Congress Probably Would Flunk an Ecological Economic Exam

It would be a safe bet to say that Congress doesn't know what ecological economics is. For many in the two houses the term might suggest something like solar panels or renewable materials. Yes it can include such items however it means a lot more; in fact it is an entirely different way of regarding the economy as part of the environment (the world basically) where it occurs, including the ecosystem.

Air is a simply idea. Usually it’s not included in classical economics quantitatively for the entire world though it could be. If someone were to make a substantial impact on the ecosphere reducing or increasing planetary oxygen and other gases, production of air fit to breathe it could be measured.

There are finite quantities of air, water, land and biota on the Earth. One can compare the amount of ecological goods available to the number of users of the finite ecosphere and its ecological goods and determine what the budget for use that is sustainable is with various scaled population and use factors- if the goods natural renew themselves (such as a lake that refills after rainfall).

Good ecological economic policy would provide work for citizens sustaining the environment and wildlife with all the value it has with D.N.A. structures uniquely configured plants, etc. in addition to usual jobs manufacturing items that make life easier or more interesting.

Ecological economic criteria do need to have government set guidelines and coordination that fit within a Democratic, free enterprise social paradigm in order to sustain a continuum of creative human progress. Contract criteria for work that supports sustainability and has low impact on the ecosphere that is adverse or destructive is a good vehicle for transforming a classical, non-renewable economic infrastructure to one that is sustainable.

Fundamentally the Democrat party isn't any more aware of the deeper nature of ecological economic procedures than the Republican Party, though the Democrats flirt with conservation and renewable energy items enough to try to attract voters to their general policy of concentrating wealth in a global plutonomy while destroying U.S. sovereignty.

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23022017/congress-environmental-climate-change-league-conservation-voters

http://sustainablepath.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/what-is-ecological-economics-one-pag-pdf-080123.pdf

Europe; Leftist, Squishy, Needs U.S. Help?

If Europe threw a hissy fit after Trump administrative upgrades for visitors to the U.S.A. in order to make terrorism more difficult to perpetrate here, it did not need to go so far as to consider making it requisite for American visitors to the old world region it has rescued twice from German hostile takeover. Yet it may be a benefit to Americans if Europe does that since more Americans will travel to Alaska this summer instead of Europe.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/european-lawmakers-threaten-visa-rules-for-americans-in-spat-over-travel-policies/2017/03/03/0f13d546-0038-11e7-8f41-ea6ed597e4ca_story.html

Old Europe has been an expensive project for the U.S.A. to invest in since the First World War. Often Americans have wondered if Europeans could quit letting their latent Neanderthal side dominate affairs without going to the bipolar opposite course of homosexual marriage and some sort of incapacity for general political reason.

Make no mistake; Germany has the best pastry in Europe and would dominate if there were fair, unbiased Universal competitions. Sadly, pastry excellence is insufficient qualification for ruling the troubled region. European resolution for worldliness without ecological economic transformation yet with a decline in Christian values while acting as a catalyst for Muslim migrations and simultaneously seeking to annex Ukraine and perhaps other parts of historical Russia and debasing individual citizenship in comparison to a concentration of wealth is problematic.

Old Europe has been squashed down twice in the 20^th century by political elites sometimes clashing with other political elites. Adolph Hitler was a surrogate for the aristocracy deposed in the First World War’s end and that Frankenstein project got out of control. The left in its infatuation with Trotsky-Leninism decided that nations rather than elites were the problem entirely misdiagnosing the a-lect of the dialectical cycle of history enabling overcompensation from the b-lect for several decades.

Global today is the left’s idea in the United States for progress. They have substituted corporate elites for political elites that became unpopular as monarchies on soviets fell on hard time. Globalism is fundamentally a tool for letting a planetary oligarchy or plutonomy own everything while in turn the masses of people become powerless through relinquishing their nationhood.

