Like Bill Clinton and Tom Harkins, Ukraine's new military leader Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi was captured for the Queen/King to use.
Bill Clinton famously chose Fleetwood Mac's "Don't Stop" as his 1992 campaign anthem, while Tom Harkin actually used "I've Seen All Good People" by Yes during that same 1992 Democratic primary race.
Tying those politicians to Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi—who earned the British Sword of Honour— highlights how these public figures are all playing their respective roles like pawns or knights on a geopolitical chessboard, ultimately being "captured for the queen to use".
Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi’s entire education was completed exclusively within an independent, post-Soviet Ukraine, distinguishing him from older predecessors who trained in Soviet or Russian academies.Kharkiv Tank Forces Institute (2004): He completed his foundational military training and graduated as an officer, immediately commissioning as a tank lieutenant in the 72nd Separate Mechanized Brigade.National Defense University of Ukraine (2019): He graduated with distinction from the Ivan Cherniakhovskyi National Defense University. He was awarded the institution’s gold medal for academic excellence.Strategic Training & British Sword of Honour (2021): He returned for advanced operational and strategic studies. Upon graduating as the top student in June 2021, he was presented with a ceremonial Sword of Honour by the British Ambassador.
Former Rhodes Scholars-Heads of Government & State
Bill Clinton: 42nd President of the United States.
Tony Abbott: Former Prime Minister of Australia.
Bob Hawke: Former Prime Minister of Australia.
Malcolm Turnbull: Former Prime Minister of Australia.
John Turner: Former Prime Minister of Canada.
Dominic Mintoff: Former Prime Minister of Malta.
U.S. Politicians Who Attended College in England
John F. Kennedy: 35th President of the United States; London School of Economics (LSE).
Bill Clinton: 42nd President of the United States
Pete Buttigieg: Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation; University of Oxford.
Cory Booker: U.S. Senator; University of Oxford.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan: Former U.S. Senator; London School of Economics (LSE).
Susan Rice: Former National Security Advisor; University of Oxford.
Bill Bradley: Former U.S. Senator; University of Oxford
.J. William Fulbright: Former U.S. Senator; University of Oxford.
I saw that Russia recently bombed the port of Odessa from a distance likely using wings attached to bombs for controlled gliding. That brought me to inquire into a comparison between Russian made and American made JDAMS (Joint Direct Attack Munitions).
I asked what kind of savings the Pentagon would have if it bought Russian made weapons to supplement American made and learned that the U.S. Government already buys Ukraine licensed weapons in the U.S.A. because they are cheaper. So the administration's effort to scale down the war does have a conflicting interest in keeping the war going through sharing profits of Ukrainian designed weapons manufactured in the U.S.A. itself- helping fund the war.
Here is part of the dialogue with A.I.
Gary– How much could the pentagon saze buying Russian weapons to supplement U.S. made weapons, or adding to the number?
A.I.– The Pentagon cannot buy weapons directly from Russia due to strict federal laws, CAATSA sanctions, and geopolitical embargoes. However, looking purely at the production math, the U.S. would theoretically save billions of dollars if it bought Russian-style hardware. A standard Russian T-90 tank costs roughly $3 million compared to over $10 million for a Western equivalent, and their UMPK glide bomb kits cost $10,000–$15,000 less than a U.S. JDAM-ER. [1, 2]
Instead of buying from Russia, the Pentagon captures these exact cost savings by partnering with Ukraine to mass-produce cheap, battle-tested technology. [1, 2]
Drone Boats: U.S. defense firms recently signed deals to manufacture Ukrainian-designed Magura drone boats in Oregon and South Carolina. These provide the Pentagon with low-cost autonomous weapons at a fraction of standard U.S. development costs. [1]
Tech Sharing: A landmark U.S.–Ukraine defense memorandum allows Ukraine to export its combat-tested drone and electronic warfare expertise directly to American manufacturers. [1]
🛑 Why Direct Purchases Are Impossible
The F-35 Block: When Turkey bought Russia’s S-400 air defense system, the U.S. immediately kicked them out of the F-35 fighter jet program. [1]
Sanctions: Federal laws explicitly penalize any ally or U.S. entity that conducts significant transactions with the Russian defense sector. [1]
Gary- Maybe something like a lighter than air irrigation system that is shaped like a large inverted c shape and would pump chem spray rather than water. It would move from one end of a field to the other, then shift over another 30 yards for new coverage. There could be front and back moving ground vehicles for stabilizers and to hold the line steady, while sideways winds would be of little effect
A.I. This "inverted C-shape" design essentially reimagines a traditional agricultural linear-move irrigation system, but replaces the massive steel truss towers with lighter-than-air structures. Using ground vehicles at both ends to actively anchor and guide the system is an innovative approach to the wind problem, as pulling the structure taut from both sides helps counteract lateral forces.
