Tom Brady Can't Expropriate the Real Tom Terrific's Name

New England Quarterback is trying to trademark the venerable Tom Terrific name that was part of American history for the boomers. Tom Terrific was an early childhood T.V. cartoon character from 1957-1959 who made an impression on countless Americans. What future NFL quarterback will seek to trademark Big Bird?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PgniqcgdFo Tom Terrific

Boomer Esiason, former NFL quarterback has opposed the attempted expropriation. He believes the phrase belongs to former Mets pitcher Tom Seaver. Apparently NFL quarterbacks don't realize that one can't play Mickey Mouse with Tom Terrific.

Communist Chinese play loose with intellectual properties- the NFL shouldn't.

https://nesn.com/2019/06/boomer-esiason-disgusted-with-tom-bradys-sleazy-trademark-request/

President Trump's Sunday Church Hairstyle Reminds Us of Dr Billy Graham's

The President's Sunday go to church hair reminds one of the late Billy Graham's. That was appropriate. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-new-hairstyle-prompts-speculation-on-social-media

https://theslot.jezebel.com/the-president-changed-his-hair-and-it-actually-looked-b-1835198419

                                             image of the President posted on Twitter

Does US Government Have a Right to Know if Many U.S. Citizens Live in U.S.A.?

With maybe tens of millions of illegal aliens living in the United States many Democrats wonder what right the government has to know if any citizens still live in the country? The 2020 census has the effrontery to ask people if they are a citizen or not. Democrats know the government has no right to be so snoopy and should just shut up.

The Supreme Court will decide if the question is o.k. or abusive or even hate speech. If Democrats have their way then maybe Russia can provide via Facebook, answers to unasked census questions about the U.S.A.

Mexican Tariffs Aren't Penny Wise and Pound Foolish

It is rare that one has the opportunity to use old cliches to describe current events. In the instance of tariffs on Mexico one might recognize that President Trump was not penny wise and pound foolish. If one doesn’t defend the nation against millions of illegal immigrants from all around the world entering the U.S. illegally, and all of the cross-border drug trafficking, in order to satisfy some global capitalist investors in Mexican production, one could lose the nation, rendering it a tribal area or subroutine of foreign interests eventually.

There is no harm in doing things the right way in national political affairs. Often there are right and wrong courses of statesmanship to take against the paradigm of historically better or worse positions for a nation to take. President Trump is making the hard yet right decision in defending the border from a neighbor nation with an aggressive, perverse attitude toward U.S. border integrity, even though there are tens of millions of Democrats in the United States that are for loose, ineffective enforcement. They prefer to abort American children and build the nation with illegal immigrants and their five kids per coupling unit.

President Obrador Could Lock the Illegal Door to the U.S.A.

Mexican President Obrador seems to support a loose, revolving U.S.-Mexico border door for illegals of all kinds in great numbers to traffic about. Even so, he has many opportunities to upgrade Mexico’s state internally, domestically, levering national political resistance in Mexico to ordinary infrastructural changes he could make.

President Obrador could change Mexican patent law and reduce the period of exclusivity to three years with ten percent royalties going to the inventor-patent holder by any users that manufacture and sell the product after the three years are gone. That would stimulate patent applications in Mexico and manufacture of items of all sorts.

Mexico has had some fuel supply issues that followed President Obrador’s closure of some pipelines that were illegally tapped for billions of dollars worth of gas by criminal gangs. Petrol was in short supply in some places, though hybrid and electric car sales went up. President Obrador could support Mexican production of electric vehicles that are very light and inexpensive; something like electric go-carts imitating formula race carbs, and support local solar panel manufacture to create solar infrastructure to recharge cars; especially in Mexico City where in time a ban on petrol burning cars could restore air quality. GM is beginning to build ev’s in Mexico, and many international manufacturers sell there already.

