American issues of Christianity, cosmology, politics, ecosphere, philosophy, contemporary history etc
05 April 2021
Is California better prepared in 2021 to stuff its annual fire disaster and state of emergency?
04 April 2021
Build at least one trans-con hyper loop Pres Joe- win one for the Gipper
On a happy Easter morning when the nation can feel blessed in the good news of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, the national infrastructure bill is calling to President Joe Biden for an upgrade to afford the construction of even one trans-continental hyper-tube. The resurrection of U.S. infrastructure requires new thinking and technology instead of just investing in already existing technology.
Sure one would like all truck stops in America to have electric recharging stations. Maybe there should be discounts on biscuits and gravy for any driver with an electric vehicle; yet getting just one hype-tube built that tosses passengers and cargo across the nation at 1000 k.p.h. would indicate the nation is not entirely mired in past infrastructure and actually looks ahead.
https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2020/11/hyper-tube-train-model-hits-1-000kmh/
It would be great if super-freighters moving across the oceans could directly unload containers to railroads from the docks and if rail cars could be independently switched to destination routes- maybe their is some streamlined electric way to upgrade to better, faster, cleaner intermodal systems technology, infrastructure and flowcharting, yet practical hyper-tubes require federal intervention for rights of way and execution; so good luck Joe on actually getting some infrastructure resurrection started for getting anything done in the U.S.A. is rather difficult these days with all of the litigation and natural human tendency to criticize more than create.
03 April 2021
If the Universe is a simulation that includes a para-normal construction of God paradigmatically
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/confirmed-we-live-in-a-simulation/
I don't know of many contemporary philosophers who can examine and compare the wealth of cosmology material, Multiverse theory, simulations and the capacity God to determine a priori the existence and order of all possible Universes within His mind. Plotinus might have addressed such questions as well as Augustine or Plato-Socrates.
01 April 2021
Democrat Divisiveness will hobble the Biden infrastructure plan
Democrats are so inept at Domestic politics, other than those of force that they excel at, as to assure national divisiveness on simple issues of interest to all like infrastructure upgrade and renewal. To some the party seems like a domestic terror agency and to others it is one that has a right to attack white males for being klansmen as if they all generally are or were. Democrats attack on cultural issues that assure distractions from objective economic policy that requires solid progressive taxation to afford and that cannot be accomplished when their support from across the aisle fades away to non-existence. Grace matters; God's grace is the sole reason that anyone is carried to salvation and eternity in heaven. God's grace can also be helpful one would think in getting the economy to transition toward ecological economic policies that work.
Futurists and philosophers seeking the well-being of the nation and world tend to need to have a nation to work with rather than a global entity. They cannot do well if culture agitators turn the citizens toward fighting against themselves. The most likely course of affairs for the U.S.A. to take politically these days is just to follow the money and conform everything politically to things that support the most concentrated wealth, so stirring up racial and other divisions to redistribute a smaller pie more equitably without reconfiguring economics inclusive of the rich that nothing much gets done. The Biden administration has a good chance of disappearing in four years without getting much done besides the cultural goals they have for-themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA8Fh6DzCTo
It is possible to continue current and historical classical economics without much government intervention besides regulations that direct economic activity toward environmental ends. Sure those can be reversed if they were done by executive order yet if the economics become quite well established they may continue even if another dinosaur anti-ecosphere Republican takes the White House in 2024. The one thing Republicans could do to get more popular support would be to take the lead on environmental economic progress- it is a small concession to make and would place the party economically toward the front of the pack as they were during the industrial revolution rather than at the back as foot-dragging resistors to progress.
31 March 2021
A pronoun conundrum concerning what to call a deluxe eunuch
In a time of increasing social demographic density a government may support population reduction via being agreeable to help pay for converting males into deluxe eunuchs with frills and chemical modification in addition to the surgery. Yet there is apparently a problem about what to title to use in reference to the former males; certainly they were men and did not become women by the conversion to deluxe eunuchs with some sort of artificial female receiving unit.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/pronouns-and-the-philosophy-professor-11617142536
One might refer to the former makes as Euns perhaps, or neo-fems yet sir is probably wrong as it is a derivative of sire or feudal lord stud. Eunuchs are not studs, and neither are they genetically female.
Genuine mixed gender people are the innocents in the mess created by those that are mentally confused and seek to convert their gender to upgrade their standard of living. People that really don't have xx or xy chromosomes probably have the right to decide for themselves what they want to be, although of course some of the complication of xyy or whatever would tend to be weighted toward the democracy of letters for a determination objectively.
It would be great if people could spell themselves as easily as they misspell term papers and become what they wrote instantly. It just doesn't seem to be the case that reality is willing to coincide with wishes in some cases.
Can Chinese insouciance in regard to US Gov nagging moderate Biden Admin policy?
One might wonder if the years of U.S. government nagging about China's interminable violation of human rights would ever be of any meaningful effect since Wall Street investments in China tend to trump U.S. federal hand waving. Chinese unconcern rising to insouciance in the island archipelago it is building up in the South China Sea and stocking with ships and implements for battle can't be taken seriously when the Biden administration cannot even defend the southern U.S. border.
