Health Reform Fiasco-End of Meaning of Marriage in Federal District of Columbia

I rather liked Soren Kierkeguaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript'. If politics in the District of Columbia is run for elites, if they get in synch with Obama administration elites they can administratively force a lot of unpopular policy through. Yesterday the President said that everything that could be said about health care has been said. It must be nice to have that kind of closure decretal ability--I don't recall anyone in Congress seeking to create a public health service exclusively for the poor-a true safety net. If the poor are forced to tithe the Global Health ncorporations and provide their addresses and financial information forever than a certain notch is tightened eliminating liberty.

The middle class will have to pay for the health service for the poor anyway--at least through a reduction in services. The cheapest way to get good health services for a safety bet for the poor in absolute terms is a public health services--mint a few more doctors. They don't need to treat more than about 90% of the problems-rare things can be farmed out to medicare.

Health insurance for the poor would require continuing emergency room treatment for the uninsured illegal aliens anyway. Insurance for all the poor that aren't sick would also be unneccessary cost. Basically the middle class would be grafting the global insurance companies so they can profit by getting payments for a lot of people that are healthy--and the middle class thinks thats a way to cut health costs for themselves!

A public health service for the poor can treat the illegal aliens the government can't stop from crossing the border, and maybe can provide faster electric wheels for the Homeland Security so it can catch Speedy Gonzalez more of the time.

Corporatism is a pervasive, encroaching economic fact of life. Americans have decreasing political competence because of the layers of complexity, networking and corrupt influence over local polities. They can have luck at voting for something they thing they need to find that it is counter-productive. Globalism makes a mockery of political sovereignty and the value of enfranchisement. Concentrated wealth, media organs and a vast evil empire of corporate-communist network have evolved a very undemocratic structure over America today.

So here is some reasoning about the corruption of marriage in the District of Columbia that occurs today or tomorrow when homosexual marriage becomes law. Concluding unscientific postscripts about the decline and fall of morality are such as can be made though the McCarthyite 'tail-gunners' of defense for the homosexual vanguard fire bursts at any sort of commentators that are not in agreement with the advance of the demonic world spirit.

If reduction of the global population was the intent of the non-homosexual advocates of homosexual usurpation of marriage, homosexual assault upon marriage was a bad choice of means. It will advance social dissolution of coherent bonding such that the eventual destruction of society for clean restart is reinforced. These fair weather over-the-top corruptions create substantial dysfunctional evils is deep water storms when society discovers that its allegiances and loyalties are as dysfunctional as a broken rudder.

Defending laws as they are, that were well formed for valid, rational causes is worthwhile if one considers their veracity and service.

Homosexual assaults upon the meaning of marriage--upon it's rational meaning, forces an evil upon society pervasively.

Terms are not perfect that cover general facts-that is becoause of the synonomic/associative nature of language terms. Marriage as the procreative union is what is at the heart of the concept-to divorce the meaning entirely to mean non-procreative association generally will kill the true meaning of marriage.

Marriage need not be perfect as an institution-or it could only be awarded post hoc after children are born. To exclude procreation as the core meaning of marriage however is to eliminate the concept of marrying the egg and sperm into a blastocycst and zygote. It would be like changing the meaning of the moon program to include a cargo cult in Washington D.C.

I have found that homosexual militants preponderantly attack personally--ad hominems, in the effort to censor opposite opinions from being published. They tend to be essential factors in the decline of civilization, considering Toynbean historical cycles. from the Roman Cult of Bacchus to the homosexual leadership of Hitler's S.A. the decadent, wild, freaky instability of homosexual cadres undermining traditional social stability is notorious.

One is not 'picking' on homosexuals by defense of traditional marriage, the truth of marriage-an institution thousands of years old, from the perversion of Congress. Homosexuals are not required to expropriate marriage-to end its rational meaning, in order to secure benefits for themselves. Men are not in some way women that need to act like women in relationship with another man. If they choose to they can at least have the honesty to seek a unique label for that relationship besides marriage.

It reminds me of efforts of the rich to be called poor on tax day,for the fearless leader to say that he is just one of the guys before counting his millions, for the labeling of an interminable Iraq and Afghan nation building effort as 'war', to have a host of Orwellian use-truth falsehood labels upon every sort of honest social relationship such that honest politics are impossible for ordinary people.