Recently
the Congress passed a resolution condemning ‘white nationalists’.
On its face it means condemning all white people that are patriots or
nationalists. It's o.k. apparently for the nation of Islam to exist
without condemnation, or for black nationalists to exist- or even
Mexican nationalists that want to annex the U.S.A. onto Mexico. The
law should be color-blind on behavior and never condemn anyone for
race, religion or political opinion. The Congress shouldn’t act as
collectivist demagogues.
One
wonders what the history is of the U..S. government condemning
citizens for having antipathetic political opinion that do not
comprise sedition? When it goes that far it is fine to call out the
Federal Marshals, yet the democracy of free people with equal
protection of the law isn’t a place to condemn, white people or any
other race. Neither is it a place that should tolerate condemning any
political group extra-legally beyond the objective criminal codes
that apply to all individuals at any time. Congress didn’t condemn
black rioters in Missouri during the Obama administration. It should
just condemn movements that don’t obey its laws if it must be
redundant for pr purposes.
Far-right
and far-left extremists have always been a part of the United States
without causing significant damage to national interests. Of course
the McCarthy era purged communist infiltrators from government and
Hollywood so far as possible, yet that should be no example for the
government to follow now. Sure there was racism historically on all
sides for a number of reasons, yet there were all people that
supported the concept of a nation where all people could live under
God as of equal worth.
The
United States is in an era where democratic politics and the 1% of
corporate wealth tend strongly to support globalism and the
destruction of the integrity of the United States as a nation. The
black power movement goes beyond seeking equality in all social
things and beyond to the destruction of the nation and whatever white
establishment remains in order to promote themselves.
The language does matter. Short after the Supreme Court legalized homosexual marriage the Congress ended no child left behind and replaced it with 'every child succeeds'. The Mayoor of Seattle- a leader in the homosexual marriage movement, just quite after several allegations of molestation of male children surfaced. Congress understands the symbolic consequences of its language.
President
Trump does not need to support the invasion of the United States by
Mexican illegal immigration nor the outsourcing of jobs to China.
Looking out for the interests of all the people of the nation
impartially is his right. And he doesn’t need to sign off on the
ambiguous phrase of ‘white nationalists’ in order to prove he is
working for equal protection of the law. The movement to condemn the
historical United States as a white nation of Christians in order to
promote people that feel they were second class citizens is
misguided. So many white Americans lived and died working to create
social equality and liberty for all in the United States. The
high-power anti-white racism is not leading in a good direction.