No one wants war of course for everyone is a loser with the excellence in weapons of mass destruction existing these days. I can even imagine a time when some oligarch will send drones to an inhabited planet to terminate the existence of potentially adverse biomass with photon torpedoes or some other unkind of particle beam device.
The Chinese victimize Muslim Uyghurs and Tibetans while trying to annex Taiwan into the eastern version of the evil empire; yet China has a two millennial old tradition of racial and territorial expansion that is difficult to counter without Mongols or some other kind of mechanized cavalry surging down from the high plains or serpents of war rising up from the sea. While great fiction dragons make wonderful stuff for movies practical political actions leading to an increase in democracy and individual human and social rights are more challenging to bring to China especially when the U.S.A. itself is finding new ways to censor free speech at social media sites and concentrate wealth in the name of globalism.
Given the vast public debt the rich so kindly bestow upon the federal government it is no wonder U.S. government policy to chastise China for human rights violations is about as toothless as old people that fell through the cracks of dentistless Obamacare.
30 March 2021
Wrapping up national women's month
American women and homosexuals assuredly are more aggressive than they were in former times, although listening to the leader of the national Center for Disease Control say that she was frightened and had a sense of doom wasn't exactly inspiring to many. Sure results are more important than posing or superficialities yet a good leader should have qualities of good works and confidence-inspiring leadership.
Some day if the nation survives and is more than just a feminine subordinate employee of global plutocrats and socialist governments women may achieve real equality and dueling may return to legality in an over-populated world where everyone becomes unnecessary except for soteriological purposes. Networking and technology have made ad hoc organized petty crimes and collusion routine essential tools of the affirmative action set in their march to become a true dictatorship of the proletariat allegiant to global corporate. The natural feminine characteristic of gossip and networking socially serves the advance well. February was the month to commemorate George Washington and Abe Lincoln's births now forgotten and people realize that if the nation were being remade Martha Washington would be CEO of a cherry pie corporation and no slaves would be compelled to harvest cherries- just foreign guest workers.
29 March 2021
Will Antifa build up an American fascist party to have something real to protest against?
There was an actual historical fascist movement in Europe
that fructified in the Nazi war on Europe, yet it never had too much traction
in the United States or Mexico especially after the end of the Second World
war. Never in my experience as an American more than 65 years has there existed
a fascist movement in America of any substance. That is why the anti-fascist
movement named Antifa is disorienting; one wonders who or what they really are
protesting.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/antifa-armed-rioters-descend-on-oregon-state-capitol
Antifa seems to attend any popular left-leaning cause in
order to build it up to a more volatile level and piggyback the protest
upwardly. They are an accelerant of crisis rather than a catalyst, although as
a willing and ready go-to organization for conflict in a mercenary kind of way
perhaps they may be in the call-list for any number of people looking to create
civil disorder in support of a given cause.
So long as the civil disorders are someplace else, I suppose
many people aren't too concerned with the interminable unrest and protest. With
the election of 2020 over and decided mostly in favor of Democrats the
continuing lunatic extreme activity of Antifa because even more of an enigma.
Have they just named themselves Antifa to seem for public relations purposes to
have a real opponent they need to fight against in order to promote a
leftist-socialist-communist agenda? Do they receive international financial
support from foreign intelligence organizations or rich individuals seeking to
create strife in the United States?
My one concern is that Antifa in creating an imaginary enemy
will draft the creation of a real fascist party in the United States. They seem
to make the existence plausible and that plausibility supports normality as a
worthy opponent to an organization of ill repute that supports
communist-socialist causes.
My late father was a four-year veteran of the Second World
war on the anti-fascist side, yet there is no way he in the world that he would
have sympathized with Antifa. He
attended college in Salem Oregon. I attended a computer programming school in
Portland Ore. I would be uncomfortable in that city if were inclined to go
there with its inability to support a civil social environment that is
peaceful, ordinarily.
Democrats have encouraged Antifa and other uncivil methods
outside the usual political structures in normalizing disorder. Hillary Clinton
sought to marginalize Trump supporters and the hatred of Trump and Republicans
that voted for him continues to this day.
There are at least three kinds of Republican voters. One is
the rich and the would be rich that support Wall Street programs and are
globalists. Fundamentally they rule the party and, in many respects, share the
same ideas as wealthy Democrats. Antifa protests don't affect those Republicans
at all- their policy choices continue and wealth is concentrated.
The second kind of Republican voter is a traditional moral
conservative. They are adamantly opposed to liberal Democrat policies such as
abortion, homosexual marriage and atheist indoctrination. Those people are not
fascist for having morally conservative thought.
Some of that second group overlaps with a third group of
people sometimes sharing membership with the first two yet with distinctive,
differentiating ideas for-themselves. One shared idea may be anti-social
spending, one differentiating idea may be that cluster of ideas that are
ill-founded scientifically including no regard for global warming problems or
environmental decline, over-population and so forth. The third group also share
ideas about national security with the prior two including border sovereignty. The
third group is not implicitly fascist either.
