03 July 2016

Self-Driving Cars Should Eliminate Drunk Driving Fatalities

After the first self-driving car fatality the problem of moving along in a tin box at 70 mph reminds one of the inherent dangers of traveling at speed. Yet if mankind was ever meant to operate a car will drunk, it had to be while asleep in a self-driving car.

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-hy-tesla-google-20160701-snap-story.


About 10,000 people were killed while driving under the influence in 2014, and there were 200 fatalities of children who weren't driving. Tesla, G.M. and others will work out bugs eventually, yet sooner is probably a better way to reduce fatalities on the road than later overall.Making a car that doesn't allow tobacco smoking would also reduce deaths-though in an unrelated field (lung cancer etc.).


http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html


Tesla blamed the car's inability to distinguish the white color background a truck the car crashed into as the reason for the accident. Human drivers fall asleep, have heart attacks, strokes and seizures while driving, and making innumerable driving judgment errors leading to accidents-especially in passing. If self-driving cars can be proven to be statistically safer than human drivers that may be good enough.

Yet it may be the cognitive psychologists will need to test the cognitive abilities of the automotive AI systems of self driving cars-an interdisciplinary project to see where their blind spots are. I personally would not want to ride in a self-driving car on the Alaska highway in January anytime soon.

On Six Days of Creation (Video)

Making Best Moves for Democracy

American politicians have shown recalcitrance to act for U.S. national interests rather than global interests in recent decades. The nation was founded as a democracy, or a democratic republic as it were. It is worth remembering that British and Roman Catholic papists didn't support democracy. Sadly the Catholic Church history is one of opposition to democracy and support of Habsburgs until comparatively recent times.When U.S. political leadership works for foreign and globalists rather than U.S. interests it also works sedulously against democracy in the U.S.A. Support for illegal immigration is one example of a preference for globalist imperialism against democratic self-determination of by and for the people of the United States.

In foreign policy choices have been made primarily  to benefit concentrated wealth rather than the people of the U.S.A.Those interests are not always in harmony or close to be one.In order to present a little philosophical detachment and reflection about foreign policy criteria that benefit Americans rather than the globalist agenda I will post a brief article on the logic of aggregating winning moves.

In chess tactics trainers at least there does seem to be a 'best move'. One's agenda might always be to choose the best move, although there may be numerous equally valid best moves at various points in a game. Evaluating best moves options ought to be reflexive, rather than possibilities within an agenda doomed to win because it has a winning agenda ideal. If one opts for the end justifies the means agenda then the means must have a sequence of best movies. If one justifies the means are the end-in-themselves, the aggregation of best moves must lead to a winning agenda lest the moves with retrocausality be proven to be less-than-the-best and politically losing.

02 July 2016

Recalcitrant Republican Globalists Fear Trump

Donald Trump seems to be the anti-dote to globalist destruction of the United States. Therefore many Republican elites entirely sold out to globalism fear the Donald and won't support his Presidential candidacy. Trump needs to find unconventional Americans to fill in the convention speaking slots usually given to ass kissing sycophants of the 1% working on making a global plutocracy.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/politics/donald-trump-convention-children-speakers/

Trump may be the remedy to the it takes a village paradigm with the Clintons as the Chief faces of the village where everyone is a loser and the United States just a memory. Even the Pope seems to like the village as is against keeping Mexican Latinos from illegally entering the United States. The Clintons and apparently Pope Francis believe only be enforced if and only if they benefit your race, the British imperial financial project, personal financial interest or organization, and otherwise... they don't count and should be ignored for moral and compassionate reasons. 

Even without the support of people like Lindsey Graham, Trump may be able to keep the U.S.A. a little intact, strong and secure for a while longer before its completely overrun by anyone that can take a profit from skimming it in the new age of globalism.

Building up NATO Troops for W.W. Three With Russia (satire)

Finally NATO has begun the troop build up required to have a decent World War Three. Secret plans were obtained detailing Vladimir Putin's Von Shufflin Plan to invade Poland before cutting and slashing for a quick blitzkreig to Berlin, over the Alps via the Von Hannibal route and down to the beach at Palermo

The reason for the impending war is simple enough. The exit of Britain from the EC has created a tremendous gap in the defensive line that needs to be filled with free agents from Canada (that is sending 4000 soldiers including trans-genders and homosexual special forces). The next war to end all wars will be the most democratic in history with medals for all the winners and beautiful sad songs, pompoms and circumstances for the losers (the dead).

