Judicial
racism has occurred from time to time in U.S. history. Presently the
Black Lives Matter movement has sought to identify it in police
forces around the nation. Racial bias has existed in state and
federal judiciaries from time to time, although usually in support of
an establishment. As a member of an internal proletariat trying to
assert racial empowerment, it is possible for anti-establishment
judges to have bias against those they view as obstructive toward
their racial group will-to-power. Of course the media and Speaker
Ryan believe it is the definition of racism to recognize the odds of
racism in federal judges as being solid now and then.
http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/proceedings/21/cunneen.pdf
judicial aboriginal bias in Australia
One
would need to be very naive to believe that a Mexican Federal Judge
appointed by the Obama administration who is a member of La Raza
(The Race) would be without bias toward a Presidential candidate who
has campaigned on the promise to build a wall with Mexico to halt
illegal immigration into the U.S.A. from Mexico. Several Hispanic
groups have actively worked to stop the Trump election and even
boycott Trump businesses. It is entirely reasonable to use real
politik recognition of the inherent trend toward bias from Mexican
organizations including some that Judge Curiel is affiliated with
toward Donald Trump.
If
when F.D.R. was running for office he had a campaign platform to go
to war with Japan and a legal case reached a federal court with a
first generation Japanese American on the bench; one that was
affiliated with organizations to boycott F.D.R. businesses and defeat
the F.D.R. candidacy for President it would be entirely reasonable
for F.D.R. to say that the Judge should recuse himself for being
Japanese and biased against the defendant F.D.R.
If
a federal judge is a member of a racial organization with a political
agenda based on race , and further, one with a particular prejudgment
against a defendant, it is improbable that a defendant could ignore
that, as Speaker Ryan might wish of Donald Trump.
When
a racial group or nation breaking U.S. immigration laws by the tens
of millions is a political issue that issue may well reach into
federal courts and those sitting on the bench. That is real politik
that ostriches will ignore yet one that defendants and political
candidates may recognize.
If
important social issues reach federal courts such as in Dred Scott or
Brown versus Board of Education it can matter if the federal judge is
a member of an antipathetic racial or social group; the Klu Klux Klan
for instance. That membership and point of view can bias judicial
decisions as well as narratives of novels. Honorable judges step
aside when they have an inherent conflict of interest in identifying
with or having antipathy toward one side or the other in a legal
disputation. The corrupt never do, and profit from their biases and
hate.
http://www.ttokarnak.net/RITC.html
racism in the Supreme Court
No comments:
Post a Comment