Bouncing about that Iggs field scale ( a poem)

   The answer to everything

an Iggs fueled emerged
embedded in that singularity
top hat spring-loaded
an unfolding sombrero diverged
faster-than-light expansion
massless particles slowing down
spinning around glued on quarks
welding protocols for three dimensions

  Iggs field across empty space
it was one field of infinite
numbers everywhere fluctuating
in a field matrix of infinite variables
a field of spuds spun nich(e) feelds
empowered force carrying protocols
unpacked singularity, bubbles of negativity
breathers of oxygen molecules
timing emergence of rhyming

  Iggs popped from singularity
without form and void
mass and anti-mass spin
from never begins
determinism to be and become
from nothingness infinite fields
send force through streams
digital actualized dreams
themselves forms of tomorrow

  Discrete digital captures of contained energy
horses for courses running to ground
quantum uncertainty of trans-finite infinities
eigenstate climbers of thermodynamic thresholds
phase change structures of the will of One
hermeneutic images of modge panc patterns
quantified, non-localized and compounded
infinity with freedom paradigmatized
bounce-sing on apposite Iggs field scales.

Senatorial Integrity, Ted Kaczynski, Covid 19, Ethics

 In my opinion few senators have excellent ideas- that is caused by not knowing any better. They are not, in other words simply suppressing good ideas or wrong ideas and promoting bad ones. They do what they believe is right although its wrong sometimes. Maybe there is a sliding scale of ethics in government- ethical relativism as it were.

What if some Democrat with a PhD in biology who is an atheist and total global warming kool-aid imbiber believed that another Trump administration would bring about the end of the world because of Trump policies; so like Ted Kaczynski, an environmental activist known as the unibomber, he or she decided to take direction action and sabotage the booming economy based on fossil fuel liberation after the last best hope of getting rid of Trump before the second term failed (that was the Russian collusion fiasco). Direct action would be collusion with the Chinese perhaps, or developing the Covid 19 virus from samples exfiltrated from Wuhan’s bio lab level 3 facility and taking the virus from America to China and releasing it in the market near the lab.

Knowing the virus would swiftly reach the U.S.A. and sabotage the economy, the unknown agent of evil would melt back into his job and process germs in Atlanta or wherever while Trump is blaming the Chinese and being impeached a second time. If that unlikely scenario were true or not, Democrats in Congress would not investigate the possibility of Chinese collusion to elect Joe Biden or anything like that and would attack such ‘extremist’ views. Would that be integrity or consistent political behavior these days.

In my opinion product loyalty is everything required presently in politics.

Could anyone have engineered Covid 19 to hurt Trump and reduce the population?

 This question is not in some way a joke as quora minders have said. I don’t know how to phrase it in some more neutral way either. Plainly the appearance of Covid 19 destroyed the President’s economic management and prospects for re-election that appeared likely in spite of the years of Democrat accusations concerning Russia. Covid 19 was the grease that put President Biden in office.

Quora let me know that “This question's wording makes it seem like a joke, or intended rhetorically to make a statement, rather than looking for helpful answers. It should be rewritten to be a neutral, non-leading question. “

Population reduction- ZPG is a Democrat priority. They have championed abortion and have had 70 million dead pre-born so far. That isn’t a joke either. They also support euthenasia. Covid 19 is a wild kind of euthenasia killing older Americans. Some might want to achieve that- not joking, in the extremist biological expert community.

The Young, the Weak and the Sick: Evidence of Natural Selection by Predation

Herd Immunity - let the weak and sick die

If I had asked the question in this way ; ‘Did godless democrat PhDs in biology commit mass murder and frame the Chinese to get rid of Trump’, that would have been tactless.

I am simply looking for answers to the question of how easy it would be to select and distribute a lethal virus somewhere on Earth that would cull the herd of the weak and elderly, easily. And who the possible suspects are.

One Chinese general said they would defeat the U.S.A. with low technology rather than high technology; bat shit virus might count as low technology.

Would libertarian, open-sourced co-op social media offset corporate social media censors?

 The problems of social media sites that are owned by corporations concerning censorship are innumerable. It is thus surprising that more libertarian social media sites publicly owned and maintained by users that are quite tolerant of free speech don’t much exist so far as I know.

Social media content tends to disappear over time if it isn’t what the owners regard as helpful to their political or corporate benefit. That creates big headaches for people with their content deleted. Some of the M.S.M. would say it is extremism that is being deleted, and of course they define for-themselves what extremism is. History and social media is made by the victors and wealthy corporate deep pocket owners.

Citizens need reliable public social media infrastructure so they can write whatever they like without concern for it disappearing They should be assured that it will last for decades. Social media should not be an elite media that is filtered by various exclusive others to further their political interests. It is amusing that even the left these days positively chortle when writing to someone being censored that the social media is private so they can do whatever they like and bite it therefor- get a lawyer if you want (corporate media can afford lawyers more so than private citizens of lesser means). So long as corporate social media supports all of the basic leftist planks of abortion, homosexuality, legal dope and so forth the left are happy sycophants in building the repression of free speech in the U.S.A. Public owned social media to provide a non-volatile balance for free speech in a free country would be a positive change.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative#:~:text=A%20cooperative%20(also%20known%20as,a%20jointly%2Downed%20enterprise%22.

