Democracy and the Balance of Capital

There are four primary types of capital.

1. Intellectual capital
2. Private capital
3. Public capital
4. Natural capital

When the nation was found there was a wealth of natural capital. Over the centuries much of it has been converted into private capital through methods that unnecessarily depleted or diminished the capital. Natural capital was sustainable yet the intellectual capital to use it and not lose it was lacking.

Intellectual capital built up over the centuries yet private capital can be managed by people with over-specialized knowledge who have no grasp of the intellectual capital content, especially regarding other forms of capital. Private capital has had a tendency to exploit and reduce natural and public capital.

Public capital (i.e. streets, public utilities, public schools, ports and harbor constructions, airports, sports stadiums proving a socialistic base for the NFL to perform bread and circuses rituals for the plebeians) has increased with the increase of the national population of the United States over the centuries yet it has not increased in size with private capital at all. Public capital policy general is made to conform with the interests of private capital.

Democracy can become dominated by concentrated wealth managers of private capital with obsessive specialized interests. Public political management may become dominated by representatives of private capital wealth concentrations in the political forms of corporatism and plutocracy. Then the capacity of enlightened political management and adaptation to national challenges is diminished.

In theory democracy is free to management parameters of private capital concentration that would reinforce egalitarian opportunity for the acquisition of capital and capital growth (capital is here defined as real properties and knowledge of value.) and support the increase of all forms of capital rather than the domination of private capital concentrated in a small percent of the populous.

The Ford Accusation; All Hat No Cattle?

Christine Ford's accusations against a U.S. Supreme Court nominee may be all hat no cattle on her claims to be a rancher of a sex offense she said Brett Kavanaugh made. She made her accusation (that appeared carefully timed to delay a confirmation vote by someone-collusion with unknown persons of interest to leak the story) as a bolt out of the blue though Senator Feinstein had the letter Dr. Ford wrote since July and when talking with Judge Kavanaugh never mentioned the subject. Senators sometimes may have other concerns besides getting to the truth about the quality of potential political appointees. Christine Ford is unwilling to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to present her cattle for inspection, if she indeed has any. Did anyone offer to provide free transport, a quality hotel and a fully stocked refrigerator if she would testify?

It is ironic that the technically rigorous legal profession and judiciary is so influenced by ad hoc data that seem to have less than quality evidence standards for its Supreme Court nominations.

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2018/09/19/accusers-schoolmate-says-she-recalls-hearing-of-alleged-kavanaugh-incident/23532800/

A school student at the elite female school Holton-Arms who graduated in 1983 informs us that;

"Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me,"I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen . Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details. However Christine's vivid recollection should be more than enough for us to truly,  deeply know that the accusation is true."

Judge Kavanaugh's mother was a Judge too. She adjudicated an eviction proceeding for Christine Ford and her parents from their home. Judge Kavanaugh's mother settled the proceeding, dismissing it, yet it is possible that young Christine formed some sort of bias against the son; Brett Kavanaugh at the time became of his mother's involvement. It is quite possible that Christine Ford contrived some sort of revenge leverage and circulated it in her all-female elite school in 1983.

Demanding the F.B.I. investigate the decades-old story would require weeks and realistically might not get any sort of reliable testimony at all about the alleged party and party incident. The claims should have some clear, present discussion before the Senate along with whatever Judge K has to say about it. That is a good place to start to look into the alien mutilation of the cattle of Judge Kavanaugh's reputation as it relates to confirmation. In theory, the narrative will play before the Senate next Monday.

Cancel that. Dr. Ford has apparently decided not to testify unless the F.B.I. investigates first. The public is left with an unverified report of a bum steer on the road beyond the wire.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/19/politics/susan-collins-kavanaugh-accuser/index.html

The Rich Should Be Taxed 90%

The rich should have a 90% tax rate in order to prevent them from playing with the poor. They have far too much power and influence to determine politics and even liberty to be allowed such wealth.

One doesn't need socialism to accomplish that, and the money could pay off the national debt and improve public education or simply be destroyed. The purpose is to de-mock democracy rather than to provide free chicken dinners for hundreds of millions.

