3/17/14

Doesn't Self-Determination Apply to Russians Too?

Cold war rhetoric often developed the idea of political self-determination as being a fundamental right lacking in the authoritarianism of the Soviet Union. Assuredly the dictator Joseph Stalin liquidated those that expressed a desire for that. If Stalin controlled the Internet he would let anything be published in opposition to his will. What about the U.S.A. today though and the Republics, oblasts and semi-autonomous regions of the former Soviet Union that historically are part of Russia and desire to return to the emergent Russian Federation/ Haven't Russians got a right of self-determination as much as anyone else?

The Crimea and the Ukraine historically are Russian regions. If the cold war rhetoric was just a sweet sounding trick to dupe Russians into trusting the west. That is, if self-determination only applies if former Soviet republics determine to be part of the European Union and not the Russian Federation will that provide a reason for trust by any nation in the future about U.S. rhetoric?

 http://www.voanews.com/content/crimea-applies-to-join-russia/1872664.html

The Planet of Insignificant Empires (science fiction from 'A Universal Widget- In the Realm of Forms')

-note from the author-This book is available in EPUB format as a free download at
http://www.lulu.com/shop/garrison-clifford-gibson/a-universal-widget-in-the-realm-of-forms/ebook/product-21268508.html

Chapter 16
In the happy days of undergraduate learning when increasing knowledge seemed a serious way to earn a living I took a minor in history. From youth I was fascinated by the historical actions, structures and relationships of sentient beings and societies. I discovered that Yuman and alien ways have often differed yet many things are ditto'd intra and extra-Yuman socially speaking.

Learning of the ways of the galactic beings with sentient thought emerged as one of several methods for increasing my philosophical understanding. The love of wisdom leads one to investigate not only the structure of physical reality and the greater physics of where and what that comprises, it brings one to comprehend how and why sentient beings live and act in that circumstance. Numerous divisions of the pursuit of wisdom and knowledge of meaningful truth are illuminated by the weave of social history.

Sometimes I've invested in data acquisition of the social history of non-sentient species for comparison with that of sentient social history structure. To learn to what degree the social history of sentient culture is pre-determined and generic natural behavior enacted without substantial intentional or willful creative rational thought I contrasted it with unthinking animals that my researches brought me to into contact with as well as alien societies and their physical environments of habitation. I have wondered if supposedly sentient societies inevitably construct or ossify particular social structures without capacity for selecting any alternate course for actualization?

Life is short and passes like a mirage in the reflection of future's past. There are many roads to travel and too little time to journey over them all. Determining what knowledge should be given priority for acquisition is one of the valuable general skills a philosopher hopes to develop.

Skipping over the surface waters of the macro and microcosms intellectually one can select immersion in a spatio-temporal locality for intensive research. For instance, combat and wars occur for many non-sentient species as general expressions of conflict over resources and reproduction. Many life forms conflict as the natural expression of a fallen Universe dissolving order with entropy.

Sentient species ought to be able to evolve beyond war and comprehend the reasons why energy consumption and boundary issues are ubiquitous in unintelligent species. Those interactions of conflict in a paradigm of temporal entropy are a less than optimal use of life spacetime.

The Wars of Insignificant Empires began without an historically recorded explanation. Morality had long ago been killed as a casualty of the end of religion and the past restarted with the end of history. No one remembered what meaningful life had been nor what meaning was. None had ever been found. Social reality was essentially without form and void. Wars of Two Insignificant Empires were a way of life, the only way of life in the land of two kings.

Yvonne and I felt social senselessness when we entered the final zone of social reality as war for-itself with the combatants living entirely in the present. The Bashtunwali code of honor and vengeance in-itself morphed into transcendent violence as the moral good delimited only by Occam's razor of simple opposition-force enabled thoughtless execution of war toward a direct object of hate- the enemy.

This was another space-time that would not have been at the top of our list of places to visit for work research if we had a choice. Our preference is to follow the most intelligent leads in excellent places of civilization and beauty, not to go someplace like the forgettable neo-worlds of the Hologoloid nightmare of emerging eco-hell brought to premature management apocalypse or a planet evolved to fundamental feudality of war.

Even birds of The Insignificant Empires know poverty. Wealth management finesse has sought to get a trickle or a flood of wealth moving from the masses to flow upward since social time immemorial. Before the common descent into venality stabilizes poverty at the bottom, wealth of a tiny minority with heavy capitalization concentrates high above. The vast majority far below is often restive in anticipation of change. That is, an unstable distribution of wealth and power awaits instant, catastrophic transition to a more stable state.

Heedless of an unstable top-heavy pendulum of capital allocation, greedy, myopic, leveraging capitalists invest in social development of their own built up power acquisitions training the masses to be thoughtless followers of mindless entertainment. They are confident the masses are occupied with venal concerns that distract them from considering the state of their own economic subjugation.

The masses are politically and economically blinded by martinets of the consequences of wide-spread corruption following the top-heavy distribution of capital.

When a rotten infrastructure propping up high, unstable towers of concentrated wealth in the financial clouds gives way under the straining weight on the masses sublimating yearning for liberation the catastrophic transition into mass social chaos flares uprenormalizing creative destruction in an evolutionary crash.

The newly asexual warrior-gangsters of two kingdoms inherited an evolutionary history reaching four hundred thousand years to the past when the first ape-like primates living on the ground among dozens of primate species developed an evolutionary edge by hunting and running in packs able to chase down and kill rival species of sapient primates regarded as rivals. Leaders were the better killers. Social power is the basic capital good. Material goods quite common are exchangeable without changing the status of personal wealth. What some cynics would call civilization started with piles of bones at good sites for predation that built up enough that the primates eventually arranged them in mounds, sorting out the good for war clubs and the bad for building material and tools. Wars amidst rival gangs were fought for control of the best bone piles. Warriors evolving situational competition for control began living at the piles year around developing the first settlements eventually reinforcing bone piles with mud and eventually stones.

On a grassy knoll at the bottom of a valley that would in the distant future become flooded with a rise in sea level the civilization of one kingdom got its start. Kingdom two was a bone pile on a hill just barely visible beyond a tectonic tear in the land at the side of the valley. From a grassy knoll near the edge it commanded a view of the canyon obstructing immediate war.

The first war over flooding issues developed when the lower valley tribe blamed the acceleration of global warming, ice melting and valley flooding on the uphill tribe. It was obvious they built too many campfires and heated the sky. They needed to move uphill yet wanted a good moral reason to exterminate the vermin and found it.

The remedy was to take the land and wealth of the others so it might be used wisely. Wealth began concentrating at an increasing rate and non-violent social development was completely arrested with the exception of work in a few construction trades. Plundering raids overcame farming and cultivation of inventions. A relocated new and improved kingdom grew to resist the other.

Yvonne and I perused the writing on the five meters high wall of the city. As a xenopologist she was strongly experienced with alien cultures. A variety of insults and threats decorated the blood stone rectangles boasting of victories and the god status of the kingdom assembly.

We saw no one atop the wall and heard a clamoring roar rise beyond it. We felt something of the presence of sentients. A pungent brawling mob surged through the primary gate over the drawbridge. Punches from brawny arms were thrown connecting with square jaws and the mob stomped over the beat-down casualties trampling on them before the excess surged off the bridge into the deep, dry, concrete moat.

"That is not an example of lions lying down with lambs Yvonne. Those troglodytes would bite any lambs they got a hold of."
"Pat, when Jesus Christ returns the fundamental nature of thermodynamics will change. The message of the lion and the lamb symbolizes the original sin of thermodynamics and the consuming human drive to input energy for growth.
Like all organisms evolving in nature human beings are driven to consume others in various ways as a raging thermodynamic process in a Higgs field. God is a spiritual being and above spatio-temporal thermodynamic evolution.
Jesus Christ portrayed metaphorically as the Lamb of God sacrificed himself to make atonement for those of faith who are incarnated physically with original sin, as are all human beings, condemned because of entropy imperfection that is sin. Jesus defeated sin and death and was resurrected, His sacrifice is payment enough for those that recognize and accept him as their personal savior.

As the Lion of Judah Jesus is destined to return in power to wrap up the sinful way of the world in a fair and balanced termination of evil through apocalypse and judgment. The Lord Jesus is the way to God and is the only complete non-temporal Person capable of not only intervening in Universal existence, but of surpassing the Universe and its thermodynamic phenomenalitymorally. Jesus Christ can mend the fallen and thermodynamic Universe and give eternal life with God to the saved souls for whom He is Lord."

The fight on the bridge and beyond surged around us. It was a large bridge.
"Yes, I think so too Yvonne. Thermodynamic world lines can evolve toward evil as well as good. The duality of good and evil in the Universe might be more accurately said to be neutral, evil thought. In this paradigm good is a category of things that satisfy thermodynamic energy input drives with moral equanimity and low evil values in proportion to the 'good'. The good is just a neutral consonance with thermodynamics. Evil is to victimize mass acquisition prevailing over neutrality.

Mass food production that doesn't adversely impact an ecosphere is good (neutral) when the production is abundant and equally available to all. Evil evolves phenomenality when sentient beings are crimped with socially placed insults or privations. When the public balance of thermodynamic neutrality or the ecosphere is reduced through private and exclusive acts, evil has occurred.

