Guessing P.M. May's Next Vector Fork Brexit

 British P.M. Theresa May having survived a vote of confidence test in her conservative party has some few months to get her Brexit bill passed by a recalcitrant parliament that would prefer to have her cake and eat it too or let the hard natural Brexit evolution become fact 29 May 2019 when the lines would be cut to EU pirate ships plundering British booty. What is her secret recipe the next few months?

The Brit PM might organize an alternative global economic organization with the British former Empire at the core yet welcoming anyone that wants to be member of a preferred trade and business group without any sort of social surrender requirements regarding sovereignty. It is possible that she might sell a new ecological economic trade organization that lets nations join whom are willing to work sustainable economic policies and measures within her new economic organization. At least the organization might allow just sustainable businesses the zero-tariff free trade while taxing anything else that would seek to pass through the green screen.

Probably leaving without an agreement is best for Britain insofar as Britain is enough of a party house as it is and millions of migrants arriving to plunder and trash the place wouldn't be too helpful. Alternatively may have a Russian economic collusion card she could play after Brexit is wrapped up to bring Russian into a new economic order with Britain being the non-space business brain to develop Russia for a profit.

Actually there are too many economic possibilities to enumerate in a brief note for the British PM to potentially utilize. PM May could choose a conservative Wilsonian reform direction or a liberal Thacherite equalization of trade globally within any of several potential international organizational formats She could create and lead. Instead of the many EU encumbrances that made belonging an onerous duty to those without ecological economic ideas for-themselves or for-others May's Thatcherian updates could induct new players into a more equitable business union.

Sen Schumer- Illogical Wall Funding Ideas

Senator Chuck Schumer illogically believes that because Mexico will pay indirectly for the wall through increased U.S. income from revision of NAFTA the U.S. Government doesn't need to appropriate funds to build the wall. If that sort of reasoning is typical of federal politicians it easily explains why there is a twenty trillion dollar public debt.

Senator Schumer may believe that foreign governments directly fund U.S. government projects while the Senate sits on its ambition. Yet Mueller is investigating President Trump instead of Schumer for foreign collusion. 
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/12/13/schumer_there_will_be_no_additional_appropriations_to_pay_for_border_wall.html

US Judge Body Slams Obamacare- Dems May Tap Out

After a Federal Judge in Texas body slammed Obamacare ruling the individual mandate unconstitutional Democrats that forcibly snuck passage of Obamacare through a congressional recess should tap out and look for a new match for health care that actually includes the poor that must travel interstate for work annually. Those people were left out of the Obamacare program that was designed for obese middle class Democrat voters whom are sedentary.

A righteous and realistic health care bill would be multi-purpose and cover all of the poor, veterans and would serve as a national emergency health care disaster back-up facility. It would greatly expand the VA and homeless clinics, unite them and let all poor Americans with citizenship identification walk in to any of those facilities for free treatment.

Democrats could tie the system access together with a new national high-speed electric mass transit tube train infrastructure to bring patients to hospitals. Those prosperous Americans that can actually afford health care insurance or pay it out of pocket should do so and not use a system designed for anyone that cannot afford proper or any medical treatment besides band aids.

Obamacare Individual Mandate Ruled Unconstitutional

So many people knew that it was unconstitutional for the government to compel people to buy insurance and to tax other people to pay for it. A federal judge saw it that way too and ruled the Individual mandate unconstitutional. So much time wasted by Obamacare. Democrats should have just expanded VA Hospitals and homeless clinics, brought them together to treat those that are actually poor for nothing, and built a national electromagnetic tube transport system to get people to treatment locations.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/14/affordable-care-act-ruled-unconstitutional-federal-judge-texas/2318733002/

Hobson's Choice of Paying off Federal Debt or Economic Growth?

