Corporatist Putch to Surrender Border to New World Order (2007 draft)

These putching corporatist neos will censor the internet by taking posts or pages down until the issue is decided when one writes in opposition incidentally...

A Corporatist Congress trembling a year after the Mexican mass marches in support of illegal alien amnesty in the U.S.A. works to pass a surrender the border to Mexico bill in effect. Corporatism has coopted the U.S. Congress and administration corrupting to a remarkable extent; so far in fact that providing residence status for up to 20 million illegal aliens instantly, and residence for the entire population of Mexico as relatives of the 20 million are allowed entry too. Corporatists in Congress fundamentally are traitors to the U.S.A. in favor of globalism because of greed and delusional concepts of power and what the global economy will be on a non-renewable foundation. Particular highly cultivated nationalism with good neighborliness is a far better approach to providing a sustainable planetary environment.

Southerners and Senator Edward Kennedy have led the fight to reverse the sovereignty of the United States from Mexico gained by General Scott in the Mexican war at substantial American cost. Ulysses S. Grant was a young lieutenant that led an artillery battery firing from a multi-story building that broke the back of Mexican defense of Mexico City. What not even Robert E. Lee could accomplish in the American civil war of defeating Grant the U.S. Congress is accomplishing today...and fort the same onerous purpose of exploiting human labor. The results will eventually become the same perhaps, with the end of the United States instead of just the confederacy.

Globalism is a corporatist goal supported by union busters, cheap labor plotters and others seeking instant profits from Chinese, Indian and Mexican labor. What history demonstrates however is that the lazy non-creative exploiting class eventually becomes the servant class ensnared by their own perfidy.

The Congress passed a Lenin-like bill providing a way for the permanent subversion of American political independence by globalists radically  infusing insecurity into the American lifestyle. Like Lenin's 1916 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Kaiser to subvert the Romanov dynasty in which Lenin gave away the Ukraine and one-forth of Russia to Germany the U.S. Congress has sought to annihilate American national border security, led by the traitors Cherkoff, Bush, Kennedy, McCain and Gonzalez and flood the United States permanently with a cheap labor conveyor belt from Mexico and elsewhere. If the bill passes the House the United States will be at an effective end, and a globalist succubus will develop as a body snatcher of the body politic transforming it into raving jellyfish of corporatist blindness.

FDR's 1% Economic Weapon of Mass Destruction

The President cannot coup against himself. He is already leader of the state, and rather deeply at that. Yet he may still be an outsider; something to consider at least. The military too is an outsider and an inappropriate coup tool for the target parameter of the deep state.

If Harvard and Yale Illuminati Ivy Leaguers have deep pockets equivalent to a deep state because they control all the appointees to the Supreme Court, State and so forth, and if they meet now and then in the Bohemian Grove or in Trilateral Commissions or whatever, the purge of those people could be accomplished only with an increase on the tax rate to 90% for the upper 10% of earners in the nation. If it’s all about money and the deep state owns the media and everything else and everyone else is paying rent in one way or another to the deep state, the appropriate coup tool is the F.D.R. tax policy- a super-weapon of deep state economic mass destruction that needs to be used with discretion at the right moment by a President and leaders with impeccable warrior non-socialist character for reform of capitalism and ecospheric economic policy. Donald Trump just doesn’t have that Ceasarish disposition for-himself.

Best and Brightest Neural Chess Network Would Beat 100 GMs

In a chess game of the best neural network for chess vs 100 GMs at one move a day, I would pick an A.I. like Alpha Zero to win.

It is the respect for computing power that brings me to side with a neural network such as Alpha Zero. At one move per day Alpha Zero would have something like Fibonacci Series improvement and upgrades until it exhausted all of the possible moves in chess. It could approach infinity in a sense- a Cantorian trans-finite set paradigm- for learning and structuring chess moves making the human grandmasters about as competitive as 100 monkeys typing Shakespeare vs Shakespeare, in writing another Shakespearian play in 1611.