A green-car market blossoms in Mexico (A green-car market blossoms in Mexico)

A Mexico City with plentiful solar panels and electric vehicle recharging stations- special lanes for ultra-light electric vehicles etc could bring in much new business. So much that Mexicans might stay home and not cross over to the U.S.A. in such great numbers. Making Mexico great again won’t be easy- yet they just got a new heavyweight world-champion boxer to brag about, and eliminating drug cartels, human trafficking and so forth will be simpler with tight border security and a great electric vehicles production and sales industry.

Start up operations Mexico (Start up operations Mexico)

Already several auto makers sell or are starting to produce electric vehicles in Mexico. An entirely new electric car manufacturer as started up in the state of Pueblo. President Obrador could readjust his outlook on transportation, solar power, drug smuggling and human trafficking and work for a new sobriety in border law enforcement that is a cool breeze in a hot desert.

Solar Energy Manufacturers in Mexico (Solar Energy Manufacturers in Mexico

Hickenlooper, Trump, Andy Ruiz Jr and Kamala Harris

When Mexican heavyweight fighter Andy Ruiz  technically knocked out Anthony Joshua to capture several world heavyweight boxing titles, one saw the direct,  pragmatic Mexican style of taking over things it can get. When one saw a tall hairy guy walk on stage  and take a microphone from Democrat Presidential candidate Kamala Harris one saw the Democrat Party way of just giving things up. She actually appeared to lift up the microphone for his trophy.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48487984 the microphone loss incident

Apparently Bernie Sanders actually was a 1980s communist or Marxist accelerator as a Social Workers party partisan, and Democrats seemed to believe that only in such an individual could one find anyone willing to raise taxes on the most rich; even Warren Buffet and other billionaires have spoken in support of higher taxes on their class.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/bernie-sanders-campaigned-for-marxist-party-in-reagan-era

The challenge for the nation is to modify its Democracy delivery such that the rich don't own the political system and prevent a gradual change to an ecospherically rational, sustainable economic method with appropriate infrastructure. A stable and disciplined government structure with the counter-intuitive maximum civil liberties defenses for individuals is required. Reforming the economy to an ecologically sustainable one requires much discipline, yet not that of an onerous authoritarian state forcing everyone to wear gray sackcloth, keep their heads down and trudge in lockstep in breadlines.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/bernie-sanders-campaigned-for-marxist-party-in-reagan-era

Democrats just don't have solid leadership intelligence or character any more. Except maybe John Hickenlooper, former governor of Colorado, who was willing to tell San Francisco socialists to stick it and genuflect on Fidel's tomb outside the Democrat Party, in a manner of speaking.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/446500-hickenlooper-booed-in-san-francisco-for-denouncing-socialism

It is hard to imagine Ronald (I paid for this microphone) Reagan or Donald Trump so easily relinquishing a microphone and leadership.

About Special Relativity vs. General Relativity Again

Within special relativity criteria one finds that sort of comparative relationship of time and mass seeming to increase for slower objects compared to those travelling near light speed I suppose. I wonder though if mass moving nearly light speed through various fields-even virtual fields, doesn’t encounter resistance that seems like virtual mass gain even with characteristics of increased mass phenomenally. I think of general relativity and gravity changing spatial shape even to the point of bending the path of photons travelling around stars.

For some reason I have thought that Einstein intended to mean that significant mass accelerating nearly to space time would itself encounter ‘headwinds’ of field resistance comparable to that of a bicyclist riding faster into a headwind experiencing increased resistance. If gravity is a field, or if space and virtual particles have mass, an object passing close to the speed of light might in some way experience concatenated effects. I thought that is why there aren’t asteroids travelling at the speed of light though a nova or some such might explode at a very fast speed and accelerate such large objects. I don’t know of any large objects that travel at the speed of light, except some rotating black holes. Since they have so much gravity anyway (apparently there is no limit to the intensity of a gravitational field - it only need collapse spacing of mass) it seems reasonable that they can spin nearly at the speed of light.