in 2007, Russia in 2021).
• Co-orbital ASATs: Satellites equipped with explosive devices, kinetic weapons, or robotic arms designed to disable other satellites.
• Non-Kinetic/Soft Kill Weapons: Cyberattacks, ground-based lasers, or electronic jamming designed to disable satellites without creating”

Ukraine Upgrades Psyops War on President Trump

Ukrainian negotiators apparently decided to change the name of areas of the Donetsk Oblast Ukraine to 'Donnieland' to spite President Trump's unwillingness to supply Ukraine with weapons and cash. President Trump also has said that the Ukraine should cede the Donetsk to Russia as a way to bring the war to an end through negotiation rather than forcing Russia and Ukraine to continue the body count  way of negotiating.

It is possible that President Trump may retaliate by renaming Kiev, Zelenskyy.

Step by Step, Inch by Inch, Zelenskyy and E.U. Leaders Escalate to Nuclear War

 I wasn't surprised by the news that Martial Law President Zelensky is finding more Ukrainian bodies to fling into the line of combat by returning expatriates and scraping the nation for 35,000 inductees each month. Russia has had somewhere fewer than 500,000 fatalities and Ukraine fewer than 200,000 fatalities in a pointless war that cannot be stopped unless Ukraine recognizes Russian sovereignty over select portions of eastern Ukraine and Crimea.

Russia is battling to recover land lost at the end of the Cold War, when it was re-emerging from more than half a century of communist rule. Russia was completely defenseless at that time in history and uncertain even of how to organize a free-enterprise economy, when all property under Soviet rule had been owned by the state. Russia needed twenty years of peace to change its economic infrastructure and prepare an army able to recover land that was integral to historical Russia before the communists.

The West began methodically expanding NATO eastward at the end of the Cold War and became an obvious threat to the new Russia. At the present stage of this protracted war in Ukraine—sponsored by the West and largely by Europe now—the conditions to end the war remain much the same as they have been since it started in 2022. Ukrainian President Zelensky has only sought ways to recover all of the land lost to Russian military advances, and European countries have provided a huge element of support, actually seeming to insist that the war continue until the last Ukrainian has been sent to the front.

Zelenskyy recently mentioned Russia's developing starlink like system as something that needs to be destroyed. He probably is likely to seek anti-satellite capabilities and create a precedent for global attacks on satellites- and that could be devastating for the economies of developed nations.

Recently, what may be the final mass mobilization of Ukrainian men available for combat has started, though the return of expatriates from European nations isn't quick. Perhaps more than 300,000 will become available in the next year. Russia may also require a mass mobilization commensurate with total war in order to survive the Ukrainian troop increase. The logic of the war remains the same, though.

Europe hopes to win a war of attrition and sanctions against Russia—a completely useless program that is creating limitless suffering for the casualties and their families, as well as costing the lives of the dead. Russia cannot really afford to just quit the war—it would never voluntarily vacate the hard-fought territorial gains—and that vacuum would be filled by European-backed Ukrainians and NATO membership too, presenting an existential threat to Russia.

Unfortunately, Europe plans to mentor Ukraine on how to build missiles for air defense that will replace the American-sourced Patriot missiles it no longer receives. Ukraine is also building its own ballistic missiles. A Zelensky without any rational option beyond total war to recover the lost land, given ballistic missiles to attack Russia, will attack Russia. That can escalate into nuclear exchange fairly swiftly. European leadership seems as irrational as Mr. Zelensky on the subject of the war.

The parameters for finding reasons to counterattack that might win are based upon some sort of status quo in war parameters continuing into the future while new plans are being implemented. When the time arrives for the new personnel or weapons systems to finally appear, the nature of the conflict often has already changed. That is why the calculus of the Ukraine war—with its increasing and high number of casualties—is rather tragic. The final situation, short of nuclear devastation, is likely to be the same as it was several hundred thousand fatalities and a million casualties earlier.

If Europe did somewhow begin winning a war of attrition and Ukraine was attacking RUssian cities with profusion of missiles it is probable the war would be upgraded to a nuclear level with Europe finding it difficult not to participate. With an end to the war and Russia finally accepted along with eastern Ukraine as part of Russia by Europe, the situation would return to normal peaceful life with little changed from the way it was before the war.

Summary by Gemini-"While Ukraine cannot currently build Patriot interceptors from scratch due to technical complexity, it is developing domestic, dual-purpose "Patriot-like" systems capable of both air defense and offense. These new Ukrainian systems are designed to operate in a ground-launched, "fire and forget" mode to act as both air-defense and, with different hardware/ammo, potentially as offensive surface-to-surface missiles. 

Key developments regarding this capability include:

• Dual-Purpose Development: Ukraine is developing mobile air defense systems, such as HMMWV-based launchers, that can use R-73 air-to-air missiles, providing high maneuverability and allowing the system to engage targets and immediately relocate.
• Alternative Systems: As of early 2026, Ukrainian defense firms like Fire Point are developing low-cost, domestically produced alternatives to the Patriot system, including new ballistic missile models.
• Sapsan Operational-Tactical Missile: Reports indicate Ukraine has begun serial production and deployment of the "Sapsan" (or Grim-2) system, a domestic ballistic missile capable of targeting long-range ground targets.
• Patriot Limitations: While Ukraine has received advanced Patriot PAC-2 GEM-T missiles, these are specialized for interception rather than offensive ground-to-ground use.
• German Partnership: Germany is establishing production lines for Patriot missiles that will support Ukraine's defense needs by late 2026 or early 2027, according to. 

Although "Patriot-like" in defense capability, the domestic systems being built are primarily new, independent designs rather than modified Patriot interceptors."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYP1OBZfFK0