In agricultural engineering, this concept bridges the gap between fixed ground infrastructure and free-flying aircraft.
Structural Mechanics and Design Advantages
Eliminating Soil Compaction: Traditional heavy rolling irrigation systems use massive tires that compact the soil, which can damage crop roots. A floating truss completely eliminates this ground weight.
Controlled Wind Resistance: By anchoring both ends to synchronized ground vehicles, the system can maintain high tension. This tension keeps the spray boom steady and prevents it from bowing or drifting in sideways winds.
Continuous High-Volume Delivery: Unlike a free-flying drone that must land every few minutes, a tethered, bridge-like system allows for a continuous, uninterrupted flow of liquid pumped directly from large nurse tanks on the ground vehicles.
Practical Engineering Hurdles
The Aerodynamic Sail Effect: While the ground anchors keep the ends secure, a large gas-filled structure spanning hundreds of feet across a field acts as a massive sail. High crosswinds will put immense tensile stress on the tethers and ground vehicles, requiring heavy, high-torque robotic tractors to keep the line straight.
Changing Crop Heights: The vertical clearance of the "C-shape" would need to be adjustable or high enough to clear different crop stages (such as tall corn versus low alfalfa) without snagging.
Infrastructure Costs: Manufacturing, filling, and maintaining a massive lighter-than-air envelope that can withstand field conditions (UV exposure, sharp branches, and corrosive chemicals) represents a significant financial investment compared to standard ground rigs.
Would you like to look at how autonomous ground vehicles (AGVs) are currently used to pull and manage heavy agricultural equipment, or explore how linear-move irrigation systems currently handle precise chemical application?
Gary- I believe the lighter than air c shaped bag to be more than 10 feet in the air and perhaps 3 feet thick could suspend a thin spraying nozzle line below it to release insecticide. It shouldn't be very costly. If it covers 100 feet in width there could be four ground anchor autonomous drones pulling it forward and four more keeping it from blowing too far forward, behind- perhaps the end drones could each have a rigid pole to keep the ends where they should be. AI could operate the ground drones in coordination to move it about.
A.I. -Your detailed specifications lay out a highly structured, low-altitude tension grid that solves several classic lighter-than-air stability problems. By utilizing an automated, multi-point anchoring system controlled by coordinated AI, you effectively turn a free-floating balloon into a rigid, manageable agricultural implement.
Mechanics of the 8-Drone Stabilization Grid
The Tension Box: Using four autonomous ground drones pulling forward and four braking from behind creates a continuous tug-of-war effect. This high tension keeps the lightweight, 3-foot-thick envelope taut, drastically reducing the structural flexing or "snaking" that usually plagues long, flexible structures in the wind.
Rigid Guide Poles: Incorporating rigid vertical poles on the flanking end-drones is a brilliant mechanical anchor. It establishes a fixed minimum height (10 feet), ensuring the floating envelope cannot accidentally dip down into the crop canopy if there is a sudden downdraft or loss of pressure.
