Sustainable Nationalism or Runt Globalism?

Sustainable U.S. nationalism is a prerequisite for creating an ecologically sustainable economy. An ecologically sustainable economy with liberty and economic justice for all citizens requires much intelligence, determination and will to evolve into being. The global economic system would not support many if any necessary reforms and worse-owns the broadcast media acting to defeat U.S. nationalism.

Strong U.S. nationalism is requisite for democratic control rather than gradual subduction under planetary plutonomy. Large nations such as the U.S.A., Russia, China, Australia etc require strong nationalism with a trade differential able to effectively engage with other nations yet retain the power of self-determination. Solely with national political self-determination might democracy elect a new or reformed economic system that reverses the present global economic system methodically destroying the ecosystem of the planet so far as human life goes.

Small nations-the runts, are better off in de facto trade unions preponderantly. Their political self-determination may be overwhelmed by a single global corporation. In banding together carefully they may be able to defend their trade interests better to a limited extent.

The present global economic system is preponderantly above the laws of national democracies and lead rather than follow the law. Recent U.S. Presidents have served as butlers to global corporate interests deregulating where possible ans expediting planetary free trade agreements to allow global economic corporatism the freedom to exploit world resources including people as they deem; even fluidly relocating profit beyond tax accountability. It is a system draining the environment, expanding the human and corporate footprint until no wild spaces remain for wild life on Earth, heating the atmosphere with business and technology gases, concentrating wealth, engendering an aloof elitism and corrupting free enterprise for ordinary people except as it is co-opted to serve the plutonomized-oligharchic global economic structure.

Strong U.S. nationalism is required as the basic entry point for an enlightened democracy with a stable population to elect economic change and regulate it in order to conform to environmental economic criteria for continuing life and economic efficiency.

U.S. voters should vote for objective economic class interests rather than follow bait of race,perversion or gender enhancement. When all Americans have economic justice the former fade away. Full employment within a sustainable eco-economic system developed nationally can serve as a role model for the world to follow. That will never develop within an increasingly globalist environment where democratic changes to the present economic system are impossible. I have elsewhere described that system to a limited extent. It is not socialist. Instead it is a directed economic evolution with business at a certain scale required to conform to ecological criteria. Capital is also progressively taxed with the most rich being no more than 500x wealthier than the most impoverished. Excess tax inflow is invested by the government in environmental restoration, education and space exploration.

The patent system would be reformed and expedited with a public co-op created where inventors could safely market their works to producers.

Corporations would be limited to 5000 employees maximum. Natural selection of good ideas would allow social selection of business models to reinforce. All citizens would have a guaranteed minimum income for several good purposes including letting middle class young people afford an free, self-directed intellectual career without wasting time in menial labor or economic careerism for rent paying. Presently the black culture has yet to evolve a substantial intellectual cultural tradition because of the time required for evolution culturally away from origin in a slave market. As it is inheritance is the best available way for bright young blacks to afford an intellectual liberty without strings or quality reduction and that is usually too late in life and/or rare since fewer pass on significant savings to the next generation in the present globalist economy.

True free intellectuals require financial support. Before electrification priests were often intellectuals drawing from community church financial support. Copernicus (Kopernik) and Gregory Mandel for instance, where Catholic scientists.

There are several varieties of contemporary intellectuals, yet just those with independent if limited financial means are actually free from social structural conformal logic. Intellectuals practicing law or in the film industry have limited degrees of freedom; occupational and professional structures require conformity as needed. A few are fortunate enough to earn enough with little time opportunity-cost to devote themselves to thought and research unobligated.

Free intellectuals with lots of time to research and think are actually very productive- not all become Marxist revolutionaries, join ISIS or follow Hillary Clinton on Twitter. Actually the number of those probably are few.

With a strong U.S. nationalism and secure borders it is theoretically possible that an enlightens populace will vote to office leaders in national ecological economics and full employment with a goal of continuing technological and quality of life progress for all citizens within a recovering environment. Nations, like homeowners that want to turn off lights to save electricity or turn them on for light in the darkness need to flip the switches one at a time rather than everywhere in the home at once. Without strong nationalism where good ecological economic policy and economic justice affording a high quality of life and free enterprise opportunities for all citizens exist developing in one real nation, then another, it is unlikely to develop anywhere-the present global economic unaccountability of the trans-national business environment is far too strong and socially unwilling to relinquish power and turn to better policies on its own that would contradict its own Wall Street logic and investor methods.