Actually though the Von Putin plan is missing quality free-thinking drones required for success in any trendy battlefield ecosystem. It is also well known that the excellent Russian tanks are rather gauche in appearance and present good targets for military haters programmed to like stealthy and sleek fashions in armored vehicles. Putin as a lawyers is aware that their is a treaty making it illegal for NATO to station troops on the Russian border, and that violation could be a legal context to commence battle. If that occurs one hopes that Anderson Cooper will be on the front line with camera team to beam it all to American spectators.

With luck though the tremendous NATO build up will de frappe the conflict before it starts. The crunch time should be before Oct. 1st when it gets a little more cool and war is less attractive to the troops. If there is no war by then it may wait until summer 2017.

NATO Masses Troops on Russian Border (satire)

Finally NATO has begun the troop build up required to have a decent World War Three. Secret plans were obtained detailing Vladimir Putin's Von Shufflin Plan to invade Poland before cutting and slashing for a quick blitzkreig to Berlin, over the Alps via the Von Hannibal route and down to the beach at Palermo

The reason for the impending war is simple enough. The exit of Britain from the EC has created a tremendous gap in the defensive line that needs to be filled with free agents from Canada (that is sending 4000 soldiers including trans-genders and homosexual special forces). The next war to end all wars will be the most democratic in history with medals for all the winners and beautiful sad songs, pompoms and circumstances for the losers (the dead).

Actually though the Von Putin plan is missing quality free-thinking drones required for success in any trendy battlefield ecosystem. It is also well known that the excellent Russian tanks are rather gauche in appearance and present good targets for military haters programmed to like stealthy and sleek fashions in armored vehicles. Putin as a lawyers is aware that their is a treaty making it illegal for NATO to station troops on the Russian border, and that violation could be a legal context to commence battle. If that occurs one hopes that Anderson Cooper will be on the front line with camera team to beam it all to American spectators.

With luck though the tremendous NATO build up will de frappe the conflict before it starts. The crunch time should be before Oct. 1st when it gets a little more cool and war is less attractive to the troops. If there is no war by then it may wait until summer 2017.

Democrat Convention Fight to Dump Hillary?

With Hillary's sordid history of denial of ever doing anything wrong while in political circumstances going back to her husband's Presidential years it would be reasonable for Democrats at the convention to try to dump her nomination and select a wild card such as a good economist for the job-one with clean hands and no barges of political baggage following.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-everyone-looks-bad-because-bill-clinton-met-with-loretta-lynch/2016/07/02/a7807adc-3ff4-11e6-a66f-aa6c1883b6b1_story.html

Mitt Romney and Lindsey Graham-even the Speaker of the House and of course the Bushes, have proven that Donald Trump is not a bureaucratic corporate flunkie and corrupted Republican insiders still seek to replace Trump with someone else with better communist, socialist or Wall Street elite credentials who will suck up to the inertia of the day that all hands want to partake of as if sharing REM on black sabbath. So it is not unreasonable to consider the possibility that Democrats with actual valid reasons may seek to go where no convention has gone before the past 30 years and find someone people don't hate to run for the Presidential job. Even the hate crimes laws won't stop many Americans from hating on Hillary.

The Clinton's have made themselves a privileged clan seeming to be a little above the law. Some believe that Bill gave Attorney General Lynch the eye to let her know that if Hillary is trashed for repeatedly concealing official State Department business on her private email server and then losing some of them, she just might find her future downwardly mobile. Nothing like burning the Koresh ranch or anything, just a friendly reminder about her kids, grand-kids or whatever the future could hold for them.

01 July 2016

What's Isis, Hamas, Al Qaeda Think of 2-State Solution?

The quartet is working a two-state Middle East solution for Israel again begging the question; what do ISIS, AL Qaeda, Hamas and the Saudis think about that?

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54379#.V

The Obama administration is pushing Russia to help settle down the Syrian conflict by getting Assad to ground his Air Force so rebels can attack without so much resistance. It seems important to get rid of Assad and Vietnamize the conflict with rebels that can present a fair and balanced anarchic state to ISIS. A two state solution instead of just dumb and dumber.