Globalism has always existed since there was a world realistically. Nations however are political constructions that let a body politic have inalienable political rights unless they give them up through weakness, moral incapacity or ignorance. Though nations are strong and have strongly defended boundaries the world still may coexist peacefully with trade and tourism. Today’s globalists claim that the alternative to the unfettered planetary domination of wealth is isolationism however it is isolation of citizens from their own national right reason and properties of civil rights that occurs when the 1% have the world as their oyster and the masses are shifted about as cheap labor without a right to own anything or even in time to have sovereign democratic political rights in a republic.

Today a popular leverage tool for the globalism for the rich is to use Russia as a villain to prevent the practical global smooth flow of commerce and trade amidst sovereign nations with strong national ecological economic values. At the end of the cold war the Clintons and Europe sought to take Ukraine a third time from Russia in a century following up on that last accomplished by the Nazis in the Second World War. It would make sense for the U.S.A. to form a free trade policy with Russia in order to allow Miami to Fairbanks to Irkutsk high speed electromagnetic tube travel (and onward to Europe). That too would be globalism even if it occurs with strong U.S. sovereign boundary protection. It is not necessary that Americans are weak and indolent, doped up homosexuals to let the fake brave new world globalism bring happiness to the miserable. Rational actual global facilities for all travelling from their own nations with strong ecological economic policies can develop too as a better alternative to the world vision imagined by deathocrats and plutocrats seeking to rule as a corporatist central committee.

Russian-American Free Trade Act and Senator Jeff Sessions

Democrats have discovered a cache of documentation about two meetings by then-Senator Jeff Sessions with the Russian Ambassador in Washington D.C. and have called for the Attorney General to resign-. A reasonable request for a party taking up where Joe McCarthy left off in hating on the Russians (and Donald Trump). In theory the party reasoning goes something like Jeff Sessions met with the Russian ambassador to plot to put Hillary's emails from State on an insecure private server so Russian hackers could buy the stuff from a dark web auction site with laundered C.I.A. money that would only be enfiladed after deeper throat met with a Washington Post reporter behind a closed door secured with plumbers tape and forward the emails to wikileaks that would then release it during Hillary's Presidential campaign thus winning the election for Donald Trump after the public got a look into Hillary's way of doping business and Clinton Foundation tours of the State Department for big foreign contributors .

Senator Sessions decision to possibly discuss political matters with the Russian ambassador is unprecedented; US. politicians strictly stick to a code of silence and never meet with foreign representatives to discuss politics when they have a big stick of nuclear weaponry in their pocket. The fire stick makes savages heal with big wamp-em. Good Senators don't meet with diplomats; they use N.S.A. surveillance to listen in on their dirty little secrets.

It is of coarseness possible that the Senator met to discover what the Russian view of certain political matters were concerning war and peace in regions of mutual concern. Yet until Russia concedes the Myrny diamond pipes to the Democrat national Committee they will be regarded as a rogue nation unlikely to permit homosexual marriage and atheist, godless domination by feminism and BLTs.

Senator Sessions might have simply yearned for peanuts, caviar and vodka that no longer are automatic freebies flying in first class. The Russian ambassador might have provided a decent snack and then suggested some sort of treachery such as a free trade agreement between the two nations. Jeff Sessions as a naive political innocent would not have known the ambassador was capable of persuasive subterfuge and was actually recruiting him to spy on and steal Senator Al Franken's jokes. Free trade agreements are tantamount to treason in the Democrat play book.

Revised freak trade might work with RAFTA though. Athletes, vodka, whiskey and raw materials could be traded freely while manufactured goods and c.p.a.'s would not. Russia could make quick and dirty lunar lab modules and heavy lift them to the moon base. Space X would provide transport for humans and supply. How many billions it would take N.A.S.A. to build a moon base!?