Alpha Zero’s neural network required just four hours to learn to play chess and beat SF 8? Given a 30 move game, and 30 days to compound its own interest, Alpha Zero’s improvement would be greater than that of Magnus Carlsen vs Gioachino Greco over the centuries. Humans don’t learn remotely as fast, nor have the power for simultaneous equations as a state-of-the-art neural network. Formulaic models written by 100 GMs in a day would be comparatively primitive to those invented by the best and brightest neural network.

Computers presently are up to 122.3 petaflops (IBM Summit June 2018). Neural networks including Alpha Zero I would think, may exploiting any number of computers, including super-computers. The power applied to a single chess game or match would be absurd.

One hundred GMs with about any sort of non-electronic approach calculating board positional vectors would have as little of a chance as 100 of Emperor Gao Gui Xiang Gong best suanpan (abacus) wielders versus a supercomputer at calculating numbers of rice grains in theoretical inventories of all possible Universes minus 1.

image credit: https://applied-data.science/static/main/res/alpha_go_zero_cheat_sheet.png

For GMs to beat an AI neural network, logically they would require comparable processing capability in critical areas. One might anticipate that human reasoning algorithms regarding chess might be modeled by program designers, yet not vice versa.

Simple Alpha Zero

Fritz beat World Champ Vlad Kramnik in 2006 running on a Xeon dual-core 5160 chip at 3 mgz. The chip sold for just $860. It was a very tiny chip in comparison to today’s chips used for desktops such as the 32 core AMD Threadripper chips.

Neural network programming for artificial intelligence has advanced quite a lot since the 1996–97 Deep Blue-Kasparov games. Apparently the A.I. programming was good old brute force rather than sophisticated algorithm. The A.I. designer for Deep Blue discusses that project here… https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/20-years-after-deep-blue-how-ai-has-advanced-since-conquering-chess/

I took a programming and systems analysis course in 1980, though I worked in other fields, so I understand the philosophy behind designing computer algorithms to process data reasonably well. Computers today are orders of magnitude more powerful than those that beat Kasparov and Kramnik. There is a field of study called Big Data that is remarkable to those that know nothing of it. Big Data sweep with neural networks can get all of the information there is on-line about chess rather easily

A.I. neural network designers today can use everything ever put on-line concerning chess and program a network to sort through it and process it in numerous ways to ultimately let it select the best move. Capablanca, Morphy, Pillsbury, Steinitz; every game ever played and noted online would be in its live database. Deep Blue had very limited capacity for that, and it had just two GMs help its design. With the way data is now, the question to me is could the A.I. read and convert into meaningful information every chess book in any language that it could input. It could have the help of thousands of GMs in a sense providing data and it might build chess ‘wisdom’. Those are just programming challenges that probably were already solved. Some have said that IBM may have been using Deep Blue just to test its A.I. Maybe Google and Alpha Zero were doing that too. It was a learning test.

AlphaGo Zero Explained In One Diagram – Applied Data Science – Medium

!) Deep Blue’s lead designer was an AI specialist named Murray Campbell, who spoke about his assignment by IBM to develop Deep Blue after having made Deep Thought- the first artificial intelligence project to defeat a GM. He still works in IBM’s A.I. Foundation within the Cognitive Computing Group. Deep Blue was an attention getting development project of the people developing artificial intelligence. 20 Years after Deep Blue: How AI Has Advanced Since Conquering Chess

2-Apparently the late Charles Krauthammer shared your point of view about Deep Blue. A Forbes article comment;“ To Krauthammer, Deep Blue’s win in the 1996 match was due to “brute force” calculation, which is not artificial intelligence, he says, just faster calculation of a much wider range of possible tactical moves.”

The Brute Force Of IBM Deep Blue And Google DeepMind

Gil Press-the author of the Forbes article writes that; “Deep Blue was an example of so-called “artificial intelligence” achieved through “brute force,” the super-human calculating speed that has been the hallmark of digital computers since they were invented in the 1940s. Deep Blue was a specialized, purpose-built computer, the fastest to face a chess world champion, capable of examining 200 million moves per second, or 50 billion positions, in the three minutes allocated for a single move in a chess game.”