A fourth element would comprise fewer than 5% of the
Republican party I would guess and does have racist beliefs. They would support
extremism yet usually are or were fairly quiet historically. Even with racist
beliefs they do not necessarily support a fascist political agenda. Fascists
were so marginalized in America before the rise of Antifa that they seem to be
trying to create that political agenda themselves.
There was racism and segregation in the American south of
course that slowly and methodically ended. By the 1970s blacks comprised as
much as 30% of American unions and the integration of the United States was
well under way. There wasn’t a Hispanic migration problem. With the radical
changes in the post-Vietnam war economics and outsourcing of industry even
before the end of the Cold war the political and economic policies of the United
States were rapidly changing and as some have noted, splintering.
Union membership declined with the end of quality union jobs
outside government unions generally. The peaceful social evolution of the
United States racially transformed gradually into agitation with so many
restive groups of females and minorities-even homosexuals seeking empowerment
through affirmative action and unsatisfied with that, with legislation to make resistance
to increasing legal and economic advantages futile. The problem was that real
wages for American white men had been arrested at the 1970s level with jobs
being outsourced and the influx of illegal migrant workers adding to the
general average stagnation of the income of the middle class and poor as the
rich simply divided new revenue among all the new workers as well as the old at
the same level as formerly went to mostly white men- profits were just
concentrated to the rich.
That is why the Antifa organization seems like a cargo cult
of politics to me ,with its oars in the water perhaps- heading toward Niagara
Falls. Increasing racial conflict tends to terminate the challenge of building non-emotional non racism. Racism develops along economic lines for economic reasons rather than rational ones. Ending racism that isn't legally structured or built in that make require civil disobedience to end requires non-hostile normal trade and commerce relations as people move about the nation and work.
28 March 2021
Side by side sleeping configs for President's child captives in El Paso reinforces disease transmission
President Biden is apparently failing to adequately manage the surge of child captives arrested while illegal infiltrating to the U.S.A. from Mexico. The problem is not simply that his policy encouraged development of the crisis, it also exposes the children to risky airborne viral contact from being packed in too close in captivity.
Children are some of the worst virus vectors in the U.S.A. Schools are incubators for the flu and other diseases that spread like wildfire typically so packing kids in side by side for sleeping on a floor while in captivity is an especially egregious way to prepare to infect all those kids with whatever is going around, on release to 'relatives' in the U.S.A. they will take their viral contagions with them.
I had some experience with sleeping side by side on the floor at a homeless shelter in Anchorage one December a decade ago with several people that experienced frostbite. I caught the flu and then pneumonia that stayed with me for the better part of the next ten years providing residual symptomatic reminders that very, very slowly faded away. It was said that everybody catches something at the over-crowded shelter. Who knows what kind of exotic viruses exist in Central America from whence the kids have travelled; they all share it like rem among themselves in their corral before being sent infected to sites across the U.S.A.
Why the United States is so slow at innovating domestic solutions to problems in a timely way is a mystery to me. Although I don't support illegal migration to the U.S.A. nor providing thousands of teenage girls to the tender mercies of San Diego, developing and implementing competent, compassionate conservative processing of migrants should be a fundamental skill of governance.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ted-cruz-biden-dhs-staffer-video-donna-migrants
27 March 2021
Which global ad hoc alliance has its oars in the water?
China and Iran recently signed a 25 agreement for cooperation with technology and economics. Russia and China have in recent years drawn closer together on economics and other works. Russia and Turkey have developed select military sales and cooperation. The relationships together seem to add up to being an informal international economic and military alliance in basic competition with the United States and whatever other nations are part of the western, N.A.T.O. and G-12 economic alliance.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/27/iran-china-agreement-478236
The eastern alliance (I will call it that for lack of a
better term easy to find) is a new world order politically speaking. The
western new world order boiled down to being one dedicated to making the world
homosexual and bisexually normalized and that in part reinforced the
development of the counter-alliance.
The post-war new world order to the west was one of
concentrated wealth and power gravitationally attracted to plutocrats
reinforced by legions of minions from both major American parties, Europeans
and others chasing after corporate jobs. The new world order of the west had
accelerating micro-transistor gadgets driving networking, technology and
economics. Atheism evolutionary doctrines reinforced the movement of
traditional immorality toward the political center, yet extremism is difficult
to make a new normal for natural reasons, and the effort unbalanced political
sensibilities- a political rift energized in the west
The west’s judgment after-the-fact that winning the cold war
meant that greed was o.k. dispensed with trying to build economic ties with
Russia while it sanctioned Russian leaders for trying to keep lands that had
been part of Russia from 250 to 1000 years part of Russia. Greed and the wish
to put down Russian government resistance the homosexual agenda drove Russians
to find alliance with China though carefully for China has long presented an
implicit military threat of attacking and annexing the vast Siberian lands of
the east. Russia, Turkey and Iran all tend towards substantial opposition to
the western agenda of homosexuality, middle eastern policies including war
while China is seeking to expand its sphere of influence in Africa, Central
Asia, the Middle East, Pacific and elsewhere.