The Saved, the Secular and the Lost

Assuredly Christians have an eternal life with God to look forward to even as they may be troubled by nefarious secularists that believe godless atheism is the best thing since a computer chip. Christianity itself is a little troubled by the lack of upgrades to the delivery of the gospel from that essentially unchanged since the era of feudalism when so many were illiterate. Today of course many Americans have been programmed by the broadcast media and have something of a functional philosophical and theological illiteracy.

 One of the sad points of the Obama era was that there are those with the wrong belief that unrepentant L.G.B. church goers are saved. There is no mistake that aberrant sex beyond that of heterosexual is sin. In order to be acceptable to God and His Son at the minimum one must cohere with the will of God as expressed in the Holy Bible/gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. That means that one cannot be an active, unrepentant homosexual. If one is then one is most likely not saved, for one never had faith and grace enough to quit that sin.

I would think however that if one were saved at some point and truly denounced all sin, even if one slipped at some point later and committed sin yet and repented that, they would still be alright. Being reprobate though; actually denying that sin clearly enough defined in the Bible is OK. and acceptable to God and the Lord Jesus Christ, and believing that one is saved seems silly. One might as well be a Muslim and consider praying five times a day in a supine position facing their neighborhood Wal-Mart is OK. Muslim practice.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/03/01/on-ash-wednesday-ashes-to-go-with-a-little-extra-sparkle/

Eternity is a deep game. Some cosmological physicists regard the Universe as having been created from nothing; the void and perhaps its zero-point energy. With historical evidence for evolution they regard the point about God as res judicata; such superficial philosophical, theological and even scientific reasoning makes them hardened in their faithlessness and nthus they become malevangelizers of the word of oblivion. Eternity is a long time without time however existing trancendently beyond the physics of the mortal coil. True faith shall have its just reward while so mayhaps, that which is true wickedness.

Genetic Engineering and Chess Middle Games

 It is challenging to anticipate who will qualify for the remaining seven slots in the 2018 challenger’s tournament; the world’s number two and three ranked players chose not to compete in the qualifying grand prix tourney this year-currently in progress, leaving just three remaining ways for them to become qualified to enter and try to win the challenger’s and the opportunity to play world chess champion Magnus Carlsen in November 2018.

The challengers 2018 has perhaps nine players that are or have been ranked over 2800 in the competition, plus 17 year old next-gen Wei Yei who is on Magnus Carlsen’s pace of advance in the ratings. Before Yei turns 18 he may equal Carlsen’s 17 year-old rating of 2780. People expect Wei Yei to challenge Magnus Carlsen for the world chess title between the years 2022 and 2030 with the interim being filled by one of chess’ mystery players with enigmatic motivation and purposes such as Fabiano Caruana, Alexander Grischuk etc.

Chess has many faces in its book of ages. Transitions three and four levels deep arise with discovered checks and double attacks appearing as if a chess engine designed them. In that regard a chess board is like the human genome; changes through genetic engineering of the human genome to correct error structures/positions may lead to discovered and double attacks because of the complexity of relationships across the helixian board with time  and the complete complex of compresent pieces arrayed.

Chess is however like a multi-dimensional tic tac toe game devoid of other intellectual content. Unlike the actual void with a Higgs Field and zero point energy and virtual particular energy a chess board has just eight pieces and eight pawns with two colors and little charm, different motion freedom for pieces and some pawns sharing with electrons the inability to occupy a given space or orbit with same has determinist characteristic like those of genetic genome paradigms that cannot continue after select phase changes or in some circumstances any phase change at all. To lose one’s pawns and pieces or genetic bearing is effectively to lose the game without residual zero point energy from which to attempt a Universe restart.

Within deterministic structures without super-conduction, common structures such as power transmission lines, it might be desirable to discover some way of sending internet transmissions and affixing Wi-Fi capabilities ubiquitously. One may debate pros and cons of politics that are empowered to fund research of such matters or energy even when the era is dominated by a party of unrepentant sinners versus another of repentant sinners each trusting their leaders to enrich themselves and global oligarchs who shall rule mankind in a Soviet Union style fusion-corporate jazz utopia replete with dramatic pathos.