Probably it will require war to get the tax rate down. A war with unforseeable context as yet a cloud at best amidst clouds. Then another Roosevelt will step forth to raise the bar on those that mock democracy in favor of plutocracy, globalism and corruption.

A disclaimer; the Democrats are even more corrupt than Republicans- one needs to look somewhere else.

An effectively aristocratic owned market limits the potential number of socially valuable creative start-ups. Individuals require enough capital to prove up worthwhile inventions. Egregious investment in dubiously necessary businesses such as fossil fuel vehicles and asphalt highways demonstrably present an opportunity cost that displaces better product simply through the weight of concentrated capital.

Big F...ing Rocket Gets Japanese Boost

A Japanese billionaire has bought all of the seats aboard a Big Falcon Rocket trip around the moon. That will help pay for construction of the rocket that should occur in the next three to five years. That's a venture capitalist time paradigm that ought to be emulated by N.A.S.A., who decided not to finance the Space X BFR.

What N.A.S.A. could chip in  would be a realistic study of building a Mars Gateway that is something like the moon gateway it has a a present project. The mars Gateway could be constructed on Phobos or simply orbit and should have next-robotic assembly and 3-d printing.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/09/nasa-isnt-going-to-pay-for-the-bfr-so-musk-charts-a-new-course/

Syrians Shoot Down Russian Aircraft With 15 Aboard

The Syrian government forces were shooting at Israelis and hot a Russian aircraft. Russia blames Israelis because their aircraft wouldn't hold still to be shot down. Russia should be realistic on the incident and not blame Israel for not having dolt pilots. Real politik is a Russian strength rather than weakness. There is already enough spaced out politics in the world, Russia needn't contribute.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/09/israel-rejects-responsibility-downing-russian-aircraft-180918130621740.html

Derailing Judicial Ascensions With Last Minute Accusations

The technique of wrenching Supreme Court Judicial appointment votes with last second accusations about high school sexual misconduct is a fairly fool-proof tool for Democrats to use to force things their way. Judge Kavinaugh left high school decades ago and delving into those years with murky memories providing virtually zero chance of accurate confirmation works fairly well.

Opposition parties to judicial nominations should not be free to keep a spare accusation in their back pocket to trot out at the last minute when their prospects for getting a no vote don't look good. A regular process to input all objections to the nominee should be established such that the objection evidence is all brought to the public hearing attention in a timely way with a cut off date for the introduction of new evidence, except for explicit objective evidence of a very high quality.  Unscrupulous politicians may otherwise choose to subvert honest proceedings simply for temporal control of the court to keep it as it is presently for as long as possible if they believe the court membership is disposed to supporting opposition political viewpoints regarding decisions.

It is unfortunate that Prof Christine Ford; a psychologist, choose to wait until the last minute to  trash Judge Kavanaugh's character. Yet it may produce a positive result eventually in predisposing the Judge to hold a little bias against psychologist working conflationary activities to conjoin the law and psychiatry to the detriment of human liberty.

Law should stiff-arm psychology in evidentiary and culpability to prevent social totalitarians from making it illegal to think, and correcting those who do. No one has even troubled to ask if the young Mr. Kavanaugh broke any laws, and to what extent he should be disqualified from being a Judge on the Supreme Court if he did actually grope the future psychologist.

Psychology is a field for atheists these days, preponderantly, with associative mind contents they can dismiss as phenomenal and meaningless. They may even be capable of dissimulation equal to that of politicians. Yet Judge Kavanaugh, if he has been of good character and conduct since allegedly groping, Christine Ford 35 years ago approx, might still be able to perform the duties of being a High Court Justice.
It may be the Christine Ford views the incident differently than the Judge-especially if it did not occur.

How Senator Murkowski of Alaska views the matter may be dependent upon how the Alaska Federation of Natives regard it, for she is basically owned by them for supporting her in her first run as a Senator against the Republican Party candidate Joe Miller. If she sabotages the somewhat conservative nominee Republicans of Alaska may remember that in her next re-election campaign, in addition to her support for Obamacare. Fundamentally she is a mercenary independent for hire.