When private interests that exist within a meta-neutral state are insulted or degraded evil occurs. Keep in mind that the thermodynamic condition of organic beings implicitly is unbalanced and biased toward consumption and destruction of the packaging of others. Laws, borders and boundaries of being are targets of destruction as well as tools for defense as well as oppression.

Some of that evolution to consume is sociopathically enforced such as in Nazi extermination camps. Another example is the desertification of an ecosphere caused by sentient-produced global heating. Indifferent to developing macro-social environmental evil because of more concern for taking personal profits in a producing-consuming business cycle, evil deeds often actualize to sell out an ecosphere.

In the end we think of the future Yvonne, the Lord Jesus Christ overcomes the whole problem of a thermodynamic Universe and original sin. The anti-Christ's spirit of lawlessness personifies thermodynamic egoism following the sin of Adam and Eve in the non-temporal garden. Jesus Christ is the atoning second and perfectly obedient to the will of God Adam.

The Apostle Paul described the way original sin and world thermodynamic consumerism for Christians would be concluded in Second Thessalonians chapter two; Christians will be taken up and disappear in the atmosphere in what is known as The Rapture.

Thessalonica two thousand years after the Apostle was a city that experienced fascist terror with the depopulation of tens of thousands of Jews that had arrived over time seeking refuge from European persecution. The Third Reich transported the Jews ofThessalonica in sealed trains to concentration camps and gas chambers during the holocaust of the Second World War on Y'Earth.

The extemporal Garden of Eden is beyond four-dimensions of temporal exstasis in relativistic space-time and was guarded by four cherubim. I am not certain what that means. It could have been Saudi Arabia before the end of the Wisconsin ice age.

The tree of life and the tree of knowledge are with God. After eating from the tree of knowledge mankind dove into new thermodynamic consumption of the ecosphere and was lost spiritually. Humanity lost its naked innocence putting on original sin.

The lion and the lamb in one light can be regarded as Biblical symbols of consumerism as carnivores and herbivores. Unthinking animals as predators and prey are elements in the thermodynamic compresence of an ecosphere. For animals good is no more than positive reinforcement of thermodynamic requisites of energy intake and control. Evil is the antinomy of good. Of course animals have no reflective awareness of the concepts of good and evil as moral categories. They simply move for the good of consumption and control.

What is the definition of innocence? It is something humanity lost after eating from the tree of knowledge? They were also forbidden to eat of the tree of life. Cast out into temporality humanity had to learn and develop their own knowledge to survive for a while but the entire enterprise was doomed because of the original sin and reduction to temporal existence and mortality.

Two thousand after Jesus Christ lived as a man on Y'Earth human geneticists began working on constructing a tree of immortal life embedded within the thermodynamic, temporal Universe. That was a counter-intuitive effort considering that thermodynamic process is about the increase of entropy. In the absence of spiritual development live animals increase entropy overall in order to decrease it for-themselves for a time."

"It is amazing that we can consider the history of a race and historical social traits even as the bodies pile up in the moat from the conflict surging around us."

"That's necessarily the way it is Yvonne. What could we do, pick a side and start killing people?

When Cain the maker of tools killed his brother Abel, a shepherd, the sentient awareness of evil was present. Cain like Adam and Eve knew the difference between neutrality and evil. A sentient mind in a body integrated in an environment of original sin can rationalize away its knowledge of evil and even the difference between neutrality and evil. It cannot hide from itself the innate knowledge of the difference between good neutrality and evil when it acts as the predatory lion consuming others regarded as lambs for the taking."

Yvonne thought about that a second and said,
"So the Insignificant Empires of this world brawl through one another and an ecosphere without right moral direction. They are producer-consumers repressing with mass social privations, insults, sanctions and death unreflected immersion in original sin?"
"Exactly. Keep on your optic invisibility screen Yvonne. I think the people of the Insignificant Empires are people that shouldn't see us for now. "
Our images weren't visible to the brawlers surging their way onto the prairie outside the castle walls continuing their fight. They left many bodies strewn behind unconscious and bloodied while reinforcements pushed across the drawbridge. The epicenter of action continued to evolve vectoring away from the crowd inside surging out. We saw no obvious reason for the chaos at all. Punches were thrown all around. Wind across the prairie was rising ahead of a dust storm looming several miles away. Senseless violence was silhouetted against a double-star dawn.

Yvonne took out a quantum camera to record the fight. She must have made quite a substantial inventory of video captures to work with for cutting, splicing and uploading YouBoob movies. Several thousand men were embroiled in the melee. The women were missing and I wondered about that. Maybe they were left behind in the city?

Arising from nowhere-probably stealth shrouded before the moment- a host of vicious machines labeled with words in chartreuse letters Cyborg Massachoose cut a way through the mass of men with laser life-scythes drawing tighter complete encirclement and in seconds reduced the brawling men to smoldering pieces of charred meat.
We egressed from the scene of carnage quietly unnoticed by the Cyborg Massachoose and made our way to the edge of the moat thirty feet from the drawbridge. Yvonne and I descended down the moat climbing cautiously on its steep side to interview a survivor with a broken back. The interview was made easier because he couldn't see us. He could have touched and smell our presence if he'd tried very hard.

Yvonne smelled rather sweet this morning. That's probably better than goat dung odor to a casualty. The smells of blood and offal in the dry, dusty moat distracted him enough with the broken back and paralysis that he mightn't notice us, not that it mattered.
"What is your name?" Yvonne asked the casualty.
"Who are you? Where are you?", the broken man said, "I am Bull Querdo."
"Why were you fighting son?" Yvonne asked Bull Querdo.
"We are the evolution of evil. I am the evolution. We fight for the evolution of unrighteousness because we evolved to do that."
"Well that wasn't the secret phrase Bull. We are sorry to see you like this, arms all akimbo with compound vertebrae breaks. Everyone can have a bad day. Tell us about the Cyborg Massachoose. What are they and what authority sent them?"
"The Cyborg M are godless enforcers of atheism. They evolve evil. They are made with computer-aided design and manufactured to consumer specifications with partial human brains. The synthebrains that hate love and love hate operate the most wicked relevant machinery bodies available to keep the leavening mass of choosing-for-others dominant in political power.
Beyond a slash in the rodina, a deep chasm that is a tear in the fabric of reality, Cyborg Massachoose are produced in the bloody shining city on a hill we see through a cloud of dust darkly, whenever at all. When Cyborg Massachoose programmers iterated corrupt controlling algorithms to win the last battle of the final four world brawls the Eastern Evil Empire of Insignificance made swell like no other empire before."
"Well Yvonne, That doesn't sound much like an ignorant feudal bumpkin." I thought to ask Bull Querdo,
"In the next millennium will the Insignificant Eastern Evil Empire select a new Cyborg Massachoose ruling clique"?

The formerly brawling wretch Querdo was in obvious pain and shock talk. He tended to run on sentences as if he were chewingkhat before the brawl and the effects hadn't worn off yek, "They always promise so I would suppose. They have been talking about power sharing for several hundred years at least, according to the public school mystery teachings."

With that final piece of insignificant information uttered Bull Querdo experiencing the descent of the black curtain and shuddering chill of death. He expired beginning the process of becoming one with the dust in his own moat of decay.

The ground dissolved under us though we didn't sink. It became transparent with myriad firefly-like atom-sized widgets replacing the minerals of the planet. Fewer widgets were replacing the atmosphere as well, then the city itself faded away to transform into trillions of little widgets resembling the Universal widget that we encountered on the planet Spud. We were still able to breathe.

"What is this widgetness transformation Pat?"
"If I were to guess Yvonne, I would say it seems that the widget can boot up into reality at whatever scale it wants converting mass and energy directly into little widgets."
"So you believe this reality formation is caused by the Universal widget Pat?"
"Well, I haven't got a more likely suspect. Apparently the UW is more fundamental than the Higgs Field. You notice that gravity has stopped and time has quit. Relativity coheres with mass and energy so with the UW replacing mass and energy time has become relativistic, discrete and stationary as an attribute of the Universal widget field following whatever way the Universal widget sentience or directions-from whatever source that might be- wills."
"So that means an absence of time as well as gravity?"
"Evidently Yvonne. We seem to be sustained by a local personal field enveloped within the meta- widget field. The widgets haven't yet consumed our mass energy. The space-time energy for-ourselves coincides with our experience of being."
"Your spacetime is one of my memories", the sky said.
"I think that was the Universal widget Patrick"
"Yes, who else could it be Yvonne?"
I asked the Universal widget, "So how's life UW?"
"Same old, same old", replied the Universal widget in its mellifluous style.
Considering the circumstances and our vulnerability and subjectivity, I made a philosophical evaluation of the complete complex ofcompresence. Maybe the Universal widget didn't regard us as being highly sentient. It might have no experience of being human.
"Though we are a memory widget, I think we are real even so. We exist as real independent beings within your present memory."
"How thoughtful you are Patrick Voevoda. Think about this; as all widgets that exist in widget reality are of my sentient design, and since all things that I make to exist can be constructed in any time order it follows that everything I think and will to be is pre-determined to exist phenomenally."

