AOC's Green New Deal Was off the Mark; Not Too Extreme

No it's not too extreme, it's just off the mark. As in chess, accuracy matters. When addressing such large issues efficient engineering design including social engineering, is requisite. It's better to let reformed capitalism pay for a transition to ecological economic infrastructure itself through investment morphing, than tax dollars. Regulations and incentives are requisite for creating ecological economic infrastructure

The present capitalist creative destruction is an extreme process firmly established and quite costly. Resistance is futile. In judo one redirects the opponents energy rather than directly opposing it as might a Marxist hoping for an atom-smasher synthesis of a new, bigger atom smasher.

The corporatist-socialist party owns the broadcast media and concentrates wealth for the 1% while degrading the health and viability of the world ecosphere. The corporate media and entertainment businesses have forced moral decay on the U.S.A., academia is awash in environmental atheists without any spiritual sense at all nor respect for individuals and families. It is an elitist ‘we know better than the minions’ cult.

Even so ecospheric reform appears necessary for human survival on Earth. The economic infrastructure is old style unsustainable. It consumes the ecosphere and biosphere converting it into disposable consumer items and manure. Highly entropic systems. Reform is needed, and it would seem far more extreme than AOC’s one goal of reducing greenhouse gas plus neo-socialism. It wasn’t comprehensive enough. Interesting ideas though. maybe she will read an environmental economics textbook. She has a degree in economics.

Ecological Economics, Second Edition: Principles and Applications 2nd Edition - PDF Version

Rebuilt Green Notre Dame - Hydroponics Farm for the Poor?

Notre Dame Cathedral was part of Parisian history. It should be rebuilt yet it should have triple roles and not just be a replica museum. Plainly as much of the old stone should be kept and used as a wall in the new steel and glass structure as possible. The new Notre Dame ought to be solar and wind energy productive. A hydrogen fuel cell plant could be primary power and the hydrogen produced from water by monastics.

https://rmi.org/people/amory-lovins/

Some part of the new structure should have a hydroponics farm to grow food year round for the poor. Good eco-structure designers such as are affiliated with Amory Lovins might help design church structures that are reconstructed to be more than museums to the past as if Christian was not a living faith.

Green Notre Dame should surpass the spirit of the Paris accord in exemplary eco-stewardship.

Between Rocks and Hard Places; Trump, Biden and Buttigeig

President Trump needs the Christian vote for reelection. Fundamentally he needs the pre-tribulationist and dispensationalist voters to agree that he is less evil than satanic Democrats that regard just two of the five evolutionary pillars of morality (a popular academic theory of moral psychology) have no need for morality. They seem satanic and at least daft. yet they are just the flip side of the evolved socialist-corporatist coin that is satanic and repressive. President Trump as an independent liberal Republican seemed a reasonable alternative to the demonic left in 2016.

Pre-tribulationists are victims of American hucksterism. It is just one Christian theological school of which the late Charles Ryrie was a staunch exponent, had joined. The paradigm has been repeated ad nauseum by commercial movies. It is an eschatology based belief that the world is doomed and the anti-Christ will appear when things get messed up enough. At that point a Christian rapture will occur and the saved will be lifted up into the Cuds with the Lord. The theology is wrong and promotes environmental indifference- since a new Earth will arise the belief goes.

If the devil wants to prevent people from being saved it will develop a political structure that is a Hobson's choice between bad choices. On the left the Democrats will promote moral evil and corporatist socialism, while on the right, capitalists will destroy the world ecosphere for a profit and build corporatism. President Trump seems like the Fuehrer of the corporatist state.

