Democrats in Congress are trying
to scuttle the high frontier plan to develop a lunar base camp for exploration
of the solar system and beyond. Instead they propose to send one mission to
claim Mars in 2033 at tremendous public cost. While it would be good to claim
Mars, look what happened to Lunar development after the United States arrived
first more than a half century ago- nothing.
The
United States has a lot of frontier experience; it was initially a frontier
nation and the lessons learned from Perry and Byrd, Armstrong, Lewis and Clark
etc are still relevant. In fact one may look at expeditions to frontiers or
climbing Mt. Everest to discover that a base camp at an advanced location is
common. Frontier forts for the U.S. Army supported eventual civilian
settlements; the Moon is the base camp for the solar system and its use will be
shared with other nations eventually.
The
Democrat Party with its socialist trend and habit of running up vast public
debt should realize that with the way things are going presently the United
States may well not be able to afford an easily chopped expensive mission to
Mars. Incompetent health care plans that leave out the poor and globalization
plus too high of a military pay scale are driving public debt higher. Democrats
refused to continue to win the Cold War after the Clinton administration as it
should have with partnership with Russia in numerous areas of mutual interest,
business and military concerns. All that was required was to share the Ukraine
with Russia along the Dnieper River border and recognize the Crimea as Russia.
Peace with Russia with friendly relations with Russia was and is a primary U.S.
concern for the rationally minded. Good relations with Russia mean a cheaper
defense cost and better, cheaper defense against China. Democrats though are
spaced out posturers that believe trashing U.S. financial infrastructure will
help advance socialism and/or communism.
https://gizmodo.com/scientists-slam-congresss-new-plan-for-nasa-1841432879
It is possible that an advanced working lunar base could act to synergize beneficial technologies for the Earth's near-term survival of a number of approaching potential disasters from global warming to asteroid defense. The far side could provide good locations for the study of the Universe as well. Alternatively, Mars is a very sketchy locale for near-term benefit to the Earth in a survival paradigm. Mars is better for gradual colonization with steady methodical advances from all parties venturing from the moon base.
No comments:
Post a Comment