Stealth Tenting Through Hard Social Times

For internal economic refugees from the corporate-media networking using the mobility and low profile tent is a practical option for independent living in the U.S.A. It is easy for insiders to subvert professional education career development cutting off graduate school finance. Without a practical trade that can be worked without much social networking individuals are quite vulnerable to the corrupt zeitgeist of the times. Youth may be conditioned to purge those recognized to be unconformed to the governing evil. Illegal aliens that are loyal to the moneyed will share contempt for off-the-grid Americans. So it is useful to know some of the basic minimalist survival facts of life (outside of the morally corrupt swingy-doper niche classes) of tenting. People in impoverished circumstance need no help from Russian propagandists to lack confidence in U.S. politicians or the value of the election system at fixing things.

A bicycle is very helpful for the broke. It is reasonable to trek across the nation looking for a job, perhaps temporary if in a politically shunned class. That is where a practical trade that allows direct service is especially useful for survival. Sadly, the smaller the tent the better. Low tent profile means easy concealment in a semi-urban and suburban environment. Any tent can be weatherproofed with a disposable dollar-plastic tarp placed atop it- leave plenty of room for air circulation of course.

Put the tent on level or slightly sloped ground with good cover. Stay out of direct sunshine unless its winter because the tent will heat up very quickly in warmer seasons.

Never leave trash around a tent. Pick it up and covertly dispose of it in public trash containers. Urinate in a bottle if male and empty that far away from the tent because it attracts flies and renders the tent location too smelly in a couple of days. Females usually coach surf I should say, and don’t suffer the inconveniences of independent tent survival long-term.

It is easy to use a bottle of 70% isopropyl alcohol for washing armpits and groin to stay clean and odor free. A dollar bottle lasts about seven days. Always wear some sort of sleeping clothes in a sleeping bag because that bag will be as uncomfortable as a pair of underwear that is worn unwashed for five days in a month or less. It is easier to wash underwear than a sleeping bag.

It is possible to buy semi-medicated powder to add to underwear to further reduce any itching caused by not bathing for 6 months to 7 years. Really though one should use soap and water at least every two weeks.

Tents that are entirely pattern camouflaged may be ordered from e-Bay for fewer than 25 dollars that work fairly well for people not more than 6 feet in height. Taller souls will find it challenged to stretch out legs.

With notebook computers and TP-Link wireless antenna (that do need a windows operating system to be installed realistically) it is possible to connect to the Internet from twice the usual distance. However if one has charged batteries and doesn’t need the Internet it is practical to spend long winter months rather inactively working in a tent on a computer.

The experience is rather like living in an ancient Irish pennants hut that were small and made of stone piled up to resemble a small tent, though the media and government should be the penitents for being so daft about ecological economics.

If living in a colder winter climate such as Anchorage a larger tent is needed. In 2010-11 I spent five months in a tent well below freezing without heat. Frost crystals from breath exhalations grew n the ceiling to four inches in size and occasional broke and dropped to the tent floor. In too small of a tent that is acceptable in warmer climates there just isn’t enough room to move.

Fire ants make southern tenting unreasonable. It is possible to place ant powder on a plastic tarp under the tent. Yet because ants smell meat and can make a hole in a tent in minutes southern tenting should be a worst case alternative. When a security guard in Texas trying to get a couple of hours of sleep on weekends the ants would make that very difficult. Later, when camping in east Texas the air temperature was 117 degrees and inside the tent, higher. Good intellectual work slows down with that sort of temperature.

In a time when some community colleges are facing budget and enrollment shortfalls they still spend tens of thousands of dollars on greenhouse gassing emitting vast lawn mowing instead of training students to raise and process goats for potted meat delicacies synergizing with business, biology, anatomy, manufacturing and culinary classes. Students could use practical as well as classroom, abstract experience raising and caring for goats, slaughtering and dissecting them, creating business models for processing the meat on campus for end-of-semester barbeque, feeding hungry students and sales or export. 

Students need good examples of land use on campus to change their values and the way they see land use. They have vast greenhouse gassing parking lots full of cars that don’t pay for parking, absorb sunshine that is released after dark and mechanics courses to train students to service them until Mark Zuckerberg finds a way to connect their brains to computers in cars whence Americans can get rid of their biological shells and reproduce cars with more pleasure and eleatic cosmogasmic infinitude.