If the alleged incident of groping a peer-girl while drunk at a party actually happened, getting people to testify to the event that supposedly ended with two boys running downstairs in drunken revelry, would be challenging. Some people  might remember the party perhaps, a somewhat typical adolescent socializing event with girls and boys playing together rather awkwardly in a post-pubescent (mostly) event, yet with no report at the time of the incident made apparently, there wouldn't be a good chance of putting the Judge on trial, or waterboarding him to determine if he actually did or did not cop a feel of sumptuous boobs without permission, under the influence of alcohol.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/17/fox-news-first-dems-seek-kavanaugh-delay-after-accuser-comes-forward-florence-brings-dam-breach-flooding-fears.html

A trial for an adult incident would require months to prepare and would set back the vote obviously. Yet with the incident introduced at the last minute simply to stop the proceedings being made from Sen. Feinstein's California constituency by a professional psychologist well able to fabricate false memories and so forth, the entire affair does have the aura of bogusness about it. In the future there perhaps should be some sort of rule made that does not allow the introduction of last-minute accusations in to derail a vote. That is, there should be some reasonable time requirements to introduce evidence that won't allow flimsy accusations to disrupt normal legal affairs. Supreme Court appointments don't just slip through when no one is looking; it would be reasonable to set a time period following the public nomination of a Judge of a month or two for the introduction of hostile accusations.

Automatic Food Dispenser for Weight Maint

To be as fashionable as those commercials made on the south of France where they show the chic way to open brand new large size garbage bag boxes I thought I would write about the concept of automatic food dispensers used for weight control.

Actually I don't know if they exist. The problem with dieting in the USA today is access to food without a planned diet and chef to prepare and serve the right quantities and quality of food. A new venture could produce a timed release, soy, dried beef, vegetables and fruit food dispenser for a balanced and tasty diet that would let consumers be free of concern about what or how much to eat for a month.

The automatic food dispenser should allow four meals a day and also have a liquid dispenser. One would be eating a variety of soy biscuits and compact dry goods of various sorts; maybe there should be four or five channels for different kinds of food and each tube or lane working like a dispensing machines would dispense all breakfast food, lunch foods, dinner and snack at the same time. The liquid portion would contain a fruit and vegetable drink rather like a mix of carrot, apricot and celery juice.

We the People*, (*defined as those that aren't just purely rich, materialist and aloof lacking any sort of spiritual element), should be able to have a low cost, in-home fast food dispenser with a timed release of diets designed for people according to an ideal body height and weight chart, as well as kind of work activity and caloric intake requirement setting that is appropriate.

Those who are very poor and even hungry sometimes have a difficult time stretching whatever resources they have away from a front-loaded immediate consumption of fatty foods such as the excellent pig barbecue burgers at a dollar store and to the monthly non-panicky balanced diet, if one is lucky enough to have monthly resources. So the cost should be low and as efficient at delivery a healthy diet although lacking the savory sauce kind of experience, as well as heating up.

Not of course as exciting as a super-rich NFL game with vast left and right wing consumption patterns plus steak and nutritional supplements or special excrement observers to make sure the diet of the players is working good, yet useful for those the people that remember what America was like before REM or the end of Radio Shack.

Team Obama Bought Costly Curtains for UN Ambassador Residence

It was team Obama that bought the $52,000 curtains for the U.N. Ambassador's residence in New York CIty; not Donald Trump or Nikki Haley. Before Mr. Obama left office Team Obama picked the best, though it probably lacked golden thread with cute little diamond chips, in anticipation of Team Hillary moving in.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/holmes-lybrand/fact-check-the-nikki-haley-curtain-kerfuffle

Pope May Let Chinese Atheists Select Bishops

Allowing the Chinese authoritarian government, or any government for that matter, to nominate bishops for the Catholic Church is fairly crazy. It's a giant step backward on the road to human freedom that would subvert whatever moral authority the Catholic Church has in the United States after the child molestation record of the past few decades. Reportedly the Catholic Church leader Pope Francis is considering the matter, yet one hopes that he will soon say that it isn't so.