The Universal widget evidently created its form as a local infinity cloud of discrete widgets without any content from the standard model of quantum physics. It could build its own content and scale up or down with relativistic mass. Its own mass was relative to its intention with variables of composition forming a unique steady state of fundamental energy. Energy without space-time mass needs to exist in quantum packets that aren't of infinite value themselves. Time can be reassembled subjectively into whatever structure the widget configures. 

Yvonne asked, "Widget of widgets have you a name?"
"No one before asked. Yes I have a name."
"Well that settles that Yvonne."
I asked the Universal widget,
"If we are experiencing no-time-passing for us now with our Universe 1 mass of a different form than we are accustomed to, and if we visualize the beginning and the end of our encounter with your will at every instant finding complete routes through space-time, why is it that we speak in a linear way? You must be replacing our standard mass quanta with your timeless steady state quanta as we speak, evolving a standing wave form of our being independent of any space-time compresent setting?"

"Patrick Voevoda, It is convenient to filter and structure an order for communication of idea expression even though all actualized ideas could exist all-at-once with a specialized spatial structure. It not only takes less time, it takes no time other than the present. For now you are one of my memories, as is Yvonne.

When I return you to a Universe 1 context you will resume normal, local integration in a steady-state actualization of the Higgs field ensemble with personal independence.
Everything I encounter physically becomes one of my memories. You have a spiritual identity-a name known to the One who is Three persons. I haven't data on where or how those names exist. I am concerned with my own widget workings useful for Universe 1 generally. Pure spirit is of a finer nature than my own."

"That's all right U.W. I think you too must have spirit in order to be given such a prominent role,"
"Nice of you to say so Yvonne."
You may know that some refer to you as The Wonderful Widget.
"It's good to have fans."
"Well W. W., I think we do exist as beings for ourselves and not simply as echoes of solipsistic ideas of yours."
"Why do you think so Patrick Voevoda?"
"A human being if converted to ash weighs about six pounds. The rest when burned off is mostly hydrogen and oxygen as water made into vapor. That six pounds of disorganized chemical residue after water is extracted was a human being because of its structure. Structure and the abstract form of structure, one might call it the order of organizing principle, is the essence of existence. I think the fundamental organizing principle is the Intellect of God.
Let me tell you something about what was commonly said about quantum cosmology in the 21st century...
Fields were the fundamental element of being known to physics. Particles get mass from fields. Field symmetry breaking lets local forces arise such as the strong force and the electroweak force. Massless particles (bosons) exist as vibrations traveling through a non-local field such as the electro-magnetic field with bosons like photons and gravitons. Particles with mass occur in gauge fields also known as local fields. Mass is comprised of Fermions although heavy bosons with mass (i.e. the Higgs boson) can exist virtually (temporarily) before breaking down into other particles.
In that context, I can wonder if dimensions are micro-gauge fields bound in place? Massless particles are emergent vibrations in a field.

I can consider a thought-metaphor such as a straight rope lying on the ground. One takes an end of the rope and gives it a flip sending a wave down its length. That's like a photon in an electromagnetic field or a graviton in a gravity field in fewer dimensions. It's a phenomenal particle at any given place or time where it's moving yet it really is just the rope-field as a four-dimensional field fluctuating.
Consider a Higgs field in four dimensions in a shape more like a sphere than a rope, and that field is where the Universe occurs. Particles with mass develop through contingent, local fields arising within the primary field. Symmetry breaking is the usual suspect for the development of local fields and particles with mass.

Mass seems to be particles that are hierarchically bound within local fields. Massless particles can pass through local fields yet not vice versa. Mass is a hierarchy of standing waves in local fields within the non-local Higgs field.

Consider the nature of fields; what determines the scale and quality of a primordial field like the Higgs field, what delimits it, and what selects its dynamic values? Ought a field be expected to have harmonic scalar increase of intelligence or to lose energy? Is a field inevitably a collection of quanta emerging from some deeper field?

Can Einstein's ten-value metric tensor of General Relativity describing the curvature of space-time be regarded as describing changes in quantity and quality for embedded values of local quantum field values in the non-local Higgs field (or relationships to condensed mass or gauge fields within)? Is vacuum energy a metric for change in the Higgs field over time?

U.W., I believe our structure as human beings is structured and pre-determined, including the meta-state that you have placed us in. Human beings made by the Creator of Being including us are meta-temporal virtual lives that can be transformed through compatible fields while keeping coherent form. Human beings must be pre-determined by the Creator to be contingent beings in virtual form within virtual fields adapted to host forms appearing from a Library of Forms existing by the will of God."
"Yes I can see that you might be uncertain of the delimitations of the realm of forms and your role in it while believing that your experience of being sentient is ultimately pre-determined by God's will rather than mine. Evidently you haven't decided if I am an emergent Universal form in a field or if I am the field of forms for-itself. I can tell you that I am sure that I am not the initial non-contingent Being.
Patrick, one useful direction for contemplation is this; you may have a mapped structure existing in The Library of Forms of God. That is a good premise for phenomenal independence from my memory for Yvonne and yourself. Even if I locate the contingent form-structure you had in Universe 1 and expropriate that for my own meta-structural idea widget-thought processing unit, the form itself is a reflection of the Universal, non-local form that each of you have in The Library of Forms."

While we wondered if we were a reflection of a Universal form or a reflection of a reflection of a Universal form the immediate transcending reality Yvonne and I experienced together faded away into an emerging mist morphing to reveal a planet of Insignificant Empires.

Dark thunderheads overhead roiled convection thermals like anomalous dumplings across the dry-as-dust landscape outside the gate. Snapping like a vast towel from the sky a lightening bolt struck nearby. A deluge of large warm raindrops broke upon the empires. Water running like a sheet down the slippery slope to the moat began to fill and rise over new mud.
"I guess that counts as finding the Universal widget."
"You didn't get the three wishes Conspiron Saulobinsk promised."
"I am not sure where the Universal widget is. It did find us after all."
"I wonder why it did that?
I hadn't an answer for that,
"I don't know Yvonne. Maybe we will learn why in time."
"We should evolve out of the storm Patrick."
"Very funny Yvonne. Into the city?"
"Yes."
We walked across the drawbridge into the city. Large winged shrimp rose up from the mud in the new water of the moat stimulated by the rare moisture. Summoned from a resting state of dehydration they were arising with hunger. They sprouted wings and flew to the corpses on the battlefield landing on them to gorge down chewing with countless tiny teeth leaving nothing besides glistening bones in the rain.

3/16/14

Select Concepts of Social Evolution in Middle Ages Church History

The Middle Ages connect late antiquity to the modern era. Bishop Ulifilas d. 381 invented the Gothic alphabet (Shaff V 4 page 73) as St. Cyril would later invent the Cyrillic. Civilization would expand its range and change its form through Christianity outgrowing Greek-Roman classicism to become Germano-Romanic, Celtic and Slavic-Greek. Beyond the reaches of the ancient Roman Empire and western Europe there were other ancient civilizations existing. China, India and the Americas had religions of various forms that hadn't encountered the word of God through Moses or Jesus Christ. Civilization founded with the Lord accelerated theological philosophical,technological and social development.

Mesoamerican civilization failed to invent the wheel except as a toy understandably since they had no horses until the Spanish arrived. Human sacrifice of prior ruling clans was practiced at Cohokia at St. Louis and of captives in Aztec Mexico. While Polynesians performed great sailing voyages and Dorset Eskimos drove dog teams across the North American arctic littoral from Sibir to Greenland in just 200 years thy failed to develop very far scientifically The intellectual genius of such people is applied to survival. Techcraft not uncommonly. Toynbee pointed out that the challenges of civilizations with arrested development are too great.

The Chinese without the Lord failed to develop a non-imperial egalitarianism politically as did Europe easily establishing decentralized and centralized bureaucratic networks of not only royal in various realms but of churchmen and women as well. Less than ideal and variegated in violence and non-violent phases of changes the evolution was comparable to that of any worldly kingdom in levels of violence. Christianity dampened violence from the bottom up rather than the top down. To learn how Europe was prior to Christian missions one made read Tacitus to learn of German rules of trial and penalties for clubbing someone's skull with or without breaking it and if the victim was or wasn't a member of the tribe. More recent studies have found that Celtic tribes sometimes ate their captives and made exterior building ornaments of their skulls in homes as shown in Swiss archaeological research.

G.W.F. Hegel wrote of a thesis in his Phenomenology of Mind of the evolution of spirit as God realizing himself through history and of course the Universe. That may have been an informative paradigm for the Christian scientist Charles Darwin as well as the political philosopher Karl Marx Each adapted Hegel's paradigm to his own thesis in interpreting substantive history. One may choose to adapt and employ Hegel's paradigm in a different way though to describe an omnipotent God pre-existing history and all things that are contingent ideas for God. God is letting man evolve through history.

