US Should Build Up Border Security With Fence and Visa Requirement for Euros

The United States should require visas for Europeans entering the United States and put a global warming tax on them for offsetting the carbon of trans-Atlantic travel. Sailors would not be required to pay a carbon tax on the visa good for three months and available for just five easy payments of $19.95 plus a modest $50 Euro carbon flight tax. The visa fee could help pay for the cost of building a good fence on the Mexican border. It would be worthwhile keeping European terrorists out of the United States, as well as those terrorists just visiting Europe to get an easy shot to the U.S.A.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/us-europe-visa-eu-schengen-american-tourists-travel-trump-a8815076.html

The visa-free travel program should be deleted for a security upgrade.

https://www.immihelp.com/visa-waiver-program/

One must tighten up the border security looseness if global warming is to be reversed. With loose border security a King Canute command to fix it on cue won't work especially when illegal alien voters approved by Democrats veto the Rube Goldberg scheme because it gets in the way of monster truck sales and coal mining jobs.

Democrat Platform 2020-Anti-Israel, Pro-Infanticide, Illegal Alien Voting Rights

The Democrat Party platform for 2020 seems to be emerging as Anti-Israel, pro-Talib, pro-Omar Mullah, pro-infanticide, anti-Trump, neo-socialist, illegal alien rights of citizenship including voting, anti-capitalism except with socialist government partnership, anti-Google, anti-Facebook, homosexual marriage, anti-Christian, pro radical Islam, pro-dope, anti-fobiya etc.

Senator Dorothy Feinstein's days may be numbered as she seems to be anti 93 trillion dollar Green New Deal and possibly pro-Jewish. Demos of California will be eyeballing her post and slathering up and coming new b's with cash, prizes and fully stocked refrigerators.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/8/house-votes-favor-illegal-immigrant-voting/

https://news.iheart.com/featured/rush-limbaugh/content/2019-02-26-senate-democrats-vote-for-infanticide/

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2019/02/27/democrat_media_blacks_out_the_party039s_infanticide_vote_467459.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/marijuana-election-steve-sisolak_us_5bd0ba58e4b0d38b587f478a

Two-Season Roofing Panel Idea

Roofing shingles that are asphalt absorb heat in the summer and won't let snow slide off in the winter causing a few roofs to fail. Maybe extra roof snow shoveling works. It seems inefficient.

Why not manufacture a roofing panel that is aluminum for winter with a slate or heat repelling cover in the summer. One would slide over the other and return.

The two-phase roof panel/shingle could be changed electrically or manually. Just an idea.

Some would point out that it would be better to make a good annual slate shingle that resists solar heating yet is still slick enough to let snow slide off. I would agree with that concept myself, If it were lightweight, plastic, fire-resistant and maybe with glue-on adhesive strips with solar voltaic capability yet tough and long-lasting that would be even better.

I like the idea of roofing panels that change color seasonally or even diuranally like select glasses. Just saying.

How Christians Do Not Sin

I have wondered if people might not misunderstand John. When saved one gets credit through the Lord as if one had never sinned. Sanctification may make the temporal life a work in progress. One could compare temporal life to ram space in a computer where the imperfect, condemned humanity lives. Jesus converts imperfect character code of those with faith to perfection before allowing them onto the eternal SSD.

A program may be perfectly written, as it were, suitable for a Garden of Eden. Characters created in the program may be given free will and operating instructions. They disobey, and the program is given a correction to contain the free will virus run amock.

The free will virus may have good and bad characteristics. Good because it emulates some of the creative, inventive spirit of God, bad because it breaks the parameters of its own existence (as if a dog off a leash in a home near a freeway runs into eight lanes of high speed traffic). Interestingly sin of the unsaved and those with badly understood theology use global economics to move the world to an ecospheric brink.  

Before the program code of the characters is allowed into the eternal SSD of heaven the code must be corrected. God is perfect and imperfect code just won't work in heaven. Jesus through His atoning sacrifice enters good code for each individual character subroutine who is saved so they can exist eternally with God through the Lord. Over time the code of each character is transformed like unto that of the Lord, who is perfect and fully God.

