02 August 2018

Media Think President Should Gag Himself

The media, including Business Insider, evidently believe the President of the United States should gag himself and ignore things happening around him.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-russia-probe-tweets-may-be-evidence-in-an-obstruction-trial-2018-8

Does the media really need to invent charges for the President to worry about a priori and expect him to self-censor executive comments? How can public remarks comprise obstruction of justice theoretically. It is public speech rather than behind the scenes criminal activity?

There seems to be no end of media invention of theoretical charges and theoretical incriminating speech the President may be doing whenever he speaks or tweets about things openly- Apparently the media don't yet choose to call it hate speech. The President is so lucky.

Has Vlad the Elector Filled Brackets for November Madness Yet?

Some people are wondering if  Vlad the Elector has picked his rackets for the Novermber 2018 aka "Mid-term" election brackets yet. The odds against picking a perfect bucket of brackets are five billion Quintillion, however Vlad the Elector is said to pre-determine the outcome rather than just watching it.

Bettors don't know if Vlad selects all the way down to the level of municipal elections. It would not be wise to misunderestimate his capacity to pre-determine US elections; Santa knows whether or not each individual kid and adult has been naughty or nice spanning the globe so it might be simple and require nothing more than a dilitente with a vast center-winged Federal'naya sluzhba bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii to pre-determine U.S. elections.

Mueller Probe Could Be Russian Collusion to Hinder President Trump

The Mueller Probe itself could have been designed by Vladimir Putin's special political theorists in order to hinder the U.S. President and hinder his reform of government. As unlikely as it seems it is possible. How many Democrats in Congress have puppet masters in the Kremlin these days?

Russian agents might have stimulated the concept of a special prosecutor for President Trump on Facebook and other social media as well as supporting various divisive political issues and persons along the lines of their program to throw accelerants on U.S. political issues. Americans would never do that to any other country, so they have a hard time figuring out the true dimensions of Russian manipulation of social media for political purposes.


In the midst of their shock over Russian control of the remote control too many have forgotten that there might be another nation besides Russia that has a remote control pointed at U.S. social media.


British collusion with the Clinton campaign and the F.B.I. axis of espionage nominally appears likely. 


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/12-times-christopher-steele-fed-trump-russia-allegations-to-fbi-after-the-election

https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/08/03/delingpole-tommy-robinson-was-abused-and-tortured-with-the-complicity-of-the-british-state/

Corporate Censorship of Social Media is the Emerging Trend

Corporate censorship of social media is the emergent trend. Corporate social media platforms are entirely subject to corporate policy decisions about what speech is permissible for users. In the past government censorship was the primary opponent of free speech whereas now it is corporatism.

Alex Jones' Infowars is a contemporary presentation running its head into the glass ceiling of free speech in the corporate world.






The rubric for censoring content by removal is hate speech. Hate speech is generally politically incorrect speech, or speech that is offensive to the Democrat Party constituency. One need only use appellations for members of the Democrat Party that they don't like to find oneself targeted as a user of hate speech.

I learned about Mussolini's political philosophy of corporatism in reading of the history of corporatism years ago. The unification of political and corporate leadership can occur intentionally as in Hitler's Nazi Germany or simply through social evolution of power seekers. The ability to suppress dissent of critics may be irresistible to powerful leaders able to fire anyone they want from their own corporations and to set policies about what employees may say or information they may distribute in the workplace. When corporate leaders and policies pervade government naturally corporate censorship expands through various means such as the very useful innovation called hate speech.

I learned about corporate censorship through a personal encounter writing at what was then named Helium.com where my hundreds of peer reviewed articles rated in the top 5%. In writing on the live political issue of homosexual marriage that I opposed,  I used words such as 'queer, faggot, and homo' in fewer than 1% of the words I published; maybe 30,000 words or so. I wrote on a wide range of issues besides the homosexual platform to queer the U.S.A. during the Obama years. The Boston-based company gave a slight warning then locked me out of Helium, kept my writing for some time selling advertising on the articles, censored what they wanted to of my articles and applied censorship in the most egregious, arrogant and cold blooded ways they could.