The unexpected new ad hic eastern alliance of course reminds
one of Orwell’s novel 1984 with its interminable war between vast yet vague
planetary states. One of the key differences is that the United States built up
China’s economy, along with others, by investing there to produce items sent to
the U.S.A. with a great markup to enrich Wall Street. China has become such an
important part of the U.S. economy that it is too big to fail and can wield its
economic power in forming planetary alliances with those countries the United
State’s government policy has left to the tender mercies of international
economics, sanctioned or ben at loggerheads with.
The Chinese-Iran 25-year partnerships seems to be a direct
response to the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the Obama era arms
control for cash agreement that gave a pathway to nuclear weapons development
fructifying in 25 years. Maladroit U.S. policy that dropped the ball on
developing good relations with post-Cold war Russia because of the comparative
and short-sided lust for land in Ukraine, the Crimea and to exclude Russia from
trade relations in Europe that would compete with American business coupled
with the inability to return to good relations with Iran as swiftly as possible
supported the rise of the present state of affairs that U.S. leadership isn’t
likely to be able to quickly recognized, resolve in its favor or efficiently
ignore. A policy of greed works against abstract thought and goals that are
intelligent and just, necessary and utilitarian.
U.S. leadership isn’t too likely to reform its foreign or
domestic policies enough to well keep the U.S.A. leading rather than following
in the future. Concentrated wealth and loose border security, social media
owned by the rich allowing free speech primarily only if it reinforces
corporate power and an attitude that the U.S.A. does not make foreign policy
errors prevails to arrest intelligent design of god policy formation. For some
reason Ronald Regan got away with his goal of tearing down the wall and reducing
nuclear weapons, yet subsequents have ditched the spirit of that part of Reagan
policy except as it was the foundation for an expansion of greed.
A more powerful China and Iran in the Middle East does not
mean that the incorrect hermeneutical work of eschatology that has Armageddon
and Kittim is gathering strength. The post-millenniaist rather than the pre or
amillennialist interpretation is correct; yet that does not preclude wars or
planetary suicide through stupid international relations policies.
A more powerful China and Iran present more challenges to
the Sunni kingdom and Sunni states from the Shi’a-Chinese Atheist axis that is
somewhat ponderous. The U.S.A. is also working to alienate the Saudis presently
because it hasn’t got female taxi drivers and its leader apparently order a
journalist critic to be lured into the Turkish embassy, killed and hacked down
into nice, easy-to-pack pieces. The King, sultan or whatever he is called may
be sorry though he is recalcitrant about expressing his sorrow publicly.
Basically, the United States should establish a basic
minimum income for its citizen of $10,000, secure its borders and allow zero
illegal immigration and begin the graduation towards a 99% ecologically
sustainable economic infrastructure and make political priorities that
reinforce business with high eco-efficiency. As the world leader at sustainable
economic the United States would have an alibi for existing at a higher
standard of living than much of the rest of the world; it would help other nations
to rise to a high standard of sustainable ecospheric compatible living.
The U.S.A. would need to have polices and laws that limit
the size of corporations and the concentration of wealth in order to keep free
enterprise and democracy vital. Patents would need to be limited to three years
with 10% royalties to inventors after exclusivity expires to accelerate the
infusion of technological change into economic actualization.
Corporations limited to 5000 workers would be free to make
temporary relationships with other corporations to produce items that need more
hands. No citizen could own shares of more than three corporations- economics
need be about productivity rather than abstract financial skimming.
The United States should aggressively work to normalize
relations with Russia and employ Reagan’s policy of constructive engagement
that preceded the end of apartheid.
To continue the
adverse relations with Russia very long while continuing to enrich China and
transfer technology to it will further weaken American standing in the world
though it is flooded with illegal aliens providing cheap labor for Democrats
. Even if more women and minorities get government jobs at
good pay with benefits and godless and immoral corporate policies make
entertaining video, though there are select risks of war with the United States
military becoming increasingly irrelevant with no one to fight with for
political reasons. There is no guarantee that bad policy to destroy the
environment will stop. There is no certainty that social security will not stop
as one vote majorities decide to end the Roosevelt era program in order to
afford to defeat the eastern alliance with 100 trillion dollars of public debt
holding them back, or even that the dollar will not collapse because most of
the money fled to bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies.
If the United States had fought the Cold War alone against
Russia and China while heavily investing in the Chinese economy it might have
fared better and wrapped up the conflict quicker- or is that idea the wrong
one?
Hate crimes and race strife will help form the news cycle
the next few years as may gun bans in order to buy more time for politicians to
focus on concentrating wealth and making America a better airport for
globalists while providing good jobs and housing for illegal arrivals; nothing
like good distractions to help implement the new world order.
26 March 2021
Sweetie's instant evolution accelerator for just five easy payments
The idea occurred to me of the comedy product named Sweetie's instant evolution accelerator. I can imagine the surfeit of political applications and sales pitches that could arise to help politicians 'evolve' their thought platforms from what they were to something else that is more suitable for increasing proplits.
I will let you imagine some of those for-yourself.
Pre-destination and a level four multiverse
Predestination is a difficult concept for many of the Christian faith. It implies that God has pre-determined the entire Universe and the role of people in it. Some in the secular have speculated that if the Universe is entirely deterministic no one is accountable for their actions- combined with rampant disbelief in God that is accompanied with a belief in the non-existence of objective moral laws made by the Creator. There is a good explanatory video on the concept of predestination by RC Sproul- a good theology instructor that explains the Christian point of view.
