On Democrat's Treasonous Foreign and Domestic Policy Positions for Mexico and Ukraine

 Democrats tend to take a treasonous, foreign based view of select international political issues based on ignorance and error in historical judgment. They are pro-war for Ukraine and like to dump billions and billions to fight Russia and are unwilling to defend U.S. borders against illegal migration. Democrats prefer war with Russia to peace, and that is simply bad for the U.S.A. and most of the nations of the planet. Therefore I had an opportunity to briefly reply to those issues…

Mexicans were never a majority of the population in the area that is today the American west- those were native Americans and one can’t simply erase them from history. Mexicans governed or owned but hadn’t settled the American west much.

AI- “• The Entire Cession: Excluding Texas, the total non-Indian Mexican population across the entire territory (modern California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado) was only around 75,000 to 100,000 people, with the vast majority concentrated in New Mexico.

• Vast swaths of the Great Basin, the Mojave, and the Mountain West had zero Mexican presence and were entirely controlled by sovereign Indigenous nations like the Comanche, Navajo, Apache, and Ute.” Native Americans numbered up to 200,000.

“The geographic distribution across modern-day U.S. states broke down as follows:

1. New Mexico (The Vast Majority)

• Estimated Population: ~60,000 to 70,000

• Details: This was the cultural and demographic heart of Mexico’s northern frontier. Centuries of Spanish and Mexican settlement meant there were established towns, farms, and deep-rooted communities concentrated along the Rio Grande Valley (including Santa Fe and Albuquerque).

2. California

• Estimated Population: ~7,000 to 10,000

• Details: Known as Californios, this population was settled primarily along the southern and central coast in pueblos (towns) like Los Angeles, San Diego, Monterey, and San Jose, as well as on massive ranchos.

3. Texas (Already Partitioned)

• Estimated Population: ~4,000 to 5,000

• Details: While Texas had already declared independence in 1836 and was annexed by the U.S. in 1845, the Mexican population (Tejanos) remained largely concentrated in South Texas, particularly along the Rio Grande (e.g., Laredo) and in San Antonio.

4. Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada (Virtually None)

• Estimated Population: Fewer than a few hundred combined.

• Details: In 1848, these regions had almost no permanent Mexican settlers.

• Arizona: A few hundred Mexican soldiers and settlers lived in the extreme south, primarily around the presidio (fort) of Tucson.

• Colorado: A tiny handful of families lived in the absolute southern edge (the San Luis Valley).

• Utah & Nevada: There were essentially zero permanent Mexican inhabitants. These areas were entirely controlled by Indigenous nations, with the exception of temporary travelers using the Old Spanish Trail.”

Gary- The 1849 California Gold Rush brought in 100,000 Americans so California became very non-Mexican quickly. I don’t regard it as a good comparison to Russia and its origin as Kievan Rus circa 975 AD. Only later did the Russian capital move farther north to Moscow.

The Treaty of Hidalgo occurred because Mexico had gained independence through war from Spain in 1821 and Texas got independence from Mexico in 1836. The U.S. recognized that in 1845 and so Mexico severed diplomatic relations with the U.S. President Polk tried to buy the soon to be annexed areas for 30 million. Mexican soldiers killed 16 U.S. Army troopers north of the Rio Grande in 1846 and the war continued until finally U.S. Grant firing artillery from a 2nd story building and Robert E. Lee (working for WInslow Scott) neared Mexico City. The Treaty of Hidalgo ended the war- Mexico got 15 million dollars and in 1849 the California Gold Rush brought a flood of Americans to the west.

Corrupting Foreign Allegiance is Running for US Senate in Florida

Running as a Democrat for the US Senate from Florida, the former Ukrainian American Lt. Colonel Vindman who violated, while affiliated with the national security adviser, President Trump's privacy in a call with Ukraine President Zelensky in 2020, regards himself as a patriot for supporting the party of virtual treason; Democrats. They support foreign allegiance more than national interests in advocating open borders. 

Democrats support the Ukraine war because they regard Europe as neo-socialist and want to expand socialism, homosexuality and atheism into political domination of Russia. Mr. Vindman has an extremist Ukrainian point of view inimical to U. S.  national security interests. Peace with Russians rather than support for the waxing European Unions desire to glom up Ukraine while lusting for Russia and isolating the USA, is the rational policy.

U.S. leadership followed a Eurocentric policy more so than it should have following the end of the Cold War version 1. Europeans were organizing a nascent continental national union and Russia was reorganizing itself after decades of communist rule. The borderlands known as the Ukraine became the center of the traditional conflict between Europe and Russia. The present narrative has Russia as a threat to all of Europe. Yet Europe is the main threat to itself. It's paranoia and unwillingness to share the former Russian Ukraine or to honor the commitment not to expand N.A.T.O. promised to Boris Yeltsin are the salient features of the conflict that Europe could settle for-itself if it really want to resume peace. And foreign policy experts are already whining about the expanding German military that is tripling its military budget from two years ago. Foreign policy experts these days seem preponderantly to be deaf, dumb, blind and stupid in regard to what intelligent and realistic goals are for Europe and world economic and ecological stability.

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/germany/europes-next-hegemon-liana-fix

Democrats feel that government need not support itself with secure borders for the polity. For Democrats, government of, by and for the people means government of, by and for aliens. No one has clued them in to understand that self-determination is de rigueur for a democracy to mean anything. Government where citizens have a real opportunity to determine their own political direction because politicians care more about cheap labor immigrants than bettering the lives of their own citizens really aren't worth a damn.

Just flooding the nation with cheap migrant labor to subvert the wages of poor citizens while waging a foreign war through proxies in Ukraine to expand European Union hegemony over Russia while concentrating wealth domestically in reckless disregard of the possibility of compelling World War Three to actualize is nearly equal to the Southern Confederacy's determination to keep slaves and expand slave recapture to the northern states.

Lt. Colonel Vindman leaked classified information during President Trump's first term in order to team up with the one-party system narrative that President Trump should be stopped, impeached and obstructed. Mr. Vindman has said that he knows how to oppose  dictators and authoritarians or something to that effect alluding to President Trump. He seems unaware that President Trump was elected in a pluralistic political system twice because people don't support the one-party subversion and riotous, dissimulative methods of the Democrats party- and want secure borders and politics done with a honest legal system so far as that is possible with politicians making laws lol.

Mr. Vindman is the Democrat's Ukrainian candidate best able to invigorate prospects for W.W. 3. Loyal to President Zelenski's agenda, he holds out hope to those in Ukraine for a swift escalation to global thermonuclear conflict instead of the meat grinder on the ground.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS2BpEDoT_o

A civil polity needs sovereign over its land for it to be able to plan for its development. In order for a polity to determine and implement ecological economic policies for instance, political decisions need to be relevant and applicable to everyone living within the boundaries of the polity. If there are just millions of people wandering in and out of the nation at will, the polity's sovereignty loses relevance to real politic. Open borders are comparable to a clutch plate or bands being stripped in a transmission so the polity's gears don't engage. That doesn't usually happen all at once- it grows like a pile.

Democrats act as if they believed politics should evolve independently of human action- blind forces of Adam Smith's invisible hands shuffling and dealing political and economic cards to the nations of the world to play. Christians may believe that God is in control with a teleological purpose designed for humanity in order to support His agenda for human development. Neither point of view precludes intelligent human political self-determination and planning.

Good government and good civic structure aren't accidents. They follow an intelligent electorate thinking for themselves. Even self-driving cars anticipate a direction from the user about where it should go; democracy requires no less.