Helium informed I was banned with an email on Dec. 24th 2010. Because I was earning about $200 a month and sleeping on the ground in Anchorage for the winter, the banning for hate speech seemed especially hateful timing. Even after I was banned Helium continued to sell my articles...I believe that Helium has disappeared from the Internet since.

________________________________________
From: content@helium.com 
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 11:41 AM
To: garycgibson@hotmail.com
Subject: You've sold an article on Helium!

"Dear Gary C. Gibson:

Congratulations! A publisher reading Helium has licensed your article on "The relationship between metaphysics and physical cosmology theories" through our Stock Content offering. The article you sold is here on Helium: <http://www.helium.com/items/1443173>

iMake News is the Helium client that purchased your article. We need to remind you that the Helium User Agreement asks that you do not contact this client directly. Publishers use Helium because they don't have time to work individually with freelance writers.  By contacting the client directly, you could jeopardize Helium's relationship with the client for future purchases of other members' content.

You will see a credit for this purchase within 10 business days. To view the credit detail, from your My Helium page click on Earnings & Payments then click on 'Adjustments'. This page displays all credits and payment requests on your account.

Per the publisher terms, they are only licensing nonexclusive rights. So don't worry, the copyright to the article still remains with you. And, because the article remains on Helium, you will continue to earn from this article on Helium as well!

Find out more about Stock Content and how you can benefit at <http://help.helium.com/earn-money-helium#Stock>.

Thank you for contributing to Helium. And congratulations again on the sale!

Do not reply to this email. If you have any questions about this, please forward this email to 

Team Helium"

In my opinion the government should create some sort of anti-censorship Internet base account for every citizen where every citizen can complete copy his posts to social media in order that the writing will continue to exist after the corporate censors inevitably take down was they decide is not profitable to them to leave published for whatever reason including political. That should include video too.

I believe corporate censorship with the tool of hate speech militantly supported by homosexuals is comparable to the Hitler-Rohm S.A. homosexual led storm troopers that helped put the Nazis into power before being purged themselves.

The paradigmata for homosexuals being tools for concentrating power and censorship may repeat over time. Necessarily more gradual in the modern mass audience social environment, corporatism and its communist cohort with sufficient politically conveyed power of censorship may be able to implement various forms of eugenics and democide in the future without public expressions of dissent since all avenues of free expression will already have been coopted or shut down.




image credit: /Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1982-159-21A,_N%C3%BCrnberg,_Reichsparteitag,_Hitler_und_R%C3%B6hm.jpg





  Disappearing social media platforms is a fact of life, because they are corporate owned by private interests. Facebook too could disappear along with all of the content that people have invested there some time. Alternatively hate speech laws or some other political contrivance could be adumbrated to purge accounts.
I migrated much of my lost content to blogger before Helium banned me. Blogger formerly was owned by geocities and geocities was bought by Google. Because Google is large I felt they might be a little more secure from takeover by hostiles with the intent of closing things down with censorship via acquisition. The 5 billion dollar fine Google recently experienced demonstrates that even Google may be subject to some political pressure to censor writers and video producers. That's why the government should create some kind of a backup to mitigate the damage of corporate censorship even if it is blind to the need to reform capitalism that hasn't been upgraded since Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations in 1776.                                          







31 July 2018

Mars Under Glass More Efficient Than Terraforming

One shouldn't seek to change a planet such as Mars into a replica of the Earth. It's actually fairly silly since the way things are done on Earth if done on Mars would have a partially green planet soon phasing out most species and green things etc.It would be good enough to just manufacture thick glass lock-blocks on Mars and construct glass domes and other structures inside which plants would be grown.
image credit: N.A.S.A.


Allowing Martian ice and water to escape into the atmosphere is just a big, extravagant, profligate concept. Every day Martian water is being lost to space and there is no reason to expedite that.
When a surfeit of water exists somewhere and time perhaps from comets then actually terraforming some small planet experimentally would be worth the water.

