Federal Court Scalps 'Redskins' Trademark-Skin's Appeal

The Federal Court is probably overstepping its bounds in banning the Redskins symbol-free speech does exist after all. It might be legal to have the name Washington Honkies (in honor of SUV's), D.C. Crackers or Steppin Fechits, Embezzlers, District of Gollum Rebels or D.C. Darkies-it just wouldn't be a good idea.

The Redskins management should get over it and move on and stop feeding the animal of anti-white male politics. Plainly it is a political issue and one the Democrats will count coup on as long as Mr. Snyder is recalcitrant about changing the team name to the Neanderthals.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/02/24/washington-redskins-argue-decision-to-cancel-trademark-is-unconstitutional-infringes-on-free-speech-rights/

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/09/26/the-daily-show-weighs-in-on-washington-redskins-name-in-segment-pitting-fans-against-native-americans/

Neanderthals-Theories of Homo Sapien Supremacy

When Scientific American featured a Neanderthal head on its cover for February 2015 featuring a claim to be able to look into the mind of the 39,000 year extinct human cousin it reminded me of the hanging chad fallacy wherein select partisan vote counters could claim to know if a voter had intended to cast the ballot for Bush or Gore. The entire article though quite interesting does seem to evolve around the idea that the Neanderthal brain inferiority made it a ready takeover target for modern humans kicked out of Africa because of piracy and embezzlement of food (I made those points up for mind-reading of history purposes).

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/secrets-of-neandertal-cognition-revealed/

As much as 70% of the Neanderthal genome exists in 'bits and pieces' in modern European ancestry humans. As N.A.T.O. looks to make permanent annexation of the Dniepr River drain that is historically part of Russia, it can use the of Neanderthals replaced by humans as a paradigm for the inferiority of the brains of Russians that don't know history as well as people in D.C. Humans were not just aggressive killers in taking over the Ukraine from the local Neanderthals-they were superior beings with highly evolved brains better suited for language and complex social skills such as embezzling, insider trading, historical revisionism, and so forth.

There are many technical points to consider regarding the inferiority of the Neanderthal. The Neanderthal brains seem to be a little larger than humans, yet so are whales and whales historically have been used for glue making, candles for whatever so that doesn't mean much. Plainly the FOXP2 gene may have been profuse in humans compare to Neanderthal, and CNTNAP2 replication or doupleeganger genes vis human-Neanderthal may have been lacking. Yet it could have been something like smallpox or disease that killed off Neanderthal-much the way diseases that American Indians had no immunity to decimated their population. Maybe Neanderthals were victims of one of the first interracial biological wars in additions to being clubbed, hacked and ambushed by invading peoples from the south. Raping, looting and killing unsuspecting Neanderthals/settlements from the South and West may have been like later Mongol attacks on Russia from the East. At least Napoleon and Hitler were comparatively gentlemen in that regard.

The Creativity of God (video)

I read some of Thomas Watson's piece on God's creativity in 'Divinity'.

Obama Syria Policy Building ISIS and Chaos

Analysis of what went wrong in the hand off from the Bush administration to the Obama that allowed ISIS to develop to the point of declaring a Caliphate may take many angles. The Atlantic has a good piece...

http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/

If ISIS is a pro-Muslim terror organization aiming to stimulate Armageddon the Presidential language refers to the political concern as 'violent extremists' as if they were Republicans or anti-homosexual marriage partisans through other means. Not even the Republican oil economic political team wishes to bring the world to Armageddon, although like ISIS some Christian evangelical organizations believe that a tribulation is ahead and an Armageddon is in the stars, cards or political future.

Muhammad the slave-owning inventor of a synthetic religion seems to have made the same mistake that pre-trib Christians do in interpreting the Revelation of John incorrectly. Pre-trib Christians think that John's prophecies referred to times thousands of years in the future largely. Muhammad in manufacturing his amalgam of Christian and Jewish ideas misinterpreted the Revelation like so many others. That error about end times and apocalypse has infected much of the oily political world and is a good rationale for fatalistic war and terror.

The pre-tribs and pre-Apocalyptic crowd tends to regard those not anticipating chaos, war, death and orange explosions as fruitcakes. Also the Apocalyptists have deterministic doom soon as an excellent recruiting and revenue-enhancement spiel.