So I wanted to say that predestination seems almost necessary to me since God is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. The created Universe is comparable to a thought in the mind of God that he has had from start to finish and foreknows from eternity. In a way one might infer that the perfection of God has thought of everything that ever would be thought from eternity with Himself, for-himself. Others learn what glimpses of data God wills them to experience when that was in his design for whatever purpose He has and when the Holy Spirit and CEO Jesus Christ actualize.
There is a physical account of an entirely pre-determined multiverse. While I believe that every possible Universe that could ever exist in time already exists in the mind of God, the physicist Max Tegmark made a cosmological explanation of the way the Universe and multiverse may exist already actualized- every Universe that could possibly exist does exist already, fully from the beginning and end of its history.
It is funny that evolution is a paradigm that well supports the theological paradigm of pre-destination inasmuch as God foreknows who will evolve to accept salvation through Jesus Christ and who should receive the grace of the Holy Spirit to be led that way; and who would not. Those that evolve to be anti-Christian and faithless souls naturally are unsuitable for eternal life in the presence of God. They evolve with free will and select unbelief for-themselves.
I believe that concept may have originated with the late physicist Hugh Everett. Well, at any rate, Max Tegmark fully elucidated the multiverse and went into more complete description. I will post a video where Tegmark explains his concept of the multiverse.
Tegmark also wrote a book titled 'The Mathematical Universe' that is still quite a good read though a few years old. At the core he speculates the Universe and multiverse be actually be made of math, and that idea again is fine with me since God is a pretty good mathematician Himself I would think and math exists in mind rather than as physical objects.
The entire multiverse may be actualized from alpha to omega and it is just the minds of sentient beings that move through it switch with every thought to the appropriate location and universe. That sounds terribly complex and improbable perhaps, yet is may be that it actually is. The divine mechanics of God are likely to be more difficult to know for humans than quantum mechanics that are themselves challenging for non-scientists, non-physics majors ordinary folks.
Many people have difficulty juggling the idea of Christian determinism and physical determinism especially with the concept of quantum uncertainty thrown in, juxtaposed like a plank of space dimensions into time. The physical universe of energy, based on math or thought as a healthful pre-existing condition. One should enjoy it rather than wait for the ordinary authorities of education to be clued in to the point of making it doctrine.
If Covid 19 did escape from Wuhna lab, that demonstrates the risks in modern virology and DNA-RNA research
A former head of the Center for Disease control expressed the opinion that the Covid 19 virus escaped from a Wuhan lab that was researching various bat excrements nuggets for viral research. Regardless of the truth or falsehood of that vector of delivery there should not be antipathy toward the Chinese and American researchers that worked at the lab or the people of China nor that Chinese guy in Los Angeles who sells tacos to the hungry masses yearning for salsa and sweet and sour sauce on their hamburger. The virus should be viewed as a test of the planetary emergency response capacity toward lethal pathogens that may arise in the future given that their is a surfeit of research with new technology going on every continent of your basic Earth.
One day there will probably be instructions describing how to build your own lethal pathogen distributed widely on the dark web under a special damp rock in a dank sub-basement someplace that will allow the second year biology student to assemble his own designer virus. It is just a matter of time until someone yields to the temptation one would think and a perennial ostrich outlook might not be the best response.
https://nypost.com/2021/03/26/ex-cdc-director-believes-covid-19-came-from-wuhan-lab/
Ending Senate filibuster rule might herald the start of reign by coercion era
Ending the Senate filibuster rule that requires sixty votes to overcome would enable rule by a majority of one to be the new normal in the legislative branch, at least while the Senate is evenly divided and the VP casts the winning vote. It would start and era of increasing partisan division and end any semblance of concurrence is U.S. governance wherein laws are not really supposed to be made without a majority of the people through their elected representation going along with it. That is there should be something of a consensus in a general opinion about promulgating a new law instead of a slight advantage that can force onerous laws upon half of the nation.
Not surprisingly Senator Biden has expressed support for ending the filibuster rule.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/filibuster-reform-senate-biden-republican-abuse/
That opinion is wrong and lacks an historical perspective without a sense of keeping the nation together rather than ripping it apart like some kind of gourmet pulled-pork.
25 March 2021
Writers should be wary of corporate intel gathering social media sites
Writers should be careful contributing to corporate social media sites like Quora that may pay a little for contributing content. Corporate has very deep pockets and is networked on Wall Street. Appealing to the masses they can vacuum up content and information and use it to learn about American political sentiments. They can also censor writers and delete content, ban writers and/or content for violating corporate policy which can be interpreted of course many ways. If one is not politically to the left questions at Quora for example can be regarded as hostile or not sincere and evoke warnings and temporary bans. A writer and question asker can work for hundreds of hours and not receive a penny in compensation and his copyright trail security put at risk. One morning one logs in to discover one is locked out and receives a hate e-mail describing all of the offenses one has committed on the corporate web site. How troubling it is to learn that one’s best writing is ‘vandalism’.
