Small Worlds/Illegal Aliens/Decreasing Democracy

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3224

First I must acknowledge that evil race smears are used by some proponents of illegal Mexican immigration to the United States upon those for legal immigration only policy.

It is wicked to associate Americans for national sovereignty with world war two era fascism much less extermination of Jews effort in the holocaust. Of course there is only so much to history, and the lines are fine, and many just bum-rush right over it substituting fiction for truth.

The essential causes for the flood of 22 million illegal aliens into the United States is pure economic and political avarice by Mexicans encountering in their own nation repression from an elite plutocratic social environment that has 40 people owning 30% of the nation's wealth.

If all those Mexicans were Germans today, wouldn't it matter if 20 or 30 million just volkerwanderrrunged over the border, and their Furher campaigned in Utah, California, Washington and Oregon for more?

The United States easily could develop rational and self-serving immigration policies with fair apportionment of racial components proportional to that of the world if it had the will to do so. The U.S.A. might bring in one million new citizens annually by consent rather than by the force of Mexicans illegal will (President Fox is visiting his newest state 'conquest' Utah first)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060523/ap_on_re_us/us_fox_visit_8;_ylt=Akhr6rvQr1ScBHG4ilxk9sZQuk0A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

The actual cause of Democratic Party perfidy (Senator Max Bacchus of Montana supports the flood in votes it seems) is probably traditional state and federal corruption caused by redistricting and computer programming (see the current U.S. News article) and the expense of defeating incumbents. U.S. politics may not even be fairly called a democracy anymore some are speculating and globalism and greed, including the Bush administration's perfidious approach to environmental law is essentially reforming the United States. Why the Democratic Party is so much for just Mexican illegal immigrant favoritism is perhaps also related to the wealth of globalism and Democratic incompetence. Senator Dorothy of California just needs Mexican votes. Of 52 Representatives in California in 2004 no incumbents were defeated. The odds of winning a U.S. House seat in a race against an incumbent may be about 5%, and it costs a couple of million to finance the campaign spin.

Environmental liability may be a reason for the flood of illegals too. While Reagan and G.W. Bush scuttle the EPA Superfund and mining tax legislation is defeated, superfund sites and thousands of mines still seep toxic waste all over the U.S.A. Grupo Mexico bought Guggenheim’s Colorado mines at Leadville and a number of others in a purchase in 2003? With their out of country incorporation they can just not pay for clean ups, but the federal administrators believe the taxpayers should pay anyway instead of the polluters.

All this globalist political anarchizing attacking on democracy is a consequence of perfidious subtle reorganizations possible with globalism purchasing federal and state democratic representation. With good democratic government and secure borders the people can have a better chance of a fair and orderly, lawful and rational political environment...without it they will indefinitely sell out to opulent glitz of Colonel Sanddoom at home and abroad.
Points about racial genetic differences and what causal effects they may have on politics are interesting as made above, yet I will comment on a few points of the past 100 posts generally...

Capitalism does have an inadvertent tendency to exploit the poor, concentrate wealth and so forth, yet it may also increase the new wealth of society and though previously free, happy, independent people may become comparatively poorer with oppressive rulers with corporatism removing their liberty, they may be in the materially absolute sense richer.

Pres. R. Reagan's trickle down didn't work; inequality in wealth distribution has increased in the U.S.A. Lateral reallocation of wealth ensued instead, with women and non-whites increasing their comparative share.

Capitalism isn't unique in concentrating or distributing power, in the small worlds theoria preferred attachment, or the rich getting richer, builds in a way not unlike the aggregation of 'spurs' on snowflakes in predetermined patterns, or numerous other physical examples. Communism and other mass political organizations tend to accumulate power through preferred attachment, aka excremental affluent derriere smooching., direct purging and consolidation and other organizational forms that are an aspect of human interaction.

Perhaps original sin is the best explanation for why people are cruel, exploitative of others and so forth so often hiding behind 'big lies' or 'use-truths'.