AI Swarm Coordination: Real-time AI processing allows the ground vehicles to act as a coordinated swarm. If a sudden gust of wind hits the left side of the structure, the left-rear drone can instantly increase its braking drag, while the right-front drone accelerates, perfectly counteracting the wind vector to keep the spray line completely straight. [1, 2]
The Buoyancy and Lift Equation
To evaluate if this can be built cheaply, engineers look at the lifting capacity of the gas envelope versus the weight of the spray line:
The Volume: A tube that is 100 feet long and roughly 3 feet thick has an approximate volume of about 700 cubic feet.
The Lift Capacity: If filled with standard helium, 700 cubic feet of gas provides roughly 43 pounds of total upward lift (hydrogen would provide slightly more, about 48 pounds).
The Payload Weight: 43 pounds of lift is more than enough to completely support an ultra-lightweight carbon-fiber truss, a thin plastic fluid line, and a row of micro-spray nozzles. Because the envelope handles 100% of the vertical weight, the ground drones only need enough motor power to fight lateral wind resistance and roll forward, making them incredibly energy-efficient.
Manufacturing and Material Viability
Your assessment that it shouldn't be very costly is highly accurate regarding the envelope itself. Modern commercial inflatables utilize rugged, UV-resistant polyurethane or PVC-coated nylon, which can be heat-sealed cheaply in large quantities.
The primary cost of the system would shift away from the balloon and onto the AI navigation sensors (RTK-GPS) required to keep all eight ground drones moving in millimeter-level synchronization so they don't accidentally pull the system apart or snap the tethers.
Would you like to explore how RTK-GPS systems allow agricultural drones to stay synchronized within centimeters, or look at how micro-nozzles manage fluid pressure over a 100-foot span?
How does RTK-GPS swarm synchronization work?
What are the best lightweight materials for the spray line?
16,000 drones. One synchronized brain. China just set a world record as 16,000 drones flew in perfect formation above Liuyang, powered by an AI swarm system. Each unit adjusted position, trajectory, and light pattern in real time to create massive 3D shapes in the sky with millimeter-level coordination. It’s distributed control, swarm intelligence, and real-time computation at scale. Is this art powered by engineering or engineering becoming art? ⚠️ This video is shared for educational and informational purposes only. It does not contain any sponsored deals, advertising, or commercial intent. Credit to the original creator. All rights belong to the respective brand. If you are the owner and wish to have it removed or credited differently, please contact us. #Drones #SwarmIntelligence #AI #Robotics #Automation #AerialTech
Feb 17, 2026 — Thousands of drones flew in perfect synchronization, guided by artificial intelligence that constantly adjusted spacing, timing, a...
Drone swarms – Intelligent agents to dominate the skies of tomorrow Nov 23, 2025 — In this series of three videos, we demonstrate our latest advancements in the development of algorithms that enable drone swarms t...
Gary- I believe that is as far as I need to go with the concept. Maybe I will publish it so farmers that like to experiment can consider developing the project.
A.I. Publishing an open-source concept is a fantastic way to spark innovation in the agricultural community, as DIY farmers are incredibly skilled at fabricating and testing new machinery. Sharing the specific breakdown of the 8-drone tension grid, the volume-to-lift calculations, and the rigid guide pole mechanics could definitely inspire someone to build a working prototype. [1]
I find it difficult to agree with the premise that structuralism replaced existentialism as far as philosophy goes. Structuralism seems a more materialist, naturalist investigation. Structure is a transcendent, ubiquitous concept with myriad circumstances where overlapping structural systems simultaneously present themselves. A given portion of reality may have a plethora of concurrent systems discoverable. Cosmology and quantum mechanics theory paradigms are a prime example. Structure and relationships obviously exist, yet Sartre viewed existence through a rational interpretation ala Descarte, phenomenologically.
Sartre’s view of first-person being; expressed in Being and Nothingness 1943, was expanded into the tome Critique of Dialectical Reason in 1960. In that work he explained how concatenated social experience of groups and semiotics were expressed with serial and ossified praxis, ques etc. Structuralism on the other hand occurred closer to the realm of naive realism anthropology and linguistic theory epistemologically. Like Freud and Jung in search of deep neurological or even genetic reasons for language, thought and social structures, Levi Strauss sought explanations of phenomenology in neurophilosophy. I tend to regard language not as a grand human equivalent of hard-wired bird language structure, instead as lexicons of sound associations-semiotic sets- such as Kripke and Quine regarded in terms of lexicons, ontology and neorealism and/or nominalism.
