A few
philosophical comments…
If one finds a well ordered and
logically put together system, universe, multiverse or machine- that
does not imply that it wasn't designed. Subtle and infinitesimal
quantum uncertainties may enliven art and being like pictures at an
exhibition.
Ok so God is omnipotent. He has made
every possible universe in every possible form
and stage in his thought. Everything is
possible for him that he wills possible.
In one universe a rock is movable and
in another it isn't. Every infrastructural form of everything can be
super-positioned like quanta in all possible lines God determines
possible.
Modal logic allows one to populate a
universe with whatever forms and relations one prefers, including
temporal positions. One may make their own system of logic (ref
Elements of Logic by W.V.O. Quine) concerning where and what is
possible in possible locations. It is a mistake to assume that a
particular logic structure exists in all places universally, as it is
wrong to assume there is one universal time across a multiverse
except in relation to eternal God.
If a universe can be defined as
space-time with the same physicals laws or patterns of order, thought
and logic in that area likely conform preponderantly to the forms
that function in that space-time. An eternal being whom constructs
those systems from eternity might be regarded as the unmoved mover by
sentient contingent beings moving about.
Quine refuted the dogma of empiricism
that just empirical statements about the world had valid data, and
that wasn't subjective. He showed that all statements have a
subjective element including scientific
Quine was one of the best logicians and
philosophers of logic of his time
In Word and Object he examines
subjective epistemology. In Ontological Relativity he examines modal
logic word lexicons from a nominalist perspective.
Someone cleverly noted that the
thesis-antithesis dialectic is a good way to trick people into doing
stuff as reactionaries. Besides that, the dialectic has numerous
applications via analogy as stimulus-response loops, natural
algorithmic cycles of increase, challenge response and baloney.
Hegel thought the or a world spirit was
trying to realize itself in history. Logically though humans had
realized themselves in history for at least 100000 years and the or a
spirit of the universe isn't retarded like a drunk trying to wake up
after a binge
The spirit probably pre-existed the
universe
Human wickedness and many other issues
follow after the fall. I believe Adam and Eve when found unable to
follow the will of God flawlessly were sent onto a containment
facility known as the Universe today with its second law of
thermodynamics, births toil etc in quest of energy and pleasure.
Human nature is depraved and the elect
are saved through grace. Because God is eternal and Universes
temporal the individual soul has a chance for salvation and salvage
from the human condition
If uncorrected wicked humans as eternal
spirits could run amuck plenty- hence the need for a temporal
universe and a chance to sort things out.
I am not certain about nihilism being a
first-person activity or just a point of view. The idea that reality
is an illusion and belief in God is a heresy are part of Buddhism and
consistent with nihilism in some ways, yet not in others. political
nihilism could be a practical effort simply to destroy a government
and leave nothing to replace it, or no one, and that would differ
from anarchy. I am not sure that meaninglessness is necessary for
nihilism. Consider people that hate western civilization and believe
that it should be destroyed- they are partial nihilists if they want
to annihilate the traditional American way and replace it with
something else, foreign and non-specific, and plain nihilists if they
want to leave scorched Earth and let the environment recovery (even
if short sighted because without engineers to safely shut down all
the nuclear plants and chemical dumps the environment would be a mess
for quite a number of years left to themselves when they broke down.
Anti-particles just have an opposite
spin. That is anti-matter spin is a mirror reverse image of matters
spin. So anti MC could be like anti matter and annihilate MC or
matter when it is incompatibly infused with it
Maybe it's like forcing a left threaded
device into a right threaded device thereby breaking both objects.
That reminds me about the one
concerning the Universe meeting it's long lost anti-universe rival...
Max Tegmark's book 'The Mathematical
Universe' describes a Multiverse up to a level 4 Multiverse, and
further posits that pure math may be the basis of everything,
literally. Tegmark makes a mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH).
Great book to read.