There are innumerable configurations of macro-economic relations possible. Creative economic minds select one course of action for political economy and determine the present vector. Yet the U.S. Government probably is functioning to materially benefit the 1%. Three billionaires have as much wealth as 160 million U.S. citizens. Concentrating wealth allows the most rich to buy the media and control political opinion and thought to a certain extent while also closing down secure internet sites for writers to express dissenting ideas. One could reduce the federal debt (and they should) yet that would require progressive taxation and Americans have been misled to believe that higher taxes on the rich support indolent socialists that don’t want to work and want everything for nothing.

A democracy should be somewhat egalitarian and support individual independence so far as possible. Because concentrated wealth can become a political danger the progressive tax is requisite to keep the blimps tethered.

Democracy is the great middle ground between socialism and plutocracy. Democracy can serve the demographically real people best and fairly reform non-sustainable economic policy toward sustainable economic foundations that place growth in quality instead of material quantity. Most U.S. politicians are unable or unwilling to defend real democracy and progressive taxes instead of sieging the capitalist fuhrer of either party in the White House who may nominally talk about conservation of the environment but in fact doesn’t in the least move away from the concentration of wealth to the point of making the 1% royalty. One-percent economics is non-sustainable economics and completely against democracy.

Maybe This is Why Some Foreigners Consider the U.S.A. a Great Nation

The United States has had the strongest democracy for a couple of centuries with liberal immigration policy and freedom from the ossified social structures of the old world or the pathos and suffering of underdeveloped countries. Landing a man on the moon made a good impression although Steph Curry of the Warriors doesn’t believe that really happened. Being on the winning side of the past two world wars mattered.

In recent years the concentration of wealth tarnished the image with just three of our billionaires having as much wealth as half of the citizens of the nation. The left have supported foreign sides of armed conflicts since the start of the 20th century now and then and they have helped create a negative view of the U.S.A. and sometimes seek globalist socialism such as that envisioned by Trotsky. Most of the broadcast media are left-leaning corporatist stooges that are not for egalitarian democracy with progressive taxation. The ultra-rich and global socialists are both globalists, so Hollywood leftists get along well with the 1% as long as they are well paid.

Many Americans are against foreign migration to the United States now because of the economic structure that tends to benefit the rich, create vast public debt and encourage cheap foreign labor for the advantaged with immigration and outsourcing. If foreigners don’t want to migrate here that would be good.

Ecological economics and sustainable economics require a stable population too rather than millions more. The nation already has 320 million souls and without radical ecological economic reform that is nearly impossible to innovate with the current political stasis, that is more than enough. The economy is on a disposable material foundation of non-renewability like that of most nations and eventually, with over-population, that won’t work.

Censorship through indirect means is increasing in the U.S.A. though it is not as bad as that of authoritarian nations. Corporatism closes down venues for writing and expressing dissenting political opinions while authoritarian nations like China just arrest people and toss them in jail.

The United States continues to have religious freedom unlike China and Muslim nations. The evolutionary atheists movement hates Christian though and are gradually trying to marginalize Christians.

The United States also has a large economy, military and allows free enterprise. Foreigners locating to the U.S.A. are often very successful in business.

N.A.S.A. photo from L.R.O.

About the Worst Charges the President Faces

It may be that no one is very sure of what Mueller is looking into. It is a kind of posterior alien probe providing ongoing pain for the President. A federal judge presently is examining the F.B.I. paradigm for the Flynn interview and Mueller may have some tainted evidence. It all does seem partisan and hostile in comparison to the treatment that Hillary and minions got. They were widely believed to be liars and no sort of lying charges were brought.

Yet there are some funny elements to the Democrat Party efforts to purge the Republican President from office. It looks like it could be boiling down to a matter of if the payments to a couple of women that say they sexed the President years ago were some sort of campaign finance violation, and that seems rather far-fetched.

The most serious matter however, might be if Special Investigator Mueller has evidence of alien life forms from Area 51 acting in collusion with Donald Trump to move the Earth elsewhere in the galaxy because of all of its liquid water. Three billionaires in the U.S.A. have more money that 160 million U.S. citizens. Americans like bread and circuses more than egalitarian democracy. Luckily none of those billionaires are in cahoots with the extra terrestrials that might be colluding with the President if they exist.