Construction technology easily could learn to build vast solar energy collecting buildings to let human habitation and wildlife in other structures exist safely on Mars. It is just the reasonable way to go if designers want to have their oars in the water on Mars or Saturnian moons.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/274577-nasa-says-terraforming-mars-is-currently-impossible


N.A.S.A.-Cassini Imaging Team

He Shall Have Dominion - a third edition of the best eschatological work of the era

Kenneth Gentry's excellent eschatological work on Christianity and the post-millennial view is presented in He Shall Have Dominion 3rd edition.

http://www.kennethgentry.com/he-shall-have-dominion-paperback-book/

It is unfortunate that so many Christian's have missed out the prophecies of Jesus regarding the 1st century apocalypse that were fulfilled, and the continuing era of building the kingdom of God that is present.

Russian Collusion in NFL Anti-National Anthem Knee Taking?

Special Investigator Mueller should look into the anti-national anthem disrespect of NFL player and NBA players to determine if the activities were catalyzed or planned with Russian collusion. Have any Russians attended NFL games or been observed in NBA games? Did any leaders of the anti national anthem knee taking activities travel to Moscow or know Russian sleeper agents?

LeBron James, N.B.A. superstar, has shown the blindness of racism in choosing to blame President Trump for the idiotic N.F.L. anti-American knee-taking during the national anthem. President Trump did not start that godless, evil anti-American protest that so many former NFL viewers hate.

LeBron demonstrated why pro athletes are radically over-paid contributing nothing to society besides entertainment. The super-rich can moon the U.S.A. during the national anthem and President Trump is to blame. Kolin Kapernikus started sitting or taking a knee during the national anthem in August-September 2016 months before the November election.

http://www.tmz.com/2018/07/30/lebron-james-trump-race-sports-america/

James believes the President is using sports to divide America. Apparently he believes Americans should hate the U.S.A. as much as he or the N.F.L. does, if one interprets hate as meaning disrespecting the national anthem for an agenda of super-rich sports celebrities.

Rich biological entities with no apparent loyalty to the nation are worse that yippees; they are a fifth column of 'we are the world' globalists with various agendas of racism, plutocracy and aristocratic tendencies.  Many Americans care about democracy and the nation for it's all they have. They are not post-jet set globe trotters with no concern for a nation-in-particular.

30 July 2018

LeBron James; LA Racist, Blames Trump for Sports Scum that Disrespect National Anthem

LeBron James, N.B.A. superstar, has shown the blindness of racism in choosing to blame President Trump for the idiotic N.F.L. anti-American knee-taking during the national anthem. President Trump did not start that godless, evil anti-American protest that so many former NFL viewers hate.

LeBron demonstrated why pro athletes are radically over-paid contributing nothing to society besides entertainment. The super-rich can moon the U.S.A. during the national anthem and President Trump is to blame. Kolin Kapernikus started sitting or taking a knee during the national anthem in August-September 2016 months before the November election. Was Russian collusion involved?

http://www.tmz.com/2018/07/30/lebron-james-trump-race-sports-america/

James believes the President is using sports to divide America. Apparently he believes Americans should hate the U.S.A. as much as he or the N.F.L. does, if one interprets hate as meaning disrespecting the national anthem for an agenda of super-rich sports celebrities.

Rich biological entities with no apparent loyalty to the nation are worse that yippees; they are a fifth column of 'we are the world' globalists with various agendas of racism, plutocracy and aristocratic tendencies.  Many Americans care about democracy and the nation for it's all they have. They are not post-jet set globe trotters with no concern for a nation-in-particular.

That's the Way Things Spin Theoretically


Interesting ways of modeling ‘fundamental’ particles continue to develop along with algebras to use experimentally. The standard model of quantum physics doesn't use Octonion or Dixon algebra that could be valid ways of finding sharper descriptions of the way things spin.


Spin and non-commutativity are important concepts about particles that may be represented algebraically

http://www.7stones.com/Homepage/_matter_dominant.pdf Geoffrey Dixon “The Standard Model arises from T := C⊗H⊗O”

The concept of finding deeper math that scientists can use is encouraging for those interested in learning how the mass-energy of this apparent Universe works. Hilbert space allows non-Euclidean extension of space representation to any number of dimensions. Algebraic representation of particles in any number of dimensions might be turbo-charged theoretically with new approaches.


using Octonians to develop the standard model of physics particle-waves


http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nnpss/lectures/19/NNPSS-I.pdf Fundamental symmetries of the standard model

Government Shutdown Might Be a Libertarian Event

IMO some deficit hawks will be happy that the government is shutting down. Government is too large and President Trump may possibly think about building a wall around D.C. too.

