Feminism of the New World Order

In the age of the machine and advanced technology (comparatively) women became empowered with birth control and automation. While men had learned for generations that political and economic differences in leaders and movements were independent of gender, with the Clintons that lesson seemed to be lost as feminists believed to a certain extent, such as former Sect. of State Madeleine Albright, that gender was all important and a political-economic mode in-itself.

Feminism politically has been led to support a global economic war against men. First world feminist leaders have failed to realize that the enhanced status of first world females requires first world economic and technological infrastructure that isn’t present in second and third world economies generally. Though feminists have supported outsourcing male manufacturing and production jobs to second and third world nations having the effect of increasing their economic status the lead time is slow. Second and third world nations lack the general negotiating positions that existed in the United States for workers seeking enhanced status in the 20^th century before the end of the Cold War.

Plainly the U.S. national economy of post-WWII growth is over. In that economy with fewer than 140 million citizens initially white men were fully employed and the differences between rich and poor weren’t nearly so great. The tax rate was progressive and the rich paid more than 70% income tax. The population steadily increased and life was good for that class. Segregation still existed in the south though, and women were resentful to a certain extent of their role as self-regarded social economic inferiors (to a certain extent). Unionization also decayed with the union remnant being strongest in government comprising an insulating layer of common people for the rich who pay for politicians. Government union workers in effect work for and are loyal to the rich, largely mirroring global corporate wishes.

After the cold war ended most industrial jobs for men were outsourced to China or elsewhere with an abundance of cheap labor. Technological efficiency increases also undermined the value of male labor and there were additional factors. Women didn’t want men to have greater pay and sought and egalitarian earnings environment. Feminists tended to support illegal alien migrant labor too that also contributed to the devaluation of male labor domestically.

For many Americans the Clinton-Obama economy seemed to be one designed to enrich the 1% and concentrate wealth rather than to better the middle class and poor. Taxes by the second Obama term were made incredibly low and wealth had concentrated through Wall Street networking and zero-interest loans to big banks. Hillary Clinton planned to continue Obamanomics and much of the electorate didn’t care for that including 45% of female voters.

Nevertheless the changes brought by technology comprise a new economy albeit one not at all designed along sustainable economic lines. Feminists in the new economy have made power of equal value with economic progress for women. Yet like chess grandmasters that learn the game from childhood and never work at physical labor, sharing criticism of the white male economic infrastructure (that hasn’t made real economic progress since the mid 1970s) and resisting individuals in the game of inter-social communication, wealth has continued to concentrate and the middle class overall has been in decline though women have a bigger piece of the economic pie within the class.

Chess is a highly skilled game wherein game-boys grown up may function with economic blinders on. They produce nothing consumable except perhaps entertainment and are as highly paid as similarly non-productive commercial athletes that profess nothing and manufacture nothing consumable 9except entertainment). Chess is a good retirement skill that keeps the mind active, and a relaxation tool for intellectuals. Real economics require particular attention to particular national goals and relationships however. A nation enthralled with gaming may find it difficult to discern the woods or the trees.

Donald Trump the candidate promised to benefit the nation and restore a sense of great nationhood to the U.S.A. Replacing the corporatist Obamacare with an expanded V.A. Hospital system serving the civilian public too that are poor, and coordinating that structure with community clinics for the poor would be the most cost effective way. The de facto one-party system in Congress probably wouldn’t produce anything practical like that.

Female voters have in effect signed aboard the globalist agenda forwarded by the Clinton-Obama-Harvard axis of economic evil designed to create a global village of idiots owned largely by a plutocracy of 1%ers working with communist party elites to keep the village idiots happy in a non-sustainable economy. An eleatic social moral renormalization where the village idiots are amoral and doped appears to be the basic policy in order to have all people treated equally as no more than plankton. Religious ideas regardless of being Christian or Moslem are undesirable for the godless plutocratic atheist world order.

Feminists like the idea of a non-physical labor work force with a heavily governed social order dominated by biggest bitch political bosses lording it over drone male and female worker-doped-pacified village citizenry permitted sex like swine that by homes with veritable lifetime mortgages. With the left being so supportive of a bifurcated immoral citizenry under capitalist, globalist plutocrats, the need to persuade business leaders like President trump of the economic value of the ecosphere for the sustainable goods and services that it supplies to all like receives little support.

President Trump is a businessman. Business leaders don’t let highly placed executives like Vice President Pence sit around and cut blue ribbons. While pure politicians might pick symbolic Vice Presidents and keep them out of the way lest they be rivals for attention and glory, business minded Presidents want to get some work out of them. President Trump recently sent V.P. Pence on an Asian mission perhaps to coordinate a response to North Korean nuclear weapons and missile delivery expansion.

President Trump is probably not only for sovereignty for the U.S.A., he also has a habit of making a profit. Ecological economist could show trump the advantage and potential profits of ecological economics and if he were convinced he likely would support it; especially if it is synergistic with existing economic structures and amenable to evolutionary transformation from old to new without radical displacement. If the profit is there, capitalists and business will follow.

A healthy U.S. economy with strong border control and stable immigration policies that won’t disrupt American lives should be the foundation for an America policy able to guide other nations toward similar ecological economic business free enterprise structures that are sustainable. That is a concern that American feminist should develop before the next election rather than playing social reality as some sort of chess game they can win with incessant attacks on their fellow citizens that just need to earn a living too.

It may be that abstract business zoning criteria should be devised and made into law to which any new business would need to cohere in order to exist. There might be a cap on employee total such as 5000 to prevent monopoly. Taxation on individuals earning more than a million dollars annually might be set at 51% in order to defend the sovereignty of democracy from the power of plutocracy. Business should have responsibility for environmental externalities and have taxation in relation to their environmental efficiency at low entropy. Patents should be limited to 7 years with 10% royalties to inventors after that from any business using the patented idea. None should be allowed to own stock shares in more than three corporations.

Because one year in prison at $40,000 for a convict could have paid for food stamps for 20 people for a year, and for other reasons in a similar way, it is desirable to provide minimum income and physical storage facilities for the poor to lower economic pressure for crime. Crime has numerous indirect social costs that should be reduced in a fully democratic, environmentally sustainable free enterprise economy in the United States.

Numerous factors work against employment for U.S. individuals that are out of the work force for any length of time. Women as men should be given the real opportunity and have the social expectation to be independent citizens able to earn a living without being exploited or experiencing onerous conditions. Relationship should be consensual rather than circumstantially coercive. Illegal migration, environmental exploitation, a too powerful broadcast media, concentration of wealth and more reinforce social anomie and degradation rather than a good national equilibrium. It doesn’t take a village; it takes a nation.