Why Change in the Balance of Power Paradigm Isn't Always Good

The balance of power paradigm is a general historical guideline rather than a fixed rule. One can find exceptions to generalities. Generally though, if there is an existing balance of power, in peaceful relations between nations, a change in the balance of power in weapons qualitatively and quantitatively between the nations favors opportunities for new conflict between nations. I can understand why nations that desire aggressive war may first want to change the balance of power.

The United States hasn’t ever had African colonies. It does not repress African nations militarily and I see no reason why any African leader would believe that a military budget increase would be of value for him or her in getting a better trade balance with the United States. Perhaps African nations can use military power to forge better relations with Europe. If Iran points enough nuclear-tipped missiles at Europe it is sure to get their attention. Muslims invaded Europe some time ago (starting in the 7th century) and for a while got more land, and goods too, that provided export to the Caliphate.