President Trump has supporters of all kinds of political spin. Maybe they are modeled with non-commutative SU (3) matrices somewhere (a unitary group ideal). The 1% in earnings (not the 1% in the motorcycle world) seemed to have their politicians in the Repub Party work against Donald Trump’s election. Democrats are government workers and against the President. Maybe the rich will hate the closure, the Demos in government hate the closure, and those that voted for the President in some areas of a Boolean algebra truth table will be unhappy, and others with different values, happy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gj8QmRQtVao

If some sort of extraordinary permanent budget reduction could occur whenever the government shuts down- as if when a plant didn’t get water for a while it shrank in size- that would be helpful.

At least President Trump is exercising a bit of libertarianism on European security with some reduction of the U.S. role in paying for it, and allowing libertarian trends in global trade relations by cutting out so many bureaucratic, automatic insider trading circuits for a little while with tariffs.

Government inefficiency reflects its primary concern with serving the most rich and lesser economic levels from the top-down. Government grows in size yet without making a more effective social environment for as many as 100 million Americans on the bottom of the economic mountain. Probably government could be cut in half yet its efficiency increased 50% with some cleverness.

29 July 2018

Wift Broke British Brexit Soy Stands For Food Supply Substitute


Since China helpfully tariff'd away its U.S. soy imports Britain's challenged with potential food supply issues from a broken Brexit has a ready, cheap source of high-quality protein from the U.S.A. available for acquisition.

Soy is a vast right-wing vegetable protein useful in myriad food products. British technical scientific researches can probably convert soy into the new Spam of foods to stand beside conventional, traditional Spam and discover new ways to combine it with fruits and nuts into candies with extended shelf lives. Adding soy to the 49% food supply produced in Britain should cover the gap for some time-until locally grown intense mari and polyculture increase food productivity.


https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/world-leaders-in-soya-soybean-production-by-country.html




Soy is a fundamental food available in great quantity and easy to ship in bulk. Soy warehousing could be made in temporary tensioned-membrane domes for thousands and thousands of tons of bulk soy powder.


http://www.graboplan.hu/tensioned-membrane-structures/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensile_structure



Why Paul's Writing is More Important Than Augustine's

Paul was an apostle, with Apostolic authority. He knew the Lord in a personal way. He was a planter of churches and an authority on correct doctrine. His friend Apollos probably was the author of the letter to the Hebrews, with Pauline consultation. Paul was known to all of the disciples as well as people like Clement of Rome. The letters or Epistles attributed to Paul comprise a substantial portion of the New Testament. He was martyred in Rome.
Augustine of Hippo was a 4th century theologian and an important one. His writing was excellent and his ideas philosophically interesting. His personal life and experiences and conversion to Christianity comprise much of his works. Theologically his most important position may have been the opinion that mankind’s nature with original sin is totally depraved, while another theologian named Pelagius had the point of view that it is only partially so.
Augustine interpreted scripture centuries after the crucifixion of Christ. Paul lived in the first century and was the Apostle to the Gentiles. His letters are scripture. Augustine was a philosopher of a kind; a neo-Platonist before conversion to Christianity. Paul was a Jewish Pharisee and student of Gamaliel before Christ appeared to him on the road to Damascus.
The way theological positions are hermeneutically interpreted from scripture determines church doctrine and informs church dogmatics. Augustine’s ideas are regarded as more accurate than those of Pelagius.
The Catholic church is still concerned about Pelagianism- quote from the Wikipedia- " in a letter of February 2018 titled Placuit Deo, stating, "A new form of Pelagianism is spreading in our days, one in which the individual, understood to be radically autonomous, presumes to save oneself, without recognizing that, at the deepest level of being, he or she derives from God and from others.”

28 July 2018

Why Nations Do Not Try to Start War 'Games' With War 'Game Piece' Equality

It is a political tradition for governments to be concerned about weapons of hostile foreign governments. Perhaps it is because they are sometimes used in war. Unlike a chess game wherein it is usual to start the game with an equal number and assortment of pieces, in war the players do not try to make sure that their opponent (s) have an equal number of pieces.

