Facebook's New World Order

Facebook has a CEO who got lucky with one idea in college during the rapid growth phase of social media on the Internet. For whatever reason it was welcomed and Mark Zuckerberg became a billionaire. Now of course he wants to rule the world, or rather, have the political thought of humanity exist within his vast leftist global empire on-line.

https://arstechnica.com/staff/2017/02/op-ed-mark-zuckerbergs-manifesto-is-a-political-trainwreck/

Actually independence and nationalism are requisite for meaningful democratic politics. Strong national boundaries are needed for the possibility of ecological economic transition to develop from the present non-renewable economics. Change needs to happen in particular areas rather than sort of generally. Zuckerberg would like to form millions of people into little regional groups where they are given appropriate news of public concern. Like the broadcast media owned by the rich those concerns cannot really be in conflict with the way things are.

The Unibomber also wrote a manifesto. He also wanted to change the world to conform to a radical vision. If he had owned Facebook perhaps he would have required humanity to be brainwashed in planetary groups that would support his goals for a new world order.

Mark Zuckerberg should write a few books on environmental economic theory and let the sophomoric approaches to a new world order go.

http://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/2/18/14653542/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-manifesto-sapiens

Everybody wants to rule the world. Logically the first guys with preferred network locations would want to get in on the action. Facebook would morph like the planet eating blob into an organism containing everyone. All would be subject to Facebook's ability to know what they write as if they were a super-N.S.A. toying with it's prey.

Facebook would become the real political means of being with overwhelming power to raise up or put down those that make the global corporate agenda function more smoothly. As the present media hates Trump now except for some honest reporters like Rush Limbaugh, it would be able to coordinate and promote attacks on political systems anywhere.

Facebook's goal seems to be to move directly to Mussolini's corporatist utopia that failed in Nazi Germany but in a brave new world order might fulfill Mao's ideal state with the central committee being a planetary oligarchy dwarfing even the Chinese Communist Party. It is a logical, evil turn toward the dark side of the force.

Questions of Matter, Space and Gravitons

Are gravitons attracted to mass or vice versa? Are there states of mass that do not attract gravitons (such as neutrinos) such that one might say it is in a state comparable to that of monatomic elements?

If gravitons overwhelm matter condensing its implicit forces and structure to a state of matter unique to gravitons; in fact a stable state of mass, it might have finite size. It also might have warped space around it in such a configuration that when released with the monatomic phase of the graviton solid it unfolds with an apparent faster-than-light speed.

Monatomic elements

http://www.zptech.net/science.html

Of course gravitons might be something that pushes space. They might be something like virtual particles surrounding a particle wave like a digital field that activates into being briefly then switches off. Gravitons may be embedded within space and when drawn to mass release a certain amount of weight from space taking it to mass.

One wonders about being and nothingness. Smallest particle-waves theoretically like strings or membranes perhaps with virtual fields of their own. It seems though that all particle-wave are emergent characteristics of potential energy unpacking from a big bang-inflation field possibly emitted by the monatomic equivalent state of the graviton solid. Or not.

The idea that a digital field without space is entirely subject to the will of God is interesting.

Yazdgird, Islam and Sassanids; Leashing the Wild Bitches

When ISIS tried genocide on the Yadzi people of upper Iraq they were following an ancient Muslim tradition. The last great King of the Sassanid Empire was named Yadzgird III and he was killed by Muslim forces after the conclusive battle of ending the Sassanid Empire at Qadisiyya in 637. From then on the Muslim advance increased inexorably until being revered in 1061 by Roger the Norman at Palermo Sicily. Sicily had been invaded and occupied by Muslims since 831. Innumerable interesting historical facts can be found in Michael Angold’s 2001 book named Byzantium.

The left have developed a narrative for decades whereby the Crusaders one day decided to invade south of the Mediterranean. Nothing is mentioned of the real history of the Middle East’s history of the Sassanid, Byzantine, Muslim and Carolingian Empires meeting and interacting militarily and theologically. The Sassanids worshipped fire. Isis described the Yadzis as devil worshippers. When Islam expanded the Sassanind was it first rival followed just later by the Byzantine.

The book Byzantium; The Bridge from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages is a brief, informative read. Perhaps the examination of iconoclasts vs iconodules would be too much theology for today’s godless atheists of the Democrat Party. Angold notes that some theologians actually used polemic in their writing and policy expressions. It seems that politics were fused with religion in the day. Even Charlemagne brought together theologians and scholars to form opinions and works for the western church that was not subordinated then to the church under the Papacy at Rome. Angold’s treatment of the relationships between the Frankish Church, the Roman Church and the Byzantine as well as from theological and political points of view is quite interesting.

The three major civilizations of the day outside of China were all devoted to religion. If one thinks about it, illiteracy, images and popular ideas about God and government were inextricably meaningful and continue to shape the politics of the world. Classical civilizations, pagans (an equivalent of modern atheists in some ways especially if they worship string theory) and even scientifically inclined philosophers receded into the past.

When Muslims ruled Sicily from 830 to 1061 it is written that the major export was Slavs south as slaves. Roger the Norman ended that, however slavery of Europeans continued for hundreds years more elsewhere in Islam. It is thus ironic that the Byzantine Empire itself disassociated itself from an Arab tribe of Christian monophysites that guarded 'the desert approaches' (to the east) for Byzantium because they were monophysite Christians (from Yemen). The byzantine Emperor's decision to get rid of those Arabs with a theology somewhat at variance with their own allowed an easy avenue of attack for first Sassanids and later, Mohammadans.

