3/11/14

The Correct Dialectical Evolution of Society With the Spirit of the Christian Church in History


G.W.F. Hegel wrote of a thesis in his Phenomenology of Mind of the evolution of spirit as God realizing himself through history and of course the Universe. That may have been an informative paradigm for the Christian scientist Charles Darwin as well as the political philosopher Karl Marx Each adapted Hegel's paradigm to his own thesis in interpreting substantive history. One may choose to adapt and employ Hegel's paradigm in a different way though to describe an omnipotent God pre-existing history and all things that are contingent ideas for God. God is letting man evolve through history.

The Medieval era of the history of the Christian Church was an exciting period of a little less than a millennium in which human society of the west grew with the spiritual leavening of the spirit of God bringing the nations together from a more primeval time as pagans of the forests. In the preceding pagan era tribal associations commonly with warrior as the basic male occupation jostled for turf. Protracted war of Germanic tribes against Celts. Slavs to the east met with Turkic and Mongolian tribes as a precursor to later great conflicts of the invasions of Mongols and Turks from east to west. Several hundred years after the fall of the western Roman Empire Vikings would row and sail around Europe and journey on its rivers to attack various peoples for profit. Christianity would become the spiritual tie that drew and bound the leaders and many of the people of the pagan world together.

The Middle Ages became an age of discovery for mankind of his intellectual, social and physical potential for being better in the image of God. God is pure reason, logic and love surpassing all human understanding. Bootstrapping any given Universe from the inclination of His thought He donated the impetus and order of assembly of existence for the development of human society during the middle ages. God's modge panc (mind plans) comprising teleology is marvelous to consider so far as one might make inferences of it.

With the presence of the Christian Church and with its monks, priests and Bishops nations were given spiritual reasons to interact at the highest level of state. War and hostage taking were basic elements of statecraft before the infusion of the Church into the social order, yet of course with human beings the agents of socialization that God employed the problems of sin in the state, people and Christians continued. Development of the nations from the pagan foundations of tribal turf instead of legal boundaries emerged. If Kings sometimes donated land to the Church they sometimes appointed Bishops as well (ref. Merovingian Kings).

As the Christian Church developed an ecclesiastical structure and evolved its method the nations too founded agencies and ideas, doctrines and procedures of increasing sophistication. The problem in modern third world nation start-ups of the lack of non-governmental agencies to fill the void as catalysts for social cohesion and public development were mitigated significantly during the middle ages by the progressive advance of structure in and out of the church coinciding with state advance. It is a marvelous subject to consider. Problems with the succession of kings and right to rule internationally were paralleled in the Avignon captivity and subsequent simultaneous existence of three popes. While the controversy on the right of investiture continued the issue of the right of any pope or patriarch to act as monarch over all Christians, and even the politics of the nations arose. While arguments over doctrine rising to the level of heresy occurred political theories about the political rights of man to be free from tyranny stirred. The assertions of the right of the laity to select their own leader of the church made at the Council of Constance supported the paradigm of traits toward political independence from imperialism. One could find the development of nationalism too in reactions against various formations of political and/or ecclesiastical imperialism.

With Phillip Shaff's list of contents of his study of Christian Church History published in the late 19th century (following) it is easy to comprehend the rise of complexity and structure that implicitly occurred socially around the Christian world and beyond. Even the Muslim world was influenced by Christian ethics. It is challenging to imagine Muhammad arising in the absence of the appearance of Jesus Christ the Savior or even the course of mass social paganism through the same period without a spiritual foundation. Francis of Assisi in personifying the work of the Lord is a far cry different than the ethics of tossing deformed babies on the public garbage heap or those stoking up chemical or biological engines of holocaust. Humanity do not all follow the spiritual ethics of the Lord and some do not know what they are.