Hidden temporal dimensions wherein are hidden discovered chess and genomic attacks on the body politic exist for-themselves in any generation. Kleeping a balanced ecospheric and social economy is challenging through continua of leadership incapacity of popular governing bodies. Thus regular progression of players advance to challenge the reigning champions of the day from the basis of an historical pyramid of plays differing mainly just at the top.

Fallacy of Adequate Taxes and the Welfare State

A modern state requires a lot of tax dollars to pay for making it work; keeping the flow moving together. Public spending is like the lubricant in an automobile engine. WIthout engine lub the independent parts would grind away with much friction.

Public spending in the wrong place creates inefficiency in the economic and social engine of a nation. Too much lube and too few engine parts doesn't work for progress. Cutting taxes to ridiculously low levels with a 20 trillion dollar public debt with a belief that reductions in 'welfare state' entitlements can be exploited top create a balanced budget and eliminate the public debt is silly.

Wealth in America is progressively concentrated with Republican and Democrat Party policies from leaders reinforcing the trend. Media sycophants and manic political leaders seem to want to keep mob hysteria and polity divisiveness gpoing over non-economic issues. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-trump-foes-keep-resistance-persistence-n725436

 Democracy is about the well being of the majority and politicians shouldn't be ashamed to pursue rational policies in behalf of the majority.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

The richest 1% are said to have more wealth than 90% of Americans put together. The poorest 73% have most of the debt. Washington politics primarily benefit the ultra-rich and globalism.  It has been said that 50% of the people of the United States share just 1/2 of 1% of the national income.

Democrat politics under the Obama administration slopped the poor and anyone they could reite or put out of the work force without adding to unemployment stats. Even so they focused on enriching politicians and the most rich sigining off on Bush II tax cuts with enthusiasm. Republicans simply like to berate the poor and starve them with a misbelief that good jobs are easy to be had with effort. Those that are comfortable and well do do cannot imagine that real effort can pay off with virtually nothing in the U.S.A. There is no objectively even field for work and individual progress over the course of a lifetime any more.

F.D.R. got a 90% tax rate on the rich and only very sklowly didi that decrease over several decades. He did create something of a welfare ethos since the private sector put millions on the bread line with the depression.

With a 60% tax rate on the 1% government could reallocate capital to ecological economic policy actualization through private enterprise rather than just welfare payments. Government could set paradigms for business bidders to fullfill that would be financed upon winning competetion. Today though the Trump administraion should create incentives for business to higher those out of work the most time, first. Real nationalism means taking up policy that benefit the majority of the people rather than the ultra-rich that tend to have globally allocated portfolios at any rate.

The people of the United States should try to keep some sort of reality in their thinking about what concentrated wealth and power means. The nation's founders revolted against concentrated wealth and power of British aristocrats. Several revolutions that shaped the modern world were against concentrations of wealth and power that reduced ordinary people to the status of peons or slaves. 

Some have said that if one is happy living in a political manure pile one shouldn't stick one's neck out. The media tend to pacify the public when they are stimulating panic or hate, yet it is intelligent analysis that too often or generally is lacking. One needs to be circumspective too about current events in regard to history. Perhaps no one in the U.S.A. should have more wealth than 300x that of the average. Maybe corporations should be limited in size to 5000 employees. 

Can Inflation Occur With E-Dollars ?

A modern state requires a lot of tax dollars to pay for making it work; keeping the flow moving together. Public spending is like the lubricant in an automobile engine. Without engine lub the independent parts would grind away with much friction.

Public spending in the wrong place creates inefficiency in the economic and social engine of a nation. Too much lube and too few engine parts doesn't work for progress. Cutting taxes to ridiculously low levels with a 20 trillion dollar public debt with a belief that reductions in 'welfare state' entitlements can be exploited top create a balanced budget and eliminate the public debt is silly.

