Iran War Crime Put Bounties on US Soldiers to Influence Democrat Voters

Iran’s Army Chief Amir Hatami announced a $30,000 bounty to kill or capture US soldiers. That is a war crime. Yet like the US Democrat Party that just launched a war to change the structure of SCOTUS because they can’t pack the court with Democrats who would support one party rule, Iran can’t annex the Strait of Hormuz through lawful means so it resorts to attempts to capture US soldiers for hostages that it can lever the US electorate with in the mid-term elections. Iran is rooting for Democrats who will give them what they want, so the Democrat Party is free to escalate the Ukraine war toward Armageddon with a myriad weapons donations of billions and billions served to Ukraine.

President Trump will be busy at the Strait of Hormuz

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/iran-offers-30000-bounty-for-killing-or-capturing-of-us-soldiers/

AI- The Legal Framework

Treacherous Killing Prohibited: Under Article 23(b) of the Hague Convention IV (Regulations on the Laws and Customs of War on Land), it is expressly forbidden “to kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army”.

Bounties as “Outlawry”: Military doctrines, including the U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 (The Law of Land Warfare), explicitly construe this prohibition as banning the “putting a price on an enemy’s head, as well as offering a reward for an enemy dead or alive”.

Distinction of Combat: While a military can legally target individual enemy soldiers or officers through standard combat operations, offering financial rewards or bounties invites assassination and treacherous conduct by non-combatants or irregular forces, which breaches international law.

Contemporary Context

This legal issue is highlighted by modern geopolitical conflicts: Iran Bounty Announcement: Iran’s military chief Amir Hatami announced a $30,000 bounty for the killing or capturing of U.S. military personnel. Such unilateral declarations violate established laws of armed conflict by explicitly placing a financial price on soldiers’ heads.

The European Union Doesn’t Sympathize with American Concerns About a Nuclear Iran

 The European Union hates President Trump. Apparently he isn’t enough of a malleable unit to their liking, and so they wish they had Joe Biden or a reasonable facsimile as President. The EU hates the Iran war because it makes oil prices rise. Even though the administration and Israel have real concerns about Iran developing nuclear weapons, the EU doesn’t care. They just want cheap oil and hate Donald Trump.

So I asked the well-known world geopolitical strategic analyst Dr. Hyrim Pinkerstrom what the likely outcome of the Iran war fallout between the U.S.A. and the EU will be.

Wasabi Tabasconi: Will N.A.T.O. remain a strong bulwark against Soviet Russians?

Dr. Pinkerstrom: No, not at all. The U.S.A. will no longer defend Europe from anyone—not even nuclear threats.

Wasabi Tabasconi: Winston Churchill said the only thing to fear is fear itself; are you afraid of the EU losing that courage? Cynics have commented that the only danger to Europe is Europe itself.

Dr. Pinkerstrom: Of course not. With the United States gone from interfering in continental affairs, the world will become a more peaceful and prosperous place. Germany and Japan will develop nuclear weapons and France will increase its stockpile, transforming from a force de frappe to a force de défense active. A number of peace agreements between Germany and France, and Britain and Japan, will assure responsible use of nuclear weapons in case of insult to the security interests of the greater co-prosperity sphere.

Wasabi Tabasconi: Germany and Japan were once enemies of the United States. To this day, many Americans oppose them having nuclear weapons just as strongly as they oppose Iran getting them.

Dr. Pinkerstrom: Some Americans harbor prejudice against Germany and Japan possessing nuclear weapons—racism still lingers in high places. The world would actually be far safer with a more multi-polar distribution of nuclear bombs. No one would feel jealous or underprivileged.

Wasabi Tabasconi: The former enemies of the United States that are regarded as American allies now are becoming alienated and siding with Iran in the present conflict. The media and deep establishment of the United States have regarded Russia and China- former allies, as enemies today. Where is the logic of trying to be consistent regarding positions of 'nembranes' flowing in different relative directions?

Dr. Pinkerstrom; You must be joking. Differential calculus of AI has solved that problem in Hilbert Space

Wasabi Tabasconi: I suppose Iran will be allowed to develop nuclear weapons too in order to increase the balance in favor of peace?

Dr. Pinkerstrom: That would be the best way to keep the peace globally. Iran, Pakistan and India are the leading edge of peaceful nuclear programs. Wars occur only through failures to recognize that Europe has need of cheap oil, as British P.M. Starmer commented recently: ‘I am sick of Donald Trump’.