AI is a Disruptive Military as Well as Economic Influence

 Conventional military balances and assessments by analysts in regard to power will be overturned potentially, by the disruptive power of A.I. and AI agents to control machines and detonation devices while infiltrating in countless ways behind conventional military frontiers. Not only will A.I. chips and platforms be able to convert about anything mobile or electronic into a weapon of war able to attack enemy interests in some way, they may be embedded b y terrorists as well in countless ways govern attack vectors. KSM- Khalid Sheik Mohammad, the designer of the 9-11 attacks was an engineer graduate of the University of North Carolina. The next KSM could be a software app designer from anywhere attacking anything. An application of a synthetic AI co-pilot could be the takeover and crashing of a jet following an unseen installation of a special chip. The Ukraine war is stimulating countless conventional and technical weapons spin-offs able to convert low cost machines, transport and electronic devices into weapons of war. Consequences are difficult to predict difficult to predict. History doesn’t roll backwards though.

The Military Doesn't Need Democrat Videos Urging Them Not to Follow Illegal Orders

 Select Democrats are continuing the divide and conquer approach to political power by making a video urging active duty military to not obey illegal orders (from President Trump).The implication is that the President is ordering the military to perform illegal actions, and continues to do so after court decisions to order the action to stop.  Neither the President nor the Courts benefit from Super-intervention by select Democrats admonishing military members. Levering the military undermines the trust in the executive, the military and government itself. President Trump wasn't wrong in suggesting the Democrat Party is flirting with sedition. After all they do favor policies that are harmful to the nation and of more value to Mexico and Europe than Americans rather often.

The military are already aware they can be court martialed for following plainly illegal orders. For members of the national guard to follow the President's orders to deploy in order to security the safety of federal officials or to secure the safety of American citizens is more of a legal issue; a technical one, for the judiciary to decide, rather than individual soldiers themselves. Placing an onerous burden of jurisprudence upon soldiers to litigate thorny legal issues in their minds and make a choice to obey an order or not is wrong. That in itself is not sedulous, although it does strive to disrupt the Executives and Judicial role in domestic affairs and infuse distrust and chaos amidst the military.

https://suno.com/s/WVRXt7sI4aGJ2UVX

President Trump was accused of leading an insurrection against the U.S. Government by the Democrat (ic) Party and must relish the opportunity to return the favor to Democrats. It would not be too surprising if Congressional Republicans established a committee of some sort to investigate Democrat party affiliation with foreign governments of Europe and with Mexico to discover hidden relations to drug cartels and those seeking to continue war and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the corrupt government of Ukraine for war against Russia. Republicans though don't have a total war upon political opposition as their political modus vivendi.

NBC reported however that Trump "suggested that Democrats should be killed"- in a libelous parsing of what the President actually said; a textbook case of fake news. Trump simply referred to the on the books legal penalty for sedition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfh2Iqv6USI