The Medieval era of the history of the Christian Church was an exciting period of a little less than a millennium in which human society of the west grew with the spiritual leavening of the spirit of God bringing the nations together from a more primeval time as pagans of the forests. In the preceding pagan era tribal associations commonly with warrior as the basic male occupation jostled for turf. Protracted war of Germanic tribes against Celts. Slavs to the east met with Turkic and Mongolian tribes as a precursor to later great conflicts of the invasions of Mongols and Turks from east to west. Several hundred years after the fall of the western Roman Empire Vikings would row and sail around Europe and journey on its rivers to attack various peoples for profit. Christianity would become the spiritual tie that drew and bound the leaders and many of the people of the pagan world together.

The Middle Ages became an age of discovery for mankind of his intellectual, social and physical potential for being better in the image of God. God is pure reason, logic and love surpassing all human understanding. Bootstrapping any given Universe from the inclination of His thought He donated the impetus and order of assembly of existence for the development of human society during the middle ages. God's modge panc (mind plans) comprising teleology is marvelous to consider so far as one might make inferences of it.

With the presence of the Christian Church and with its monks, priests and Bishops nations were given spiritual reasons to interact at the highest level of state. War and hostage taking were basic elements of statecraft before the infusion of the Church into the social order, yet of course with human beings the agents of socialization that God employed the problems of sin in the state, people and Christians continued. Development of the nations from the pagan foundations of tribal turf instead of legal boundaries emerged. If Kings sometimes donated land to the Church they sometimes appointed Bishops as well (ref. Merovingian Kings).

As the Christian Church developed an ecclesiastical structure and evolved its method the nations too founded agencies and ideas, doctrines and procedures of increasing sophistication. The problem in modern third world nation start-ups of the lack of non-governmental agencies to fill the void as catalysts for social cohesion and public development were mitigated significantly during the middle ages by the progressive advance of structure in and out of the church coinciding with state advance. It is a marvelous subject to consider. Problems with the succession of kings and right to rule internationally were paralleled in the Avignon captivity and subsequent simultaneous existence of three popes. While the controversy on the right of investiture continued the issue of the right of any pope or patriarch to act as monarch over all Christians, and even the politics of the nations arose. While arguments over doctrine rising to the level of heresy occurred political theories about the political rights of man to be free from tyranny stirred. The assertions of the right of the laity to select their own leader of the church made at the Council of Constance supported the paradigm of traits toward political independence from imperialism. One could find the development of nationalism too in reactions against various formations of political and/or ecclesiastical imperialism.

With Phillip Shaff's list of contents of his study of Christian Church History published in the late 19th century (following) it is easy to comprehend the rise of complexity and structure that implicitly occurred socially around the Christian world and beyond. Even the Muslim world was influenced by Christian ethics. It is challenging to imagine Muhammad arising in the absence of the appearance of Jesus Christ the Savior or even the course of mass social paganism through the same period without a spiritual foundation. Francis of Assisi in personifying the work of the Lord is a far cry different than the ethics of tossing deformed babies on the public garbage heap or those stoking up chemical or biological engines of holocaust. Humanity do not all follow the spiritual ethics of the Lord and some do not know what they are.

Reading Shaff's History of the Christian Church Vol 4 on the Middle Ages it is possible to get a good idea about the evolution of the ecclesiastical institution. Maybe the church had three primary roles in that 1000 years. Missions, Doctrine/Ecclesiastical Structure and relation of Church & state. It's complex. There were three popes at one time. Then one is aware of the five patriarchates of the ancient era, and one should consider the council of constance and where the Catholic Church is today in regard to the bishops and the election of the Pope-especially the new one from Argentina. Shaff has a bibliography that is remarkable. A few writers actually put together a 50 volume history of the Byzantine Empire. Complex yet beautiful illustrating an element of God's role in developing human social infrastructure.

It is worth including Shaff's bibliography for volume four here in order to have the sources easy to reference.

Some of Shaff's sources and literature for volume 4...
They are mostly in Latin—the official language of the Western Church,—and in Greek,—the official language of the Eastern Church.
(1) For the history of missions: the letters and biographies of missionaries.
(2) For church polity and government: the official letters of popes, patriarchs, and bishops. The documents of the papal court embrace (a) Regesta (registra), the transactions of the various branches of the papal government from a.d. 1198–1572, deposited in the Vatican library, and difficult of access. (b) Epistolae decretales, which constitute the basis of the Corpus juris canonici, brought to a close in 1313. (c) The bulls (bulla, a seal or stamp of globular form, though some derive it from boulhv, will, decree) and briefs (breve, a short, concise summary), i.e., the official letters since the con-
clusion of the Canon law. They are of equal authority, but the bulls differ from the briefs by their more solemn form. The bulls are written on parchment, and sealed with a seal of lead or gold, which is stamped on one side with the effigies of Peter and Paul, and on the other with the name of the reigning pope, and attached to the
instrument by a string; while the briefs are written on paper, sealed with red wax, and impressed with the seal of the fisherman or Peter in a boat.
(3) For the history of Christian life: the biographies of saints, the disciplinary canons of synods, the ascetic literature.
(4) For worship and ceremonies: liturgies, hymns, homilies, works of architecture sculpture, painting, poetry, music. The Gothic cathedrals are as striking embodiments of mediaeval Christianity as the Egyptian pyramids are of the civilization of the Pharaohs.
(5) For theology and Christian learning: the works of the later fathers (beginning with Gregory I.), schoolmen, mystics, and the forerunners of the Reformation.
II. Documentary Collections. Works of Mediaeval Writers.
(1) For the Oriental Church.
Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, opera Niebuhrii, Bekkeri, et al. Bonnae, 1828–’78, 50 vols. 8vo. Contains a complete history of the East-Roman Empire from the sixth century to its fall. The chief writers are Zonaras, from the Creation to a.d. 1118; Nicetas, from 1118 to 1206; Gregoras, from 1204 to 1359; Laonicus, from 1298 to 1463; Ducas, from 1341 to 1462; Phrantzes, from 1401 to 1477. J. A. Fabricius (d. 1736): Bibliotheca Graeca sive Notitia Scriptorum veterum Graecorum, 4th ed., by G. Chr. Harless, with additions. Hamburg, 1790–1811, 12 vols. A supplement by S. F. W. Hoffmann: Bibliographisches Lexicon der gesammten Literatur der Griechen.
Leipzig, 1838–’45, 3 vols. (2) For the Westem Church. Bibliotheca Maxima Patrum. Lugduni, 1677, 27 vols. Fol. Martene (d. 1739) and Durand (d. 1773): Thesaurus Anecdotorum Novus, seu Collectio Monumentorum, etc. Paris, 1717, 5 vols. fol. By the same: Veterum Scriptorum et Monumentorum Collectio ampliss. Paris, 1724–’38, 9 vols. Fol. J. A. Fabricius: Bibliotheca Latina Mediae et Infimae AEtatis. Hamb. 1734, and with supplem. 1754, 6 vols. 4to.
Abbé Migne: Patralogiae Cursus Completus, sive Bibliotheca Universalis ... Patrum, etc. Paris, 1844–’66. The Latin series (1844–’55) has 221 vols. (4 vols. indices); the Greek series (1857–66) has 166 vols. The Latin series, from tom. 80–217, contains the writers from Gregory the Great to Innocent III. Reprints of older editions, and most valuable for completeness and convenience, though lacking in critical accuracy. Abbé Horay: Medii AEvi Bibliotheca Patristica ab anno MCCXVI usque ad Concilii Tri- dentini Tempora. Paris, 1879 sqq. A continuation of Migne in the same style. The first
4 vols. contain the Opera Honori III. Joan. Domin. Mansi (archbishop of Lucca, d. 1769): Sacrorum Conciliorum nova et amplis- sima Collectio. Florence and Venice 1759–1798, 31 vols. fol. The best collection down to 1509. A new ed. (facsimile) publ. by Victor Palmé, Paris and Berlin 1884 sqq. Earlier collections of Councils by Labbé and Cossart (1671–72, 18 vols), Colet (with the supple- ments of Mansi, 1728–52, 29 vols. fol.), and Hardouin (1715, 12 vols. Fol.). C. Cocquelines: Magnum Bullarium Romanum. Bullarum, Privilegiorum ac Diplomatum Romanorum Pontificum usque ad Clementem XII. amplissima Collectio. Rom. 1738–58.
14 Tom. fol. in 28 Partes; new ed. 1847–72, in 24 vols.
A. A. Barberi: Magni Bullarii Rom. Continuatio a Clemente XIII ad Pium VIII. (1758–1830). Rom. 1835–’57, 18 vols. fol. The bulls of Gregory XVI. appeared 1857 in 1 vol. G. H. Pertz (d. 1876): Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Hannov. 1826–1879. 24 vols. Fol. Continued by G. Waitz.
III. Documentary Histories.
Acta Sanctorum Bollandistarum. Antw. Bruxellis et Tongerloae, 1643–1794; Brux. 1845 sqq., new ed. Paris, 1863–75, in 61 vols. fol. (with supplement). See a list of contents in the seventh volume for June or the first volume for October; also in the second part of
Potthast, sub “Vita,” pp. 575 sqq. This monumental work of John Bolland (a learned Jesuit, 1596–1665), Godefr. Henschen (†1681), Dan. Papebroch (†1714), and their associates and followers, called Bollandists, contains biographies of all the saints of the Catholic Church in the order of the calendar, and divided into months. They are not critical histories, but compilations of an immense material of facts and fiction, which illustrate the life and manners of the ancient and mediaeval church. Potthast justly calls it a “riesenhaftes Denkmal wissenschaftlichen Strebens.” It was carried on with the aid of the Belgic government, which contributed (since 1837) 6,000 francs annually. Caes. Baronius (d. 1607): Annales ecclesiastici a Christo nato ad annum 1198. Rom. 1588–1593, 12 vols. Continued by Raynaldi (from 1198 to 1565), Laderchi (from 1566–1571), and A. Theiner (1572–1584). Best ed. by Mansi, with the continuations of Raynaldi, and the Critica of Pagi, Lucca, 1738–’59, 35 vols. fol. text, and 3 vols. of index universalis. A new ed. by A. Theiner (d. 1874), Bar-le-Duc, 1864 sqq. Likewise a work of herculean industry, but to be used with critical caution, as it contains many spurious
documents, legends and fictions, and is written in the interest and defence of the papacy.
IV. Modern Histories of the Middle Ages.
J. M. F. Frantin: Annales du moyen age. Dijon, 1825, 8 vols. 8vo.
F. Rehm: Geschichte des Mittelalters. Marbg, 1821–’38, 4 vols. 8vo.
Heinrich Leo: Geschichte des Mittelalters. Halle, 1830, 2 vols.
Charpentier: Histoire literaire du moyen age. Par. 1833. R. Hampson: Medii aevi Calendarium, or Dates, Charters, and Customs of the Middle Ages, with Kalenders from the Xth to the XVth century. London, 1841, 2 vols. 8vo. Henry Hallam (d. 1859): View of the State of Europe during the Middle Ages. London, 1818, 3d ed. 1848, Boston ed. 1864 in 3 vols. By the same: Introduction to the Literature of Europe in the 15th, 16th, and 17th centuries. Several ed., Engl. and Am. Boston ed. 1864 in 4 vols.; N. York, 1880, in 4 vols.
Charles Hardwick († l859): A History of the Christian Church. Middle Age. 3d ed. by Stubbs, London, 1872. Henry Hart Milman († 1868): History of Latin Christianity; including that of the Popes to
the Pontificate of Nicholas V. London and N. York, 1854, 8 vols., new ed., N. York (A. C. Armstrong & Son), 1880. Richard Chenevix Trench (Archbishop of Dublin): Lectures on Mediaeval Church History. London, 1877, republ. N. York, 1878.
V. The Mediaeval Sections of the General Church Histories.
(a) Roman Catholic: Baronius (see above), Fleury, Möhler, Alzog, Döllinger (before 1870),
Hergenröther.
(b) Protestant: Mosheim, Schröckh, Gieseler, Neander, Baur, Hagenbach, Robertson. Also
Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Rom. Empire (Wm. Smith’s ed.), from ch. 45 to the close.
VI. Auxiliary.
Domin. Du Cange (Charles du Fresne, d. 1688): Glossarium ad Scriptores mediae et infimae Latinitatis, Paris, 1678; new ed. by Henschel, Par. 1840–’50, in 7 vols. 4 To; and again by Favre, 1883 sqq.—By the same: Glossarium ad Scriptores medicae et infimae Graecitatis, Par. 1682, and Lugd. Batav. 1688, 2 vols. fol. These two works are the philological keys to the knowledge of mediaeval church history. An English ed. of the Latin glossary has been announced by John Murray, of London: Mediaeval Latin-English Dictionary”

