An Unoffical Long-Term OIl Price Forecast

I got the crash in oil prices forecast about a half a year before the drop considering the effect of all that fracking. So it is rather simply to predict that oil price per barrel won't recover to former levels at all with Saudi Arabia, Iran, the Baku oil fields and every place on Earth with running down oil reserves able to frack and recover former reserves available quantities if they wish (going on the American experience). That would include Mexico and Pemex and African nations too.

http://stream.marketwatch.com/story/markets/SS-4-4/SS-4-107267/

Thus oil price may be effected more by the design of oil companies and governments to increase the cost for revenue streams. Even so the steady increase in alternative electronic-solar and super-conductor technologies will offset short-term oil price increases through war and other supply disruptions. If global warming continues to affect shoreline economies and actually increases pace public opinion may decrease the value of oil per barrel too as alternative transportation is sought that is renewable and non-polluting thermally such as electric platforms covered with very efficient solar voltaic materials.

In present dollars I would think that oil should range from 10 to 60 dollars per barrel for the next half century. There is a lot of oil to recover, while engines are increasing in efficiency, alternative power supplies also, and public opinion about the effect fossil fuels have on the environment will balance out the increased yet untenable demand from second and third world consumers for gas-guzzling ground transportation.

A Doctor’s Right to Privately Euthenize and Abort?

Should a physician be allowed to cut, slash and terminate lives if done discreetly and privately. A recently passed Oklahoma law concerning abortion that does not recognize a physicians right to privacy covering his action abortion someone else’s fetus in theory should apply to euthanasia equally well. It is a real stretch of the constitution to say that a citizen’s right to privacy implicitly covers his actions upon others to perform services for them. While an abortion may be legal for a women to perform upon herself, as it might be legal in Oregon and and few other states to take one’s own life if sick and in pain, it is quite another thing for someone else to take take another’s life or abort a fetus even with consent.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/20/us/oklahoma-bill-abortion-doctors.html?_r=0

The U.S. Supreme Court has never said that an abortion is moral or implicitly meaningless, it instead simply determined that the issue is hidden under the right to privacy all citizens have. When another citizen becomes involved that privacy has already been compromised. Making it a felony for a physician or anyone else to perform an abortion on someone else appears to be consistent with the concept of privacy.

If privacy were to be used as a general curtain to excuse illegal acts such as possession of stolen goods or buying and selling stolen goods the absurdity would be apparent even to members of the court. The high court should not just decide what things are politically correct to hide behind the curtain of privacy, or how many people can be in the space concealed from legal review.

When a city such as Arlington Texas is asked to build a new 900 million dollar sports stadium for the Texas Rangers to place baseball in with parking taxes raised to help pay for it, wouldn’t the visiting citizen from Houston have a just right to be excused from paying the parking meter tax because he hates the Rangers and has a right to privacy in his parking space without the intrusion of decadent, corrupt government building stadiia when the Zika virus is spreading? Why is the Houstonian’s right to privacy destroyed when he does not want to subsidize a private sports authority?

It is possible with the new age interpretation of the Constitution to make it a rubbery document stretchable in any direction. N-dimensional legal interpretative universes have arrived. The U.S. Supreme Court in Rowe v Wade in effect found that the right to privacy covers illegal acts if they are politically correct. Yet that criterion hasn't been applied equally and well elsewhere. Privacy seems to be a superfluous concept meaningful mostly as a tool for the court to allow political correct yet hitherto illegal acts to  go ahead yet cast aside if an act is disapproved by the court. Privacy as a legal concept is  a middle term syllogisticly speaking used entirely at the court's discretionary whim.

Post-Cold War Abomination; The Spiritual War

The end of the cold war with Ronald Reagan's inspired Christian leadership and a willing, bungling communist leader accomplice brought an age of new hope. Irrational exuberance saturated the stock market and President Clinton signed off on every sort of Wall Street scam for global profits with dire results. President Clinton was also known for moral failures.

President Clinton began with burning a rural farm of Christian cultists at Waco Texas with the A.T.F. and F.B.I. growing impatient on the 52nd day of their siege. He followed that up with the notorious Monica Lewinsky lip service peccadillo that got him impeached by Congress for lying. School children started shooting their classmates and the grunge era was followed by deeper, darker, satanic musical and media trends. President Obama has taken the post-cold war immoral tangent to a deeper level of hell.

At the start of his administration I noted that his was likely to be an abomination administration morally speaking ans so it turned out to be. The President has built a homosexual atheist immoral ascendancy creating a spiritual war within the nation; one leftist atheist and anti-Christian plan to win.

Replacing the external threat cold war with an internal threat spiritual war with the aggressor side employing traditional satanic methods of personalized and mass spiritual attack was a double failure of leadership. It was possible to avoid the conflict; just as it was possible to avoid the Syrian civil war simply through not supporting its build-up with cash, weapons and advisors.

Homosexual civil security wasn't endangered without the usurpation of traditional heterosexual marriage unto themselves. It probably would have been possible to end the homosexual deferment from military service over time too if they really desired to kill rather than suck their military foes.

The spiritual war is a way that insider, scientific atheists can attack the people of the United States that are Christians and traditionalists. President Obama repeatedly calls for change and has placed a homosexual as Secretary of the Army and threatened lawsuits on states that are recalcitrant about keeping bathrooms separate for men and women along traditional lines without the blur of undefined 'trans-gender' right to go anyplace they want, perhaps on the same day. The spiritual war seems to fit with the President's pro-Muslim immigration policies and transition to waging war upon Christian cultures wherever they are through spiritual means of homosexual, drugs, immigration and Islam.

American is a tolerant nation on the foundation of independence and personal individual freedom. It never has supported government coercion though, and the spiritual war is essentially a war on the soul for the possession of Satan.