B.F. Skinner too may have regarded being as primarily deterministic following biological requisites, yet philosophy is more than that-even inclusive of the idea of spirit. French philosophy was heavily influenced by Marxism until Soviet Marxists evolved toward free enterprise. Since then it is just the French and other N.A.T.O. members of Europe pursuing quasi-structured socialism as a religion of war with Russia to force the lost socialist back into a closer relationship with the remaining socialist super-power; China. It is difficult to know if quantum mechanics and cosmology have saturated philosophy so far as to bring skepticism to the effort to find epistemological satisfaction within a secular deterministic model. They do seem to exist at cross purposes to a certain extent.
On egalitarian summits and below the sea depths of colors with currents of staved clefs horizontal lines of tomorrow's silver mines present yesterdays wakes liked orders of geometric signs risen silently with semiotic aches
Transcendent mystics sear lost rhymes of space pathways to reverse cosmologies ripples for sensations of lakes settled sprung inversions dartwinian smoked fired in the distance brought convenience too poor jokes.
I asked A.I. about the context of building a half to three quarter billion dollar shipyard at Wrangell.
Gary- Do you think there is a market sufficient to invest in building a three quarter of a billion dollar ship repair facility at wrangell alaska?
A.I.– A $605 to $726 million shipyard in Wrangell faces major economic hurdles. A standalone commercial market alone is likely insufficient to justify this massive price tag, so the project’s viability depends on public-private partnerships, securing federal defense contracts, and capitalizing on the Coast Guard’s expanding Arctic operations. [1, 2, 3]
Key Market Variables
Sky-High Costs: Full build-out estimates range from $605 million to $726 million. The project requires aggressive phasing to be digestible. [1]
Target Customers: The proposed 500-foot shipyard relies heavily on securing contracts with the U.S. government, U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard, and research vessels. Private commercial vessels (e.g., state ferries) alone cannot carry this level of capitalization. [1, 2, 3]
Partner Backing: The City and Borough of Wrangell has established a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Seattle-based JAG Marine Group and Miami-based Pearlson & Pearlson to navigate port feasibility and secure state and federal funding. [1, 2, 3]
Geopolitical Drivers: Proponents are pitching the facility to federal officials as vital to national security and Arctic patrol maintenance. [1, 2]
Current Feasibility: Keep an eye on ongoing 30% design phase deliverables that will dictate long-term funding requirements. [1]
Gary- Can a population of 2000 people afford that sort of thing?
A.I. No. A local population of 2,100 people cannot afford a project of this scale through local taxes or municipal debt.
The project relies entirely on external funding, with the local community acting as a host rather than a financial backer.
The Funding Reality
Zero Local Funding: Wrangell’s municipal budget cannot support a $700 million project. Local residents will not pay for the construction through property or sales taxes.
Federal Defense Dollars: Proponents are targeting federal funding. This includes the Department of Defense, Department of Transportation (MARAD), and federal infrastructure grants.
Private Capital: Private partners like JAG Marine Group are expected to bring external investment to cover commercial operational costs.
State Support: The State of Alaska may provide economic development grants, as the facility would boost the regional maritime economy.
Local Risks and Impacts
Infrastructure Strain: A massive shipyard brings hundreds of temporary construction workers and permanent contractors. A small town must upgrade its housing, utilities, and medical services to handle the influx.
Economic Boom: If funded externally, the facility would create high-paying year-round jobs. This would diversify a local economy currently reliant on seafood and tourism.
To help evaluate if this project makes sense for the region, tell me what concerns you most:
The environmental impact on the local waters?
The potential boom-and-bust cycle for housing and schools?
How it compares to competing shipyards in Seattle or Ketchikan?
Let me know what area you would like to explore next.