Wealth in America is progressively concentrated with Republican and Democrat Party policies from leaders reinforcing the trend. Media sycophants and manic political leaders seem to want to keep mob hysteria and polity divisiveness gpoing over non-economic issues. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-trump-foes-keep-resistance-persistence-n725436

 Democracy is about the well being of the majority and politicians shouldn't be ashamed to pursue rational policies in behalf of the majority.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

The richest 1% are said to have more wealth than 90% of Americans put together. The poorest 73% have most of the debt. Washington politics primarily benefit the ultra-rich and globalism.  It has been said that 50% of the people of the United States share just 1/2 of 1% of the national income.

Democrat politics under the Obama administration slopped the poor and anyone they could retire or put out of the work force without adding to unemployment stats. Even so they focused on enriching politicians and the richest signing off on Bush II tax cuts with enthusiasm. Republicans simply like to berate the poor and starve them with a misbelief that good jobs are easy to be had with effort. Those that are comfortable and well to do cannot imagine that real effort can pay off with virtually nothing in the U.S.A. There is no objectively even field for work and individual progress over the course of a lifetime any more.

F.D.R. got a 90% tax rate on the rich and only very slowly did that decrease over several decades. He did create something of a welfare ethos since the private sector put millions on the bread line with the depression.

With a 60% tax rate on the 1% government could reallocate capital to ecological economic policy actualization through private enterprise rather than just welfare payments. Government could set paradigms for business bidders to fulfil that would be financed upon winning competition. Today though the Trump administration should create incentives for business to higher those out of work the most time, first. Real nationalism means taking up policy that benefit the majority of the people rather than the ultra-rich that tend to have globally allocated portfolios at any rate.

The people of the United States should try to keep some sort of reality in their thinking about what concentrated wealth and power means. The nation's founders revolted against concentrated wealth and power of British aristocrats. Several revolutions that shaped the modern world were against concentrations of wealth and power that reduced ordinary people to the status of peons or slaves.

Some have said that if one is happy living in a political manure pile one shouldn't stick one's neck out. The media tend to pacify the public when they are stimulating panic or hate, yet it is intelligent analysis that too often or generally is lacking. One needs to be circumspective too about current events in regard to history. Perhaps no one in the U.S.A. should have more wealth than 300x that of the average. Maybe corporations should be limited in size to 5000 employees.

Toward Better U.S. Middle East Policy

I have limited time today to write so this incomplete note; A month prior to the Islamist assault on the U.S. Embassy and C.I.A. station at Benghazi Libya Senators Graham and McCain extolled military intervention in Libya as a reason to militarily intervene in Syria. Evidently they did not comprehend the situation of sandals on the ground in either Libya or Syria. Before military can work to bring about a non-violent peaceful transition to democracy within a global Facebook webpage empire the U.S. need airdrop in crack Democrat Party liberal elites to supervise and coach the inexperienced neophyte godless atheist young professionals who must locally lead their underverse Muslim brothers and sisters to full liberal accountability as good citizens.

American leadership apparently were clueless about Syria before supporting military escalation of that conflict that led to the deaths of a quarter of a million people or so. They didn’t like Assad because he is authoritarian-yet there were reaso0ns for that such as that any middle eastern Arab government must be authoritarian if it is to exist-even an ostensibly democratic one for some time if it is to survive and put down attacks form dissident elements within and extraneous violent military interventions from without.

Americans perhaps didn’t realize that when Syrian boundaries were invented by the British in the aftermath of the First World War Sunni and Shi’a Muslims were thrown into the same bag as it were. Historically Middle Eastern sects and tribes of patristic societies were not all that comfortable with one another unless forced to live bucolically under authoritarian rule such as that of the Ottoman Empire or Saddam Hussein and his Baathism. The minority Alawite population needed to have an authoritarian power to let itself exist along with an antagonistic Sunni majority. For the U.S. to support democracy in Syria was fundamentally to support religious democide and purging of a religious minority. U.S. leadership should instead support a reconciliation of the British-set Syrian boundaries such that each party gets a fair viable portion of Syria. I believe that Jordan should rule the Sunni portion for a century.