 The good tenter only uses a self-igniting propane torch for cooking being sure to ventilate adequately and not blow up free gas in the tent with a spark. Wasted gas becomes methane; a vicious greenhouse gas.

Oregon tenting winter 2016-17

Jeff Davis, Sanctuary, and Sedition Laws

Anisotropic state sanctuary laws present some issues. States such as Oregon and California have or seek to have laws prohibiting state law officials from cooperating with Federal officials enforcing immigration laws to arrest and deport illegal aliens. The so-called sanctuary laws have untended consequences that are interesting to consider. They highlight the problems mass numbers of illegal aliens have in deflecting the American political system from positive internal issues to one concerned too much with conflicts created by illegal immigrants.

State’s rights have been salient points since the civil war when state's rights to not cooperate with federal law largely ended. Illegal aliens as cheap workers are being protected by the same legal paradigm of state’s rights that allowed slavery with states of the confederacy asserting their right to not cooperate with federal officials seeking to enforce federal law. Following the civil formerly confederate states were not allowed to continue slavery even if their state legislatures voted to do so,

The basic problem is the lack of coherent legal reasoning in leftist governments led by the former party of slavery (Democrat Party) so far that they should regard laws as applicable to all rather than a few in special circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is an important principle to keep in mind when making laws that would be consistent with equal protection of the law. Democrats have sought to gerrymander laws to their benefit without concern for the effect on national legal environment. Jeff Davis today would call the confederate states sanctuary states, providing on the job training for underprivileged Africans.

It is unlikely that sanctuary laws would stand up in federal courts against legal challenges. Paradoxically President Obama used federal law as the tool to prevent Arizona state legal officials from arresting illegal aliens denying state officials the power to enforce federal law while Oregon and California state governments have sought to shelter the same illegal aliens from the state side passing laws to prevent state officials from cooperating with federal law enforcement.

It is ironic that the left that have driven federal special-class, discriminatory, anisotropic laws known as anti-hate criminal laws forward and while seeking a profusion of sanctuary for illegal aliens laws. Down the road those state laws conflict with federal supremacy of law over state laws when they conflict that is the basis for so much of the civil rights movement. Not that slavery would be popular in the U.S.A. again if the Federal Government did not consider it illegal, it is the case that universal federal laws on important fundamental civil rights, the most basic of which is the right of citizenship and any benefits and responsibilities of it should be disambiguated from moldy under-the-table state laws that subvert it.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions from a former confederate state is another good part of the irony since he is the principal to defend federal law in federal power to enforce the will of the people of the United States to have equal protection of the law unsubverted by foreign interests including illegal aliens. The U.S.A. is first a sanctuary for citizens of a republic-democracy with national citizen-sovereignty.

Kim Jong Un and the Nuclear Game-Boys

President Trump has taken a harder attitude toward North Korea’s dictator Kim Jong Un who has continued his family’s policy of developing nuclear weapons and delivery infrastructure. Clinton-Obama containment policies were demonstratively ineffective and stopping the increase of Dictator Kim’s nuclear arsenal. What can President Trump actually accomplish to change Kim’s policy short of war?

Without the prospect for war the Dictator probably hasn’t an incentive to quit developing nuclear weapons. Perhaps Dictator Kim has the goal of reaching a weapons abundance level that would create a mini-MAD policy of security. Modern dictators require external enemies and internal civil repression to stay in power in addition to a reign of terror on potential dissidents.

North Career isn’t in the Cold War criterion as it formerly was though. China that has moved further towards a mixed capitalist economy has less reason to support a hard core communist dictatorship in the region that indirectly threatens its own economic security. China would probably profit from a regime change that would unify North and South Korea in a capitalist economy with an increase in trade.

During the transition that allowed foreign investment in Chinese business North Korea was a useful bad dog on a chain distracting western attention away from China, and it was non-threatening to the Chinese. All of that has changed though, and Dictator Kim is rather out there on his own and most appealing to Moslem terrorists seeking to end western world economic dominance through nuclear destruction of Euro-American economic security perhaps via attacking Washington, Moscow, Paris and London.