Rather than brute force, Alpha Zero has enhanced programming compared to that of Deep Blue. A.I. is a matter of programming code written by humans (presently) to generate calculating responses that can find their own answers to challenges. In defeating the world Go champion Alpha Go aka (Zero) trained using reinforcing techniques playing against itself.

First it was given 30 million moves that humans use in Go to develop its own game. Then it played against itself calculating moves in advance that were optimal. After that those moves formed a database that it again played against itself finding moves that human players hadn’t. An article on the Alpha Zero program that people tend to call Artificial Intelligence- that is a matter of the ability of the program and computer support to find ‘winning’ replies to specific configurations, notes that on move 37 of the game Alpha Zero calculated the odds of a human playing the move at 1 in 10,000. The higher refined data base provided very elite moves. Inside the Epic Go Tournament Where Google’s AI Came to Life

Gil Press wrote in his article about the technology that support Alpha Go. It is a lot of processing power and dwarfs the calculating power of 100 GMs laboring like a commune to find the best chess move once per day.. “AlphaGo used 1,920 Central Processing Units (CPU) and 280 Graphics Processing Units (GPU), according to The Economist, and possibly additional proprietary google Tensor Processing Units, for a lot of hardware power, plus brute force statistical analysis software (processing and analyzing lots and lots of data) known as Deep Neural Networks, or more popularly as Deep Learning.” - The Brute Force Of IBM Deep Blue And Google DeepMind

Cade Metz writes is his article on AlphaGo that “AlphaGo’s relentless superiority shows us that machines can now mimic—and indeed exceed—the kind of human intuition that drives the world’s best Go players.” Elsewhere Deep Blue was described as exploiting Kasparov with psychology, such as playing an instant move after a deep think by Kasparov to lead him to believe he “had fallen into a trap”. It is not that computers have learned to think like humans with some sort of self-awareness or cognizance that someone could believe is required for artificial intelligence. It is the case that computer programs can find better, faster answers than human to particular set criteria such as chess and Go- much better and faster even that communes or collectives of human players, when they have a certain level of expert system programming and hardware for processing power.

Human thought on certain kinds of challenges that can be modeled, can be processed faster with enhanced computer programs that were at some point written by humans. It is the equivalent of automachines beating humans in a race around a mile oval track….just the way it is.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13124/the-amd-threadripper-2990wx-and-2950x-review

Shouldn't Airlines Install Anti-Theft Ignition Systems?

With the theft today of an Alaska Airlines jet by a would-be stunt pilot baggage handler the need to upgrade airline security was demonstrated. One would think that airlines already have some kind of anti-theft key code to start aircraft engines, or at least some kind of foolproof ignition key fob to deter volunteer hijackers or joy-riders.

https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2018/08/11/authorities-probe-how-airline-employee-could-steal-plane/

The young fellow that stole the jet enfiladed a gaping security hole that might have been exploited by terrorists later, perhaps to crash a jet from Boston again into another buildng in N.Y, So he actually performed a useful service.

Never forget the security moto; when fingers (as dangers weapons) are outlawed, only outlaws will have fingers.

Who Is In Charge of Long-term U.S. Foreign Policy

That is a problem for the United States. Each President can generally set his or her own parameters that sometimes contradict those foreign relations that went before. Occasionally a President may establish a new policy direction such as Richard M. Nixon did in opening up Chinese relations, that persists for several generations. A President may be a trail breaking sled dog behind which the other dogs temporally follow. The dogsled may have no driver, or it could be a hidden groupthink.

For example G.W. Bush normalized relations with Libya, President Obama decided to support rebellion and destruction of the Libyan government, and today there is chaos of a sort in Libya.

While Presidents inherit some traditional relationships such as the Cold War or the trouble with North Korea, sometimes they choose to realistically change the criterion.

Because of the Iranian problems and the wounded pride of the embassy capture U.S. Presidents have selected adversity with Iran rather than something else. President Obama though, briefly tried to change or move toward normal relations with Iran. Some speculate that he was really born in a Muslim nation- Indonesia, and his Hawaiian birth paper was fudged by a friendly doctor there in an era when it was possible to do so. Growing up in Indonesia until age seven when he moved to Hawaii may have made him too sympathetic to Muslims and antipathetic to Christian interests as well as Jewish. So he signed a kind of treaty with Iran that President Trump has repudiated because it would let Iran have too good a chance to develop the infrastructure of nuclear weapons and missiles eventually, legally (meaning with U.S. acquiescence).

