Like nativity scenes on courthouse
lawns that were normal and customary until a profusion of godless atheists
rocked the boat in court and federal judges concurred on corruption, marriages
were heterosexual-only in the U.S.A. before the
Obama administration decay. While there is a pretext constitutionally for a
separation of church and state with the no
establishment of religion item, nothing at all is written about marriage.
In fact government has no requirement whatsoever to participate in anything
regarding marriage or to recognize it legally though religious marriages are
free to exist. Existentially speaking, government could allow corporations to
marry, or decide that temporary marriages could be made between politicians and
electorates. Creative fiction can be made in government promulgation of law
when Occam’s razor is eliminated as criteria for legislation and judicial
decision.
Government reinforcement of marriages was
a traditional role even so far as selling marriage licenses. Yet in the
post-modern age of biological and social trans-morphology perhaps it is time
for government to step aside and withdraw from the non-constitutional task of
regulating or sponsoring an institution of marriage.
There is no rational reason for homosexual
marriage based on biology. Male and females procreate together instead of
amongst the same sex. If there is to be no rational foundation for state
involvement in marriage-not even in order to prevent incest (what two queers
are going to produce deficient progeny with sex?) then it will be difficult for
immoral government judges to explain why two sisters or two brothers can not
marry as homosexuals and further, in order to assure equality and non-bigotry,
that sisters and brothers and even parents ought not be allowed to marry.
A science fiction story ‘Lazarus Long’
was written by a graduate of the naval academy with such an existential
marriage paradigm. Biotech screens for genetic deficiency were used as the sole
paradigm for screening procreation. When biological rationalism is removed from
the paradigm for marriage there are no boundaries. Government should not inevitably
be such a worst-case evil dictator of immorality just because it has nuclear
weapons and unlimited force to compel states to comply with perversion by
judicial decree.
The forces of doom will polemically
label resistors to the pseudo-scientific morphing of society to amoral subjectivity
under bio-engineering as phobes of the homo agenda. The salient bigots in the U.S.A. today are
broadcast media sycophants of satanic psychology
Federal courts moved to force states
to permit homosexual marriage with the Utah case the
lever godless elites of the Government apply to dictate immorality to all the
states.
A Federal judge also found the
N.S.A.’s invasive surveillance program lawful dismissing an A.C.L.U. suit
It is wrong for the courts to veto
democracy-2/3rds of Utah voters voted
for a ban on homosexual marriages- and force the will of the wicked on the
people of the United States. If 2/3rds of
Americans were to vote to ban invasive federal surveillance programs in the
states it is certain that the Obama administration would say with support from
select federal judges that you lot of n’s
can’t do that.