Churches are supposed to be of the city of God rather than of the city of man. Letting the evolutionist, liberal, secularian theological viewpoint promote itself further with Communist-approved loyalist bishops would be another substantial blot on the papal, record; the other being moral anemia in a leadership position on the homosexual marriage issue when it was a live grenade.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliviaenos/2018/09/14/religious-freedom-for-chinas-catholics-imperiled-if-vatican-deal-is-inked/#4e470bfa63cd

Catholic bishops become cardinals that elect popes. China has a large population and could potentially have a lot of communist bishops and cardinals becoming electors. One day the Catholic Church could have an atheist Chicom Pope if the Catholic church chooses to go after quantity instead of quality.

The Church should not conform itself to the world. If it loses truth in believing it can define it, what value has it then except to the secularian unprincipled? Peter said the saved do not sin and he was right. That is they are justified and have no legal accountability for sin even while their sanctification to be more Christ-like is a project continuing for the balance of their lives. To accept secularian doctrines like homosexuality and abortion enables the Church to deceive the masses and exacerbates the problem of sin. Bringing people into the Church with deceit is to effectually lie; and that is a sin in many cases too. 

Inforwars Still Exists; Just Not on Big Social Media

The social media giants are something like the Dar al Islam vs the Dar al Harb having pacified FB, Apple and Twitter by removing Infowars platforms making the environment a safe zone for the globalist left who refuse to transition to nationalist environmentalist with full-employment ecological economic policy.

  Alex Jones' Inforwars site is https://www.infowars.com/

Answering the Question; Is Google Biased to the Left?

Laura Ingraham's video provides some fairly explicit evidence.

The Last Times According to Jesus (12 videos)

The Rev R.C. Sproul of Ligonier Ministries presented a good 12 video course- free to watch on-line- on the last times according to Jesus. The last times concerning when Jesus will return, is called eschatology. Rev. Sproul is a discursive educator providing informative material.

https://www.ligonier.org/learn/series/last_days_according_to_jesus/crisis-in-eschatology/?

Blitz Chess (3M) vs Scandinavian Defense

Board analysis shows that the player with fewer blunders won. More than a dozen blunders combined. I played white.

Khabib Nurmagomedov vs Conner McGregor Fight

The October 6 M.M.A. lightweight title fight is interesting tactically. Each fighter is well conditioned and with different training. The 154 pounders each are title holders.

In McGregor's recent fight for a title,  McGregor's counterpunching clobbered Alvarez 3 or 4 times, and he fell down each time. The Mayweather fight prep and loss might have helped McGregor better his counterpunching skills. 

Khabib is a two time combat sambo world champion and that art is pretty good for sweeping legs I guess. He has a black belt in Judo, maybe with some Brazilian Judo skill thrown in- who knows- it's good for the ground game. It's hard to imagine that Khabib can't get break through McGregor's long jab that is employed like the jab of post-Joe Louis boxers. Like good fighters from Ray Robinson to Ali  and Holmes... If one watches a highlight of Khabib's fights, one sees that his opponents were very hard to put down, and wouldn't stay down.

House Bans Dog and Cat Eats; Hates Cattle

The Congress hates cattle enough to allow them to be slaughtered and made for barbeque yet has taken care of dogs and cats providing special protected status for them. The House has outlawed dogs and cats from being made into dog burgers and cat crackers, snacks and fries.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-bans-eating-of-cats-dogs/

The Hindu wing of the Republican Party venerates dogs and cats as sacred, and disregarding the Petrine genius (all non human things are freely edible-Acts 10:11), thinks they aren't fit for restaurant menus. 

There are some down sides to the measure. For one thing I know of a few bike chasing, Achilles tendon biting pit bulls in Georgia that would be tasty on toast with hot sauce and fixins. They deserve the hors d'oeuvres penalty. Cats make good eagle snacks yet are really for the poor if starvation overtakes them, or if some kind of clothing for a global winter were required all of a sudden.

Excessive government regulation in the Republican-controlled House means that Democrats won't be able to put low-fat dog and cat treats on public school lunch programs.