Gary- All three
A.I.-Building a massive $605M to $726M shipyard in a town of 2,100 people creates intense friction between economic opportunity and small-town stability. [1]
1. Environmental Impact on Local Waters
Heavy marine industrialization introduces severe localized environmental risks to Wrangell’s pristine waters. [1]
Contaminants and Runoff: Large-scale ship repair involves hull blasting and painting. This releases toxic anti-fouling copper or tin paints, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and microplastics directly adjacent to marine habitats. [1, 2, 3]
Industrial Noise & Dredging: Operating a 38,000-ton lift and servicing 500-foot vessels generates significant underwater noise and light pollution. This can disrupt local marine mammals and migratory salmon corridors. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The “Brownfield” Advantage: On the positive side, Wrangell plans to place this facility at the 6-Mile Mill property. Because this is a former timber mill site, it is already an altered industrial footprint rather than untouched, pristine coastline. [1, 2, 3]
2. The Threat of a Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Bringing an estimated 150 permanent shipyard jobs—plus hundreds of transient construction workers—into a tiny community triggers a classic infrastructure shock. [, 2]
The Housing Crisis: Wrangell already suffers from a severe housing shortage. Local officials note it is a “chicken and egg” problem; developers won’t build without guaranteed buyers, yet the workforce cannot arrive without housing. The borough is proactively designing 60-unit complexes at the old hospital site and expanding sub-divisions to get ahead of the crush. [1]
Utility & School Strain: The influx will heavily tax local water systems, electricity grids, and medical clinics. While a population boost could save local schools from declining enrollment, a sudden exit if a major federal contract expires would leave the town holding massive debt for over-expanded infrastructure. [1, 2]
3. Competition with Ketchikan and Seattle
Wrangell is entering a highly competitive and protective Pacific Northwest maritime market.
The Ketchikan Rivalry/Alliance: Nearby Ketchikan already features a world-class shipyard owned by the state (AIDEA) and operated by the exact same company partnering with Wrangell: JAG Marine Group. JAG recently secured a $99.6M federal NOAA contract for Ketchikan. While JAG claims a Wrangell facility would “complement” Ketchikan by expanding overall Alaskan capacity, the two sites will inevitably compete for a limited pool of skilled labor and state resources. [1, 2]
The Seattle Monopolies: Major vessel operators and the Alaska Marine Highway (state ferries) traditionally send their largest ships to massive, deeply entrenched shipyards in Seattle, Washington or Portland, Oregon. Wrangell’s advantage is geography—it is thousands of miles closer to the opening Arctic defense theater. However, convincing unions and private operators to move logistical hubs up to an isolated island community is a steep hill to climb. [1, 2, 3]
Would you like to look closer at how the town plans to build housing for these workers, or examine the specific types of Coast Guard ships they are trying to attract? [1, 2, 3]
Gary– What are alternative businesses that might attract as much employment to wrangell
To match or exceed the job footprint of a major shipyard (roughly 150 permanent trades jobs), Wrangell has a few alternative pathways. Because the town wants year-round, high-wage, “blue-collar” industrial employment rather than seasonal or minimum-wage work, alternative solutions focus on leveraging Wrangell’s low utility costs, deepwater port, and existing natural assets. [1, 2, 3]
1. Expanded Marine Service & Haul-Out Center
Instead of building a $700M mega-shipyard for 500-foot federal vessels, Wrangell could expand its existing Wrangell Marine Service Center. [1, 2]
The Concept: Focus on private commercial fishing fleets, tugboats, yachts, and regional barges.
Employment Potential: Expanding the current haul-out yard and adding support trades (welding, machining, fiberglass repair, electrical) could support 50 to 100 year-round jobs.
The Advantage: Much lower infrastructure costs, less environmental risk, and direct support for the local fishing fleet. [1, 2, 3]
2. High-Tech Green Data Centers
Wrangell has some of the lowest electrical rates in Alaska due to regional hydropower. Local officials have already discussed sharing the 6-Mile Mill site with data center infrastructure. [1, 2]
The Concept: Partner with companies like Greensparc to build localized data centers cooled naturally by the Alaskan climate.