I believe that Shaff's slightly modified T.O.C. may be used as a basic outline for the essential salient features of Christian Church history during the Middle Ages, a period from about 590 A.D. to 1500 A.D. -almost a thousand years.

History of the Christian Church, Volume IV: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1049-1294 Phillip Shaff

Content Items

“The Middle Age. Limits and General Character
The Nations of Medieval Christianity. The Kelt, the Teuton, and the Slav
Genius of Mediaeval Christianity
Periods of the Middle Age
Conversion Of The Northern And Western Barbarians
Character of Mediaeval Missions
Literature
The Britons
The Anglo-Saxons
The Mission of Gregory and Augustin. Conversion of Kent, a.d. 595-604 29
Antagonism of the Saxon and British Clergy
Conversion of the Other Kingdoms of the Heptarchy
Conformity to Row Established. Wilfrid, Theodore, Bede
The Conversion of Ireland. St. Patrick and St. Bridget
The Irish Church after St. Patrick
Subjection of Ireland to English and Roman Rule
The Conversion of Scotland. St. Ninian and St. Kentigern
St. Columba and the Monastery of Iona
The Culdees
Extinction of the Keltic Church, and Triumph of Rome under King David I
Arian Christianity among the Goths and other German Tribes
Conversion of Clovis and the Franks
Columbanus and the Irish Missionaries on the Continent
German Missionaries before Boniface
Boniface, the Apostle of Germany
The Pupils of Boniface. Willibald, Gregory of Utrecht, Sturm of Fulda
The Conversion of the Saxons. Charlemagne and Alcuin. The Heliand, and the
Gospel-Harmony
Scandinavian Heathenism
The Christianization of Denmark. St. Ansgar
The Christianization of Sweden
The Christianization of Norway and Iceland
General Survey
Christian Missions among the Wends
Cyrillus and Methodius, the Apostles of the Slavs. Christianization of Moravia,
Bohemia and Poland
The Conversion of the Bulgarians
The Conversion of the Magyars
The Christianization of Russia
Mohammedanism In Its Relation To Christianity
Literature
Statistics and Chronological Table
Position of Mohammedanism in Church History
The Home, and the Antecedents of Islâm
Life and Character of Mohammed
The Conquests of Islâm
The Koran, and the Bible
The Mohammedan Religion
Mohammedan Worship
Christian Polemics against Mohammedanism. Note on Mormonism
The Papal Hierarchy And The Holy Roman Empire
General Literature on the Papacy
Chronological Table of the Popes, Anti-Popes, and Roman Emperors from
Gregory I. to Leo XIII
Gregory the Great. a.d. 590-604
Gregory and the Universal Episcopate
The Writings of Gregory
The Papacy from Gregory I to Gregory II a.d. 604-715
From Gregory II to Zacharias. a.d. 715-741
Alliance of the Papacy with the New Monarchy of the Franks. Pepin and the
Patrimony of St. Peter. A.d. 741-755
Charles the Great. a.d. 768-814
Founding of the Holy Roman Empire, a.d. 800. Charlemagne and Leo II
Survey of the History of the Holy Roman Empire
The Papacy and the Empire from the Death of Charlemagne to Nicolas I a.d.
814-858). Note on the Myth of the Papess Joan 2
The Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals
Nicolas I., April, 858-Nov. 13, 867
Hadrian II. and John VIII a.d. 867 to 882
The Degradation of the Papacy in the Tenth Century
The Interference of Otho the Great
The Second Degradation of the Papacy from Otho I to Henry III. a.d. 97-1046
Henry III and the Synod of Sutri. Deposition of three rival Popes. a.d. 1046
The Conflict Of The Eastern And Western Churches And Their Separation
Sources and Literature
The Consensus and Dissensus between the Greek and Latin Churches
The Causes of Separation
The Patriarch and the Pope. Photius and Nicolas
Progress and Completion of the Schism. Cerularius 2
Fruitless Attempts at Reunion
Morals And Religion
Literature
General Character of Mediaeval Morals
Clerical Morals
Domestic Life
Slavery
Feuds and Private Wars. The Truce of God
The Ordeal
The Torture
Christian Charity
Monasticism
Use of Convents in the Middle Ages
St. Benedict. St. Nilus. St. Romuald
The Convent of Cluny
Church Discipline
The Penitential Books
Ecclesiastical Punishments. Excommunication, Anathema, Interdict
Penance and Indulgence
Church And State
Legislation
The Roman Law
The Capitularies of Charlemagne
English Legislation
Worship And Ceremonies
The Mass
The Sermon
Church Poetry. Greek Hymns and Hymnists
Latin Hymnody. Literature
Latin Hymns and Hymnists
The Seven Sacraments
The Organ and the Bell
The Worship of Saints
The Worship of Images. Literature. Different Theories
The Iconoclastic War, and the Synod of 754
The Restoration of Image-Worship by the Seventh Oecumenical Council, 787
Iconoclastic Reaction, and Final Triumph of Image-Worship, a.d. 842
The Caroline Books and the Frankish Church on Image-Worship
Evangelical Reformers. Agobardus of Lyons, and Claudius of Turin
Doctrinal Controversies
General Survey
The Controversy on the Procession of the Holy Spirit
The Arguments for and against the Filioque
The Monotheletic Controversy
The Doctrine of Two Wills in Christ
History of Monotheletism and Dyotheletism
The Sixth Oecumenical Council. a.d. 680 7
The Heresy of Honorius
Concilium Quinisextum. a.d. 692
Reaction of Monotheletism. The Maronites
The Adoptionist Controversy. Literature
History of Adoptionism 1
Doctrine of Adoptionism 5
The Predestinarian Controversy
Gottschalk and Babanus Maurus
Gottschalk and Hincmar
The Contending Theories on Predestination, and the Victory of
Semi-Augustinianism
The Doctrine of Scotus Erigena
The Eucharistic Controversies. Literature
The Two Theories of the Lord's Supper
The Theory of Paschasius Radbertus
The Theory of Ratramnus
The Berengar Controversy
Berengar's Theory of the Lord's Supper 8
Lanfranc and the Triumph of Transubstantiation 11
Heretical Sects
The Paulicians
The Euchites and other Sects in the East
The New Manichaeans in the West 524
The State Of Learning
Literature
Literary Character of the Early Middle Ages
Learning in the Eastern Church
Christian Platonism and the Pseudo-Dionysian Writings
Prevailing Ignorance in the Western Church
Educational Efforts of the Church
Patronage of Letters by Charles the Great, and Charles the Bald
Alfred the Great, and Education in England
Biographical Sketches Of Ecclesiastical Writers
Chronological List of the Principal Ecclesiastical Writers from the Sixth to the
Twelfth Century
St. Maximus Confessor
John of Damascus
Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople
Simeon Metaphrastes
Oecumenius
Theophylact Michael Psellus
Euthymius Zigabenus
Eustathius of Thessalonica
Nicetas Acominatos
Cassiodorus
St. Gregory of Tours
St. Isidore of Seville
The Venerable Bede (Baeda)
Paul the Deacon
St. Paulinus of Aquileia
Alcuin
St. Liudger
Theodulph of Orleans
St. Eigil
Amalarius
Einhard
viiSmaragdus
Jonas of Orleans
Rabanus Maurus
Haymo
Walahfrid Strabo
Florus Magister, of Lyons 3
Servatus Lupus
Druthmar
St. Paschasius Radbertus
Patramnus
Hincmar of Rheims
Johannes Scotus Erigena
Anastasius
Ratherius of Verona
Gerbert (Sylvester II.)
Fulbert of Chartres
Rodulfus Glaber. Adam of Bremen
St. Peter Damiani