The saved do not want to sin though as imperfect beings probably do. They still have bodies that are reason enough for condemnation through original sin. Some have associated the liberal viewpoint of freedom to sin since Jesus is screening them from the penalty of sin viewpoint with a Gnostic heresy. If one cannot be credited with sin after being saved then, the reasoning went, why not use that as a license to sin. That viewpoint misunderstands the entire criterion of salvation.

Romans 6- 1"What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?""2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"

2nd Corinthians 4 "7But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us. 8We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; 9Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed; 10Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body. 11For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh. 12So then death worketh in us, but life in you.

13We having the same spirit of faith, according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we also believe, and therefore speak; 14Knowing that he which raised up the Lord Jesus shall raise up us also by Jesus, and shall present us with you. 15For all things are for your sakes, that the abundant grace might through the thanksgiving of many redound to the glory of God.

16For which cause we faint not; but though our outward man perish, yet the inward man is renewed day by day. 17For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory; 18While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal."

Never Say Never on Humans Beating Super-Computer Chess Engines

I couldn’t say they won’t. The capacity lies the realm of science fiction. A break-through in human use of logic that allows shortcuts to winning calculations computers cannot make would be the best way. It is more likely that human brains enhanced with technology or D.N.A. modifications permitting spatial matrix folding calculation visions to find winning tensors will arise for other purposes than chess.

Chess has just 64 squares so, though there is a very large number of possible paths to victory, the number is finite. I am not sure why anyone would want to bend, fold, warp, rearrange the squares and their order in imagination to find optimal paths given the variable worth of pieces and pawns together, yet some mathematician of the future may learn how spaces and relations like those of chess apply to configuration theories of the Universe construction in some way and apply the discoveries to beating a chess supercomputer engine that lives in quantum spaces of all possible worldlines over the threshold of solid-state space before the dawn of quantum decoherence.

Mullah Omar;'The American Superpower is on the Brink of Destruction'

I was looking for quotes from an article on the late Mullah Omar of Afghanistan who was a Taliban leader and resistance fighter after 9-11 brought the U.S.A. to Afghanistan. I couldn't find much. The BBC report mentioned a "ritual claim" that  "American superpower and other allied forces are on the verge of destruction and defeat"".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32193807

Mullah Omar issued a directive for the Taliban to refrain from anti-Saudi activities. He probably would have been happy to engage in anti-Israeli activities.

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/97ISLAMABAD2488_a.html

It is interesting how recruiting of militants continue regardless of the death of Muslim leaders. Featuring the number of American soldiers killed in action was an enticement intended to get youth to sign up for the war.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/174032/hate-literature-mullah-omar-wants-you/

Attacking the soft underbelly of the United States from the Mexican border with a million illegal aliens a year might not be a Taliban policy, instead it could be designed by some Argentinian as pay back for U.S. support for Britain in the Falklands war that resulted in putting down the Argentinian junta. That was comparable to the German popular revolt against the aristocracy at the end of the loss of Germany to the allies in the first world war (well, an armistice resulted that set the stage for WW 2).

A better try might be electing Omars from within the U.S. to attack Israel and weaken the Christian nature of the nation already under attack by godless Democrat infanticidalists.

Democrats Have a Gaggle of No-Good Candidates; Why is That?

One must wonder at the Democrat Presidential candidate roster so far. There are 24 announced or with exploratory committees and none seem Presidential.

Criteria for a President should include a few items.

1) Has read the second edition of Ecological Economics by Dailey and Farley
2) Has read The Unconscious Civilization by John Ralston Sauls
3) Served as an officer in any branch of the military
4) Has run two miles in under seven minutes
5) Was born in the U.S.A.
6) Read the Dialogues of Plato
7) Can accurately summarize the constitution of the United States
8) Completed a college course in science and can pass a general science CLEP exam
9) Has good verbal communication skill
10) Isn't a socialist or member of the communist party
11) Regards U.S. citizenship and political egalitarianism as important enough to secure borders against illegal entrants
12) Is fundamentally color blind in economic policy

