It should be quite reasonable that a democracy can set limits upon the size of organizations such as corporations. A democracy is centered upon individuals rather than collectives including those of business. In order to prevent the hostile takeover of social liberty, that is of individual liberty by clever organizations making a ceiling for organizational employee numbers such as 3000 people would be good enough.
Large organizations reduce invention and product development through neo-oligharchy and networking. Overly large organization socially reduce efficiency and create inertia for design stagnation. If one compares today's cars to those of 1960, it is easy to observe the the most significant difference in the auto systems infrastructure is that the speed limit where higher 50 years ago. In a half century America has not improved or radically upgraded and changed its personal transport infrastructure and of course it could.
For the Harvard M.B.A. gang abstract market control factors become more important than the well being and standard of living of ordinary individual American citizens. Citizen freedom to compete on a level free enterprise field is important to defend. Actual national citizens should not be plundered by globalists with deep pockets.
If the domination of the economic-political sphere was regulated through democratic action, if no individual could invest in more than three corporations, then innovation and competition, efficiency and adaptability would increase. On one branch is individualism, small business and ecological efficiency, and on the other road are the mega-social isms of communism, fascism and corporatism. Even libertarianism lies on the side of 'freedom for large organizations to rule the world as they desire.
The next President needs good ideas, an understanding of the political philosophy of corporatism, a textbook understanding of what actual ecological economics is, and a willingness to lead Americans to a new compassionate nationalism with an oars in the water approach to rectifying maladroit contemporary economics and security. Spending more money (maybe 5 trillion) to defend the nation from box-cutter wielding hijackers than we did on cold war defenses against ballistic nuclear missiles is absurd and the most gross incompetence and corruption. The Executive and Congressional branches of government seem corrupt, stupid or both, by logical inference.
American issues of Christianity, cosmology, politics, ecosphere, philosophy, contemporary history etc
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Alternative Courses to Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were civilian targets. Truman had different courses to take yet he was a Democrat. Perhaps he could have nuked just o...
-
Alaskan officials have cut down or banned King Salmon fishing in much of Alaska because so few of the large fish are returning. The Ancho...
-
Here and there pointillist continua build rowing the skiff clambering over the road staying in shadows until spring insouciant compact snow ...
-
Why do F-22 pilots lose consciousness and let their planes crash and burn? The air superiority fighters are designed to survive oppositio...
No comments:
Post a Comment