The end times that pre-tribbers believe in already happened in the first century as Jesus Christ said it would; before the end of that generation. Rome destroyed Jerusalem with a million dead and the Christians were scattered. The theological school of post-tribulationism is true. The millennium is a nominal name for the period from the second coming at Pentecost until the third coming at the end of the millennium.

https://www.amazon.com/Shall-Have-Dominion-Postmillennial-Eschatology/dp/0977851672

https://www.amazon.com/Postmillennialism-Eschatology-Hope-Keith-Mathison/dp/0875523897/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_14_t_0/134-4629334-0816139?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=NKV0D5SWFBBAFG6D6FQN

Pre-tribbers have no excuse to allow the fuehrers of corporatism to decimate the health of forests, destroy the vitality of the ocean, and let global warming occur. Gold platted toilet seats until the world is destroyed is more akin to satanic goals for the destruction of the people of the world so they may accompany him unto a nearly godless eternity in hell. Political tools of satan exist on the left and right Incidentally, physicists believe that below absolute zero there is a temperature change to infinitely hot.

Trump Trade; Destroy Ecosphere for a Good Economy

President Trump is accelerating the old style, unreformed, ecospherically destructive economic methods. The result is the lowest unemployment rate in U.S. history and an increasing pace of unsustainable ecospheric destruction.

The President has harmed Alaska and the future world prospects for a healthy ecosphere. Spoiling the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve and working against a sustainable fishery are usual for a from the cradle son of an immigrant business billionaire. He will let oil wells sprawl while fracking pollutes groundwater. A city guy.

Democrats would take away guns so after guns are outlawed only the government and outlaws would have guns. Democrats want a neo-authoritarian socialist union with corporatism to repress people liberated with a queer, amoral social environment with copious dope for all. democrats are a godless party of amoral evolution. Personally I believe God created everything including evolution.

Democrats run lawyers instead of credible candidates. They work to bring globalism through illegal immigration to help destroy traditional American family groups and job security with good wages. They seek to overpopulate the nation and let hell develop on Earth. It’s not encouraging.

President Trump should be careful not to become regarded as a tool of the devil seeking to destroy the world ecosphere. As it is he is a complete moron on ecological economics. Humanity isn't on Earth for the short run...many want people to live on Earth in a few centuries as well.

Americans vote for Trump as an alternative to the godless and immoral corporatist-socialist branch of the Republicrat-Party, and may do so in 2020 if the electorate remains dumb of ecological economics or prefer to be dead instead of directly in support of satanic immoral Democratic policies.

In a way, President Trump seems like the Fuehrer of the emerging Corporatist state. Democrats and Republicans are a Hobson's choice for those that prefer egalitarian democracy in a moral social environment working toward ecospheric recovery and a balanced federal budget with a good safety in for a nation with secure borders.

The Fuehrer has all of the tools of state terrorism within a socialist-corporatist ecosystem that money can buy. Serialized terror against dissident individuals through the mass media, firing from employment and earnings to repress non-sycophantic expression; those were tools of communism and fascism that are unified in the Corporatist state.

Couldn't Monte Carlo Algorithm Balance the Federal Budget?

The United States has been gambling with its financial future since the followers after the Reagan Administration choose to lose their minds and blindly follow the principle of deficit spending and concentrating wealth for the 1%. The environment is in decline too. Democrats have expedited the abandonment of morality. People regard them as empirical truth-challenged immoralists* running a white homosexual mayor as a symbol for butt-gigs bending over South Bend peer of twerk. No one considers balancing the federal budget and paying off the public debt.

A computer running the Monte Carlo algorithm such as Wall Street high-speed traders use might be able to find a myriad ways to balance the federal budget. Has anyone even looked into artificial intelligence solutions to the problem of public spending arrears?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_algorithm

Different configurations and balances for making public spending outlays balance public income revenues should be easy for A.I. dozens of those models could be constructed and presented to the public for review now and then.

* Democrats regard just two of the modern Five Foundations of Morality as being important. Those two are Harm and Autonomy. The Five Foundations are incidentally derived from evolution theory and experimental observation. Of course morality is an abstract concept, so limiting the paradigm to five 'foundational' planks is arbitrary and to atheists something like the Buddha's Noble Eightfold Path is to Buddhists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_foundations_theory

The Democrat-liberal interpretation of both planks are wrong. For one; they enact harm to others with racketeering and such to have their way and dismiss the harm in that, and two, they seem to exclude virtue from autonomy as if they were mutually incompatible, or that any autonomous individual would lack virtue or faith in God. That is wrong. Autonomous individuals needn't be amoral slobs.

von Neumann vs Einstein in Chess; The Winner Would Be?