Chess is a game that can be learned from early childhood enabling one to attain grandmaster status in adulthood. Such individuals may be like idiot savants that have nothing besides chess on their minds. In the modern world gaming theory has become more important. Stock market computer trading scamming was developed with the tools of the Monte Carlo algorithm initially. Computer trading programs to automate profit extraction through quantitative trading, like chess gaming structures using real people as analog pieces, may be applied with sociopathic disregard for the reality of individuals in the real social world. Communist dictators following Marxist theory have traditionally risen to the level of being political sociopaths killing civil political foes. In the modern global communications environment it is practical for sociopathic gaming communications players also to extend their paradigms.

Military games theorist alone would know if it is militarily possible to successfully war with North Korea with minimal friendly casualties. Real world military gamers have pattern and composition analytic criteria designed to model reality. Chess and computer market model profit systems have no regard for the reality of individuals though. They are limited to sociopathic power perceptions of individuals of the real world as objects and externalities of no meaning.

The profusion of cruise missiles might be able to destroy North Korea’s ability to launch mass artillery attacks on the south. North Korean power centers might be destroyed with tactical nuclear weapons. It is quite difficult for non-specialist to guess what a one-day war would be like. Apparently, short of war, virtually nothing can be done to change North Korea’s nuclear weapons development. That is not an ideal ecological economic direction of reform/

In the aftermath of war whereat North Korea and south are unified, one would expect that the economic recovery would be comparable to that of the reunification of Germany after the Cold War. It seems likely that the emaciated, oppressed North Koreans would enjoy liberation from the Dictator and his insiders. The public is usually opposed to war-especially nuclear war. If given a choice many would prefer to be on a winning rather than a targeted side of such a conflict.

President Trump’s political timing might be another factor in the decision to put a regime change on North Korea. With the inability to replace Obamacare with a cost and service effective system such as expanding the V.A. Hospital system an treating civilians too that are poor, a nuclear conflict with North Korea might make it difficult to get the Trump agenda done in the remainder of his term yet the market should recover with increased Korean economic investment prospects. Harry Truman wasn’t re-elected one recalls. For grandmasters scaling up their analog targets from individuals to nations, controlling global war economics might be a daunting task.

Feminism of the New World Order

In the age of the machine and advanced technology (comparatively) women became empowered with birth control and automation. While men had learned for generations that political and economic differences in leaders and movements were independent of gender, with the Clintons that lesson seemed to be lost as feminists believed to a certain extent, such as former Sect. of State Madeleine Albright, that gender was all important and a political-economic mode in-itself.

Feminism politically has been led to support a global economic war against men. First world feminist leaders have failed to realize that the enhanced status of first world females requires first world economic and technological infrastructure that isn’t present in second and third world economies generally. Though feminists have supported outsourcing male manufacturing and production jobs to second and third world nations having the effect of increasing their economic status the lead time is slow. Second and third world nations lack the general negotiating positions that existed in the United States for workers seeking enhanced status in the 20^th century before the end of the Cold War.

Plainly the U.S. national economy of post-WWII growth is over. In that economy with fewer than 140 million citizens initially white men were fully employed and the differences between rich and poor weren’t nearly so great. The tax rate was progressive and the rich paid more than 70% income tax. The population steadily increased and life was good for that class. Segregation still existed in the south though, and women were resentful to a certain extent of their role as self-regarded social economic inferiors (to a certain extent). Unionization also decayed with the union remnant being strongest in government comprising an insulating layer of common people for the rich who pay for politicians. Government union workers in effect work for and are loyal to the rich, largely mirroring global corporate wishes.

After the cold war ended most industrial jobs for men were outsourced to China or elsewhere with an abundance of cheap labor. Technological efficiency increases also undermined the value of male labor and there were additional factors. Women didn’t want men to have greater pay and sought and egalitarian earnings environment. Feminists tended to support illegal alien migrant labor too that also contributed to the devaluation of male labor domestically.

For many Americans the Clinton-Obama economy seemed to be one designed to enrich the 1% and concentrate wealth rather than to better the middle class and poor. Taxes by the second Obama term were made incredibly low and wealth had concentrated through Wall Street networking and zero-interest loans to big banks. Hillary Clinton planned to continue Obamanomics and much of the electorate didn’t care for that including 45% of female voters.

Nevertheless the changes brought by technology comprise a new economy albeit one not at all designed along sustainable economic lines. Feminists in the new economy have made power of equal value with economic progress for women. Yet like chess grandmasters that learn the game from childhood and never work at physical labor, sharing criticism of the white male economic infrastructure (that hasn’t made real economic progress since the mid 1970s) and resisting individuals in the game of inter-social communication, wealth has continued to concentrate and the middle class overall has been in decline though women have a bigger piece of the economic pie within the class.