30 June 2016

Whale Snoring,Big-Box Store Moving Sidewalks etc

Just a few thoughts... has anyone recorded a whale snoring? I was camping by the Inside passage a couple nights and heard the deepest audio sound, and  most strong, from what I believed was a snoring whale. Whales had been feeding and jumping out of the water at the location, and it seemed a good place for them to sleep too. I hadn't any audio equipment.

Why aren't there moving center people 'sidewalks' inside very large box stores? Any express from front to back?

Why aren't fast food menus divided into three parts, with the left being low calories (< 600 calories), the center being moderate (600 to 900 calories), and the right being fatty >900 calories? It isn't simple enough for people to select foods the way it is-way too much trouble.

27 June 2016

Url for N.Y. Post Article on Bill's Affairs described in Gary Byrne's Book

I don't know how any voter could want the Clinton's to return to the White House. I guess they have no sense.

http://nypost.com/2016/06/18/monica-lewinsky-ironically-freaked-out-that-bill-cheated-on-her/

Human Free Will and an Omniscient God Can Coexist

 If a designer created a robot able to think for-itself so far as making decisions, can it be said that the designer made the decisions in particular cases because he invented the criterion that is the robot’s critical reasoning endowment? If parents invent a kid able to think for himself are the parents really giving the kid free thought if in some way they can foresee the future? If an artificially intelligent automobile goes wild and makes bad decisions, would it be unreasonable to adjust its free will with punishing program rewrites?

One wonders about the role of humanity exiting in-the-Universe. If it was created for a particular reason in the purposes of God, and if it strays from those right roles should God be indifferent, or would one expect Him too be?

If humanity is to have a relationship with God for eternity perhaps as independent subroutines can the creator tolerate them flawed or wouldn’t he debug them as would any programmer?

One wonders if there may be contingent beings generally I suppose as a theoretical criteria, yet the facts of concrete being seem self-defining; cognizance of self as Descartes pointed out in the Meditations. Sartre pointed out that people are condemned to be free in Being and Nothingness. If God who is absolute spirit creates portions of reality whereat sentient beings exist they are still free and seem to be so for-themselves though God pre-determined the Universe and those that would exist in it. Within that Universe people have sufficient degrees of freedom to make correct choices that would be compatible with the will of God or not.

Degrees of freedom applies in motion and in quantum mechanics too I believe with phase space, three dimensional and four dimensional space permitting different hypothetical motions. While all people are more or less bound by the physical criterion of existence they find themselves in they can with thought, change it. Many people choose to just exist physically without a spiritual component restricting their thought in some respects, although thought as an ideation freedom can be developed. The relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ is the way to reconciliation with God as adopted children of God. If God is absolute freedom in-himself to be adopted and freed from the paradigm of original sin and the bonds of just the world is the right way to have freedom.

I have wondered about God's eternal economy.As the absolute good how could he tolerate sin in his presence for ever? Those that choose to not reconcile themselves to God and want to go their own way, will do so even if it leads to some place not fully funded by God to create pleasure for the lost.

26 June 2016

Pope Francis Says Catholic Church Should Apologize to Homos

The present Pope's ideas about homosexuality are rather weird. I suppose that will leave many with a more visible contrasting point of view between Catholicism as a denomination with a special relationship to homos over the millennia and the Church as the invisible relationship of the saved to the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ hasn't anything to apologize for. God is perfect and his laws are just. It is sinful man (and woman) that need to apologize for sin to one.

The Roman Catholic Church is not an egalitarian Priesthood of Believers so it is subject to the corrupting power of elites. Homosexuality is sin and should be known to be so and as proscribed from Christian conduct as adultery, theft and murder etc. The power of the state and the power of the visible church ought not be the same. Neither should the visible church choose to try to attain condign power in the secular realm.

Thomas Aquinus wrote on the topic of homsexuality. A wikipedia article says that (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_medieval_Europe):

"In the 13th century C.E., the theologian Thomas Aquinas was influential in linking condemnations of homosexuality with the idea of natural law, arguing that "special sins are against nature, as, for instance, those that run counter to the intercourse of male and female natural to animals, and so are peculiarly qualified as unnatural vices."[8] This view points from the natural to the Divine, because (following Aristotle) he said all people seek happiness; but according to Aquinas, happiness can only finally be attained through the Beatific Vision.[9] Therefore, all sins are also against the natural law. But the natural law of many aspects of life is knowable apart from special revelation by examining the forms and purposes of those aspects. It is in this sense that Aquinas considered homosexuality unnatural, since it involves a kind of partner other than the kind to which the purpose of sexuality points. Indeed, he considered it second only to bestiality as an abuse of sexuality.[10]"

The Pope should not mislead about sin being o.k. when it isn't. Too many think it is as it is without supposed Christian  ministers winking an eye at it. Assuredly governments are corrupt in many respects about policy and mislead the public themselves intentionally, unintentionally and through abuse of power.

Hierarchies of power and politics historically have tended towards violating individual human and civil rights. Innumerable means of covert and overt repression have arrogated power unto insider elites that regard themselves as having some moral right to oppress citizens. The defense of freedom requires freedom of religion and free speech for individuals more so than public broadcast media with racketeering and persecution advantages even in a democracy and especially in a totalitarian government. Omosexuality is sin yet as a private concern it isn’t a concern of a democratic government except as it becomes an over and corrupting political power on a practical basis weakening social character and the security of all people that have no interest in a buch hegemonistic government authority.

Homosexuals as organizers for a particular sin’s toleration and empowerment for those particular sinners have tended to take an in-your-face political approach that is belligerent and antagonistic rather than innovative and unique to their own interests. I write of course of marriage. They could have formed homocoupling protocols and left marriage alone instead of destroying its unique historical and social circumstance. Perhaps the Pope is was homosexual himself or let off too many homosexual priests and child abusers. As a top squishy bureaucrat he may be a moral Chamberlain rather than a forthright moral Churchill. Appeasement of sin in a tone that seems to approve of sin is just wrong. Corrupt leadership in a hierarchical organization can doom the followers sometimes.



I think that some ministers have a feudal approach to their 21st century flock regarding literacy, mobility, economic and political environments and male-female social roles that make them a little too detached from social reality and many people leave the church or never join. They are poor at apologetic too having little understanding of contemporary cosmology or philosophy and how that relates to theology and interpretation of Genesis. The speak of man being corrupt rather than men and women being corrupt as if women were still owned by husbands and not accountable socially. When women are the majority of college graduates it simply makes men seem stupid. The news in Alaska reports women embezzling from governments as often or more so than men. Sin isn’t discriminatory.

Homosexuality is wrong as Christians recognize it correctly, yet Christian conduct would have people being non-judgmental as James describes, in admonishing the brothers and sisters to treat people equally-and that was a radical thing for the first century. There are procedures and ethics for Christians to follow regarding ethics, and that is where the errors occur generally, when Christian conduct becomes worldly conduct instead. The inquisition of the Catholic Church is an example of that, yet there were political challenges to the survival of Europe that stimulated it to bring church and state from Spain to Italy and Constantinople. The Church as a monolithic entity was a strong balance to extraneous forces attacking Europe from within and without until such a time that the protestant reformation was strong enough to revolt against papal domination of ecclesiastical affairs. Monopolies generally corrupt and absolute monarchies corrupt even if dispersed into plutocratic corporatism with talking head Presidential pawns.

1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations;
3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.
4 But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.
5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
6 But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed.
7 For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord.
8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
9 Let the brother of low degree rejoice in that he is exalted:
10 But the rich, in that he is made low: because as the flower of the grass he shall pass away.11 For the sun is no sooner risen with a burning heat, but it withereth the grass, and the flower thereof falleth, and the grace of the fashion of it perisheth: so also shall the rich man fade away in his ways.
12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
16 Do not err, my beloved brethren.
17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.
19 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
20 For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.
22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass:
24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.
25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.”
2 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.
2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;
3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:
4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts?
5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him?
6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats?
7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?
8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
11 For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.
12 So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
13 For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.”







Urges for Britain to Exit Quickly for Stampede of Nations?

Are the urges of various EU leaders for Britain to exit the EU quickly a sort of indirect support for the break up the EU movement generally? 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36626409

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-26/give-u-k-leaders-time-to-rethink-brexit-vote-merkel-aide-says

Though they wouldn't say so outright that they would prefer to get an avalanche started, maybe it will if Britain doesn't tarry and go the way of the bureaucrat to Byzantine, convoluted hog wallowing that is the point of big government anyway.