Many war-mongering leftist corporatists of the Obama administration and media seeking war and removal of the Assad government did not realize that besides securing a Syrian peace-that now would require an authoritarian Alawite government for the Alawite-Shi’a-Christian part of a divided Syria simply to reduce the number of Sunni truck bombers for a century since the area is saturated with liberated c-3 and c-4 from Iraqi and Libyan arsenals-the U.S. should support just those nations it has a real responsibility for such as Israel, Iraq, Syria and possibly Kurds in a state of their own, with military support. The Sunni nations otherwise must find their own natural balance and battle it out for-themselves. America can only practice constructive engagement and be a good example if possible.

American foreign policy following the end of the cold war hasn’t always been enlightened. When President Clinton for example used a political rohipnol to get Boris Yeltsin to relinquish its soft southern parts as Vladimir Lenin had done before at Brest-Litovsk to Germany, the opportunity for long-range positive progress with Russia in economic and security issues was forfeited. Apparently the urge of Butch Street to snatch and grab land while they could was irresistible. They may look enviously at the remainder of Russia’s natural resource wealth and choose to engage negatively in the long range using military power and sanctions to make unreasonable demands upon Russia such as being happy to give it all up in the south and not share Ukraine even to the Dnepr. Russia also has Syrian allies and that was a point against them too when the United States sought to follow a Pollyannaish policy of Arab transition to democracy non-violently.

It may be that some U.S. leaders resented Bashir Assad’s support for insurgents in Iraq. Yet most of the Middle East hated American military intervention there and regarded America as overly supportive of Shi’a in Iraq. For many Sunni conservatives the Shi’a should not exist at all and should rather become Sunni. Assad was however an Alawite leader in a majority Arabian Sunni state. He needed to walk both sides of the line in a tightrope act to keep Iranian friends and Sunni too happy enough. He erred in supporting the insurgency of course.

Iran may have been pleased with the harm to U.S. interests of the insurgency in Iraq yet simultaneously concerned with suppressing it enough to cooperate with the U.S.A. U.S. leadership may have help precipitate the Iraqi invasion of Syria that left more than a million dead and a little payback might have been regarded as being in order. The U.S. may have felt that Iran got its just deserts for taking the U.S. embassy hostage during the Iranian revolution. And Iranians hated the U.S.A. a little for the Eisenhower administration’s support of the restoration of the Pahlavi dynasty to the Peacock throne early subverting the Iranian democracy in the process.

Plainly where the U.S. intervenes militarily beyond its own areas of existing special interest it just throws accelerant into the fire of Arabian confusion, chaos, populism morphing to Islamism etc. It ISIS were to become an established government anywhere the Reagan doctrine might contain it and more easily destroy its leadership if it comprised a threat to the U.S.A. or other N.A.T.O. countries. Human behavior and degrees of Muslim fundamentalism are variables and constants too. N.A.T.O. should defend Europe against Muslim infiltration, yet also constructively engage the Middle East to restore the 95% of Syrian refugees that live in the Middle East to get out of the camps and return to Syria.

Conflated theories about causes of conflict in the Arab spring wars and the worth of military intervention should not be allowed to bring the U.S.A. to throw more munitions and temporal targets that vanish and reform like some kind of amoeba composite. The desire for populist revolt against authoritarian regimes finds resonance with not only emergent godless atheist yuppies but with Islamist radicals that can politically organize best in the sanctity of mosques. The Arab Sunni states will need to balance themselves with evolving forms of states. When the U.S. intervenes it just resets the entire cycle of authoritarian, aborted democratic movement/fundamentalist revolt and so forth. In practice democracy exists in Arab states when a military that is westernized supports it. The military intervenes domestically whenever Muslims become too powerful and want to move toward theocracy. The formation of democratic political institutions is challenging and requires long-term tech support to just grow out of isolated economic and social submission to repress government, royalty or global oligarchs.