It really was crass for the Congress to disregard seals and other mammals in the national waters from protection from being eaten when they mostly are smarter than dogs and cats. Seals deserve consideration since they really are smart and are suffering so much from humans eating their food. Whale eating should be prevented with a life sentence listening to REM for those that violate their peace and tranquility in the bays and American ocean waters, and maybe a little electro-shock conditioning to avoid eating whales.

Dogs that chase deer might be considered for exclusion from the special protection. Deer have rights too; or could.

Why Northerners Opted to End Slavery

The United States was about democracy and social equality from inception. In the late 18th century it was nearly alone in that regard. Slavery is the antinomy of freedom and implicitly inimical to democracy. It is a danger to free men.
The world governments of that era were royal with kings and queens, except for the United States. Forming the nation wasn’t easy. It required revolution, National independence came first, perfecting the union of free states need be achieved later.

At the time of the revolution all British colonial entities allowed slavery. During the revolution some states began the practice of ending slavery. After ratification of the U.S. constitution in 1788, many New England States were free states while southern states that regarded African slaves as capital assets were known as slave states

Some historians have the opinion that northerners regarded slavery as a reinforcement to the paradigm of oligarchic and aristocratic political forms. It was viewed as a threat to democracy. Britain continued to be a primary threat to the existence of the United States. After burning the U.S. capital in prosecuting the War of 1812 wasn’t successful in reestablishing British dominion in America outside of Canada England, continued to find the south a weak underbelly to work mischief upon. Northern states had a protectionist trade policy concerning Britain for much of the period. Though most Brits that weren’t members of elites opposed slavery, Britain sold trade goods vital to the south during the war. Liverpool was the main port of export to the slave states. 

http://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/liverpools-abercromby-square/britain-and-us-civil-war

The free state-slave state duality continued while the nation grew in the first half of the 19th century. Laws passed by the federal government had priority over state laws. Some federal laws inflamed states citizens over a half century concerning slavery issues. The wikipedia relates this time line on select slavery issues, as well as one from England…

“The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, a law passed by the United States Congress. The Slave Trade Act of 1794, a law passed by the United States Congress. The Slave Trade Act 1807, an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom. The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves, a United States federal law from 1807.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Trade_Act_of_1794

As these laws were implemented the effects were substantial. The fugitive slave act in particular was onerous and offensive to northerners because it seemed to directly contradict their liberty and opinion; it required that escaped southern slaves that were in free states be returned to the southern slavers. An upgraded Slave Act in 1850 is regarded as a proximal cause for the civil war. It was an issue that was critical for liberty concerning not only slavery, but the power of elites and aristocrats over democracy.

Southern states couldn’t tolerate states that harbored escaped slaves, and northerners could not tolerate giving up people to slave states. There was still much Christian opinion in the nation in those days concerning the equality of mankind. Northern Christians regarded Africans as human rather than as capital, while some southern Christian leaders such as General Gordon, used wrong Biblical hermeneutics to support their opinions justifying slave ownership. The south sought secession rather than to have their rights to own and control slaves reduced, and war ensued. The war was fought not simply to end slavery. It was also fought to keep the United States and democracy from falling apart and sinking back into the vast human historical establishment of subjects ruled by rich, powerful elites.

Russians (600 Accounts) Violated US Proprietary Twits

Special issues such as Obamacare cannot be mentioned on Twitter or Facebook without consensus or stakehold of Democrat Party boss and Vigilante Media Watchdog. Twitter and Facebook are for Americans only; foreigners have no right to read American twits, much less twit for-themselves or post articles on American topics on Facebook. These corporations have been secure U.S. traditional venues since before Will Rogers crashed in Alaska.