History of the Christian Church, Volume V: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1294-1517 Philip Schaff

Content items

The Hildebrandian Popes. A.D. 1049-1073. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature on Chapters I. and II. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand and his Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand and Leo IX. 1049-1054. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Victor II. and Stephen IX. (X.). 1055-1058. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas II. and the Cardinals. 1059-1061. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The War against Clerical Marriage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alexander II. and the Schism of Cadalus. 1061-1073. . . . . . . . . .
Gregory Vii, 1073-1085. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand elected Pope. His Views on the Situation. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Gregorian Theocracy. .
Gregory VII. as a Moral Reformer. Simony and Clerical Marriage. . . .
The Enforcement of Sacerdotal Celibacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The War over Investiture. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gregory VII. and Henry IV. . . . .
Canossa. 1077. . . . . . .
Renewal of the Conflict. Two Kings and Two Popes. .
Death of Gregory VII. . . .
The Papacy From The Death Of Gregory Vii. To The Concordat Of Worms.
A.D 1085-1122. . .
Victor III. and Urban II. 1086-1099. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pascal II. and Henry V. 1099-1118. . . . . . . . .
The Concordat of Worms. 1122. . . . . . . . .
The Conflict of the Hierarchy in England. William the Conqueror and
Lanfranc. . . . . . . . . . .
William Rufus and Anselm. . . . . . .
Anselm and Henry I. . . . .
The Papacy From The Concordat Of Worms To Innocent Iii. A.D.
1122-1198. . . . . . .
Innocent II., 1130-1143, and Eugene III., 1145-1153. . .
Arnold of Brescia. . . . . . . . . .
The Popes and the Hohenstaufen. . . . . .
Adrian IV. and Frederick Barbarossa. . . .
Alexander III. in Conflict with Barbarossa. . . . .
The Peace of Venice. 1177. . . . . .
Thomas Becket and Henry II of England. . .
The Archbishop and the King. . . .
The Martyrdom of Thomas Becket. Dec. 29, 1170. . . .
The Effects of Becket's Murder. . . . .
Innocent Iii. And His Age. A.D. 1198-1216. . . . . .
Literature. . .
Innocent's Training and Election. . . .
Innocent's Theory of the Papacy. . . . . .
Innocent and the German Empire. . . .
Innocent and King John of England. . . . .
Innocent and Magna Charta. . . . .
The Fourth Lateran Council, 1215. . . .
The Papacy From The Death Of Innocent Iii. To Boniface Viii.
1216-1294. . . . . . .
The Papal Conflict with Frederick II Begun. . . . . .
Gregory IX. and Frederick II. 1227-1241. . . . .
The First Council of Lyons and the Close of Frederick's Career.
1241-1250. . .
The Last of the Hohenstaufen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Empire and Papacy at Peace. 1271-1294. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature on the Crusades as a Whole. . .
Character and Causes of the Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Call to the Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The First Crusade and the Capture of Jerusalem. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099-1187. . .
The Fall of Edessa and the Second Crusade. . . . . . . .
The Third Crusade. 1189-1192. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Children's Crusades. . .. . . .
The Fourth Crusade and the Capture of Constantinople. 1200-1204. . .
Frederick II. and the Fifth Crusade . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Louis and the Last Crusades 1248, 1270.
The Last Stronghold of the Crusaders in Palestine. .
Effects of the Crusades. . . . . . . .
The Military Orders. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Monastic Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Revival of Monasticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monasticism and the Papacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Monks of Cluny. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cistercians. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Bernard of Clairvaux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Augustinians, Carthusians, Carmelites, and other Orders.
Monastic Prophets. .. . . . . . . . . . .
The Mendicant Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Franciscan Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Francis d'Assisi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Franciscans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Dominic and the Dominicans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions in Northeastern Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions among the Mohammedans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions among the Mongols. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Jews. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heresy And Its Suppression. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature for the Entire Chapter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Mediaeval Dissenters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cathari. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter de Bruys and Other Independent Leaders. . . . . . . . . .
The Amaurians and Other Isolated Sects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Beguines and Beghards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Waldenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Crusades against the Albigenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Inquisition. Its Origin and Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Inquisition. Its Mode of Procedure and Penalties
. . . . . . .
Universities And Cathedrals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Books and Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Universities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The University of Bologna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The University of Paris. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oxford and Cambridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cathedrals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scholastic And Mystic Theology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Development of Scholasticism.
Realism and Nominalism. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anselm of Canterbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter Abaelard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Abaelard's Teachings and Theology. . . . . .
Younger Contemporaries of Abaelard. . . . .
Peter the Lombard and the Summists. . . . .
Mysticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Bernard as a Mystic. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hugo and Richard of St. Victor. . . . . . . . . .
Scholasticism At Its Height. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alexander of Hales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Albertus Magnus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas Aquinas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonaventura. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Duns Scotus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roger Bacon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sacramental System. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature on the Sacraments. . . . . . . . . . .
The Seven Sacraments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Baptism and Confirmation. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Eucharist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eucharistic Practice and Superstition. . . . .
Penance and Indulgences. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Penance and Indulgences. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extreme Unction, Ordination, and Marriage.
Sin and Grace. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Future State. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope And Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Canon Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Papal Supremacy in Church and State.
The Pope and the Curia. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bishops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Lower Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Councils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Church and Clergy in England. . . . . . . . . .
Two English Bishops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Popular Worship And Superstition. . . . . . . .
The Worship of Mary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Worship of Relics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sermon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hymns and Sacred Poetry. . . . . . . . .
The Religious Drama. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Flagellants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Demonology and the Dark Arts. . . . . .
The Age passing Judgment upon Itself

History of the Christian Church, Volume VI: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1049-1294- Phillip Shaff

Content Items

The Decline Of The Papacy And The Avignon Exile. . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope Boniface VIII. 1294-1303. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Boniface VIII. and Philip the Fair of France. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literary Attacks against the Papacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Transfer of the Papacy to Avignon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Pontificate of John XXII 1316-1334. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Papal Office Assailed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Financial Policy of the Avignon Popes. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Later Avignon Popes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Re-establishment of the Papacy in Rome. 1377. . . . . .
The Papal Schism And The Reformatory Councils. 1378-1449
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Schism Begun. 1378. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Further Progress of the Schism. 1378-1409. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Pisa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Constance. 1414-1418. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The council of Basel. 1431-1449. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Ferrara-Florence. 1438-1445. . . . . . . . . . . .
Leaders Of Catholic Thought. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ockam and the Decay of Scholasticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Catherine of Siena, the Saint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter d'Ailly, Ecclesiastical Statesman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Gerson, Theologian and Church Leader. . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas of Clamanges, the Moralist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas of Cusa, Scholar and Churchman. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Popular Preachers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The German Mystics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The New Mysticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Meister Eckart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Tauler of Strassburg. . . . . . . . . . .
Henry Suso. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Friends of God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John of Ruysbroeck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gerrit de Groote and the Brothers of the Common Life. . . . . .
The Imitation of Christ. Thomas à Kempis. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The German Theology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
English Mystics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reformers Before The Reformation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Church in England in the Fourteenth Century. . . . . . . . .
John Wyclif. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wyclif's Teachings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wyclif and the Scriptures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Lollards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Huss of Bohemia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Huss at Constance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jerome of Prag. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
The Hussites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Last Popes Of The Middle Ages. 1447-152. . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas V. 1447-1455. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aeneas Sylvius de' Piccolomini, Pius I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul II. 1464-1471. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sixtus IV. 1471-1484. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Innocent VIII. 1484-1492. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope Alexander VI--Borgia. 1492-1503. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Julius II., the Warrior-Pope. 1503-1513. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leo X. 1513-1521. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heresy And Witchcraft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heretical and Unchurchly Movements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Witchcraft and its Punishment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Spanish Inquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Renaissance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature of the Renaissance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Intellectual Awakening. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dante, Petrarca, Boccaccio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Progress and Patrons of Classical Studies in the 15th Century.
Greek Teachers and Italian Humanists.
The Artists. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Revival of Paganism. . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in Germany. . . . . . . . . . . .
Reuchlin and Erasmus. . . . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in France. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in England. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Pulpit And Popular Piety. . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preaching. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Doctrinal Reformers. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Girolamo Savonarola. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Study and Circulation of the Bible. .
Popular Piety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Works of Charity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sale of Indulgences” . . . . . . . .