Conspiracy theorist like Alex Jones and Prison Planet have speculated about secret long-term formation of U.S. foreign policy that would accomplish the objectives of elite, hidden groups. It is more difficult to access Alex Jones video now because Facebook, YouTube and Apple Pod-casts have banned and deleted his work.

In some respects the lack of solid long-term planning is a strength because it would in theory enable more responsive U.S. leadership to create good foreign policy yet of course it doesn’t work out that way. An example is the project of ending the Cold War without nuclear holocaust. Ronald Reagan envisioned complete nuclear disarmament and did everything he could to realistically move toward that and normal relations with Russia. Gorbachev and Soviet leadership were moving toward normalization to, in stages, and Yeltsin accelerated that.

The Clinton administration working with Russia befitted the rich too far in wresting integral parts of Russia away. The Crimea and Ukraine were lost and formed the basis of a bilateral schism after the end of the Cold War to slowly build its renewal. President Trump sought to move toward more normal relations yet the Democrat Party has done everything they can to move the world toward the hair-trigger of Mutually Assured Destruction and total Cold War again. They hate Vladimir Putin. Hating Russia is a kind of new American tradition that reveals the lack of reasoning concerning what good foreign policy is, or how it should be made.

My best explanation is that a secret group of elitists do desire to annex Russia and Siberia because of its vast natural resources, so U.S. foreign policy will need to be in line with that principle. Finally then it could be said that the capital interests of global plutonomy control much yet not all of U.S. foreign policy.

Where Scientists Will Be in a Century (on Earth)

James Lovelock; inventor of the Gaia hypothesis, predicted in his book The Vanishing Face of Gaia; The Final Warning, that most of the world would be desertified within 200 years. Even Scandinavia may become a barren wasteland and just a few cool spots remain. So within a century Russia or Greenland may be where the world’s scientists congregate.

High Arctic regions of Russia above the rising sea level that will flood much of the Siberian lowlands may be some of the best places to beat the heat. When Greenland stops flooding from ice-sheet meltdown remaining valleys in the mountain shadows will look cool, and not evil to scientific researchers.

Alternatively society may change its structure and homosexuals will congregate in their own nations-maybe Europe, while hetero scientists attracted to Chinese women will move to China from the U.S.A. seeking la femme. Chinese scientists may move to San Francisco and the left coast when it is vacated from homos moving abroad. Harvard and Yale may move too, perhaps to a frontier city in the Hamalayas where some coolness persists in summer.

An alt-right scenario is that scientists will seek out a small country with zero taxes and easy citizenship for an exclusive to the rich and scientists tax haven with desirable waterfront properties, fully stocked refrigerators and golf courses, good mobile robotic defense force etc. A nation to keep an eye on for that is Iceland.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29Vip-PbuZQ the Final Warning

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAHZTDQOj2I Too Late to Fix the Earth

It isn't Necessary to Import People to Improve Economy

Researchers say there are three or four true geniuses per million people. That stat applies universally, though some geniuses in poorer countries and those with repressive or corrupt governments may waste a lot of their time in defense or find unsupported health that retards development. The United States can do fine without immigrants; it already has more than 320 million people and the environment suffers with more. The few geniuses that might be lost without immigration to become U.S. citizens could discover the telephone or internet and communicate with people that way.

A better way to advance economics nationally and globally would be to reform the patent legal criterion such that a patent’s exclusivity is limited to three years. After that the inventor-patent owner would get 10% royalties for his or her invention when others produce it.

Without ecospheric economics social sustainability is itself endangered. Present global economic policy is mal-adapted to social sustainability for a number of reasons. Geniuses working to transform global economics into a reformed capitalism with sustainability, liberty and justice for all can do so regardless of citizenship. As President Kennedy said; when the tide comes in, all the ships in the harbor rise

The United States has imported a lot of foreign geniuses, yet if native birthed geniuses were all there was, and they didn’t shift allegiance, except where they would be trimmed by poverty growing up or living as in developing countries where the best chances for expressing genius may be elsewhere than in the native country, the U.S.A. might have fewer geniuses than China or India. It is possible that India’s poverty and China’s political system repress genius somewhat.