The more questions one asks at Quora the more comments One
may get. I replied to at least make an evaluation on every comment and that
consumes hours. One is paid (in theory) for asking questions rather than for
writing essays and answers. My writing was viewed 11,500 times the last month
and was increasing a few hundred each day.
Social media sites that decide to ban a writer usually
confiscate unpaid earnings and may continue to profit from the questions and
answers a writer has contributed, when the writer is gone. They also are like
to dump numerous slanderous and false accusations about the writer in order to
intimidate and to justify their extreme adverse action.
Corporations are not individuals, yet the law in some senses
regards corporations as individuals; irresponsible ones that don’t need to
suffer the consequences of their actions in some ways because they do not
actually exist as living beings.
Corporations are collectives and exert tremendous corrupting social
effects on the U.S.A. Some reform is wanted to reign in their transformative,
non-democratic social governing power. Imagine if Olympic individual events
like boxing or judo allowed collectives to compete against real individuals.
Big collectives should not be free to smear individuals with a plethora of
quasi-legal labels when they decide to kill a writer’s work after first
inviting them to participate. The collective then acts as a big international
info-terrorist agency calling to mind an old marching lyric; ‘a yellow bird with
a yellow bill was sitting on my window sill, I lured it in with crumbs of bread
and then I smashed its f’ing head’.
The United States was founded on principles of individual
rights and freedoms rather than corporate or collective rights masquerading as
individuals. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is the
justice most heavily invested in Wall Street collectives and casting vote for
homosexual marriage- a corporate collectivist policy. Corporations are ending
the era of America as a nation of strong individualism and rendering it unto
global fascist collectivist entities. Corporations and corporate wealth buy and
sell other ‘individuals’ (corporations) as it suits their purposes of acquiring
wealth, political and financial power; they own the broadcast media and annihilate
the value of U.S. citizenship with a surfeit of trans-national ‘business’.
Corporations, unlike individuals, can be everywhere on Earth at the same time
with a foot upon every continent and nation.
It would be very easy to write an algorithm that would
enable a writer to know which content is not liked by the corporation and to
put it on a list for corrections or removal, rather than to keep things hidden
until the writer is suspended temporarily two or three times and then nuked.
Social media sites soliciting writers to ‘partner’ as in the case at Quora and
to share earnings may be taking the first step out the door to being banned- it
is a god route to take to remove writers that would not otherwise be banned
simply for writing essays from a right-of-center point of view (the social
media sites tend to have a leftist-corporatist point of view and view criticism
of corporation concentrating wealth very dimly. There can be no excuse for
failing to write a proper algorithm that can sort, classify, hold, release and
otherwise process individual questions and answers in a way that is fair and
that prevents the need or opportunity for the corporate controller to suddenly
detonate a writer’s work and ban him form the website. It is just the will of
corporate to make demiurge, little gods of power of themselves working to rule
the free publishing and politics of the people of the United States and planet.
I graduated from a computer programming and systems analysis
course in 1981 so I know that it isn’t too difficult to write computer algorithms
and sort materials posted into neat little files that would let a writer know
what is troublesome to the corporate publisher and what isn’t. It takes a crude
and crass will to power and control to attack and force through bans with
justifications in the fine print and applied hermeneutics of the atheist
priesthood of corporate policy dogma. They expect writers to be witless idiot
minions that are as bland as Adolph Eichmann writing banal questions and
bureaucratic, authoritative replies. I read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s book ‘The
Cancer Ward’ and it had a prologue transcript of his interview by the local
Soviet censorship board. It is worth reading. The United States is evolving to
be that kind of society spliced into the pig-dog of corporatism and The Brave
New World. The most promotable are those amoral youth that regard use-truth as
more truthful that objective facts in the belief that al truth and meaning is
subjective.
Deep pockets and vast interconnected wealth mean that
corporate media can be nothing more than shills for the rich so they can get
any worthwhile thoughts from anyone so far as possible. It can mean that they
can have a political check so basic as to know what sort of actions might be
useful for manipulating stories and spinning political news to their own ends.
In time politics in the United States outside of corporate control may simply
perish and the will to power of corporate wealth will be complete.
Corporate power to censor or control and even repress
individual writers has no limits these days. In several respects the United
States has taken on some of the characteristics of the communist party of the
former Soviet Union with the rich in the role of the elite of the C.P.U. They
desired a one-party state and in the United States the corporate party is
fulfilling that goal of dictatorship over the proletariat.
One of the useful tools of the U.S.A. as a reincarnation of
the essence of the F.S.U. is Darwinian evolution ideology that has made it
excusable to have purely secular morality and the downgrading and ridicule in
some cases of people of faith in God. Science can provide information about the
material universe, and humans may misinterpret the paradigmatic axis of the
book of Genesis, yet all may fail to be able to comprehend that the Bible is
the actual truth and is not in conflict with the natural order of the creation.
Humans misunderstand cosmology and hermeneutics while pastors may have wrong
creation and eschatological ideas to balance the anti-faith ideas pervasive
with some in the community of physicists. Corporations and their minions can
actually instill a spirit in exerting repressive evolutionary actions and
controls to force humanity to accept their atheist world-view. The great benefit
for the rich is that they can concentrate wealth and believe they are improving
the social life of humanity by forcing secular worldview morality and social
structure everyplace on Earth.
