Politics & Racism from the Bench vs Donald Trump

Judicial racism has occurred from time to time in U.S. history. Presently the Black Lives Matter movement has sought to identify it in police forces around the nation. Racial bias has existed in state and federal judiciaries from time to time, although usually in support of an establishment. As a member of an internal proletariat trying to assert racial empowerment, it is possible for anti-establishment judges to have bias against those they view as obstructive toward their racial group will-to-power. Of course the media and Speaker Ryan believe it is the definition of racism to recognize the odds of racism in federal judges as being solid now and then.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-judges-group-tied-to-national-council-of-laraza/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/fourteen-examples-of-raci_b_658947.html

http://www.arrestrecords.com/infographic-racism-in-the-criminal-justice-system/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/juvenile/bench/race.html

http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/proceedings/21/cunneen.pdf judicial aboriginal bias in Australia

One would need to be very naive to believe that a Mexican Federal Judge appointed by the Obama administration who is a member of La Raza (The Race) would be without bias toward a Presidential candidate who has campaigned on the promise to build a wall with Mexico to halt illegal immigration into the U.S.A. from Mexico. Several Hispanic groups have actively worked to stop the Trump election and even boycott Trump businesses. It is entirely reasonable to use real politik recognition of the inherent trend toward bias from Mexican organizations including some that Judge Curiel is affiliated with toward Donald Trump.

If when F.D.R. was running for office he had a campaign platform to go to war with Japan and a legal case reached a federal court with a first generation Japanese American on the bench; one that was affiliated with organizations to boycott F.D.R. businesses and defeat the F.D.R. candidacy for President it would be entirely reasonable for F.D.R. to say that the Judge should recuse himself for being Japanese and biased against the defendant F.D.R.

If a federal judge is a member of a racial organization with a political agenda based on race , and further, one with a particular prejudgment against a defendant, it is improbable that a defendant could ignore that, as Speaker Ryan might wish of Donald Trump.

When a racial group or nation breaking U.S. immigration laws by the tens of millions is a political issue that issue may well reach into federal courts and those sitting on the bench. That is real politik that ostriches will ignore yet one that defendants and political candidates may recognize.

If important social issues reach federal courts such as in Dred Scott or Brown versus Board of Education it can matter if the federal judge is a member of an antipathetic racial or social group; the Klu Klux Klan for instance. That membership and point of view can bias judicial decisions as well as narratives of novels. Honorable judges step aside when they have an inherent conflict of interest in identifying with or having antipathy toward one side or the other in a legal disputation. The corrupt never do, and profit from their biases and hate.

http://www.ttokarnak.net/RITC.html racism in the Supreme Court

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/26/racism-s-triumph-on-the-supreme-court-plessy-v-ferguson-turns-120.html

Novilistricka Factors 2016-6 (science fiction)-video

Obama Released Thousands Of Immigrant Cons that Committed More Crimes

The Boston Globe has published some investigative articles on the President and Justice Department's release of tens of thousands-perhaps hundreds of thousands of convicted immigrant felons went out and did new crimes. Immigration and naturalization had said that maybe 10% reoffend, yet the Globe found the percent was more like 30%. If ICE released 100,000 convicted immigrants it is likely that 30,000 new and entirely avoidable crimes were perpetrated on Americans. That is a significant number.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/06/04/criminal-immigrants-reoffend-higher-rates-than-ice-has-suggested/l0OpCWfTdCuTNLIAfxApAO/story.html

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2016/03/30/obama-shortens-drug-offenders-prison-sentences/aobBBCb5vg5QtLQzgrJBdJ/story.html

Plainly solid family and community support is helpful for keeping criminals from being at the mercy of the street and other criminals when they are released. Not every con that walks out of prison has an equal opportunity to become a productive consumer with a gas guzzling SUV, cable TV and an easy non-lifting sinecure. Even so, it is logically easier to keep illegal aliens from entering the U.S.A. than to jam up courts and resources for processing convicts that in some cases are not even welcome to return to their own nation (such as Mexico).

Hillary & the Democrat Party's Unwillingness to Admit Making Mistakes

The Democrat Party almost never admits mistakes. Like the Clintons it denies and misdirects responsibility as in the reason for the Benghazi riots being attributed to a producer of a minor video about Muhammad. That has consequences for U.S. national interests.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hillary-clinton-rejects-fbi-claim-that-she-was-%E2%80%98careless%E2%80%99-with-emails/ar-BBu6Plw?li=BBnb7Kz

The Clinton NAFTA agreement with Mexico is an example. Free trade with Mexico meant that U.S. manufacturers would relocate to the far cheaper labor environment of Mexico to produce goods for export to the U.S.A. and the world, and they have. If U.S. workers were not to lose out it was requisite that no cheap foreign labor be allowed to enter the U.S. labor market legally or illegally. Democrats have instead adamantly opposed building a wall or security canal to keep illegal migrants from crossing the Mexican border into the U.S.A. So U.S. workers have been doubly screwed by manufacturers relocating to Mexico and illegal Mexican workers entering the U.S. by tens of millions.