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Mathematical.../dp/0307599809
Sartre writes about the reef of
solipsism in Being and Nothingness. It is part of the human condition
as an individual observer embedded in the Higgs field temporally.
Bishop Berkeley wrote about idealism in
The Three Dialogues of Hylas and Philonous. The human experience
could be just an idea of God or a simulation. Berkeley probably was
inspired by and developed Descartes' Meditations.
. have you never read that? it started
the thought examined logically in the first person school rolling.
https://oll.libertyfund.org/.../descartes-the-method...
Jesus wasn't nihilist in bringing the end of the old covenant. He said he came to fulfill the law, not destroy it.
When the prophet Jeremiah said that one day the laws of God would be written on the hearts and minds, that occurred with the work of Jesus Christ.
Marx on the other hand was raised with Jewish ideas of millennialism and seems to have fused Feurbach's atheism, Hegelianism and Darwinism with Zionism and socialism. As has been said a million times, Marx was a great sociologist and a rather bad political philosopher. His economic analysis of England was pretty good and the corrections he envisioned poor and sparse
He had strengths and weaknesses in equal measure.
Not all political or religious change is nihilistic. Maybe Kropotkin's Russian anarchism was neo-nihilistic. Trying to understand Christianity without faith in Jesus as the Son of the Trinity will result in misunderstanding much. A spiritual transformation is to occur and one must love God, and thy neighbor as thyself. That does not imply lazy, corrupt or moral relativism.
Socialism as an economic system of the state differs much from free enterprise and self-directed work. The volunteerism and unselfishness of Christians would tend to cap capitalist acquisition and invest excess profit in social development. A Christian society should be economically more egalitarian yet does not require state socialism. Socialism can be an oppressive, atheist dictatorship. Hitler rose to power as leader of the German socialist workers part with help from a large majority of former socialists in the storm troopers. Any sort of tribe or group can use socialist economics. The challenge is to defend individual rather than collective 'rights' the devil would defeat everyone if it could, in the details.
Much of the political conflicts of the USA occur because people don't care about evidence or faith. They have a will to believe and do so as a part of being a member of a group of like minded people. The race riots aren't about faith and peaceful change does not invariable follow YouTube video evidence of a police crime, neither does exculpatory evidence send protesters and rioters home
In some cases there is a lot of evidence to support faith and in others people have faith that their evidence is valid, comprehensive and uncontroverted by unknown facts.
People aren't generally working matters of belief and politics as logicians replete with lifetimes of learning and wisdom. Consider abortion, homosexual marriage, global warming, ecosphere decay, tax rates and attacks on faith. in God- People tend to reinforce what they want to believe and force social morality to conform to desire and political preferences.
The evidence of the good book is very good. Even jurors need faith that their verdict is true if they are honest. Einstein said that he just wanted to know the thoughts of God- the rest are details.
Philosophical certainty is difficult to attain
Socrates said that he knew that he knew nothing
Epistemology and pragmatism lead one toward dead reckoning judgements of necessity. Certainty or even true knowledge as of The Timaeus or Tractatus Logico Philosophicus and The Blue and Brown books leave one with words about words and short of knowledge of things for themselves or Kant's noumenon. Faith, reason and inference lead some to belief in God. The problem of the criterion as Chisolm mentioned, afflicts all judgments of sentients embedded atop quantum entangled energy as mass in the Higgs field
Interestingly the sub-luminal status of. otherwise classless two dimensional energy packets when not getting that important 3rd dimension in the Higgs field may be the reason why time is experienced at all.
Jesus said to let the dead bury the dead
It was an oblique reference to the need to be born again. Complex topic.
If one finds a well ordered and logically put together system, universe, multiverse or machine; that does not imply that it wasn't designed. Subtle and infinitesimal quantum uncertainties may enliven art and being like pictures at an exhibition.
There are numerous truth theories. I like correspondence theory and disquotation theory. Truth is about relationships of words. The sole being in itself that is true is God it might be said. For God is truth and anything else contingent and relative