The defense of freedom sometimes requires the public sector to act when the private sector isn’t capable of providing necessary social media themselves. It may always be the case that intelligence that is excellent seems extreme to the average Joe Stalins and Adolph Eichmanns occupying the banal center political stage where sycophancy works best. If all ideas are freely expressed rather than repressed then people can at least encounter good ideas as well as average, heavily cloned concepts.

Forms for publicly secure social media could be co-opts, or co-opts partly government financed, or servers and sites sponsored by parties like Libertarian and Green parties that are tolerant of different opinions even if they are sent to a right or conservative frequency of their spectrum of varieties of political speech. I believe Facebook already sorts out material according to political persuasion to a certain extent. Plainly more than political speech would be expressed at a Libertarian social media site and that is good. For there are myriad undreampt of ideas of an infinite variety of forms that can be discovered in thought that should not be filtered or deleted by crass corporate social media minders that are tools for brainwashing Americans.

Prisons and economic condition hypotheticals

 It’s very hard to predict what would occur in the paradigm of deep economic depression concerning prisons. The Biden administration has said it will eliminate private prisons and create, I would guess, state-operated union job staffed facilities. Those have a sliding investment allocation in regard to how much is spent on prisons and prisoners. One may invest little or nothing and yet keep people in jail- look at how little Vietnamese P.O.W. camps for Americans cost the communists. Obviously reform is need on a large scale that would reduce costs before an economic crash.

Prison reform is one of the areas of governance that has a lot of expense and not enough new ideas. Computer c.p.u.’s improve from one generation to the next (about a year and a half) yet some human institutions never really get much more efficient at rehabilitating criminals. Plainly some prisoners were imprisoned in the reconstruction era in order to provide free or cheap convict labor, and some social classes prosper when an underclass requires much incarceration and supervision. Those are complex social problems that persist along with original sin and the challenges of making pervasive institutional improvements politically.

Plato's opinion against poetry; justified?

 So much knowledge is lost to history. Perhaps the basic reason why Sumerian clay tablets and cuneiform are thought to be the start of writing is that no one else that wrote before had a good portable medium for writing that would last the ages. It may not be simply coincidental that the first writing discovered in history started where there was clay for tablets and writing hard copy followed by a recession of sea level and desertification of Sumer and Ur so people would leave and writing would lay safely buried in sand until discovery. Perhaps that was natural selection and writing on portable mediums like goat skin faded away in weather at some unknown location. History does not provide us with knowledge about content of all of the crude poems publicly recited in Athenian Greece of Plato’s day- maybe some of it was quite vulgar and luckily lost to posterity.

Yet of poetry that existed then (and I am not an expert on that or even on Plato’s writing), I believe Sappho and Pindar were the greatest of the classical era. Poetry though usual was in the form of plays perhaps, and some of the plays of the majors performed then may have been offensive politically and socially to Plato. Since Plato wrote prose- quite non-lyrical, he may have regarded the natural divide between himself and lyric poets in literature more along the paradigmatic axis (meaning) rather than the syntagmatic axis (of form). I doubt that if a lyric poet of his day wrote an ode to oligarchy (Plato-Socrates preferred oligarchy over democracy) that Plato would have been so peeved.

Democracy definitely has problems and runs toward irrationality on occasion. Plato’s Republic (or that of Socrates) was an ideal state comparatively, in theory. Someone wrote that the French would say that some things work in practice but not in theory- The Republic of theory may not alternately work in practice. Plato and Socrates would have wanted society to at least work for an ideal state however, and I can sympathize with the concept that the United States would be a much better place with more logic, understanding and effort to make an ideal state rather than to just it go and trust in the blind, invisible hand of capitalism. Seventy years after the Green revolution people continue to starve periodically on Earth- should one just rely on Adam Smith’s paradigm to relieve famines or to react to them?

Comparing Plato's soul and Freud's psyche

 Plato and Freud’s concepts respectively of the soul and the psyche can be compared. That is a good question. Each has three distinct parts; appetite spirit, and reason versus id, ego, and superego. Each has an etymology from psyche in Greek.

Plato’s troika is eternal while Freud’s is a temporal process (presumably). Neither has a purely material or physical existence although they occur in the matter of the brain. Each appear to be a way of classifying characteristics of human experience that today might be explained away through entirely material processes, yet one might also explain away matter through quantum phenomena like the Higgs field as well leaving nothing besides spirit at the heart of anything (in a sense like that of Leibnitz and his one-dimension spiritual monads could be taken as representative of a member of a set of theoretical spiritual structures sustaining energy).