Yazdgird, Islam and Sassanids; Leashing the Wild Bitches

When ISIS tried genocide on the Yadzi people of upper Iraq they were following an ancient Muslim tradition. The last great King of the Sassanid Empire was named Yadzgird III and he was killed by Muslim forces after the conclusive battle of ending the Sassanid Empire at Qadisiyya in 637. From then on the Muslim advance increased inexorably until being revered in 1061 by Roger the Norman at Palermo Sicily. Sicily had been invaded and occupied by Muslims since 831. Innumerable interesting historical facts can be found in Michael Angold’s 2001 book named Byzantium.

The left have developed a narrative for decades whereby the Crusaders one day decided to invade south of the Mediterranean. Nothing is mentioned of the real history of the Middle East’s history of the Sassanid, Byzantine, Muslim and Carolingian Empires meeting and interacting militarily and theologically. The Sassanids worshipped fire. Isis described the Yadzis as devil worshippers. When Islam expanded the Sassanind was it first rival followed just later by the Byzantine.

The book Byzantium; The Bridge from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages is a brief, informative read. Perhaps the examination of iconoclasts vs iconodules would be too much theology for today’s godless atheists of the Democrat Party. Angold notes that some theologians actually used polemic in their writing and policy expressions. It seems that politics were fused with religion in the day. Even Charlemagne brought together theologians and scholars to form opinions and works for the western church that was not subordinated then to the church under the Papacy at Rome. Angold’s treatment of the relationships between the Frankish Church, the Roman Church and the Byzantine as well as from theological and political points of view is quite interesting.

The three major civilizations of the day outside of China were all devoted to religion. If one thinks about it, illiteracy, images and popular ideas about God and government were inextricably meaningful and continue to shape the politics of the world. Classical civilizations, pagans (an equivalent of modern atheists in some ways especially if they worship string theory) and even scientifically inclined philosophers receded into the past.

When Muslims ruled Sicily from 830 to 1061 it is written that the major export was Slavs south as slaves. Roger the Norman ended that, however slavery of Europeans continued for hundreds years more elsewhere in Islam. It is thus ironic that the Byzantine Empire itself disassociated itself from an Arab tribe of Christian monophysites that guarded 'the desert approaches' (to the east) for Byzantium because they were monophysite Christians (from Yemen). The byzantine Emperor's decision to get rid of those Arabs with a theology somewhat at variance with their own allowed an easy avenue of attack for first Sassanids and later, Mohammadans.

It is important for American policy makers to be aware of world history beyond the rather narrow viewpoint of far western Europe and the transatlantic migration that at any rate misses the history of Irish and Viking journeys to America. As wild feminists go about their intifada of the new Potus as unleashed wild bitches without historical reason they should be aware that the world is not a potential Utopia, that Soviet communist sentimentality still is alive and well in many municipal, state and federal government workers, that Soviet collective bargaining and godless atheist bureaucratic power is not an actual supporter of civil liberties beyond those required for conformity to Bitchdatorship bureaucracy.

Not all American women voted for the Bitchtatorship of the proletariat that felt Zillary was entitled to rule. Americans should support individual excellence and likeability in their politicians though when they worship money instead of educated, selfless service to the Republic the choice is slim pickens indeed.Copulation without consequence is a feminist fact and ideal since the 1960s and birth control pills. Methodical destruction of moral sensibilities of tradition and increases in abortion were partners of the rise of the ideal of feminist dictatorship through the ballot box and coalitions if if it required flooding the nation with illegal aliens. Perhaps they should have been content to trust a little in the people of the U.S.A. Over time women would naturally have found an acceptable opportunity for social personal expression and participation in work without going over to wild bitch status hateful of men.

 American sanctuary cities should support internal refugees from the U.S. economy as well as non-citizen Muslim ‘refugees’ from Syria driven from their homes by U.S. foreign policy of the Obama administration that threw fuel on the fire of that civil war so far as it possibly could. The radical left should be leashed and harnessed to the sled of bettering the U.S. economy for all Americans including straight, white males. The sole competent policy for any party calling itself democratic should be the economic betterment of the poor and middle class-not just placing feminists and homosexuals in high public places. Perhaps they are so cinched economically that they are concerned solely with power for-themselves.