Taxation in Relation to Urbanization and Political Power Allocation
Taxation levels seem to be a function of the form of a political authority and population lifestyle. Urban and rural areas present different trends in political form coinciding with centralization and decentralization of political power historically. During the Roman Republic taxation on urban centers could support public works that wealthy private citizens would not themselves be expected to afford. With the decline of primacy of urban centers after the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of the Merovingian Frankish kings of the 5th century in much Western Europe political power became decentralized. Merovingian kings becoming Christianized expanded into Germany affording opportunities for evangelization and further conversion of pagan tribes to faith in the Lord. Merovingian kings and other conferred lands upon Bishops of the church as well as upon retainers and allies. Over time the benefactions and division of inherited lands among princes reduced their power. The conference of benefits and allocation of resources are historical methods of gaining political power or holding on to it.

A lesson of history seems to be that a ruling authority may actually decrease taxes upon subjects as the wealth and power of the authority increases. If the consolidation of wealth and power becomes absolute taxes may drop to zero as the authority directly is the owner of everything inclusive of the subjects. Conversely in a free society taxes may increase if a majority of a democracy views the allocation of resources away from concentrations of wealth toward pluralism as consistent with their principles of liberty. Yet urbanization tends to bring a populace toward conformity and a destruction of civil liberties found in rural social environments while political parties experience a reductionism. Taxes again may rise or fall in relation to the distribution of wealth. Public taxation is in effect the allocation of resources by a ruling power.

Ironically Karl Marx described the expropriation of the expropriators that would exchange one form of autocracy for another. There may be a golden mean in taxation and liberty such that a rural society has minimal taxes required to support the few public works required. With few homeless and landless citizens and most able to meet their own needs taxes would be low as the democratic society would have no need. Alternately urban societies are not at all self sufficient and require mass importation of resources and allocation of wealth with farm to market roads importing supplies. Taxation is substantial if there is not to be concentration of wealth and commonality of poverty. Public debt increase to support the public sector may occur in order to forestall the experience of poverty for the masses in an urban society during a period of excess concentration of wealth.

Globalization today is a form of treason against nationalism when advocated by politicians. In the private sector global trading is alright yet excess unconcern for the national well-being may bring about the demise of the well-being of the nation. In this period of the concentration of wealth with globalization of business there is a protracted post-Reagan movement toward low taxes or even the same tax on the rich as the poor in order to stimulate the concentration of wealth. One would expect that as wealth is concentrated and the power of national democracy given the orcheotomy of globalization that taxation on the rich would drop to nil as they own everything as Plutocrats.

Christian Foundation of Reformation and Renaissance

 Christianity was important in founding the modern humanist movement. The discovery of the complete texts of Aristotle introduced in the west through Spain thought also continuing from Byzantine-Greek sources stimulated the Aristotelian method of logic. That was applied to Christian thought in the scholastic movement of the 12th century. Thomas Aquinas wrote the Summa Theologica with an Aristotelian method of proofs and arguments against culminating in a syllogistic conclusion or summae. A reaction against that approach by Petrarch and others whom preferred a neo-Platonic and Augustinian approach as being more relevant and central to human concern on Earth in their relationship to God.

The politics of late dark ages Europe in relation to the church and the relation of the church to the pope is fascinating reading. Going through ‘A History of the Christian Church’ by Williston Walker, Richard A. Norris, David W. Lotz and Robert T. Handy that was put together over a time period of about a century I learned many new insights regarding the complexity of the movements of people and nations between the 11th and 15th centuries.

Of course there was a papal tax on subjects in far-flung states of Europe as well as a schism between the eastern and western branches of the church during part of the era. Two Patriarchs of the five patriarchs of the Nicene period still existed as powerful individuals. It was not to be a reunified church again until the Turks were about to take Constantinople when the East sought military help that never arrived, yet that is another story.

In the west the papacy for various reasons became divided into three. That is three post existed simultaneously and all were fired or resigned under pressure of a general council of Bishops from all over early in the 1430s. The bishops organized themselves into nations of five groups eventually to make voting simpler thought they were from more countries than that. Not only was the church in need of reform, it required one leader subject to the general council instead of a monarch levying taxes. For much of European history during the dark ages a co-evolution of political and national formation occurred along a trialectical (ref. C.S. Pierce)helix with the church. Germany or the Holy Roman Empire didn’t fare to well during this period ass the new pope appointed by the council of Constance became too powerful again-the plague had hit Europe. Other matters concerned the locals. Germans had to pay high taxes to the pope.

If the reformation was in part a tax revolt during an era when the Roman pontiff tended toward corruption as one prince among five Italian principalities contesting for land and power in a time when the prestige and power of the papacy declined (the Borgia popes were siring children and Pope Julius II was leading his army in battle), the pre-formation and renaissance were developing while vernacular translation of every useful document of antiquity including the Bible was proceeding.

Walker or Lotz wrote in the text mentioned above that the source of studia humanitatis was Petrarch. Interestingly Marsilio Ficino appointed by Cosimo de ‘Medici to lead the new Platonic Academy developed a ‘Platonic theology’ combining Christianity and neo-Platonism. I discovered that sympathetic concurrence for myself after reading the Enneads of Plotinus. Augustine was also a reader of neo-Platonism before becoming fully Christian.

Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, author of an ‘Oration on the Dignity of Man’ was also a member of the Platonic academy. Evidently many of the founders of the humanist renaissance were actually defending Christianity or renormalizing nit in relation to the Aristotelian school of scholasticism. Of course in recent decades many American scholars have taken the opposite viewpoint arguing that Aristotelianism and scholasticism- even Christianity were in opposition to an entirely secular renaissance providing a stimulus to science. Maybe Roger Bacon was considered a necromancer in his time for being a little eccentric in his experiments yet that was just the average upper-crust Brit for ya.

Science developed contemporaneously with the rest of the liberal arts or studia humanitatis though one might find some differences in the school curriculum of the first Universities of Europe in Paris and Oxford etc. that did have some Aristotelian subjects. That over time would split off from the applied secular sort of learning. Scientists have argued about the abstract reasoning of Aristotle’s method versus the applied hands-on approach of experimenters. One might point that out to the string and brane theorists who seem to have purely theoretical, almost Aristotelian math-based approaches to creating new scientific knowledge.

Shaff regards Dons Scotus (d. 1308) as the last of the scholastics. Shaff wrote that the scholastics had exhausted theological questions in the abstract. He wrote that Roger Bacon showed that many wanted to consider matters 'more realm and capable of proof' in contrast to 'abstruse metaphysical questions.'

Modern post-Darwinian secularism has itself returned to an abstruse abstract metaphysics in the field of cosmology having approached theoretical limits of observation. A 13.7 billion year old Universe that appears to be accelerating with unknown or dark energy pushing space-time and matter apart is the paradigm in which membrane theory advanced from Superstring and M-Theory developed with abstract mathematical paradigms by Witten and others to theorize fundamental structures of physics. Like the unextended pre-dimensional One of the neo-Platonist Plotinus singularity is an essential paradigm of observational physics and of the Universe's logical origin of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity applied to the mass of the Universe. Contemporary cosmology posits all material structures as phenomenal entanglements of energy in a steady state. Broken pieces of energy from a coherent energy field transcending yet containing matter the atoms and strings are regarded as having 'decohered'. They have broken symmetry. Concepts not too different from Plotinus' paradigm of broken forms described in the Enneads. Even so the examination of abstract, abstruse topics continues with the same fascination for physicists as purely theological speculations had for the scholastics.

If modern physics reaches toward understanding the Universe before the Big Bang or inflaton sometimes using models that require no singularity or that are eternally recurrent such as vast space-time sheets colliding and stimulating a new round of energized expansion until running down with entropy and time to be attracted to one another again for another collision, pulse and rebound, other consider like Bishop Berkeley the Universe as a holograph that simply appears to the human mind experience because human beings are immerse within the field of being themselves. These theories though useful if they were to confirm belief in the creation by God o9f the Universe would yet require a certain faith of completeness within a paradigm that is implicitly uncertain. Uncertainty itself permits change and temporality. Only God is omniscient.