Another problem is with weapons of mass destruction; they are just too large to be used very much on a planet like the Earth. Fluid dynamic political balances make power relationships regarding weapons stable and not used when they are constant. Proportional quality and quality weapons changes by various nations tend to precipitate conflicts if/when conflicts occur.

That is why there has been attention given by politicians and negotiators to changes in weapons balances internationally regarding quality and quantity with demands that any signed treaties regarding weapons balances are honored (such as the A.B.M. treaty signed with the Soviet Union).

A Brief History of the U.S. Relationship With the Soviet Union and Russia

The U.S.A. became an enemy of the Soviet Union after the October revolution of 1917. It sent 2000 troops to fight for the anti-Bolshevik Army during the Russian Civil war. The U.S.A. was not willing to give diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union until President Roosevelt took office and sought to establish diplomatic relations in 1933.

During World War II a reconciliation to comrades-in-arms status against the Nazi Reich was feasible. The U.S.A. supplied the Soviet Union with weapons and war material to fight against German Nazi invaders. That pragmatic working relationship ended with the conclusion of the war as the communists under Stalin resumed their war upon capitalism, democracy and so forth.

The Soviet Union understandably occupied the countries in which they had fought Nazis after the war and forced their totalitarian communism upon the people of those countries. The loss of so many western nations to communism through force created a lasting belligerent status east-west. With captured Nazi scientists and native Russian genius the Soviets built a large nuclear weapons capability that they pointed toward Europe, the United States and other anti-communist nations.

Soviets provided material support for the Communist North Korean parties leading up to the Korean War. After the U.N. chose to hold democratic elections for a government in the South the communists attacked South Korea.

Until the death of the dictator Joseph Stalin March 5, 1953, the Soviets of Russia kept a Communism in one country policy and did not implement Trotsky’s policy of global conquest. With Stalin’s death Soviet expansionism and support for communist revolutions globally resumed with a vengeance. A large number of revolutionary and sometimes anti-colonial wars commenced around the Earth. The United States and N.A.T.O. were the primary opponents to a planet of totalitarian communism. Notably Fidel Castro and Nikita Khrushchev tried to install nuclear missiles pointed at the U.S.A. in Cuba nearly causing nuclear conflict.

The issues that had divided the west and Russia ended with the end of the Soviet Union, or should have, during the Gorbachev-Reagan era (Soviets withdrew a quarter million troops from East Germany in December 1988 starting a political cascade leading to the termination of the Soviet State).

Continuing good relations with Russia is the most important political challenge for the United States today; equal to that of illegal immigration. To rebuild conflict with Russia comparable to the Cold War with the Soviet Union is counterproductive and harmful to U.S. national economic and security interests. Leadership that does so is unAmerican and/or daft.

Challenges for Christian Science Fiction Writers

Christian science fictions writers may encounter problems with different eschatological hermeneutics such as premillennialism, postmillennialism and amillennialism that have different parameters for important topics such as when the apocalypse was or will be in space-time. Science fiction writers sometimes encounter disbelief and skepticism regarding theoretical parameters such as Calvinist determinism and material predestination in supercomputer artificial intelligence epistemology.

Christian science fictions writers may encounter problems with different eschatological hermeneutics such as premillennialism, postmillennialism and amillennialism that have different parameters for important topics such as when the apocalypse was or will be in space-time. Science fiction writers sometimes encounter disbelief and skepticism regarding theoretical parameters such as Calvinist determinism and material predestination in supercomputer artificial intelligence epistemology. Postmillennialism for example places the apocalypse in the first century a.d. and the present age as that for building the kingdom of God that proximally started at Pentacost.

What the Perfect Socialist USA May Look Like to Democrats

Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton would be President. The Democrat Party would own every corporation and business in the nation. Bisexual bureaucrat-CEO’s would supervise mandatory sterilization and transneuterization of all citizens. Dope or soma in the food supply would negate the need for private property that would be abolished as people became too dopey to know where they were.

Where the One-Earth Capitol Would Be Located

Probably Aristarch City, Mars would be the capitol. It would allow safer government concentration of wealth and remote control of Earth. Easier screening out of rift raft from Earth would keep the pleasures of compensation securely in control of government authorities experienced in management of hedonist pleasure facilities for-themselves.