It is important for American policy makers to be aware of world history beyond the rather narrow viewpoint of far western Europe and the transatlantic migration that at any rate misses the history of Irish and Viking journeys to America. As wild feminists go about their intifada of the new Potus as unleashed wild bitches without historical reason they should be aware that the world is not a potential Utopia, that Soviet communist sentimentality still is alive and well in many municipal, state and federal government workers, that Soviet collective bargaining and godless atheist bureaucratic power is not an actual supporter of civil liberties beyond those required for conformity to Bitchdatorship bureaucracy.

Not all American women voted for the Bitchtatorship of the proletariat that felt Zillary was entitled to rule. Americans should support individual excellence and likeability in their politicians though when they worship money instead of educated, selfless service to the Republic the choice is slim pickens indeed.Copulation without consequence is a feminist fact and ideal since the 1960s and birth control pills. Methodical destruction of moral sensibilities of tradition and increases in abortion were partners of the rise of the ideal of feminist dictatorship through the ballot box and coalitions if if it required flooding the nation with illegal aliens. Perhaps they should have been content to trust a little in the people of the U.S.A. Over time women would naturally have found an acceptable opportunity for social personal expression and participation in work without going over to wild bitch status hateful of men.

 American sanctuary cities should support internal refugees from the U.S. economy as well as non-citizen Muslim ‘refugees’ from Syria driven from their homes by U.S. foreign policy of the Obama administration that threw fuel on the fire of that civil war so far as it possibly could. The radical left should be leashed and harnessed to the sled of bettering the U.S. economy for all Americans including straight, white males. The sole competent policy for any party calling itself democratic should be the economic betterment of the poor and middle class-not just placing feminists and homosexuals in high public places. Perhaps they are so cinched economically that they are concerned solely with power for-themselves.

All the Marbles

There is an app for Linux named Marble. It's a scalable map of Earth in the form of a movable sphere-somewhat like Google Earth. It would be great if someone produced a topographical relief global app;-able to show planetary landmass and-sea-level area at any time in Earth history. People should be able to extrapolate future theoretical contours with reciprocals of-ice-sheet melting andf sea level rise. In fact topo-globes of every substantial world and moon of the solar system would be good.

State-of-the-Union Show not Until January 2018

Waiting until next January for the President Trump state of the Union speech may be tough yet worth the wait; it could be great. Press conferences will be-an acceptable substitute if the Washington Post and N.P.R. stay away. What would the President say to that globalist pack?

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump%E2%80%99s-two-year-presidency/ar-AAmPfaZ?li=BBnb7Kz

One-Party Corporate Politics and Non-Sense Policy

With Republicrats going about wasting time in Congress deciding how to put the most meaningless pork forward, that is with the fundamental plan to enrich the rich and people in government while impoverishing the poor and stagnating the middle class, some must look to silly non-sense for political hope.

Where will President Trump's first foreign visit be? What about Antarctica where he can choose to ignore global warming any time of year? With luck the President will visit Alaska and declare it an economic disaster zone since it is hemorrhaging jobs.

The great wall of China gave Chinese a national sense of identity for a few thousand years. Maybe they would sell it to us to use on the Mexican border. Perhaps Russian troops would patrol the Mexican border since U.S. troops are forbidden with posse comitatus discouragements. Poland could pay for the cost of the troops as a quid pro quo for U.S. troops sent to Poland to protect them from a Russian invasion. Brits and Germans are closer than the U.S. and also in N.A.T.O. Why don't they go to Poland to protect Poles?

Former Joint Chief Chair Michael Mullen's Bad Bannon Advice

Adm. Michael Mullen's effort to let the military determine foreign policy keeping strategic Presidential-advisors out of the National Security Council is consistent with a globalist that with Secdef.Bill Gates were agitators for bringing open homosexuality to the military-and that did endanger the Republic throwing accelerant on Muslim conservative hatred of the U.S.A. President Trump needs rational as well as killer butch military opinion yearning for battle.

http://www.businessinsider.com/mullen-trump-steve-bannon-nsc-2017-2

2- It is well known that globalists prefer a homo-hegemony over the 180 nations including Russia. Theorists believe homosexuals are safer in a Sodom-Gomorrah paradigm wherein they would be just like anyone else. Probably that is an incorrect assumption. Muslim and some Catholic nations will look askance at having any sort of relationships with a nation that has a homosexual military. Perhaps it will cut down on foreign troop deployment costs though.

3-Mr. Bannon could point out that there are solutions besides military for select international issues. One could, for instance, change the way people think about Russia-that is-evolve the military and political thinking-to a point where at its considered a good idea to let Russia be Russia so far as the Dnepr River while reassuring frightened NATO allies that the big bad queer military really will blast the former commie forces to h and gone if to steal polish sausage or anything like that. It is difficult to interpret the leadership paradigm of the queer movement's ideas about security. Probably it would be a good idea to get rid of homosexual marriage and compel them to form some sort of institution of their own that does not muddy up family present, future and past.

American Presidents don't need to be the blasters for the master political theorists of Europe seeking to take lands of the former evil empire. Russia has suffered invasions from the east and west for thousands of years; especially from Poland, Germany and Mongolia. America need not be stupid. Split the differrence with Ukraine to the Dnepr and move on drawing a line in the suerkraut or whatever.