The idea about shortening the time for patent exclusivity and just giving royalties to patent holders after three years when anyone with capital could produce the idea is that it would stimulate the economy and get patents to market much faster. Inventors with patents would not be short changed at all. It would for example get generic drugs to the sick at much lower cost quicker, yet still return as much or more than the patenter would have earned by selling the product for-himself. Supply would be greater and demand would be more quickly satisfied.

Alex Jones Infowars Was Mueller's Primary Critic

Alex Jones and Infowars was a prime critic of the Mueller investigation. Now that YouTube has removed all of his videos that element is suddenly absent from the Internet. Jones had innumerable interesting angles and ideas concerning deep state perfidy that were silenced and deleted. Roger Stone was on the Infowars broadcast several times as a contributor; now he is a focus of the Mueller investigation. The public in the midst of a critical point in contemporary history had one side of the square of opposition erased, That wasn't good.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/11/alex-jones-claims-hes-being-silenced-as-bans-push-him-to-alternate-platforms

Don't Send U.S. No Stinking Best or Brightest

Researchers say there are three or four true geniuses per million people. That stat applies universally, though some geniuses in poorer countries and those with repressive or corrupt governments may waste a lot of their time in defense or find unsupported health that retards development. The United States can do fine without immigrants; it already has more than 320 million people and the environment suffers with more. The few geniuses that might be lost without immigration to become U.S. citizens could discover the telephone or internet and communicate with people that way.

A better way to advance economics nationally and globally would be to reform the patent legal criterion such that a patent’s exclusivity is limited to three years. After that the inventor-patent owner would get 10% royalties for his or her invention when others produce it.

Without ecospheric economics social sustainability is itself endangered. Present global economic policy is mal-adapted to social sustainability for a number of reasons. Geniuses working to transform global economics into a reformed capitalism with sustainability, liberty and justice for all can do so regardless of citizenship. As President Kennedy said; when the tide comes in, all the ships in the harbor rise

The United States has imported a lot of foreign geniuses, yet if native birthed geniuses were all there was, and they didn’t shift allegiance, except where they would be trimmed by poverty growing up or living as in developing countries where the best chances for expressing genius may be elsewhere than in the native country, the U.S.A. might have fewer geniuses than China or India. It is possible that India’s poverty and China’s political system repress genius somewhat.

The idea about shortening the time for patent exclusivity and just giving royalties to patent holders after three years when anyone with capital could produce the idea is that it would stimulate the economy and get patents to market much faster. Inventors with patents would not be short changed at all. It would for example get generic drugs to the sick at much lower cost quicker, yet still return as much or more than the patenter would have earned by selling the product for-himself. Supply would be greater and demand would be more quickly satisfied.

Fake Approval Rating or Good One?

Some report that Donald Jr posted a fake approval rating for the President.

https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-jr-photoshopped-screencap-instagram-trump-approval-a6053e82a66f/

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/401232-trump-jr-shares-fake-trump-approval-rating-on-instagram

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/08/10/trumps-approval-hits-50-percent-in-a-doctored-poll-graphic-shared-by-his-son/?utm_term=.31cefac84ff9

The Washington Post and the site above report that Don Jr inflated the approval rating 10 points. Instead of 50% its 40%. Yet the Gallup Poll reports 45% making the WP's article a half truth.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/203207/trump-job-approval-weekly.aspx

I read somewhere that one poll reported a 49% approval rating and that makes the WP report 90% fake.

Newsweek reported on a Rasmussen poll that showed (Aug. 2nd) the rating is 50%. That is what Donald Jr. said it was, and that makes the WP article 100% false.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-approval-rating-obama-higher-1054927

Even so; here is a line graph (an economical bar chart) that shows the approval rating for the President from some subjective opinion poll that I made with an online chart maker..