Another example was the Clinton decision to bomb the crap out of Serbia to force the Serbs to leave Muslims alone and not purge them from Serbia and surrounding areas. The Clinton method arguably was not the only way to accomplish the end of the bloody purge. Regardless, it was the leftist Clinton attitude to promote Muslims and pontificate about religious tolerance that created a swamp for the growth of terrorism in the United States and Europe culminating in 9-11 and the bloody interventionist wars of Iraq and Afghanistan and the election of a President raised in a Muslim nation who supported the development of civil wars or anarchic chaos across North Africa and the Middle East from Libya to Syria. It is a paradox that a godless, atheist leftist political movement of the United States' political party environment advocates religious tolerance anyplace while ordinarily attacking Christianity and promoting atheism. A Christian might think the reason for that is that besides Christianity, no other religion leads to anyplace besides eternal hell, with the sole exception being perhaps that of Jews. Democrats seem to willing to accomplish the will Satan to degrade mankind and foist doom under the guise of sensualism and hedonism upon a Butchlesbiankind Zarathustran new world order proletariat under rule of broadcast media wise-guy Supermen and women kissing butts of corporate-politborough oligarchs.

The Democrat party is the party of slavery. It is doubtful that many southern governors apologized for the civil war or admitted they made a mistake. In not defending the U.S.A. against illegal immigration adequately and enjoying the exploitable labor they are making another mistake they will never acknowledge. As the Democrat Party became the Clinton appeasement party it withered American interests around the globe, concentrated wealth and expanded poverty in the U.S.A. until today the rich have permanent tax cuts and the middle class is no longer a majority. It would be remarkable to consider how many Americans have taken early retirements and left the work force prematurely knowing there was no chance of getting a decent job.

While poverty is increasing in the U.S.A. the Clintons are becoming dynastic. Bureaucracies and the Chinese communist party are getting rich as poverty expands in the U.S.A. The Clintons have accellerated the Perverted New World Order of Bureaucracy Under Bureaucrats and Legalists seeking to make a thoughtless underclass of proles a new domestic slave-servitude class out of America.

https://youtu.be/n6Je_0jAqAk

Political Essays 2016 v1 (video)

Muhammad Ali Died at Age 74

Muhammad Ali finally died at age 74 after a long bout with Parkinson's desease probably brought on by a career of head punches from heavyweights. Jerry Quarry died at a comparatively young age after taking a zillion head shots including a 15 round fight with the former Cassius Clay.

It was perhaps pneumonia though that finally defeated the former world champ. Anyone over 55 should get a pneumonia shot. That disease takes those with weakened immune systems and is hard to beat off since their are no cures for viruses really, and pneumonia is a virus that clogs the lungs and seems to never go away.

The late Joe Frazier was the fighter that put down Ali first. Though of short stature Frazier was one tough dude who unfortunately suffered the worst knockout punch in boxing history himself later to George Foreman's uppercut that lifted him off his feet.

Ali in a later decade would have been a pro football player rather than a boxer. Even by the 1960's the best athletes were in the NFL, N.B.A. or Major League Baseball rather than in the ring. The last white fighter-Rocky Marciano who died undefeated in a plane crash, would not have been a better football player than John Riggins, Jim Brown or Lawrence Taylor and neither perhaps would Ali.

Pro boxing experienced a small rival with the Russian boxers for a time after the end of the cold war, yet the heavyweight ranks have diminished since the rise of pro sports. Mike Tyson versus Joe Frazier would have been an interesting match, yet neither or either might have been good running backs for the Cowboys, its hard to say.

Muhammad Ali would not fight in Vietnam and so became popular with the left. He claimed his Muslim beliefs made him a c.o. ISIS and AL Qaeda could claim the same and would probably also be disbelieved by a federal draft board. The 1960s civil rights era evolved into a mainstream confusion of several anti-American and globalist causes that continue today. Civil rights should apply to all Americans as individuals rather than as special classes with special class rights. The good intentions of integration have been an excuse for the corruption of equal protection of the law. It is vital that law be based on individual rights rather than race, sex or behavior class rights if economic injustice is to be corrected rather than increased.

Temporal Cross Currents - Warp in SF (video)