What is the Congressional History of Condemning Civil Political Opponents?

Recently the Congress passed a resolution condemning ‘white nationalists’. On its face it means condemning all white people that are patriots or nationalists. It's o.k. apparently for the nation of Islam to exist without condemnation, or for black nationalists to exist- or even Mexican nationalists that want to annex the U.S.A. onto Mexico. The law should be color-blind on behavior and never condemn anyone for race, religion or political opinion. The Congress shouldn’t act as collectivist demagogues.

One wonders what the history is of the U..S. government condemning citizens for having antipathetic political opinion that do not comprise sedition? When it goes that far it is fine to call out the Federal Marshals, yet the democracy of free people with equal protection of the law isn’t a place to condemn, white people or any other race. Neither is it a place that should tolerate condemning any political group extra-legally beyond the objective criminal codes that apply to all individuals at any time. Congress didn’t condemn black rioters in Missouri during the Obama administration. It should just condemn movements that don’t obey its laws if it must be redundant for pr purposes.

Far-right and far-left extremists have always been a part of the United States without causing significant damage to national interests. Of course the McCarthy era purged communist infiltrators from government and Hollywood so far as possible, yet that should be no example for the government to follow now. Sure there was racism historically on all sides for a number of reasons, yet there were all people that supported the concept of a nation where all people could live under God as of equal worth.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/12/congress-passes-measure-condemning-white-nationalists/660231001/

The United States is in an era where democratic politics and the 1% of corporate wealth tend strongly to support globalism and the destruction of the integrity of the United States as a nation. The black power movement goes beyond seeking equality in all social things and beyond to the destruction of the nation and whatever white establishment remains in order to promote themselves.

The language does matter. Short after the Supreme Court legalized homosexual marriage the Congress ended no child left behind and replaced it with 'every child succeeds'. The Mayoor of Seattle- a leader in the homosexual marriage movement,  just quite after several allegations of molestation of male children surfaced. Congress understands the symbolic consequences of its language.

President Trump does not need to support the invasion of the United States by Mexican illegal immigration nor the outsourcing of jobs to China. Looking out for the interests of all the people of the nation impartially is his right. And he doesn’t need to sign off on the ambiguous phrase of ‘white nationalists’ in order to prove he is working for equal protection of the law. The movement to condemn the historical United States as a white nation of Christians in order to promote people that feel they were second class citizens is misguided. So many white Americans lived and died working to create social equality and liberty for all in the United States. The high-power anti-white racism is not leading in a good direction.

Keeping the nation divided at all times over race is a device used by globalists to take down the nation of all citizens.

On BS in the Media

W.V.O. Quine, the philosopher, published a book titled 'Word and Object'. Words obviously differ from objects, hence there is no precise description of anything that is exhaustive or comprehensive of possible descriptions of what it is- not even of a zero-dimensional singularity.

Andy Warhol could paint a tomato soup can accurately, yet try to write about a can of coke-in-itself... ie 

http://www.garycgibson.us/2017/08/another-cold-can-of-empty-poem.html\

Intentional words strings are implicitly analogous of that perceived. Observer bias effects every report, yet words have practical value of communicating information, so valued reports are more worth reading than those that are just entertaining. People will want to pay more for better, more accurate information as always. For now they tend to over-rely on video. It is the accompanying words that are the problem. Broadcast media may not use complete bs- they may just toss in 5% bs for spicing up public interest and narrative.

An argumentative, litigious society concerned less with creating a better society and more with going forward in private interests with law as a kind of fender obviously would attract a lot of bs to desynchronize macro-social control. The positive should be accentuated rather than the negative.

NK DIctator Promises 'Greatest Pain' for Sanctions- Hillary 2020?

North Korean Dictator Kim Jong Un has promised the U.S. would receive 'the greatet pain' for sanctions imposed by the UN even though many Chinese companies sell on ebay. China may have already imposed partial retaliatoryt sanctions on the U.S. ordering its China e-bay sellers not to accept paypal from U.S. orders.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41242992

 The threat may have been a Jungian leak that Hillary will run again in 2020. It is plain the Dictator's hydrogen bomb and ICBM threat is a great problem for DC being taken almost as seriously as the greater danger that oil sales might be cut off to North Korea or anyplace else on Earth.

A Few Free E-Books of Mine

A few free e-books of mine.