Science and evolution are great things. Contemplation and research of the Universe are wonderful. Curious human beings seeking a better life inevitably work in that direction-just as they would invent blankets to stay warm in winter travel. It would be a tragedy if those drunken with the power of science and materialism further their attack on the human spirit, religious liberty and philosophy in their blind quest for power for power and believes in error, that a particular configuration of dimensions and relativity can explain creation of all, that space and extension paradigmata finally account for the set of all things and that there is no God.

Human Hunting Drones Could Change Face of War

Human hunting drones with face recognition tech built into their books of good kills will probably be fielded too soon. Built in a variety of shapes, sizes and colors small, stealthy flying and crawling drones will replace passive land mines, recharge from the sun or maybe water (for fuel cell powered drones), and be purposed to attack military units with the correct uniforms, people of a given height and weight and so forth. Cheaper to field than human soldiers drones-of-war, military conflict can be regarded as becoming more tactical and not just a straightforward chess game.

 In the future military unit survivability may be in advanced camouflage not only of visible and infrared spectra but of shape and form as well. Infrared and form recognition systems might be electronically spoofed to perceive a soldier as a tree or bolder, etc. Terrorists leading the way on camouflaging themselves as civilians may find that field crowded on a future battlefield wear unique opfor and friendly cadre identifiers are changed and recoded often in order that those regarded as fair and even legal kills are separated from those that are not. In a planetary bureaucracy those considered fair kills may evolve to political categories.

After Six Years of Support for Civil War Obama's Syria Policy Emerging

The true form of the Obama-Kerry Syria policy is finally beginning to emerge from the mists of uncertainty after six years of stimulating civil war to remove Assad- it's a twin towers demolition plan with the other towering strong man being for Assad being the late Muammar Gaddafi. It is probable that a time of troubles would follow a removal of Assad in Syria as it has in Libya after the removal of Gaddafi with more direct U.S. military intervention.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/kerry-says-competing-interests-hold-up-syria-peace-settlement

There isn't anything about a homeland for the Kurds, or a expansion of their Iraqi homeland, into Eastern and Northern Syria mentioned in Obama planning. Perhaps they would get the squeeze after their usefulness is reduced after regular non-Sunni, Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Sunnis were to take over much of the power in Syria. Very likely Hamas would send advisors and Hezballah and Iran would be unhappy. No more smiley faces attached to emails to the west.

Romney May have Communique from Kolob to Make 3rd Party Run

For Mitt Romney to consider making a 3rd party run for the White House and give the job of President to Hillary Clinton he would need to have extra-terrestrial instructions or otherwise be spaced out and unconcerned about terrestrial reality.

Mitt is Romney was a one-term governor of the liberal state of Massachusetts and provided the prototype for Obamacare so perhaps he actually was a camouflaged democrat; as likely an explanation as instructions from the Kolob Star system where Mormons believe Jesus and other divines reside.

Mitt could helpfully fade into history and stop showing jealousy of Trump who is the best the Republicans have this year. The party may not ordinarily, run excellent candidates- usually the best recommendation being that it is a less offensive choice than the Democrat-even so the bunglers should support what they have and quit with the sapping their own guy for not being a particularly satisfying kind of extremist. Trump isn't too bad at being an executive anyway and seems to have an idea of what he wants to do if elected.

Actions Harm; Not Words or Lies or Truths

A Nazi prison guard looks over the Jews and sees one that has been excused from going into the gas chamber directly. The Jew told the guard he was a scientist (and he was really an electrician), and the camp commandant had a special that week on sparing scientists from execution so they could work on building a nuclear weapon. How much harm did the Jew do to the Nazi guard by telling him the lie?

Absurd philosophical situations like that arise when one credits all lies with necessarily being harmful. Satan may be the father of lies yet he is also the father of everything evil including actions that really do cause harm. Lies printed on paper that isn't read do no harm. Falsehoods are not magical incantations that bring the wrath of harm and doom to the gullible. In fact telling the objective truth to people can in some circumstances cause as much harm, or more, than a lie. it is actions that bring harm to the soul.

A lie without an action accompanying it to bring harm usually can do little harm. A truth not acted upon can cause harm just as readily as a lie, since it is the action or inaction, response or non-response to words that can bring good or evil to others. People need to be given credit for some cognitive  reasoning capacity to discern for-themselves what is true or false, right or wrong, good or evil and decide for-themselves if or how they should act.

Without thought the human body does very little beside biologically metabolize or fall if in a gravitational field. Human actions follow human thought and the will to act or move.

So the prison guard is happy that he has saved the fake Jewish scientist from death and looks at the Jew menacingly knowing that he can act some varieties of sadistic torture upon him later to motivate Jewish science. Then another prison guard arrives and sees the Jew. Looking upon him he says-what is that Jewish electrician from my village doing in the scientist's line Heinrich? The guard has only said the truth. Nothing changes until the first guard then orders the electrician to the gas chamber. That was the harmful action.

Belief in words is for-itself a kind of action. Human will and thought are actions some use better than others. Each individual is responsible for his own thought, action or inaction for-himself, though it is possible for others to interfere with one's own freedom to act and think. Sadists and the too comfortable in politics, government and business are susceptible to perpetrating callous victimization of others overcome with their own easily arrived concepts of self-worth.

Lies and falsehoods intentional or not probably have a greater prospect for prompting harmful actions than truthful statements. Reckless driving has a greater prospect for causing harm in comparison to safe, truthful driving, yet reckless driving could be identical in appearance to evasive driving by a car and driver seeking to not get strafed by an opposition force aircraft.

Plainly virtuous actions would work for the intentionally good with accuracy and truthfulness, yet that may be a complex line of travel.