Homosexual ‘marriages’ are one of the most obvious evolution
paradigm establishments forced recently upon the people of the United States by
the Supreme Court of the United States. It is interesting that German
theologians have criticized the Pope for failing to give blessings to
homosexual marriages. For implementation of the new world order of homosexual
and bi-sexual social hegemony and usurpation of existing family structures it
is useful to have sympathizers rise to occupy social positions of authority
including those of the church, and to downgrade traditionalists. With
sympathetic authorities even the church can have its morality corrupted and
secularized, much less the judiciary and other political offices. If the laity
or the masses protest, they can be told to eat it for they are not expert and
haven’t the graduate degrees and expertise that insiders with authoritative
opinions have, in some cases because they couldn’t afford to do so.
Noah (Quora)
Mar 23, 2021, 11:29 AM PDT
Hi Gary,
Thank you for writing regarding the ban on your account.
Quora believes that all members of the community should make
an effort to contribute helpful content to the community and, ultimately, make
the site a better resource for all.
The following are some of the reasons for which we will ban
an account:
- They vandalize content on the site that is editable by
everyone, including questions
(https://www.quora.com/What-is-Quoras-policy-on-vandalizing-questions) and answer
summaries.
- They engage in one or more actions that violate the Be
Nice, Be Respectful policy
(https://www.quora.com/What-are-Quoras-two-key-policy-principles). These
actions may relate to questions, answers, or comments.
- They post a significant number of questions
(https://www.quora.com/What-kind-of-questions-on-Quora-arent-OK-What-is-Quoras-policy-on-question-deletion),
answers (https://www.quora.com/Why-are-answers-and-reviews-on-Quora-collapsed),
and/or comments that aren't helpful.
- They repeatedly violate Quora policies
(https://www.quora.com/What-are-major-policies-and-guidelines-on-Quora) and/or
do not change their behavior after receiving a content warning.
- The account is linked to suspicious and/or malicious
activity.
After reviewing your activity on Quora, we can confirm that
your account was banned due to being linked to suspicious and/or malicious
activity.
Unfortunately, the ban on your account will not be
overturned. This decision is final, and you will no longer be able to use Quora.
If there is anything else we can help you with, please let
us know.
Sincerely,
Noah
User Support
Quora
Noah (Quora)
Mar 24, 2021, 2:50 PM PDT
Hello Gary,
Thank you for writing back.
Since your account has been banned for violating our
policies and/or terms of service, any payouts that have not occurred yet will
be canceled, and you will no longer be eligible to receive earnings for the
Partner Program.
If you would like your content and profile to be permanently
deleted, and personal data associated with your account removed from Quora’s
databases, please reply to this message to confirm so our team can send you a
deletion link that will initiate the deletion process.
If you have any other concerns, please feel free to contact
us.
Sincerely,
Noah
User Support
Quora
24 March 2021
German Catholic Theologians may be too homo to accept the Popes statement rejecting blessing of homo marriage
Catholic theologians of Germans are restive and critical about the Pope's decision to reject blessing homosexual marriage. That shows how far the Catholic Church has fallen from its glory days during the middle ages before it chose to fight with Protestant reformers like Martin Luther. Germany has had religious issues for a very long time.
The Bible is plain in condemning homosexuality and homosexual marriages and any theologian worth his salt has no trouble in seeing that. However a secularized Germany that is drowned in Darwinist evolution and technology with a long tradition of a state church- even to this day, may present a tough nut for the Catholic Church to find men willing to serve; hence they may attract more than their share of homosexuals to the priesthood that would like to be able to marry themselves to one another for fun and games while taking a break from the tough chores of theological contemplations.
https://religionnews.com/2021/03/23/its-the-vaticans-lgbtq-theology-that-is-disordered/
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/15/world/europe/vatican-same-sex-unions.html
German Catholic theologians are not alone in wishing to make a farce of the Catholic and Christian Church; Episcopalians have also selected the road to hell and offer support to Germans wishing to go on the broad road leading to destruction.
For traditional Christians with moderate beliefs the ongoing destruction of Christian values to confirm the church to secularized evolutionary values is concerning. In a social environment that has experience a loss of faith due to the rise of Darwinian natural philosophy the transformation or evolution of the Church to a non-spiritual and even anti-Christian reformation is a logical development. The church does have a secular, worldly city to inhabit while the heavenly city is a distant hope that is increasingly dim to the worldly.
With the ongoing loss of faith and development unto doom the Pope may need to look ahead to the future degradation of the Church as it moves toward pure ritualized secularism and ask himself if that is what he really wants. Perhaps it is time for him to consider a deep reformation of the Church so far that it reunites with conservative protestant churches in a priesthood of believers format- a new auxiliary church as it were, that allows full participation of confessing Christian in basic and timeless Christian values with priestly roles shared in small groups along structured liturgical lines that are rotated from week to week.