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/a-philosophical-approach-theoretical/ebook/product-23138671.html

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/god-cosmology-and-nothingness-theory-and-theology-in-a-scientific-era/ebook/product-22947558.html

http://www.lulu.com/shop/gary-clifford-gibson/a-place-for-faith/ebook/product-21963399.html

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/a-commentary-on-berkhofs-intro-to-the-new-testament/ebook/product-21420051.html

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/elements-of-christian-church-history/ebook/product-21636084.html

http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/matter-of-spirit/ebook/product-21293069.html

At Least Irma Did No Harm to Nature

I think it’s worth remembering that Hurricanes do no harm to nature at all. They are a natural part of the ecosphere that roll about stirring things up a little and creating new opportunities for habitat renewal.

It is human structures and activities ill-designed for ecospheric comparability that is the problem. That is a fact at many levels. People cannot thin deeply about the entire ecosphere and exist in tiny little individual niches within it-even big capitalists like President Trump.

So it is interesting encountering the global warming claims about Irma; that it is an example of global warming- yet also the first large Hurricane to hit Florida since the 2005 Cat 3 Wilma (that I experienced in a tent in Stuart Florida). Global warming is not the cause of hurricanes; they have been around forever. Four hurricanes hit Florida between 1553 and 1559 that killed more than 2000 people altogether.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Florida_hurricanes#2000.E2.80.93present

I believe in global warming of course. The science is solid and objective. Even more I believe humans can increase global warming (I don’t feel good about owning a car and contributing tons of global warming gases from exhaust annually so I don’t own one). Yet pointing to hurricanes as examples of global warming just seems silly.

Over the course of planetary history there have been innumerable changes in climate and weather patterns. Probably they always are in change or permutation within certain parameters since it is an unstable thermodynamic system not always in equilibrium as perhaps the hydrogen burning phase of the sun is. Sometimes there may even be super-hurricanes that slam into the Gulf that are beyond the standard scale and that occur every three or four days. Fortunately that hasn't been the case in the past few thousand years, probably.

Should people take global warming seriously enough to ban fossil fuel cars- the major emitter of greenhouse gases? Sure they should yet of course they won;t for a generation or two until electric vehicles take over the majority of driver-guidance unit appendages humans for-themselves, if AI wants to have people contaminating the interior relaxation space of the machine-body.

The basic problem though is the way humanity lives in the environment without concern about nature expecting to exploit it or expecting it to be submissive or unchanging and supportive of the human physical social structure; it never will do that. Vast climate and land cycles of the surface tectonic plates and weather, and systems complexity of ecosphere will always upsurge into being displacing the museum of social existence disastrously. The challenge for human government and logic is to adapt structures of social being that thrive on and support ecospheric change and renewal rather than to expect it to die.

Why Congress Never Gets Anything Done

The U.S. Congress is quite unpopular. It seems never to get anything done. It also has made a shambles of the national budget and let the infrastructure rot. The people wonder why.

The answer is fairly simple. Each member of congress pursues self-interest rather than national interest. Collectively they pass a lot of bills to benefit their local constituents and flunk national interests. Congress has processed more than 10,000 bills passed per session the past twenty years on average with maybe 375 on average being passed into law, yet very few major, quality, reformative works that satisfy the public and assure the health of the environment, public finance or the economic interests of the people were part of that. The public regards congress as do nothings except to pass pork and perversion.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics

If one were to make a list of the top ten goals for each two-year session of congress that required congressional action to accomplish, few congresses since the 1970s have got two of ten done. Some got a zero.

The news media does keep a narrative of issues and contentious public issues going. That takes time and Congresspersons respond and put in their two cents worth, then collect campaign contributions and plan for re-election. The real, solid national issues that never go away and tend to get worse are buried under the headlines.

I can make a list of ten goals for any congress to get done that is fairly simple. Obviously people would disagree with the list all or in part. That in itself is part of the problem. Even so a congress must have such a list of priorities and work to accomplish those with equal energy as they pursue pork for their districts. Plainly getting a congress to accomplish a few of the staid goals would be a great achievement. Getting them to do anything new would be nearly impossible. The Apollo program required the treat of Soviets getting to the moon first and making a commune of it. No such competitive pressure exists today.

1) Balance federal budget

2) Eliminate national debt

3) Secure borders against illegal entry

4) Rebuild public infrastructure with new technology

5) Assure adequate guaranteed minimum income for all citizens

6) Provide free health care to all the poor

7) Stop loss of species and restore ecosystem health

8) Reform national incarceration system and stop crime

9) Eliminate North Korean nuclear weapons

10) Enforce equal protection of the law for all Americans in practice

Chinese Special Forces Documentary (English) (video)

GET READY, AMERICA: RUSSIA HAS ITS OWN DEADLY 'DELTA FORCE' || WARTHOG 2017 (video)

Russian Special Foces & FSB in action in Crimea - 2017 (video)

5 Most ELITE Special Forces (video)