For Colin Kaepernick- Race Over Nation

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick has joined what President Obama call's a long line of (negro) athletes that have pissed on the U.S. national anthem to protest racial inequality or lack of racial supremacy etc. president Obama supports that as may Hillary Clinton. President Obama early in his first term would not have been caught dead wearing an American flag lapel pin.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2016/09/05/obama-defends-kaepernicks-national-anthem-protest/89879478/

Something like 1.1 million Americans have died in wars including the U.S. civil war. The vast majority of the casualties were white men. However the oldest living U.S. veteran is a black man. There are obviously black veterans that respect the constitution over race and nation over globalism, Mecca and race yet they are a small percent of black Americans.

The late Muhammad Ali refused to serve his nation in time of war. Like Jane Fonda he was a pacifist with minor imperfections of a thirst for violence. He viewed the U.S.A. as a racist nation as do many eccentric black Americans, though he was too large to be a real V.C. warrior. Joe Frazier might have been a tunnel rat hunting V.C. if called to her-we was not.

With the vast public debt President Obama has built up, and with such substantial Anti-Americanism from black celebrities and the Democrat Party left some will consider refusing the pledge and the national anthem in protest of homosexual marriage-an abomination-and of globalism and godless atheism. Maybe they and Colin Kaepernick will solve all those problems by getting the U.S.A. to break up into smaller states leaving the public debt with the last entity calling itself 'U.S.A.'

In this age where creeping globalism is fundamentally subverting the American democracy and where the Democrat Party is duping its followers to allow the concentration of wealth public figures ought to disambiguate themselves from the appearance of supporting race over national interest. The U.S.A. has a history of progressive equalization of human rights. Other nations have preponderantly experienced various forms of social stratification legally in that same time period. Ignorant leaders with racial agendas shouldn’t overlook reality and ought to support and defend the United States rather than its assailants.

World Chess Champ Made Positive Trump Comments

Magnus Carlsen, world chess champion, had positive things to say about Donald Trump earlier this year. Evidently the Norwegian establishment didn't like that and mischaracterized his statements in the media.

http://sputniknews.com/sport/20160830/1044778475/norway-magnus-carlsen-donald-trump.html

I should say that my new favorite Carlsen chess game is one against Wesley So in round four of the Bilbao Open 2016.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KW6Wq0s5pE

Honest History V-5 and 'Risen'

I have published the fifth volume of my blog essays in the 'Honest History' collection.

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/honest-history-volume-five/ebook/product-22845570.html

Also I recommend 'Risen' as a movie worth watching.

Moving Hoops and Goal Posts?

Because the game was intended for people like short Canadians (boys) tossing peaches or larger spheres into a basket fixed at some height (e.g. 10') above the ground while players grew and became adult specialists the game changed to something requiring upgrades. With the profusion of technology the N.B.A. could afford a movable hoop and backboard that rises to 12 feet during a game with mobility from the first quarter at a regular incline. Maybe the backboard should change its slant and even the hoop rotate clockwise in a full circle during the game.

N.F.L. goalposts could start wide as at present then reduce their width each quarter until in the 4th the gap is just 6 feet. Tactics would change considerably in each sport.

Essays; Decline of Moral Leadership (vlog)

Trans-Pacific Partnership Defeatism

The Trans-Pacific partnership is a logical continuation of President Bill Clinton’s start in NAFTA and subsequent trade agreements to surrender sovereignty and democracy in the United States to global oligarchy. President Obama’s early childhood upbringing in the nation of Indonesia presents a U.S. leader with a too natural eastern center point of view on trade policy. With the Clinton-Obama-Bush trade mosaic giving up a focus on U.S. development and prosperity for that of Wall Street, recrudescent British Imperialists through business and finance the future of the United States and even the world economically and politically speaking continues to decline.

The Clinton-Obama attack on western values brought the U.S.A. to the point where it is reasonable to say, like Horace Greely, 'Go east young transexual.'

A United States flood by illegal aliens and Asians with industrial production shifted offshore leaves the United States poorer even while the world ecosystem is in decline. A plutocratic global concentration of wealth and power driving American interests down in favor of a Beijing central partnership with Harvard and global financial elites does well to destroy the former social fabric of the United States and remake it into a nation of corporate lackeys with corporatism uniting leadership with the Chinese Communist Party.

Marxism and atheism under the dialectical infrastructure of evolution is not a necessary political, theological or philosophical ontology so much as it is a simple, popular way to drive the masses into servitude lowering their expectations and ability to accomplish free enterprise, democratic reform and self-determination. It is a wonder that not so many find it funny that the rope capitalists sell to communists to hang free enterprise and democracy with is actually produced in China too.

The world does face grave financial and ecological challenges that can be successfully addressed best with ecological economics within a democratic environment with new value theory. The Democrat Party of the U.S.A. hasn’t an interest in that direction at all. It is a partner of those Republicans such as Bushes, Ryans, Romneys and McCains interested more in concentrating wealth than in preserving and defending freedom nationally, free enterprise and advancing all citizens to prosperity and environmental recovery.