John von Neumann’s algebra and architecture indicate thought more compatible for chess than cosmology or quantum mechanics. I believe von Neumann would have won a match between them if he’d put his mind to learning the game with the effort he put to walking his dog.

John von Neumann’s dog

Von Neumann architecture - Wikipedia

Einstein said; “Chess holds its master in its own bonds, shackling the mind and brain so that the inner freedom of the very strongest must suffer.”

Aliens Heisting the Universe (its expanding faster)

Scientists still haven’t produced an explanation for why the rate of expansion of the Universe is high and higher than expected since it was discovered to be expanding quickly in 1999. One implausible theory is that Alien universe-jackers are in the process of heisting it.

https://phys.org/news/2019-04-hubble-universe-faster.html

Numerous theories arise to attempt an explanation. An alternative universe is pushing it aside from the inside out with its quanta having little interaction with mass-energy in this Universe- mostly just acting on spatial dimension content.

I prefer simple accounts. So the idea that dark energy and dark matter compounding as a reflection of the electro-magnetic field scores some points with me. The limit of expansion might be made into a formula with elements such as the maximum rate of expansion reciprocally equals the dark energy and matter equivalent of  E = mc²

Light is a carrier of electromagnetic force, in its form as a virtual particle. Nothing travels faster than light because the largest field in existence is electro-magnetic. All mass-energy in fields that travels far is electro-magnetic. Photons that aren't virtual don't interact with other photons in the field and are the fastest particle/wave in the universe known.

The other field in the Universe that is equally as quick as photons in the electro-magnetic field is gravity. Gravity is attracted to mass and has the speed characteristics of photons in an electro-magnetic field. So one might think that gravity is related to the electro-magnetic field in some way with gravitons being a dark photon that seeks to ground itself in mass.

If gravitons have a charge that locks itself into mass, that charge might be related to the expansion of space. Gravity apparently is a local phenomenon in the same way that electro-magnetic fields are. The wonder is that there might not be a transcendent Universal field, though the concatenated effects of localized gravity act universally in relation to matter.

https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=2348&t=photons-as-carriers-of-the-electromagnetic-force

Electro-magnetic field photons vs Gravity

Light is a carrier of electromagnetic force, in its form as a virtual particle. Nothing travels faster than light because the largest field in existence is electro-magnetic. All mass-energy in fields that travels far is electro-magnetic. Photons that aren't virtual don't interact with other photons in the field and are the fastest particle/wave in the universe known.

The other field in the Universe that is equally as quick as photons in the electro-magnetic field is gravity. Gravity is attracted to mass and has the speed characteristics of photons in an electro-magnetic field. So one might think that gravity is related to the electro-magnetic field in some way with gravitons being a dark photon that seeks to ground itself in mass.

If gravitons have a charge that locks itself into mass, that charge might be related to the expansion of space. Gravity apparently is a local phenomenon in the same way that electro-magnetic fields are. The wonder is that there might not be a transcendent Universal field, though the concatenated effects of localized gravity act universally in relation to matter.

https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=2348&t=photons-as-carriers-of-the-electromagnetic-force

The Confederacy Hadn't Much Chance of Winning the Civil War

Technical military and industrial comparisons aside, the Union had the inside lines for personnel, and that was a substantial advantage. Character matters; the best chance for the Confederate States would have been in a weak President of the United States who found appeasement or compromise better choices than war. Lincoln wasn’t so disposed to let the will of slave oligarchs prevail over federal laws and state’s rights.