Preterists such as myself (after reading Gentry's book 'The Beast of the Revelation' and 'He Shall Have Dominion' think that John's prophecy's were about an apocalypse that actually happened in the first century when Nero and Tiberius ruled the Roman Empire and Jerusalem was destroyed. It was a brilliant prophecy yet those reading centuries later probably didn't think it too significant (though as many as a half million were killed at Jerusalem). The mistake is quite meaningful however when one considers that entire lunatic paramilitaries and wars can happen with people trying to fulfill a wrong prophetic outline.

Muhammad was not just a political-religious inventor; he was wrong. Probably if Joe Biden had read the Bible and invented a religion of his own drawing upon additional sources it would have turned out as wrong as Mohammed's. Fundamentally the problem with ISIS is that they have lots of weapons from the Bush and Obama administration activities in the Middle East and that saturation of weapons will persist to fuel terrorist conflict for some time.

The left and right will tend to want interdiction conflicts with different theoretical goals to quell the uprising of lunatic insurrections would would think. With the U.S. military now being queered by homosexuality and an administration developing homosexual marriage it is understandable that many people outside the sphere of immoral evil politics would wish to resist American occupation forces with their lives-one can't blame them in that regard, yet the killing of civilians is reprehensible. The Obama administration is guilty of trying to overthrow the Assad administration obviously and that has put them on a par with ISIS. Though civilians in America hire proxy soldiers called volunteers to do their dirty work these days and the U.S. Government uses war as a substitute for intelligent thought because it profits some corporations perhaps there is a need for deep political thought in D.C. before blundering in to doing something just for the sake of doing something-that gets expensive and can be harmful to U.S. national interests. It is equally possible to do nothing and let a bad situation get worse. That is why voters should elect intelligent leadership with good ideas.

http://youtu.be/GZP6CmyQtQc On the Wisdom of God by Thomas Watson

More Electrons for the Effort?

This is just a note on a thought that occurred to me about the possibility of getting more electrical power to flow through a conductor given a constant power supply. Obviously a super-conductor is one approach to increasing through-put, yet might not there be others?

I am not a physicist. These ideas are thus quite basic. If one does not leave such ideas somewhere publicly in case they have merit they might be lost. So...

The concern is how to get more electrons to flow through the line. An electromagnetic field moving around with a power source knocks electrons loose that flow through a wire-the question to me is how the intersecting field displaces electrons and pushes them onward creating a flow.

Would it be possible to refract an electro-magnetic field or to reflect it like one does light with a Fresnel lens to increase its power before it hits the line? Would it be possible to increase the quantity of electrons at point A on the line that would be hit by the moving electro-magnetic field with some kind of pre-interactive electron concentrator or field shaping tech?

Another chance might be to use quantum super-positioning in short range super-conductors to swipe electrons and induce a field current potential at point A.

That's it.

Britain Can Bridge the Widening Gap Between Rich & Poor

Britain has an unsustainable economy inherited and standard of living inherited from the somewhat defunct British Empire. Transitioning to a sustainable economic foundation requires living within one's means ecologically speaking. Britain has thus transformed itself into investing in foreign nations and promoting globalism in order to skim wealth from everywhere. The United States has preponderantly followed that course too. As a result wealth is concentrated and the rich don't want to share with the majority. In other words everything is a.f.up'd.

The basic problem is that of original sin; it is inherent in thermodynamic processes. The 2^nd law of thermodynamics brings human organisms to consume and desire to reproduce and have power. Jesus Christ makes it possible to transcend that paradigm. God visited the paramecium population in a manner of speaking to provide a Jacob's ladder to God in eternity. The worldly body must perish along with the Universe eventually yet saved souls acceptable through faith in God may continue with God beyond the end.

Since original sin has a variety of economic system's applications for non-renewable economics without rational recognition of non-renewable criteria and criteria for individual human needs concatenated various economic systems are always falling behind. They fail to serve all of the population. Mass economic systems tend toward maturation as organization clones with hierarchical trophic orders. Wall Street and the Soviet Communist Party each were elite collectives controlling the allocation of wealth and resources. Better value theories are required if mass human needs are to be satisfactorily met. The problem really isn't in means of production or who owns that so much as of scale and of how much material each human needs to exist to live and create.