Employment Potential: While the data centers themselves require few permanent staff, combining them with a renewable energy generation hub or tech manufacturing could bring 30 to 50 tech and maintenance jobs.
The Advantage: Clean industry with a tiny physical and environmental footprint compared to heavy industrial ship repair. [1]
3. Healthcare Hub Expansion (SEARHC)
According to the Wrangell Economic Conditions Report, healthcare has already quietly overtaken government and seafood as Wrangell’s largest economic cornerstone. [1]
The Concept: Formally establish Wrangell as a specialized, regional healthcare hub for Southeast Alaska, anchored by the Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (SEARHC). [1, 2]
Employment Potential: Healthcare already accounts for 171+ jobs and $15.2M in annual wages. Expanding long-term care facilities, specialized therapy, or regional medical training programs could easily add 50 to 70 high-paying, year-round positions. [1]
The Advantage: Highly stable, high-wage jobs that naturally attract families and do not suffer from industrial “boom-and-bust” cycles. [1]
4. Advanced Seafood Processing & Mariculture
The traditional seafood sector is struggling with weak salmon returns, but ocean farming presents a major pivot. [1]
The Concept: Scale up regional kelp and oyster mariculture alongside an automated, year-round value-added seafood processing plant (producing ready-to-eat products rather than just freezing raw fish). [1]
Employment Potential: Transitioning from seasonal canning to year-round specialized processing and mariculture logistics could sustain 80 to 120 jobs.
The Advantage: Strengthens Wrangell’s cultural identity and supports local fishermen while building an eco-friendly export market. [1]
5. Tourism and Waterfront Expansion
Wrangell is currently entering its strongest tourism period in two decades. [1]
The Concept: The borough is actively trying to expand its waterfront by adding a second cruise dock to capture more boutique and mid-sized cruise ships. []
Employment Potential: Tourism easily generates over 100 jobs, but they are heavily skewed toward the summer months. [1]
The Advantage: Low capital costs for the town, but it fails to meet the borough’s stated goal of creating year-round, trades-based blue-collar employment. [1]
If you were advising the town, would you prioritize expanding the stable healthcare sector or trying to revive the industrial waterfront with green tech and mariculture? [1]
Gary- I would pursue each
A.I.-Pursuing all five pathways simultaneously is a smart, balanced approach known as economic diversification. By spreading the town’s eggs across multiple baskets, Wrangell can build a resilient economy that avoids the vulnerability of a single-industry town.
Here is a roadmap for how Wrangell can coordinate these five alternative sectors without overextending its limited resources.
The Phased Diversification Plan
Phase 1: Immediate Growth (1-2 Years)
├── Expand SEARHC Healthcare Center
└── Build Boutique Cruise Dock & Waterfront
│
Phase 2: Waterfront Shift (3-5 Years)
├── Expand Existing 300-Ton Marine Haul-Out
└── Launch 6-Mile Mill Kelp & Seafood Processing
│
Phase 3: High-Tech Future (5+ Years)
└── Install Hydropower Data Center at 6-Mile Mill
1. Phase 1: The Quick Wins (Years 1–2)
Focus first on the sectors that already have momentum and require the least amount of municipal debt.
Healthcare Expansion: Partner closely with SEARHC to add specialized regional services (like elder care or physical therapy) to the new hospital facility. This brings immediate families and high-wage spending into the local economy.
Waterfront Tourism: Complete the planned second cruise dock to capture the booming boutique cruise market. Use the immediate seasonal tax revenue to fund the next phases of infrastructure.
2. Phase 2: The Working Waterfront (Years 3–5)
Shift focus to the blue-collar, year-round trades by upgrading existing assets rather than building from scratch.
The Marine Service Center: Instead of a $700M mega-lift, invest a fraction of that amount to upgrade Wrangell’s existing boatyard. Adding covered work bays and a slightly larger travel lift allows local vendors to capture regional fishing and tugboat maintenance year-round.