States right’s to not comply with the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was an issue that Wisconsin and Vermont tried to enact through state high court decisions that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned. Southern slave-owners felt they had a right to recapture escaped slaves anywhere in the United States. That law was effectively reversed in the eventful year of 1861, with passage of The Confiscation Act barring recapturing of escaped slaves. Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - Wikipedia

West Point was a federal education and training facility. The officers and graduates had of course to choose what side they would fight on. The Northern forces commanded the loyalists and best of the lot. The South got the decorous commandant of that young men’s school; an Army engineer named Robert E. Lee. The north knew the military ability of southern commanders. Lee and Grant each fought in the Mexican war. Lee was attached as an aide to Gen Scott. Grant personally fought in a battle against Mexicans. Later he set artillery to fire from a second story of a building in the attack on Mexico City with positive results.

Lee had married the daughter of George Washington’s (adopted) son. His father had been convicted of being a land swindler, and Lee saw the Army as a way to safely promote himself without gambling . He cut a good figure on a horse, and couldn’t resist the promotion to Supreme Commander of Confederate Forces. The Confederate leadership was flawed. Lincoln alternatively was able to experiment with his military leaders until finding the best.

Historians have written that Lee couldn’t control his boisterous, argumentative Generals. Lee wasn’t the kind of brawling tough guy to put down enmity and coordinate planning among his subordinates. Neither was he able to follow orders well enough. Confederate President Jefferson Davis ordered Lee not to go north of the Potomac River again. Lee disobeyed and the expedition to Maryland and beyond began with results that seriously weakened southern strength. Like perennial presidential candidates, Lee may not have been able to resist the prospect of capturing Washington D.C. for-himself.

The northern forces had better leadership and personnel than the south. They also had God on their side, insofar as egalitarianism- God is no respecter of persons, required that no human slavery exist, that oligarchy, plutonomy or royalty not occlude democracy. The Confederacy was doomed because it was evil.

American Civil War - Wikipedia

Idiot Muslim Bombers Bungle Sri Lanka Hit

Muslim suicide bombers that attacked churches in Sri Lanka recently were according to ISIS exacting revenge for the Christchurch New Zealand massacre of Muslims. Yet the perpetrator of the Mosque massacre wasn't acting as a Christian. Christians haven't got a theology for killing Muslims; that would be Islam for killing unbelievers).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/sri-lanka-bombings-latest-updates/2019/04/22/f2afe32a-6531-11e9-a698-2a8f808c9cfb_story.html?utm_term=.f8d39da61816

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings

https://www.foxnews.com/world/sri-lanka-mastermind-zahran-hashim-isis

The Muslim bombings of Christians Churches attacked the wrong people. Muslims in New Zealand were killed by a racist, for racial reasons, as well as culture. Muslims terrorism was a concern for  Brenton Tarrant, and he was a tit for tat king of killer.

One can make an analogy of the error of the Muslim bombers.

Say the Chicago Outfit is hit by a bomb by the Lavender Hill Mob. So they go out and get revenge on the North Side Gang, who are pissed and attack the Chicago Outfit. The Lavender Hill Mob giggles.

Muslim terrorists may not understand that a vast number of non Muslims aren't Christian. And that there are racists that actually are atheist and pagan that hate Muslims because they are believers in God as well as non-white and of a rival culture. Of course in Sri Lanka the Tamil Tigers blew up Muslim Mosques too, and they were neo Buddhist rather than Christian.

Blowing up Christians on the main Christian celebration (equal to Christmas) day just fuels the hate of more racists against Muslims racist expansionist global terrorists. It isn't Christians with the military equipment that would be too happy to napalm Muslim terrorists.

Muslims have a proclivity for state religion even to the level of theocracy. Christians eliminated theocracy long ago where it nearly existed. There are still state run Christian sects (sections) as in Lutheran Germany, and formerly in Tsarist Russia. Christians have generally sought to be free from state control, and it is no coincidence that a doctrine of the separation of church and state developed in Christian nations. Idiot Muslims interpret the world through jihad eyes and assume other Abrahamic religions seek to destroy them. That is idiocy.