One might set standards for how much non-renewable mass individuals could transform with entropy added annually and calculate a fair share for all on Earth. Obviously high-value materials use that creates more value with less material consumed would enable individuals to become wealthier than those that have simple consumed much mass such as resource extraction industries like oil. Britain has particular problems of land area and population density not yet experienced by the United States. Britain sorely needs intelligent politicians of which it is lacking except in the area of guile where a certain genius prevails.

As an emergency measure I suggest Britain through itself on the mercy of Israel or China and plead to become part of one of those nations so better political and social organization could prevail. Also Britons should take the pledge and stop drinking booze.

What the Truth Is

The Difficulty in Learning and Accepting the Truth

The Lord Jesus Christ as eternal God comprises a 'Jacob's Ladder' to let mortal man pass from the corrupted Universe containment facility to eternal life with God. With the fall mankind was thrust into temporality with death. The spiritual condition of mankind with original sin required a firewall of containment-a Universe. God yet provided a bridge to return unto perfect obediance to his Spirit through the atoning sacrifice of the Lord.

Adamas and Edith were not made corrupt, corruption evolved during their encounters in the garden. Lucifer too evolved during the life stages on his life way to his fall. The fall of the highest created being exemplified the dangers of independent will for contingent being. Renormalization unto the will of God is challenging for individuals caught in the temporal flow of space-time thermodynamics.

Genesis chapter 2:22 “And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.”

One could contextualize that no longer did asexual reproduction reign. Sexual reproduction evolved. Yet space-time and increased brain size over time let a knowledge of the difference between good and evil appear in humanity.

Genesis chapter 3[“1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”

God allowed the tempter to become transformed into a reptile-a snake that not only symbolizes evolution with its tiny vestigial legs but portrays an archetypal role as a time abbreviated comparative elongated amoeba that with an increased head size and leg-rotor expansion evolved to allow upright posture. Adamas and Edith moved into the flow of thermodynamioc direction suggested by the devil to Eve. The tree of knowledge permits increased consumerism and depletion of non-renewable resources. God intervened and terminates the proto-crisis. One might wonder if the account is descriptive or proscriptive.

In a mysterious way space-time transformation of Adam and Eve in a thermodynamic-free environment to one with normal space-time parameters where birth and death cohere in the sexual reproduction evolution of genes of a human species has an implicit parallel story of alternate interpretive explanations embedded within in allowing and historical extrapolation of the development of mankind in-the-world since perhaps 70,000 B.C. Has God set forth mankind and explained His relationship to them in a way set-for-all-seasons of understanding?

Interestingly astrophysicists discovered that a wandering dwarf star approached near the solar system 70,000 years ago and probably perturbed the comets and space junk in the Oort Cloud perhaps cascading planet-colliding masses to the Earth. At any rate, when God discovered it necessary to liquidate the culture of human corruption Noah and family lived in there were plenty of tools available.

Liquidating the society of Noah implies that a flood sufficient to cover the whole area those people resided in was required. If they did not live in the Himalayas then flooding the Himalaya wasn’t necessary. Perhaps God did not need to flood the western hemisphere either since no humans lived there so early in history. If the offending culture lived in Mesopotamia then a Mesopotamian flood was all that was needed. Floods happen. Noah was forewarned and prepared a boat that would take his family to Urartu (Ararat) perhaps when a natural earth dam broke with excess rain drowning the decadent urbanites of the first human eon-civilization.

That not all humans were erased from the world-those besides Noah’s family that did not live in the evil society but were instead far-flung honest rural folk, seems a reasonable inference. Since Cain was cast out from the social environment of Adamas and Edith to go elsewhere and given a mark that strangers would not kill him, it seems evident that people had already disbursed abroad. Those people could recognize what was in a sense the first mark of the beast-the passion of human embeddedness in thermodynamic evolutions-and not kill those souls marked with the desire to evolve power, possession, pride and fabrication. God would take a different approach after-the-flood to correcting the problem of original sin with covenants leading to the cross, Jesus Christ and salvation.