History of the Christian Church, Volume IV: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1049-1294 Phillip Shaff

Content Items

The Middle Age. Limits and General Character
The Nations of Medieval Christianity. The Kelt, the Teuton, and the Slav
Genius of Mediaeval Christianity
Periods of the Middle Age
Conversion Of The Northern And Western Barbarians
Character of Mediaeval Missions
Literature
The Britons
The Anglo-Saxons
The Mission of Gregory and Augustin. Conversion of Kent, a.d. 595-604 29
Antagonism of the Saxon and British Clergy
Conversion of the Other Kingdoms of the Heptarchy
Conformity to Row Established. Wilfrid, Theodore, Bede
The Conversion of Ireland. St. Patrick and St. Bridget
The Irish Church after St. Patrick
Subjection of Ireland to English and Roman Rule
The Conversion of Scotland. St. Ninian and St. Kentigern
St. Columba and the Monastery of Iona
The Culdees
Extinction of the Keltic Church, and Triumph of Rome under King David I
Arian Christianity among the Goths and other German Tribes
Conversion of Clovis and the Franks
Columbanus and the Irish Missionaries on the Continent
German Missionaries before Boniface
Boniface, the Apostle of Germany
The Pupils of Boniface. Willibald, Gregory of Utrecht, Sturm of Fulda
The Conversion of the Saxons. Charlemagne and Alcuin. The Heliand, and the
Gospel-Harmony
Scandinavian Heathenism
The Christianization of Denmark. St. Ansgar
The Christianization of Sweden
The Christianization of Norway and Iceland
General Survey
Christian Missions among the Wends
Cyrillus and Methodius, the Apostles of the Slavs. Christianization of Moravia,
Bohemia and Poland
The Conversion of the Bulgarians
The Conversion of the Magyars
The Christianization of Russia
Mohammedanism In Its Relation To Christianity
Literature
Statistics and Chronological Table
Position of Mohammedanism in Church History
The Home, and the Antecedents of Islâm
Life and Character of Mohammed
The Conquests of Islâm
The Koran, and the Bible
The Mohammedan Religion
Mohammedan Worship
Christian Polemics against Mohammedanism. Note on Mormonism
The Papal Hierarchy And The Holy Roman Empire
General Literature on the Papacy
Chronological Table of the Popes, Anti-Popes, and Roman Emperors from
Gregory I. to Leo XIII
Gregory the Great. a.d. 590-604
Gregory and the Universal Episcopate
The Writings of Gregory
The Papacy from Gregory I to Gregory II a.d. 604-715
From Gregory II to Zacharias. a.d. 715-741
Alliance of the Papacy with the New Monarchy of the Franks. Pepin and the
Patrimony of St. Peter. A.d. 741-755
Charles the Great. a.d. 768-814
Founding of the Holy Roman Empire, a.d. 800. Charlemagne and Leo II
Survey of the History of the Holy Roman Empire
The Papacy and the Empire from the Death of Charlemagne to Nicolas I a.d.
814-858). Note on the Myth of the Papess Joan 2
The Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals
Nicolas I., April, 858-Nov. 13, 867
Hadrian II. and John VIII a.d. 867 to 882
The Degradation of the Papacy in the Tenth Century
The Interference of Otho the Great
The Second Degradation of the Papacy from Otho I to Henry III. a.d. 97-1046
Henry III and the Synod of Sutri. Deposition of three rival Popes. a.d. 1046
The Conflict Of The Eastern And Western Churches And Their Separation
Sources and Literature
The Consensus and Dissensus between the Greek and Latin Churches
The Causes of Separation
The Patriarch and the Pope. Photius and Nicolas
Progress and Completion of the Schism. Cerularius 2
Fruitless Attempts at Reunion
Morals And Religion
Literature
General Character of Mediaeval Morals
Clerical Morals
Domestic Life
Slavery
Feuds and Private Wars. The Truce of God
The Ordeal
The Torture
Christian Charity
Monasticism
Use of Convents in the Middle Ages
St. Benedict. St. Nilus. St. Romuald
The Convent of Cluny
Church Discipline
The Penitential Books
Ecclesiastical Punishments. Excommunication, Anathema, Interdict
Penance and Indulgence
Church And State
Legislation
The Roman Law
The Capitularies of Charlemagne
English Legislation
Worship And Ceremonies
The Mass
The Sermon
Church Poetry. Greek Hymns and Hymnists
Latin Hymnody. Literature
Latin Hymns and Hymnists
The Seven Sacraments
The Organ and the Bell
The Worship of Saints
The Worship of Images. Literature. Different Theories
The Iconoclastic War, and the Synod of 754
The Restoration of Image-Worship by the Seventh Oecumenical Council, 787
Iconoclastic Reaction, and Final Triumph of Image-Worship, a.d. 842
The Caroline Books and the Frankish Church on Image-Worship
Evangelical Reformers. Agobardus of Lyons, and Claudius of Turin
Doctrinal Controversies
General Survey
The Controversy on the Procession of the Holy Spirit
The Arguments for and against the Filioque
The Monotheletic Controversy
The Doctrine of Two Wills in Christ
History of Monotheletism and Dyotheletism
The Sixth Oecumenical Council. a.d. 680 7
The Heresy of Honorius
Concilium Quinisextum. a.d. 692
Reaction of Monotheletism. The Maronites
The Adoptionist Controversy. Literature
History of Adoptionism 1
Doctrine of Adoptionism 5
The Predestinarian Controversy
Gottschalk and Babanus Maurus
Gottschalk and Hincmar
The Contending Theories on Predestination, and the Victory of
Semi-Augustinianism
The Doctrine of Scotus Erigena
The Eucharistic Controversies. Literature
The Two Theories of the Lord's Supper
The Theory of Paschasius Radbertus
The Theory of Ratramnus
The Berengar Controversy
Berengar's Theory of the Lord's Supper 8
Lanfranc and the Triumph of Transubstantiation 11
Heretical Sects
The Paulicians
The Euchites and other Sects in the East
The New Manichaeans in the West 524
The State Of Learning
Literature
Literary Character of the Early Middle Ages
Learning in the Eastern Church
Christian Platonism and the Pseudo-Dionysian Writings
Prevailing Ignorance in the Western Church
Educational Efforts of the Church
Patronage of Letters by Charles the Great, and Charles the Bald
Alfred the Great, and Education in England
Biographical Sketches Of Ecclesiastical Writers
Chronological List of the Principal Ecclesiastical Writers from the Sixth to the
Twelfth Century
St. Maximus Confessor
John of Damascus
Photius, Patriarch of Constantinople
Simeon Metaphrastes
Oecumenius
Theophylact Michael Psellus
Euthymius Zigabenus
Eustathius of Thessalonica
Nicetas Acominatos
Cassiodorus
St. Gregory of Tours
St. Isidore of Seville
The Venerable Bede (Baeda)
Paul the Deacon
St. Paulinus of Aquileia
Alcuin
St. Liudger
Theodulph of Orleans
St. Eigil
Amalarius
Einhard
viiSmaragdus
Jonas of Orleans
Rabanus Maurus
Haymo
Walahfrid Strabo
Florus Magister, of Lyons 3
Servatus Lupus
Druthmar
St. Paschasius Radbertus
Patramnus
Hincmar of Rheims
Johannes Scotus Erigena
Anastasius
Ratherius of Verona
Gerbert (Sylvester II.)
Fulbert of Chartres
Rodulfus Glaber. Adam of Bremen
St. Peter Damiani

History of the Christian Church, Volume V: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1294-1517 Philip Schaff

Content items

The Hildebrandian Popes. A.D. 1049-1073. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature on Chapters I. and II. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand and his Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand and Leo IX. 1049-1054. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Victor II. and Stephen IX. (X.). 1055-1058. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas II. and the Cardinals. 1059-1061. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The War against Clerical Marriage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alexander II. and the Schism of Cadalus. 1061-1073. . . . . . . . . . Gregory Vii, 1073-1085. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hildebrand elected Pope. His Views on the Situation. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Gregorian Theocracy. .
Gregory VII. as a Moral Reformer. Simony and Clerical Marriage. . . .
The Enforcement of Sacerdotal Celibacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The War over Investiture. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gregory VII. and Henry IV. . . . .
Canossa. 1077. . . . . . .
Renewal of the Conflict. Two Kings and Two Popes. .
Death of Gregory VII. . . .
The Papacy From The Death Of Gregory Vii. To The Concordat Of Worms.
A.D 1085-1122. . .
Victor III. and Urban II. 1086-1099. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pascal II. and Henry V. 1099-1118. . . . . . . . .
The Concordat of Worms. 1122. . . . . . . . .
The Conflict of the Hierarchy in England. William the Conqueror and
Lanfranc. . . . . . . . . . .
William Rufus and Anselm. . . . . . .
Anselm and Henry I. . . . .
The Papacy From The Concordat Of Worms To Innocent Iii. A.D.
1122-1198. . . . . . .
Innocent II., 1130-1143, and Eugene III., 1145-1153. . .
Arnold of Brescia. . . . . . . . . .
The Popes and the Hohenstaufen. . . . . .
Adrian IV. and Frederick Barbarossa. . . .
Alexander III. in Conflict with Barbarossa. . . . .
The Peace of Venice. 1177. . . . . .
Thomas Becket and Henry II of England. . .
The Archbishop and the King. . . .
The Martyrdom of Thomas Becket. Dec. 29, 1170. . . .
The Effects of Becket's Murder. . . . .
Innocent Iii. And His Age. A.D. 1198-1216. . . . . .
Literature. . .
Innocent's Training and Election. . . .
Innocent's Theory of the Papacy. . . . . .
Innocent and the German Empire. . . .
Innocent and King John of England. . . . .
Innocent and Magna Charta. . . . .
The Fourth Lateran Council, 1215. . . .
The Papacy From The Death Of Innocent Iii. To Boniface Viii.
1216-1294. . . . . . .
The Papal Conflict with Frederick II Begun. . . . . .
Gregory IX. and Frederick II. 1227-1241. . . . .
The First Council of Lyons and the Close of Frederick's Career.
1241-1250. . .
The Last of the Hohenstaufen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Empire and Papacy at Peace. 1271-1294. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature on the Crusades as a Whole. . .
Character and Causes of the Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Call to the Crusades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The First Crusade and the Capture of Jerusalem. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099-1187. . .
The Fall of Edessa and the Second Crusade. . . . . . . .
The Third Crusade. 1189-1192. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Children's Crusades. . .. . . .
The Fourth Crusade and the Capture of Constantinople. 1200-1204. . .
Frederick II. and the Fifth Crusade . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Louis and the Last Crusades 1248, 1270.
The Last Stronghold of the Crusaders in Palestine. .
Effects of the Crusades. . . . . . . .
The Military Orders. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Monastic Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Revival of Monasticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monasticism and the Papacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Monks of Cluny. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cistercians. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Bernard of Clairvaux. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Augustinians, Carthusians, Carmelites, and other Orders.
Monastic Prophets. .. . . . . . . . . . .
The Mendicant Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Franciscan Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Francis d'Assisi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Franciscans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Dominic and the Dominicans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions in Northeastern Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions among the Mohammedans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Missions among the Mongols. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Jews. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heresy And Its Suppression. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature for the Entire Chapter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Mediaeval Dissenters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cathari. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter de Bruys and Other Independent Leaders. . . . . . . . . .
The Amaurians and Other Isolated Sects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Beguines and Beghards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Waldenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Crusades against the Albigenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Inquisition. Its Origin and Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Inquisition. Its Mode of Procedure and Penalties
. . . . . . .
Universities And Cathedrals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Books and Libraries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Universities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The University of Bologna. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The University of Paris. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oxford and Cambridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Cathedrals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scholastic And Mystic Theology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Development of Scholasticism.
Realism and Nominalism. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anselm of Canterbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter Abaelard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Abaelard's Teachings and Theology. . . . . .
Younger Contemporaries of Abaelard. . . . .
Peter the Lombard and the Summists. . . . .
Mysticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
St. Bernard as a Mystic. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hugo and Richard of St. Victor. . . . . . . . . .
Scholasticism At Its Height. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alexander of Hales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Albertus Magnus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas Aquinas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bonaventura. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Duns Scotus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roger Bacon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sacramental System. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature on the Sacraments. . . . . . . . . . .
The Seven Sacraments. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Baptism and Confirmation. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Eucharist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eucharistic Practice and Superstition. . . . .
Penance and Indulgences. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Penance and Indulgences. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extreme Unction, Ordination, and Marriage.
Sin and Grace. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Future State. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope And Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Canon Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Papal Supremacy in Church and State.
The Pope and the Curia. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bishops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Lower Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Councils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Church and Clergy in England. . . . . . . . . .
Two English Bishops. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Popular Worship And Superstition. . . . . . . .
The Worship of Mary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Worship of Relics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sermon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hymns and Sacred Poetry. . . . . . . . .
The Religious Drama. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Flagellants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Demonology and the Dark Arts. . . . . .
The Age passing Judgment upon Itself

History of the Christian Church, Volume VI: The
Middle Ages. A.D. 1049-1294- Phillip Shaff

Content Items

The Decline Of The Papacy And The Avignon Exile. . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope Boniface VIII. 1294-1303. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Boniface VIII. and Philip the Fair of France. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literary Attacks against the Papacy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Transfer of the Papacy to Avignon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Pontificate of John XXII 1316-1334. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Papal Office Assailed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Financial Policy of the Avignon Popes. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Later Avignon Popes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Re-establishment of the Papacy in Rome. 1377. . . . . .
The Papal Schism And The Reformatory Councils. 1378-1449
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Schism Begun. 1378. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Further Progress of the Schism. 1378-1409. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Pisa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Constance. 1414-1418. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The council of Basel. 1431-1449. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Council of Ferrara-Florence. 1438-1445. . . . . . . . . . . .
Leaders Of Catholic Thought. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ockam and the Decay of Scholasticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Catherine of Siena, the Saint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peter d'Ailly, Ecclesiastical Statesman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Gerson, Theologian and Church Leader. . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas of Clamanges, the Moralist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas of Cusa, Scholar and Churchman. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Popular Preachers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The German Mystics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The New Mysticism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Meister Eckart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Tauler of Strassburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Henry Suso. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Friends of God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John of Ruysbroeck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gerrit de Groote and the Brothers of the Common Life. . . . . .
The Imitation of Christ. Thomas à Kempis. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The German Theology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
English Mystics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reformers Before The Reformation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sources and Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Church in England in the Fourteenth Century. . . . . . . . .
John Wyclif. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wyclif's Teachings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wyclif and the Scriptures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Lollards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
John Huss of Bohemia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Huss at Constance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jerome of Prag. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Hussites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Last Popes Of The Middle Ages. 1447-152. . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature and General Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nicolas V. 1447-1455. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aeneas Sylvius de' Piccolomini, Pius I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul II. 1464-1471. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sixtus IV. 1471-1484. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Innocent VIII. 1484-1492. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pope Alexander VI--Borgia. 1492-1503. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Julius II., the Warrior-Pope. 1503-1513. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leo X. 1513-1521. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heresy And Witchcraft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heretical and Unchurchly Movements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Witchcraft and its Punishment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Spanish Inquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Renaissance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Literature of the Renaissance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Intellectual Awakening. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dante, Petrarca, Boccaccio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Progress and Patrons of Classical Studies in the 15th Century.
Greek Teachers and Italian Humanists.
The Artists. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Revival of Paganism. . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in Germany. . . . . . . . . . . .
Reuchlin and Erasmus. . . . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in France. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Humanism in England. . . . . . . . . . . .
The Pulpit And Popular Piety. . . . . . . . .
Literature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Clergy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preaching. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Doctrinal Reformers. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Girolamo Savonarola. . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Study and Circulation of the Bible. .
Popular Piety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Works of Charity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Sale of Indulgences. . . . . . . . .

3/9/14

Christian Founders of the Reformation/Renaissance and the Crimean Conundrum


 Christianity was important in founding the modern humanist movement. The discovery of the complete texts of Aristotle introduced in the west through Spain thought also continuing from Byzantine-Greek sources stimulated the Aristotelian method of logic. That was applied to Christian thought in the scholastic movement of the 12th century. Thomas Aquinas wrote the Summa Theologica with an Aristotelian method of proofs and arguments against culminating in a syllogistic conclusion or summae. A reaction against that approach by Petrarch and others whom preferred a neo-Platonic and Augustinian approach as being more relevant and central to human concern on Earth in their relationship to God.

The politics of late dark ages Europe in relation to the church and the relation of the church to the pope is fascinating reading. Going through ‘A History of the Christian Church’ by Williston Walker, Richard A. Norris, David W. Lotz and Robert T. Handy that was put together over a time period of about a century I learned many new insights regarding the complexity of the movements of people and nations between the 11th and 15th centuries.

Of course there was a papal tax on subjects in far-flung states of Europe as well as a schism between the eastern and western branches of the church during part of the era. Two Patriarchs of the five patriarchs of the Nicene period still existed as powerful individuals. It was not to be a reunified church again until the Turks were about to take Constantinople when the East sought military help that never arrived, yet that is another story.

In the west the papacy for various reasons became divided into three. That is three post existed simultaneously and all were fired or resigned under pressure of a general council of Bishops from all over early in the 1430s. The bishops organized themselves into nations of five groups eventually to make voting simpler thought they were from more countries than that. Not only was the church in need of reform, it required one leader subject to the general council instead of a monarch levying taxes. For much of European history during the dark ages a co-evolution of political and national formation occurred along a trialectical helix with the church. Germany or the Holy Roman Empire didn’t fare to well during this period ass the new pope appointed by the council of Constance became too powerful again-the plague had hit Europe. Other matters concerned the locals. Germans had to pay high taxes to the pope.

If the reformation was in part a tax revolt during an era when the Roman pontiff tended toward corruption as on prince among five Italian principalities contesting for land and power in a time when the prestige and power of the papacy declined (the Borgia popes were siring children and Pope Julius II was leading his army in battle), the pre-formation & renaissance was developing while vernacular transformation of everything including the Bible was proceeding.

Walker or Lotz wrote in the text mentioned above that the source of studia humanitatis was Petrarch. Interestingly Marsilio Ficino appointed by Cosimo de ‘Medici to lead the new Platonic Academy developed a ‘Platonic theology’ combining Christianity and neo-Platonism. I discovered that sympathetic concurrence for myself after reading the Enneads of Plotinus. Augustine was also a reader of neo-Platonism before becoming fully Christian.

Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, author of an ‘Oration on the Dignity of Man’ was also a member of the Platonic academy. Evidently many of the founders of the humanist renaissance were actually defending Christianity or renormalizing nit in relation to the Aristotelian school of scholasticism. Of course in recent decades many American scholars have taken the opposite viewpoint arguing that Aristotelianism and scholasticism- even Christianity were in opposition to an entirely secular renaissance providing a stimulus to science. Maybe Roger Bacon was considered a necromancer in his time for being a little eccentric in his experiments yet that was just the average upper-crust Brit for ya. Science developed contemporarily with the rest of the liberal arts or studia humanitatis though one might find some differences in the school curriculum of the first Universities of Europe in Paris and Oxford etc. that did have some Aristotelian subjects. That over time would split off from the applied secular sort of learning. Scientists have argued about the abstract reasoning of Aristotle’s method versus the applied hands-on approach of experimenters. One might point that out to the string and brane theorists who seem to have purely theoretical, almost Aristotelian math-based approaches to creating new scientific knowledge

Poor historical method applied to contemporary politics can lead to judgments based on faulty logic. The Obama administration believes that the west can judge the Ukrainian situation impartially. That would be like expecting the KKK to fairly judge a civil dispute over land ownership between a negroe and a cracker in the late 19th century. One knows that the desire to take the valuables would prevail in favor of the west (if the negroe were Russians owning the Ukraine; he Obama administration, France, Italy and the Netherlands the western Crackers). The paradoxes of history are fascinating to observe.

The United States’s Obama administration is well known for being a leftist vanguard for an atheist homosexual movement in the greater globalist expansion post-cold war. The paradox in the Obama administration efforts to consolidate every last bit of formerly Russian Ukrainian land after the cold war for the benefit of the west is that Globalism is taking the west through British leadership in the Master-Blaster Thunder dome relationship of post-imperial elitism, and the movement is a kind of reverse chirility image to that of Trotsky’s international communist imperial tendency that were repressed by Stalin and that re-emerged with Nikita Khrushchev. That is one atheist, leftist administration pursuing globalism follows another. What can the Russians think of that?

It was the Christian moral guidance of the Reagan administration that had the charisma and desire to rid the world of nuclear weapons that coincided with the rise of Andropov’s protégé Mikhail Gorbachev to power in the final years of the Soviet Union that was an element of Christian grace enabling a peaceful transition to a post-Soviet Russia. Western leftist would of course attribute that entirely to President Gorbachev and deny that President Reagan’s appeal to President Gorbachev to ‘tear down this wall’ or conventional weapons build up had anything to do with it. The transition should have been one of subsequent non-exploitation of Russia. Traditional Russian lands such as the eastern Ukraine ought to have remained with Russia. Lands liberated from the Nazis yet not Russian should go independent. That was fairly simply and a premise that George Keenan would have agreed with.

The atheist, globalist movement toward a dehumanized, despiritualized west and a Ukraine given over to Chinese corporate farming (they signed a ten billion dollar farming deal) is a paradox. Russia would be flanked by the Chinese infrastructure and perhaps have the Crimea become another Panama Canal Zone run by the Chinese. The Chinese Communist party did not throw in the towel and trust the kindness of foes, the Soviet Union did and Russia is being made to suffer for that evident mistake in regard to the Eastern Ukraine and the Crimea.

 One of the Russian’s major areas of food production is being usurped lost and its food and physical security threatened by globalists of insatiable greed seeking to devour. Ant that is done in the name of atheist, scientific elitism wherein human beings have no God-given inalienable rights. Instead humanity are managed as bits of flesh- phenomenalities under the supervision of concentrated wealth and Mengeles of advanced scientific inclination toward ethics of personal egoist utilitarianism. Science is not endangered, humanity is. Science will be around learning and inventing things forever unless its technological progeny extirpate all human life on Earth, the ecosphere or both.

3/8/14

Taxation in Relation to Urbanization and Political Power Allocation


Taxation levels seem to be a function of the form of a political authority and population lifestyle. Urban and rural areas present different trends in political form coinciding with centralization and decentralization of political power historically. During the Roman Republic taxation on urban centers could support public works that wealthy private citizens would not themselves be expected to afford. With the decline of primacy of urban centers after the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of the Merovingian Frankish kings of the 5th century in much Western Europe political power became decentralized. Merovingian kings becoming Christianized expanded into Germany affording opportunities for evangelization and further conversion of pagan tribes to faith in the Lord. Merovingian kings and other conferred lands upon Bishops of the church as well as upon retainers and allies. Over time the benefactions and division of inherited lands among princes reduced their power. The conference of benefits and allocation of resources are historical methods of gaining political power or holding on to it.

 

A lesson of history seems to be that a ruling authority may actually decrease taxes upon subjects as the wealth and power of the authority increases. If the consolidation of wealth and power becomes absolute taxes may drop to zero as the authority directly is the owner of everything inclusive of the subjects. Conversely in a free society taxes may increase if a majority of a democracy views the allocation of resources away from concentrations of wealth toward pluralism as consistent with their principles of liberty. Yet urbanization tends to bring a populace toward conformity and a destruction of civil liberties found in rural social environments while political parties experience a reductionism. Taxes again may rise or fall in relation to the distribution of wealth. Public taxation is in effect the allocation of resources by a ruling power.

 

Ironically Karl Marx described the expropriation of the expropriators that would exchange one form of autocracy for another. There may be a golden mean in taxation and liberty such that a rural society has minimal taxes required to support the few public works required. With few homeless and landless citizens and most able to meet their own needs taxes would be low as the democratic society would have no need. Alternately urban societies are not at all self sufficient and require mass importation of resources and allocation of wealth with farm to market roads importing supplies. Taxation is substantial if there is not to be concentration of wealth and commonality of poverty. Public debt increase to support the public sector may occur in order to forestall the experience of poverty for the masses in an urban society during a period of excess concentration of wealth.

 

Globalization today is a form of treason against nationalism when advocated by politicians. In the private sector global trading is alright yet excess unconcern for the national well-being may bring about the demise of the well-being of the nation. In this period of the concentration of wealth with globalization of business there is a protracted post-Reagan movement toward low taxes or even the same tax on the rich as the poor in order to stimulate the concentration of wealth. One would expect that as wealth is concentrated and the power of national democracy given the orcheotomy of globalization that taxation on the rich would drop to nil as they own everything as Plutocrats.

3/7/14

Taking the Ukraine From Russia v6.1 Winners and Losers?

The west has since time immemorial eyeballed the Ukraine somewhat jealously. It's a vast productive farmland in land-short Europe. The Kaiser and Hitler took it by force or the threat of further force. The Poles and the Russians fought over it in 1919. That President Obama opts to support a claim to the entire Ukraine including the Crimea and skunk Russia is entirely a function of the power of the U.S. military over Russia today. As after the dissolution of the former Soviet Union the west continues to have quite a military edge although the nuclear weapons level is rather inconsequential since it doesn't take that much to make a big bang.




http://timelines.ws/countries/UKRAINE.HTML


Golda Meyer was from Kiev. Jews were liquidated by Ukrainian soldiers repeatedly in the early 20th century. It was a violent troubled place. Cannibalism was common during the Stalin kulakization purges of farmers. Corporate farms take over mostly without forcing cannibalism these days unlike the Soviet collective farming improvement program that Stalin implemented in the 1920s. It was actually President Warren G. Harding that ended the state of war with Germany and Austria-Hungary in 1921 instead of 1918. The U.S. Congress just couldn't bring themselves to sign off on President Wilson's Treaty of Versailles with those harsh conditions for the Germans with huge reparations etc. That led to the second world war. Maybe Russia ought to be allowed to keep the Crimea as a consolation prize for taking advantage of their moment of weakness in 1991 during our time of strength. Consider that the plague was taken to Italy from the Crimea and that Stalin purged Crimean Tartars. For the Greeks it was the Chersonesos-a northern trading colony. Russian Orthodox Christianity originated in the Ukraine. Who wins if the Russians are skunked by President Obama in keeping some of their ancestral homeland?


Straight away the U.S. fossil fuel industry is salivating over building l.n.g. plants and port facilities to export gas to Europe to make up for the loss of product sales from Russia across the Ukraine to Europe. Maybe they are jumping the gun a bit yet they evidently count on several years of hostility with Russia as a reason to export gas from the U.S.A. One wonders about the timing on the Ukrainian troubles and the development of fracking technology in producing gas in North Dakota-where can it be sold and who wants to buy it?


Evidently Russia will sell perhaps 38 billion cubic meters of gas per year to China by 2025. China seems to be the big winner in the planned long range hostility planned for Russia by the Obama administration-he has never visited Alaska either. Maybe he doesn't like people that live in cold place unless they award medals. Alaska has plans to build a little natural gas pipeline or two itself. These pipelines for gas are being built all over including Siberia yet what about reforming economic development to fuel cells.


If China has vast gas supply from a Russia that loses some western market share then it can develop its economy better, faster and better without increasing coal burning pollutant energy production. Energy supply and technology investment seem to be converging on China from East and West. Apple plans to hire more than 700 engineers and many more to increase product production.


Russia though is between China and Europe with lots of natural resources. Even with lasting hostility with the U.S.A. because of American military power driven annexation of all of the Ukraine Russia will continue to work with Europe and China as the middleman and primary supplier of vast numbers of natural resources while the U.S.A. might be a little bit out of the loop except for transferring technological know-how to China. Americans though can buy more goods at Wal-mart and get increased investment from a more prosperous China in the years ahead. Also the Chinese military will expand and they will have a better navy. Yet they do have rather official atheism and a fine bureaucracy and might be tolerant of homosexual tendencies in U.S. government and business visitors better than Saudis  so the Obama administration may be happy.


I believe a more historically nuanced policy menu could have provided a better approach. The Obama navy had its first drag show at a U.S. Okinawan military base recently so we can see the direction the Democrat Party is flouncing in. There is also a movement to send 6 to 12 year old Americans abroad as exchange students. