The media, including Business Insider, evidently believe the President of the United States should gag himself and ignore things happening around him.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-russia-probe-tweets-may-be-evidence-in-an-obstruction-trial-2018-8
Does the media really need to invent charges for the President to worry about a priori and expect him to self-censor executive comments? How can public remarks comprise obstruction of justice theoretically. It is public speech rather than behind the scenes criminal activity?
There seems to be no end of media invention of theoretical charges and theoretical incriminating speech the President may be doing whenever he speaks or tweets about things openly- Apparently the media don't yet choose to call it hate speech. The President is so lucky.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-russia-probe-tweets-may-be-evidence-in-an-obstruction-trial-2018-8
Does the media really need to invent charges for the President to worry about a priori and expect him to self-censor executive comments? How can public remarks comprise obstruction of justice theoretically. It is public speech rather than behind the scenes criminal activity?
There seems to be no end of media invention of theoretical charges and theoretical incriminating speech the President may be doing whenever he speaks or tweets about things openly- Apparently the media don't yet choose to call it hate speech. The President is so lucky.
No comments:
Post a Comment