27 July 2018

Chess Champions and Defeat of Challengers 1 and 2 in Simuls

Probably the world’s first female chess champion Vera Menchik could have beat the world’s number one and two female challengers simultaneously- only a guess though. In the 19th century Paul Morphy probably could have defeated two of the top ranked players simultaneously, yet if already the champion what would be the point of trying to make other players look like patzers?

I don’t think Robert James Fischer could have beat Spassky and Karpov in a simul. On a good day maybe MC could beat Caruana and Karjakin in a simul- yet that’s a pretty Tal order; MC would lose at least some of the time and draw most of the time in the present era of positional chess. 

Why Very Advanced Chess Programs are Calvinist

Sure. Alpha-Zero or the next gen Alpha Zero could beat the World Champion with an average player as partner sharing moves in certain conditions. As a player that finished 3rd in blitz chess at Chess.com - Play Chess Online - Free Games out of 193 players yesterday with a 1320 rating and a slow wireless connection, and with a 1550 rating at Lichess after learning the game since 2012, and graduating from a programming course in 1981 I have confidence that computers and computer programming can beat human players with the right programming. A Super GM at a simul can beat even fifty players sometimes- Alpha Zero should have no trouble partnering with a patzer. Maybe its like asking if a fat auto-bound office worker could win the Olympic Marathon with very fast high-tech ford electrical power legs if he walked without help every mile or two for a minute.

Alpha-Zero would need to study the partner’s chess games and learn how the player moves. It would need to know what openings the player knows, how far into the middle game and the sort of end game techniques the player has. If the 1400–1600 player has played 10,000–20,000 blitz games at Chess.com - Play Chess Online - Free Games and Lichess, and if the two partners had a way of communicating and sharing before the match so they would be on the same sheet of music regarding how to play (such as Bogo Indian or London System, Italian Game or Spanish, Berlin Defense or hack attack etc), I think they could together come up with a winning plan. Alpha-Zero could anticipate the chaos of inaccurate moves and blunders the partner uses foreknowing a litany of corrections or move vectors from the occasional or frequent inaccuracy.


The pair could practice the tandem chess against Stockfish 8 or 9 eventually and see how they do. They could play against PlayMagnus. Alpha Zero needed just four hours to learn how to play chess well enough to beat the best chess engine in the world although some seem to think that Stockfish might have thrown in the towel intentionally. Alpha Zero would know every game and move the World Champion has ever played and have several options paradigm to use for every move the champ made with options paradigm extending ahead for thousands of moves though games seldom reach 100. It would have the moves the patzer makes in subsets for every possible game the champion might play, and plan vectors and variable winning responses to any theoretical adversarial move.


Alpha-Zero learns too fast to have trouble playing and winning against a human-even the WC, even with half of its petaflops tied behind its back. A very advanced chess playing algorithm creates a deterministic board environment. It is Calvinist.

Y Women Have Had a Separate Yet Equal Chess Game League History

There really isn’t such an item as women’s chess. Women have had their separate leagues and title rankings yet the game is the same.

Women have separate basketball leagues and the cultural history of males and females differs from nation to nation. Vera Menchiks was the first female chess champion and she was just a 1600 player as I recall. Her father was a manager of estates of a few Russian nobles so she had early exposure to the game. Most women were not so socially positioned. Vera Menchik - Wikipedia

Women play chess with men on-line a lot nowadays and I suppose in local chess clubs too. Women GMs or WGMs qualify for the title with fewer points required and that is a carry over from history when the average women did not rate as high as men on average. Susan Polgar played as a Super GM or plus 2700 player for several years, yet no other women has crossed that line.

Sometimes people talk about abolishing the women’s title’s and just lumping them in with the men. Maybe most chess players wouldn’t mind however many nations have systems that would.

Being a class A (plus 1800 rating) requires several years of study and work so many people just don’t want to put in the time. Achieving GM status at 2500–2700 requires an early start in life with years of learning and practice. A WGM title requires a 2300 rating. The title itself has some value in being a paid chess coach so I think it unlikely to be phased out soon.