Genesis chapter 4-”14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. 16 ¶ And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.”

The descendants of Adam and Eve were numerous and long-lived. Ante-diluvian patriarch time-spans are significant literal value-markers of the age of the culture that was doomed. There is an interesting point made in chapter 6 about the culture...

Genesis chapter 6;”1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. 3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.”

Those 'giants' may have been Neanderthals that interbred with humans. Neanderthals or another homo species may have been far stronger than the progeny of civilization-like athletes on steroids. About 4% of the genome of Europeans comprises Neanderthal genes.

Genesis chapter 9-”1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. 2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. 3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. 4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. 5 And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man. 7 And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein. 8 ¶ And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,

9 And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; 10 And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth. 11 And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. 12 And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:

13 I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.

14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: 15 And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. 17 And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.”

In a patrilineal culture where ancestry is traced through males the arrival of Noah and three sons is sufficient to restart human the culture of the people of the covenant. Women from rural peoples outside the lost civilization may have become the wives of the sons of Noah.

Genesis chapter 9-”18 ¶ And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread.”

Kenneth Gentry's brilliant post-millennialist writing does not present my contemplations about God evolving the Earth, yet it is not inconsistent with it.

Kenneth Gentry writes of covenants in 'He Shall Have Dominion'-quote”In the first place, the significance of Adam's sin would bring out the force of the comparison with Israel's rebellion more specifically. Adam's role as the great sinner is familiar to the Jews (Gen. 3). Job 31:33 serves as a parallel: "If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom."

Furthermore, if "man" were adopted in Hosea 6:7, the verse would be "altogether expressionless." How else could they have sinned than like men? In addition, the reference ("they have transgressed") is to Ephraim and Judah (Hos. 6:4), not to the priests. Thus, the contrast is not one between priests and ordinary men, but between "Ephraim and Judah" and the historical Adam.

Certainly the Scriptures are pre-eminently a covenant document. Even the pattern for creation is developed covenantally in the revelation of God.”

“Continuing quote from Gentry-

”The unity of Scripture may be traced in the unity of the covenants, which set forth the overarching Covenant of Grace. The heart of God's "covenants of the promise" (diathekon tes epaggelias, Eph. 2:12) is: "I will be your God and you will be My people," This idea occurs a great number of times in Scripture. The redemptive covenants are established in order to secure a favorable relationship between God and His people. By means of the covenant, the covenant people become intimately related to the Lord of heaven and earth.

Covenantal development is onion-like, layer upon layer:

"[E]ach successive covenant supplements its predecessors."24 We may easily see this in comparing the structural and thematic continuity between the covenants,25 For instance,  in preparing for the establishment of the Mosaic covenant, we learn that "God remembered his covenant with Abraham" (Exo. 2:24). Under the Davidic Covenant, we find reference to and deliver-ance under the Mosaic Covenant frequently mentioned, as well as to the Abrahamic. And, of course, the relationship of the New Covenant with earlier covenants is contained in the very formula of the New Covenant: "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah" Ger. 31:31 29). Interestingly, Ezekiel combines the Abrahamic, Mosaic, and Davidic Covenants in the chapters in which he deals with the New Covenant:

And David my servant shall be king over them [Davidic]; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them [Mosaic]. And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt [Abrahamic]; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever [Davidic]. Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them [New]: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. (Ezek. 37:24-26)

In the New Covenant era itself, we discover continuity with the preceding covenants. Romans 16:20 harkens back to the Adamic Covenant. Second Peter 3:5-7 draws a parallel with the Noahic Covenant. Romans 4:16 founds the New Covenant on the Abrahamic. Romans 3:31 demonstrates the validity of the Mosaic. Romans 15:22 harkens back to the Davidic Covenant.

As mentioned above, Paul summed up the various Old Testament covenants as being "the covenants [plural] of the promise singular]" (Eph. 2: 12). There is both a basic unity undergirding the divine covenants, as well as a progressive development in them. Thus, with the coming of the New Covenant in the ministry of Christ, "the fullness of time" has been reached (Gal. 4:4).30 And these concern redemption - a redemption, as we shall see, that shall overwhelm the world.” -end quotes of Gentry pages 111-114 'He Shall have Dominion'.