Facetwits2

I had thought of going to church Sunday. Yet there are not any Priesthood of Believers churches franchised yet so I wrote this slowly with a broke keyboard. . . Nothing about Erastian errors or the unsaved left on base.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg recently published a manifesto describing how Fbook can be a neo–governing political facilitator evolving new world order. Hegel thought the German state the highest stage of the world spirit realizing itself in history. Mr. Zuckerberg apparently believes its Facebook. Democratic nationalism is based on land and secure borders– a gold standard vs floating currency globalism.

More people than Mr. Zuckerberg may field websites as evolved, sophisticated new format news–packing–stuffing world governments. Domain name bidding may drive prices sky high (i.e. True Sedition, Carefree Government, Acme Government, Best Government, N. W. O. 2, Zipperflipper). Maybe will China start a clone site sharing advertising cash proplits with users.

A hypothetical CEO of a startup– Facetwits2 seems like a good name for a social networking site to organize a level 4 Multiverse (presence of mind traveling through universe permutations with branching).

Planet peoples get their own user ID and user page universe. I shall make a covenant with my users so they may form secret groups and nobody else shall know what goes on – except me. I shall give news feeds that nurture users in the way of Oz.

Oz shall be held harmless and all revenue streams from Facetwits2 shall flow to moi as long as rivers run untaxed. I may give billions away and have no tax liability decades. Everyones a winner.

Toynbee would have considered me just an Oz man making way to ending the Republic in the Universal phase of American civilization (rightly). Yek I am so much more. Marx knew dialectical (political) evolution led in stages to structuretopia under a benevolent central committee. Nietzsche knew a Super Oz man would arise to lead the underverse (women, homosexuals, ethnic minorities) to reason overcoming class enemies and serving as experimental vectors someday after genetic engineering and artificial intelligence are perfected.

Facebook's New World Order

Facebook has a CEO who got lucky with one idea in college during the rapid growth phase of social media on the Internet. For whatever reason it was welcomed and Mark Zuckerberg became a billionaire. Now of course he wants to rule the world, or rather, have the political thought of humanity exist within his vast leftist global empire on-line.

https://arstechnica.com/staff/2017/02/op-ed-mark-zuckerbergs-manifesto-is-a-political-trainwreck/

Actually independence and nationalism are requisite for meaningful democratic politics. Strong national boundaries are needed for the possibility of ecological economic transition to develop from the present non-renewable economics. Change needs to happen in particular areas rather than sort of generally. Zuckerberg would like to form millions of people into little regional groups where they are given appropriate news of public concern. Like the broadcast media owned by the rich those concerns cannot really be in conflict with the way things are.

The Unibomber also wrote a manifesto. He also wanted to change the world to conform to a radical vision. If he had owned Facebook perhaps he would have required humanity to be brainwashed in planetary groups that would support his goals for a new world order.

Mark Zuckerberg should write a few books on environmental economic theory and let the sophomoric approaches to a new world order go.

http://www.vox.com/new-money/2017/2/18/14653542/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-manifesto-sapiens

Everybody wants to rule the world. Logically the first guys with preferred network locations would want to get in on the action. Facebook would morph like the planet eating blob into an organism containing everyone. All would be subject to Facebook's ability to know what they write as if they were a super-N.S.A. toying with it's prey.

Facebook would become the real political means of being with overwhelming power to raise up or put down those that make the global corporate agenda function more smoothly. As the present media hates Trump now except for some honest reporters like Rush Limbaugh, it would be able to coordinate and promote attacks on political systems anywhere.

Facebook's goal seems to be to move directly to Mussolini's corporatist utopia that failed in Nazi Germany but in a brave new world order might fulfill Mao's ideal state with the central committee being a planetary oligarchy dwarfing even the Chinese Communist Party. It is a logical, evil turn toward the dark side of the force.