Chess is a highly skilled game wherein game-boys grown up may function with economic blinders on. They produce nothing consumable except perhaps entertainment and are as highly paid as similarly non-productive commercial athletes that profess nothing and manufacture nothing consumable 9except entertainment). Chess is a good retirement skill that keeps the mind active, and a relaxation tool for intellectuals. Real economics require particular attention to particular national goals and relationships however. A nation enthralled with gaming may find it difficult to discern the woods or the trees.

Donald Trump the candidate promised to benefit the nation and restore a sense of great nationhood to the U.S.A. Replacing the corporatist Obamacare with an expanded V.A. Hospital system serving the civilian public too that are poor, and coordinating that structure with community clinics for the poor would be the most cost effective way. The de facto one-party system in Congress probably wouldn’t produce anything practical like that.

Female voters have in effect signed aboard the globalist agenda forwarded by the Clinton-Obama-Harvard axis of economic evil designed to create a global village of idiots owned largely by a plutocracy of 1%ers working with communist party elites to keep the village idiots happy in a non-sustainable economy. An eleatic social moral renormalization where the village idiots are amoral and doped appears to be the basic policy in order to have all people treated equally as no more than plankton. Religious ideas regardless of being Christian or Moslem are undesirable for the godless plutocratic atheist world order.

Feminists like the idea of a non-physical labor work force with a heavily governed social order dominated by biggest bitch political bosses lording it over drone male and female worker-doped-pacified village citizenry permitted sex like swine that by homes with veritable lifetime mortgages. With the left being so supportive of a bifurcated immoral citizenry under capitalist, globalist plutocrats, the need to persuade business leaders like President trump of the economic value of the ecosphere for the sustainable goods and services that it supplies to all like receives little support.

President Trump is a businessman. Business leaders don’t let highly placed executives like Vice President Pence sit around and cut blue ribbons. While pure politicians might pick symbolic Vice Presidents and keep them out of the way lest they be rivals for attention and glory, business minded Presidents want to get some work out of them. President Trump recently sent V.P. Pence on an Asian mission perhaps to coordinate a response to North Korean nuclear weapons and missile delivery expansion.

President Trump is probably not only for sovereignty for the U.S.A., he also has a habit of making a profit. Ecological economist could show trump the advantage and potential profits of ecological economics and if he were convinced he likely would support it; especially if it is synergistic with existing economic structures and amenable to evolutionary transformation from old to new without radical displacement. If the profit is there, capitalists and business will follow.

A healthy U.S. economy with strong border control and stable immigration policies that won’t disrupt American lives should be the foundation for an America policy able to guide other nations toward similar ecological economic business free enterprise structures that are sustainable. That is a concern that American feminist should develop before the next election rather than playing social reality as some sort of chess game they can win with incessant attacks on their fellow citizens that just need to earn a living too.

It may be that abstract business zoning criteria should be devised and made into law to which any new business would need to cohere in order to exist. There might be a cap on employee total such as 5000 to prevent monopoly. Taxation on individuals earning more than a million dollars annually might be set at 51% in order to defend the sovereignty of democracy from the power of plutocracy. Business should have responsibility for environmental externalities and have taxation in relation to their environmental efficiency at low entropy. Patents should be limited to 7 years with 10% royalties to inventors after that from any business using the patented idea. None should be allowed to own stock shares in more than three corporations.

Because one year in prison at $40,000 for a convict could have paid for food stamps for 20 people for a year, and for other reasons in a similar way, it is desirable to provide minimum income and physical storage facilities for the poor to lower economic pressure for crime. Crime has numerous indirect social costs that should be reduced in a fully democratic, environmentally sustainable free enterprise economy in the United States.

Numerous factors work against employment for U.S. individuals that are out of the work force for any length of time. Women as men should be given the real opportunity and have the social expectation to be independent citizens able to earn a living without being exploited or experiencing onerous conditions. Relationship should be consensual rather than circumstantially coercive. Illegal migration, environmental exploitation, a too powerful broadcast media, concentration of wealth and more reinforce social anomie and degradation rather than a good national equilibrium. It doesn’t take a village; it takes a nation.