That isn't much to expect. Democrats have a litmus test however that falls short of common sense. They expect a Democrat candidate to have these attributes;
1) Be pro-abortion including infanticide
2) Pro-homosexual and lesbian including homosexual marriage even if that goes against rationality
3) Flood the nation with illegal aliens that might vote Democrat some day and in the meantime will be good cheap labor for feminists and homosexuals-lesbians
4) Pro-corporatism and socialism
5) Not be a straight white male even if they say they support lesbians, homosexual and trans-gender bathroom choice and cross-dressing.
6) Hate Russia except when oligarchs make contributions to your foundation

Why Corporations Should Be Limited in SIze

There are several factors that make wealth concentrate in the Unites States. The U.S.A. is supposed to be a democracy with sovereign citizens getting their political interests done through representatives elected to government. When corporations become to large, wealth and powerful democracy is effectively eclipsed and the political philosophy of corporatism (invented by the fascist dictator Mussolini).

Too large of corporations in number of employees just have too much political and social influence and probably corrupt free market competition in a number of ways. Very large corporations and subsidiaries form networks and insider stockholders by into other large corporations and corporate boards may be overlapping. Such vast power and wealth networks drive business in the direction that best suits the bottom line of profit. The media fawns over Wall Street and no wonder- its owned by the most wealthy people.

https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/20957/as-inequality-grows-in-mexico-so-does-social-polarization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality

Too large of corporate employment numbers also return outsize salaries to CEOs and board members reinforcing the concentration of wealth. Patents are filed by the truckloads by Silicon Valley American zaibatsu. Individualism is dampened.

A remedy would be to limit any corporation to just 20,000 employees. Then a corporation would think twice about paying huge salaries and stock packages to CEOs. If corporations could have no more than 20,000 workers and no individual could own shares in more than three corporations competition would increase and inventiveness would be more reward,, the concentration of wealth might slow a little for the 1% and democracy might emerge from the dark, dank moldy sub-basement it is locked in by Wall Street.

When some corporation has need of more workers it could form ad hoc business relationship with other corporations as needed. The army hiring civilian contractors used to work that way.

One shouldn't establish such large businesses and corporate networks that hey become regarded as too big to fail. That applies to banks too. One of the challenges of reforming mass economics to a sustainable ecologoical economic infrastructure is that too large of corporations put up far too much political and social economic resistance to change. Too large of corporations are maladaptive to the pace of economic reform required for a sustainable human economy.

Socialists are an even worse problem compounding the error of too large of corporations as they seek to ossify Wall Street with high taxes and socialist hegemony doubling down on the corporatist philosophy that creates a maladaptive macro-economy for the nation and ecological sustainability.

Moderate size corporations can be allowed to fail without social disaster. It is easier to modify and reform smaller corporations. Smaller corporations may be components for the macro-economy that can be integrated within a sustainable economic system more readily and without the disruption required for the very large.

Dictator Kim is Likely Stalling for Soft Democrat in 2020

Dictator Kim Un seems to have played president Trump in order to avoid war before he has good nuclear junk to throw at San Francisco. He needs to seem to want to move toward normalized relations yet in fact is simply a Dictator with no intention of relinquish Hitler-like domination over North Koreans. If he did he might be hung.

The Dictator probably hopes a soft-on-defense Democrat is elected to the WHite House in 2020 so he can have bread from Washington D.C. as well as nuclear weapons.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/432900-trump-very-disappointed-if-north-korea-rebuilding-missile-launch

Who to Believe; Michael Cohen or Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren

A recent poll showed that voters believe Michael Cohen more than President Trump. Belief in the veracity of Michael Cohen is a kind of test of the emergency broadcasting media system. Voters may compare Michael Cohen usefully to numerous Presidential candidates past, present and future to determine who is more truthful or less false.

https://nypost.com/2019/03/05/voters-believe-michael-cohen-more-than-donald-trump-poll/

It is possible that the Mueller Report will be delayed for some time because it may have nothing positive about collusion in it. If it released and is a goose egg for Democrats they would look bad, so having the Michael Cohen truth meter ready to apply should amuse the voters until the Congress finds a new way to celebrate jihad on President Trump.