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/544676-pope-cuts-salaries-for-cardinals-clerics-to-save-other-jobs
A Christian church in a modern and skeptical post-Darwinian world with universal literacy, democracy and a measure of egalitarianism should be realistic about supporting a church for people of actual faith that are participating because they believe and want to without concern for establishing a personal ecclesiastical career. That church for a priesthood of believers- every Christian is a priest Martin Luther wrote; should provide spiritual and secular reinforcement for the Christian life of people of faith. It shouldn't be that difficult.
Here is a free book with some commentary concerning the secularized post-Darwinian challenge to the Church and apologetics.
It wasn't every necessary for the great division between those that regard marriage as strictly heterosexual and those that believe it isn't. If the homosexual crowd hadn't desired social hegemony they could have pressed for the establishment of a new institution for homosexual couples or triples etc. and left marriage alone. They instead chose the way of social domination to force the world to conform to their new world order. They set the footing for protracted social conflict, and that didn't do anyone any good.
23 March 2021
Ideas for an Honest Voting Technology
Besides paper votes and hanging chads the United States in its vast number of voting districts in different states has had some inconsistencies in getting honest vote tallies that leave out issues of ambiguity concerning the veracity of the vote. What can be done to realistically restore the vote to reliability.
In the modern era some sort of electronic and analogue vote technology probably will continue to be used. To assure that each voter is the true legally registered voter a face i.d. that can be electronically verified with a voter endorsement would need to go ahead. Once Real ID is everywhere in the 50 states automatic registration of voters of age to vote should go ahead so a voter can vote without any other registration required.
When going in to vote the ID would be inserted in a machine that would issue a voters number that would go print on the eballot. The voter would get a receipt with his or her voter number on it to keep and check out on the internet at a web site listing every voter number that cast a vote.
It would be hard to cast a fake vote, or to throw out a vote, misunderstand a vote or for any voter not to be able to vote..
Republicans should have to worry about fake votes and Democrats shouldn't have trouble getting registered voters to to make it to vote.
Banned from Quora- another Democrat centered web site
Noah (Quora)
Mar 23, 2021, 11:29 AM PDT
Thank you for writing regarding the ban on your account.
Quora believes that all members of the community should make an effort to contribute helpful content to the community and, ultimately, make the site a better resource for all.
The following are some of the reasons for which we will ban an account:
- They vandalize content on the site that is editable by everyone, including questions (https://www.quora.com/What-
- They engage in one or more actions that violate the Be Nice, Be Respectful policy (https://www.quora.com/What-
- They post a significant number of questions (https://www.quora.com/What-
- They repeatedly violate Quora policies (https://www.quora.com/What-
- The account is linked to suspicious and/or malicious activity.
After reviewing your activity on Quora, we can confirm that your account was banned due to being linked to suspicious and/or malicious activity.
Unfortunately, the ban on your account will not be overturned. This decision is final, and you will no longer be able to use Quora.
If there is anything else we can help you with, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Noah
User Support
Quora
my reply...
| 8:55 AM (3 minutes ago) | ![]() ![]() | ||
| ||||
Could Bruce Jenner have won the 1980 Olympic decathlon as a trans-woman?
Mississippi making it illegal for trans-women to compete in female sports events raises an interesting questions about the sportingness of trans-woman taking over female sports. Is there a substantial degradation of physical abilities in cutting down from male to female as in the case of the 1976 Olympic decathlon winner for men Bruce Jenner.
If Bruce Jenner had surgically and chemically transformed himself to a neo-female just after the 1976 Olympics he have won the 1980 Olympic decathlon as a woman competing in female events?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caitlyn_Jenner
What about other great athletes; could Wilt Chamberlain have played in the female N.B.A. if trans-womanized, and would he-she have been any good?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4GMUpQcf_s
22 March 2021
Do Republicans have a good female candidate for President in 2024?
If the Republican party really wanted to win the next Presidential election they need to run a woman candidate. Plainly Joe Biden was elected on the skirt-tails of the female Kamala Harris. Tokenism is everything these days, so Republicans may be looking north to Lisa Murkowski to bail them out of the mess.
Serious debate about Ms. Murkowski being a malaprop or
malapropos candidate- or even the French malaprop meaning 'messy' could arise. Nothing
worse in America than messiness- one need have diligent scrubbers deploying Mr.
Clean around the clock. Maybe there are better Republican females that would
let Republican candidates ride the skirt-tails to retake the legislative
branch, yet they need to get hot on finding one with a new and improved
compassionate conservativism.
U.S. nationalism is the key-word to the middle and lower class Republicans concerned with jobs and morality being outsourced, chewed over and regurgitated back to them via Wal-mart and a plethora of management and CEO Values with godless Chinese communist atheism, abortion and everything besides homosexual marriage that seems to be a British import.
Americans apparently vote for skin, gender, jobs and pro or anti-perversion; a candidate that can check off three of four boxes generally should win. A Republican female concerned about morality, jobs and compassionate health care and basic income- even making environmentally positive noises- should be a shoe in to trounce old Joe in 2024.
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Upgrading standard hard-plastic Halloween masks with eye covering and nose and mouth filters probably would substantially reduce the odds of...
-
President Trump made a statement today that Ukraine can't win just being defensive. He said offense is necessary to win a war. He also...