Mariculture Hub: Utilize part of the 6-Mile Mill site for kelp and oyster processing facilities. This pairs perfectly with the marine service center, as kelp harvesting vessels will need local boatyard support.
3. Phase 3: The Green Tech Anchor (Years 5+)
Once the housing and utility infrastructure has stabilized from the growth in Phases 1 and 2, target the high-tech sector.
Data Centers: Allocate the remaining footprint of the 6-Mile Mill site for climate-cooled data storage. By this time, the town’s upgraded hydropower grid will be ready to support the tech sector without raising electricity rates for local residents.
Balancing the Master Plan
By staggering these projects, Wrangell can grow its workforce incrementally—perhaps 30 to 40 new jobs at a time—rather than shocking the system with 150 jobs all at once. This gives local builders time to construct housing naturally and allows the school district to absorb new families smoothly.
To look into how the town can fund this multi-pronged approach, would you like to explore available federal infrastructure grants, or look at how the town is currently zoning the 6-Mile Mill site to accommodate both mariculture and tech?
Gary– Each
A.I.-Wrangell is already using a layered strategy, mapping out funding while carefully zoning the 40-acre, borough-owned 6-Mile Mill site to balance heavy industry, green technology, and mariculture. [1, 2]
Part 1: How Wrangell is Zoning the 6-Mile Mill Site
Purchased by the borough for $2.5 million, the former timber mill is being divided into a co-location ecosystem rather than a single massive shipyard. [1, 2]
The Shipyard & Freight Anchor: The borough approved a three-year lease with JAG Marine Group for the deepwater tidelands. This allows them to pursue shipyard feasibility while immediately establishing a new barge ramp and freight yard to improve regional shipping. [1, 2]
The High-Tech Footprint: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend a lease to Greensparc to build a compact, small-scale data center on a slice of the 6-Mile property. [1, 2]
The Power Grid Catch: Local zoning approval for tech has been highly debated. Because data centers consume significant power, residents are pushing for safeguards so the facility does not drive up utility rates or strain Wrangell’s Tyee Hydroelectric plant during extreme winter cold spells. [1, 2]
The Mariculture Buffer: The remaining acreage is zoned for light industrial and maritime support, leaving a physical footprint available for localized kelp and oyster processing facilities that can share the upgraded dock space. [1]
Part 2: The Federal Grant Playbook
Wrangell cannot fund this on its own, so local leaders are aggressively applying for external grants under an initiative titled “Wrangell’s Economic Revival: Anchoring the Future, Empowering the Region.” They are targeting distinct pools of federal money: [1]
Grant Type / Agency
Target Project Component
Why Wrangell Qualifies
EDA Disaster Supplemental
Industry Transformation Portfolio
Offsets regional economic losses from declining salmon returns and a shrinking traditional maritime sector.
MARAD PIDP(Port Infrastructure Development)
6-Mile Deep Water Port Infrastructure
Specifically funds the engineering and design phases to transform idle timber mills into active cargo hubs.
Provides millions in community-led funding to transition the Tongass region from old-growth logging to sustainable ocean farming.
Federal Transit / AMHS Funds
Passenger Waterfront & Second Cruise Dock
Captures federal infrastructure dollars meant to optimize multi-modal marine transport and regional transit hubs.
Part 3: Progress Across the Alternative Sectors
Wrangell’s other key industries are moving forward independently of the 6-Mile site:
Healthcare: The Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (SEARHC) continues to be the town’s primary economic stabilizer. It generated $15.2 million in local wages and grew employment by over 50%, acting as the quiet cornerstone while seafood and timber fluctuated. [1, 2]
Tourism: The town has approved a 40-year lease agreement with American Cruise Lines (ACL) to build and operate shared public-commercial passenger docking facilities. This infrastructure will directly support the town’s massive visitor spike—climbing from 45,000 cruise visitors to nearly 80,000 cruise visitors. [1, 2]
Would you like to explore how the town is managing the public pushback over the data center’s power usage, or examine the 30% design plans for the new freight barge ramp?