The American political system has ossified into two polarized political parties that each support globalism in their own way and subvert democracy. Americans are against amnesty for illegal aliens, against illegal immigration, and haven't confidence in the Republican Party in Congress or in the White House presently. In an actual democracy uncorrupted by computer-designed and state legislative approved gerrymandering, the Democrats would retake both houses of congress easily in November. With the ossification of incumbency and politics competition for voters is ended, and blind party fealty for trophic position blue/red is insinuated to advance global corporatism.

Humanity should be able to work out their sociologically based oddities, yet social differences are the rational behind much of human organizing phenomena. Not only is liberty enhanced for creative purposes with civil rights, sound borders and property rights, rational allocation of opportunities, interests and social rights are delineated by differences amidst individuals and classes. Differences and classes aren't best 'exterminated'.

At any given time in politics, as in history, there are inertia social forces of organization that de facto place a macro-morality from the primary power upon accompanying economic methods. Small world theory may demonstrate how power 'fuses' more power and wealth upon itself as gravity draws mass although it is within a different structural pattern. Individuals may choose to resist the affects of adverse political forces, as is the case with the illegal immigration, and encounter opposite forces to disorder their own organizational principles.

Immigration isn't about race, but about the subversive impact upon U.S. political self-determination for the masses that are being ill-served by globalist corruptions of congress. One must read today's 'Dilbert'.

55 Senators Oppose Rule of Law

"The vote was 55-40 against a proposal by Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga, who said that anything less than a border security-first approach amounted to "a wink and a nod one more time to those who would come here" unlawfully."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/16/national/main1620758.shtml
An element of choosing to vote to legalize crime and approve of illegal entry to the United States as a legitimate course to citizenship may be caused by the investment in Mexican oil, and lobbyist’s contributions to/of the 55 Senators.

http://www.bushwatch.com/bushmoney.htm
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5a.htm
http://www.moles.org/ProjectUnderground/drillbits/6_05/vs.html

It is interesting that Senate Democrats lead the way on opposition to border control before negotiating with border bounders. Having sovereignty is a prerequisite for making sound law, simple following after lawbreakers and providing support is the function of a crock congress.
The Democratic Senators are acting in support of elements gutting the minimum wage in the United States and the value of U.S. labor. It isn't really surprising though. Senators are wealthy and wealth tends to accumulate globally in the rule of the 80-20 principle. That is in Pareto's law twenty percent or less of the people have 80% or more of the wealth simply because of preferred attachment, the ability of people with excess wealth to invest or gamble more, and other flow dynamic factors having nothing 80-20 principle is suitable for communist nations too, in which 20% or less of the communist party rule 80% or more of the national wealth. Global corporatism also follows those wealth flow phenomena and adroitly unifies communist and corporate governance and management through a number of interties from boardrooms to global media ownership, pseudo conflicts and state surveillance of citizens etc.

The Senators being quite wealthy investment in non Chinese or non-India political directions would be difficult, as that is the region in which wealth is currently finding the easiest pickings. A vast flood of cheap Mexican labor is as well beneficial to the wealthy in the United States in accord with the 80-20 principle. I should point out that this fits in quite well with the small worlds networks theories that explain a.i.d.s. distribution social and a number of other network transmission phenomena. It isn't necessary that someone have a political theory to get it started.

In the United States decent social philosophical theory just doesn't make it into politics as far as helping to elect enlightened Senators. With the historical debate between Adam Smithianites and Marxists and the social psychological trait of people choosing sides, stopping to think and dogmatically following 'leaders' theories convincing the U.S. public that their could be more to economics than the 'invisible hand' of Adam Smith or the state authoritarianism of Marxism is very difficult.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad using Smith's principle of personal greed being the best way to develop a society rightly rejected EU offers of a light water nuclear reactor if he would stop building a heavy water reactor saying (I paraphrase)'It would be like giving up gold for smoke and mirrors’. Page 188 'Nexus' Buchanan explained that many economists believe the market isn't rational entirely, and greed won't get it done. Behavioral economists have modeled market economics based on herd behavior with success.

Mexican Presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador of the Welfare for All Party is the only Mexican candidate that has rightly comprehended the ill-effect on Mexico's economy by the loss of migrant workers north. The wealthy candidates support the principle of 80-20 unknowingly, which in a limited global environment will lead to technological and enterprise stagnation within a vice of plutocratic deadbeats.