A streamlined form of instant, pay-as-you go trade packages that work for a few years and that can be purchased or phased out for renewal might be a better way. It hasn't been done that way before yet so what.

It should be easy to make standard global bilateral and tri-lateral trade contracts for all nations to print out from some trade-agreement-on-line web site of standard legal forms. The people could read those too and not have their futures traded away by elitist such as the Clintons, Rothchilds, Hitler, Molotov, Goldman Sachs etc.

24 June 2016

Britain Leaves E.U.- What it Means

Britain's vote to leave the European Union provides more options for economic self-control and political self-determination that were lost with the anachronistic blob of the European Union. The E.U. emerged as a rather obsolete concept format developed during the Cold War without any sense of the post-cold war social, political and economic environment of the Muslim jihad and New World Order challenges to democracy and national sovereignty.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/top-eu-leader-we-want-britain-out-as-soon-as-possible


Because of the practical electronic integration of European society there is no prospect for 12-mile isolationism or for Britain to elect a Dictator Von Kim Libervorst-Windsort and take the path of existential trade neurosis. The opportunities for selecting beneficial points of the E.U. trading arrangements to keep and those that should be discarded will enable the big island to make its economy more responsive to actual citizens of England rather than distant martinets.


The issue of national identity that arose from the waves of illegal immigration that the E.U. was incapable of responding to and forced upon Britain is a basic challenge to every nation of the world today. The corrupt elitist powers of predatory capitalism prefer to destroy national sovereignty and labor security of the masses and keep labor wages as low as possible through mass labor and refugee migrations. Better for the common man and woman are secure borders, labor stability and development of each nation cooperatively toward and ecospheric economic sustainability. Britain may peg the pound to the value of the Euro, use the Euro ordinarily and keep the pound in the electronic abstract to smooth exchange.


The E.U. may evolve to a more compact economic coordinating clearing-house role with a menu of options given to every nation to select from to customize their own relations. Issues of national security regarding sovereignty and citizenship may be returned to each state for their self-determination. It may be better for ecological transportation and energy evolution for nations to be free to experiment with their own technology and politics rather than have a New World Order technology forced upon them universally.


Free enterprise and capitalism in the computerized global trading environment require a measured defense against oligarchic and monopolistic practices that may be pervasive and oppressive through numerous modes of networking. It may be necessary to index taxation upon accumulated wealth and corporate holdings to a percent of national and global wealth in order to prevent extreme concentrations of wealth and keep capitalism more accessible to everyone within reason.

Britain has taken a first step toward a new era of facing planetary demographic, environmental, economic and political challenges head on, yet the challenges are great and those working to move in the right direction few in politics.

22 June 2016

Clinton-Obama Policy of 'Trolling for War With Russia'

Pat Buchanan the former Presidential candidate wrote a good article titled 'Trolling for War With Russia' that I want to share...

https://www.creators.com/read/pat-buchanan/06/16/trolling-for-war-with-russia

It is a summary of the present state of affairs. it has seemed that way to me too. The Clintons began the long term globalist policy of annexing Ukraine to Anglocentric N.W.O. elites after the Cold War and of intimidating Russia in order to stimulate defense contractor spending and additional policies of value more to the elites of the New World Order than Americans or Europeans.

Alaska State Senate Seeks to Trim Public's Share

The Alaska state  legislature, notorious for corruption, passed a bill to trim the public's portion of oil revenues and natural resources sales by limiting Permanent Fund Dividends at 1000 dollars. No one put a limit on government spending or public debt of course. It is easy for politicians to rationalize taking money directly from the poor, students, minors etc and giving it to the government.

 http://www.ktuu.com/content/news/Senate-passes-bill-placing-1000-cap-on-Permanent-Fund-Dividend-382058471.html

State insiders traditionally kick back to special interests in and out of government instead of using intelligent economic development ideas. So the first time they have revenue shortfalls they seek to make it up by trimming the public's earnings from the Permanent Fund.

The Alaska Permanent Fund was created by former Governor jay Hammond to assure that ordinary Alaskans could share in the state's oil wealth and also that the heritage would last into the future when the oil ran out. Now the Senate feels it was created for their discretionary spending to make up for their lack of integrity and competence.Instead of cutting the size of government and kick backs to insider contractors and special interests they simply cut the public's share.