I wanted to quote on a couple of points about William of Okham that remain philosophically interesting...

Vol 6 page 105 quote “A characteristic feature of the scholasticism of Durandus and Ockam is the sharper distinction they made between reason and revelation. Following Duns Scotus, they declared that doctrines peculiar to revealed theology are not susceptible of proof by pure reason. The body of dogmatic truth, as accepted by the Church, they did not question.

A second characteristic is the absence of originality. They elaborated what they received.
The Schoolmen of former periods had exhausted the list of theological questions and discussed them from every standpoint.

The third characteristic is the revival and ascendency of nominalism, the principle Roscellinus advocated more than two hundred years before. The Nominalists were also called Terminists, because they represent words as terms which do not necessarily have ideas and realities to correspond to them. A universal is simply a symbol or term for a number of things or for that which is common to a number of things.”- end quote

Poor historical method applied to contemporary politics can lead to judgments based on faulty logic. Synthetic reason and the desire to exercise power leads to rash use of power and failure to have a better informed judgment of justice.

In Shaff's Volume 6 he considers “THE MIDDLE AGES. THE DECLINE OF THE PAPACY AND THE PREPARATION FOR MODERN CHRISTIANITY. FROM BONIFACE VIII. TO MARTIN LUTHER. a.d. 1294-1517”. The decline of Papal infallibility develops over time, and that appears naturally enough with a preceding period with as many as three popes at once not all of whom could be right in all things, and of general councils reining in the power of Popes. One wonders if the doctrine of infallibility wasn't something of a function correlating to actual political and ecclesiastical power of a particular Pope. Joseph Stalin too was infallible in his own special way to the citizens of Soviet Russia, or at least dissenters had to be quiet about Stalin's errors lest they be taken to visit Beria's basement for a bullet.

Another cause for papal infallibility may have been pragmatist; one authorized and decisive opinion could stifle a babble of confusion. At some point within a productive cacophony of diverse opinion on theological issue a resolution and conclusion may have been desirable. Res judicata, stare decisis-the Pope after listening to council of cardinals and other wise ministers has reached a verdict, in fact an infallible opinion. Of course it didn't work that way, and for most of church history there was competition for not only the role of sole, primary oracle but for leadership itself such as the Emperor or Patriarch of the East, councils and so forth. The Lord is right and true, yet every human errs. God's grace supervenes and brings history to the predetermined course overcoming human tendency toward failure.

One may consider the problem of infallibility and power not only endemically a problem for the papacy but as cause for schisms between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox as well as the Protestant west. What ought to be a universal Christian Church evolved within and without western civilization concurrently developing methods for resolving pluralism of opinions on politics, theology and political investiture on an ad hoc basis often with conflict and occasionally with the perennial temporal solution of violence. Methods of resolving doctrinal differences and theories about the proper allocation of power may be illustrated with the metaphor of a non-self-correcting computer program without tolerance for sectarian subroutines and without intrinsic parallel program management.

Because of human infallibility it is useful to regard select doctrinal differences that rise to become emergent sectarian divergence as subroutines within the greater catholic concept of a universal church. I of course mean catholic itself in a non-sectarian way here rather than in reference to Roman Catholicism. I would think the primary thing that ought to be excluded from doctrinal inclusion is acceptance of sin. The experience of the middle ages and the doctrine of infallibility held in regard to the attrition of heretics with the Inquisition ought to lead Christians toward a better understanding of the organization challenges in keeping a Universal Christian community together in spite of significant doctrinal differences.

Obama administration efforts to consolidate every last bit of formerly Russian Ukrainian land after the cold war for the benefit of the west presents a kind of reverse chirility image to that of Trotsky’s international communist imperial tendency that were repressed by Stalin and re-emerged with Nikita Khrushchev. That is one atheist, leftist administration pursuing globalism follows another. What can the Russians think of that?

It was the Christian moral guidance of the Reagan administration that had the charisma and desire to rid the world of nuclear weapons that coincided with the rise of Andropov’s protégé Mikhail Gorbachev to power in the final years of the Soviet Union that was an element of Christian grace enabling a peaceful transition to a post-Soviet Russia. Western leftist would of course attribute that entirely to President Gorbachev and deny that President Reagan’s appeal to President Gorbachev to ‘tear down this wall’ or conventional weapons build up had anything to do with it. The transition should have been one of subsequent non-exploitation of Russia. Traditional Russian lands such as the eastern Ukraine ought to have remained with Russia. Lands liberated from the Nazis yet not Russian should go independent. That was fairly simply and a premise that George Keenan would have agreed with.

The atheist, globalist movement toward a dehumanized, despiritualized west and a Ukraine given over to Chinese corporate farming (they signed a ten billion dollar farming deal) is a paradox. Russia would be flanked by the Chinese infrastructure and perhaps have the Crimea become another Panama Canal Zone run by the Chinese. The Chinese Communist party did not throw in the towel and trust the kindness of foes, the Soviet Union did and Russia is being made to suffer for that evident mistake in regard to the Eastern Ukraine and the Crimea.

 One of the Russian’s major areas of food production is being usurped lost and its food and physical security threatened by globalists of insatiable greed seeking to devour in the name of atheist, scientific development wherein human beings have no God-given inalienable rights. Instead humanity would be managed as bits of flesh- phenomenalities under the supervision of concentrated wealth and Mengeles of advanced scientific inclination toward ethics of personal egoist utilitarianism. Science is not endangered, humanity is. Science will be around learning and inventing things forever unless its technological progeny extirpate all human life on Earth, the ecosphere or both.

Pope Adrian I-the only British pope, sent Henry II of Britain the ring of investiture of Ireland and asked that nation tp be subdued and brought over to the Roman Church though it had been the heart of the Celtic Catholic Church for centuries. Pope Adrian I ordered a tax upon every Irish home of one penny-a lot of money in the 12th century.

Quoting Shaff on the topic from V. 4 page 56...

quote-“This papal-Irish bull is not found in the Bullarium Romanum, the editors of which were ashamed of it, and is denounced by some Irish Romanists as a monstrous and outrageous forgery, but it is given by, Matthew Paris (1155), was confirmed by Pope Alexander III. in a letter to Henry II. (a. d.1172), published in Ireland in 1175, printed in Baronius, Annales, ad a. d.1159, who took his copy from a Codex Vaticanus and is acknowledged as undoubtedly genuine by Dr. Lanigan, the Roman Catholic historian of Ireland (IV. 64), and other authorities; comp. Killen I. 211 sqq. It is as follows: “Adrian, Bishop, Servant of the servants of God, to his dearest son in Christ, the illustrious King of England, greeting and apostolic benediction. “ Full laudably, and profitably has your magnificence conceived the design of propagating your glorious renown on earth, and of completing your reward of eternal happiness in heaven, whilst as a Catholic prince you are intent on enlarging the borders of the Church, teaching the truth of the Christian faith to the ignorant and rude, extirpating the nurseries of iniquity from the field of the Lord, and for the more convenient execution of this purpose, requiring the counsel and favor of the Apostolic See. In which the maturer your deliberation and the greater the discretion of your procedure, by, so much the happier, we trust, will be your progress, with the assistance of the Lord; because whatever has its origin in ardent faith and in love of religion always has a prosperous end and issue. “There is indeed no doubt but that Ireland and all the islands on which Christ the Sun of Righteousness has shone, and which have received the doctrines of the Christian faith, belong to the jurisdiction of St. Peter and of the holy Roman Church, as your Excellency also acknowledges. And therefore we are the more solicitous to propagate a faithful plantation among them, and a seed pleasing to the Lord, as we have the secret conviction of conscience that a very, rigorous account must be rendered of them. “ You then, most dear son in Christ, have signified to us your desire to enter into the island of Ireland that you may reduce the people to obedience to laws, and extirpate the nurseries of vice, and that you are willing to pay from each house a yearly pension of one penny to St. Peter, and that you will preserve the rights of the churches of this land whole and inviolate. We, therefore, with that grace and acceptance suited to your pious and laudable design, and favorably assenting to your petition, hold it good and acceptable that, for extending the borders of the church, restraining the progress of vice, for the correction of manners, the planting of virtue, and the increase of the Christian religion, you enter that island, and execute therein whatever shall pertain to the honor of God and welfare of the land; and that the people of that land receive you honorably, and reverence you as their lord—the rights of their churches still remaining sacred and inviolate, and saving to St. Peter the annual pension of one penny from every house. “If then you are resolved to carry the design you have conceived into effectual execution, study to train that nation to virtuous manners, and labor by yourself and others whom you shall judge meet for this work, in faith, word, and life, that the church may be there adorned; that the religion of the Christian faith may be planted and grow up, and that all things pertaining to the honor of God and the salvation of souls be so ordered that you may be entitled to the fulness of eternal reward in God, and obtain a glorious renown on throughout all ages.”-end quote



That is a very sophisticated international letter yet one wherein two powerful nationals work together to takeover another country. The Irish Celtic Church was phased out over time, yet the infrastructures of communication are remarkable for the practical effects not only in Ireland, Britain and Italy.

Imperfect Character is Universal

The question of why anything exists rather than nothing was a question that Plotinus considered in The Enneads. Why would The One order anyt...