In the days of WC Fields, Americans respected twits and mugbook without worry about foreign interference and comment sabotage. Now spooks tossed out of San Francisco under Boris and Natasha have taken to clandestine posts and tweets to subvert American way of life and pollute precious bodily fluids.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/nearly-600-russia-linked-accounts-tweeted-about-the-health-law-1536744638

https://www.cnet.com/news/at-facebook-and-twitter-hearings-congress-needs-to-bring-its-a-game/

Pres Trump's Florence Reaction May Sway Mid-Term Election

If President Trump has a blitzkrieg ready for relief from the mass disaster of Hurricane Florence Republicans may narrowly hold on to both houses of Congress. If the response is mundane, though defensible, the pathos and propaganda will kick Republicans in the gut.  FEMA should be ready for a global warming era mega-disaster even if it is only a normal one.

http://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/406207-five-reasons-not-to-underestimate-hurricane-florence

The Federal response to take the high ground on positive p.r. with a quality rapid reaction force to beat down suffering and loss, quick rebuild and etc should be overwhelming. The first lady should visit within ten days of the eyewall reaching the shore to provide a morale boost. Rope a dope just won't work before election day. A Marciano knock out uppercut and left hook need impact the malaise across the region putting down for the count lack of coordinated response. Just waiting several rounds to let the opponent tire itself would let disaster stories multiply.

Nike Won’t Stand for the National Anthem

That’s something of a joke people say when returning new shoes to sporting goods stores. Politics entering into television entertainment isn’t such a good thing, yet it isn’t new.

Tennis umpires may boycott Serena William’s matches in fear she might go off on them. Serena’s rival who bested her for the U.S. Open title got a vast contract with Adidas. Amusing stuff.

https://sports.yahoo.com/reports-umpires-consider-boycott-serena-williams-matches-fearful-next-ramos-2-220947324.html

Did Woodward Endanger National Security?

 Did Washington Post Reporter Bob Woodward endanger national security with his new book's leaked information and statements about unpublished tweets concerning North Korea? President Trump is making more progress with North Korea than any President has before. The Clinton's just gave the North Koreans a lot of food and cash in exchange for pretending they weren't building nuclear weapons (they did). If Mr. Woodward's book has effected the careful interaction between Kim Un and President Trump and the North Koreans fail to continue rapprochement with South Korea and the U.S.A. while getting rid of nukes, that may leader to a future nuclear exchange and that could be said to endanger national security.

https://deadline.com/2018/09/john-oliver-donald-trump-bob-woodward-president-idiot-all-going-to-die-fear-white-house-1202461409/

The title of the new Woodward book is 'Fear'. Fear is a popular theme with young Democrat supporters and politics and. In Oregon last year Sen. Ron Wyden told the young people of Lane Community College not to fear (the Trump election). Apparently youth are fearful and worry about impingement on homosexuality, drugs and blue hair. Bob Woodward tapped into one of the Democrat party's underlying themes about Republicans. Apparently their is a myth that Republicans will put youth out on the street where they will be victimized by the Klan who is lurking with motorcycles, whips and chains nearby.

Yet Democrats don't have a real platform to change anything. Their polices work for the concentration of wealth; it what Mr. Obama who made Bush II tax cuts permanent without a single vote of dissent from Democrats except for Bernie Sanders who was an independent.

I recall that during the Reagan administration writers including myself used to advocate national self-determination and democracy as opposed to the forced subjugation to communist authoritarianism. I could no longer write that way about the United States or the west if there was some sort of international situation. I still oppose communist authoritarianism, yet the United States is no longer for national self-determination so much as it is for globalism. It is also a real politic advocate for corporatism and globalism instead of national democracy tat requires secure borders.

Democrats are leading youth to increased national debt in partnership with Republicans. Democrats just go about globalism differently and apportion government spending priorities to their constituency instead of the military industrial complex. Even so, the primary benefit for Democrat voters is moral corruption and licentiousness (Ken Starr writes in his new book that Hillary Clinton said she could not remember or didn't recollect an event more than 300 times while being interviewed and he felt like charging her with perjury). That will lead to the destruction of citizen interests and strength politically in prep for a lot of people globally being phased out. Homosexuality is just a birth control and population reduction tool. Democrat Party leadership just works to make a future Earth a better place for the 1%.

President Trump's government environmental policies aren't good. The only real way to fix the ecosphere is to have a strong national identity and self determination with Democracy taxing the rich enough to pay for secure borders and ecospheric rehabilitation. That can be done with either party. Presently neither party even recognizes what ecospheric economics are, nor have a clue about reforming capitalism. Democrats are trained to hate Christian, develop a Sodom and Gomorrah ethos and prep the world for the rich to inherit.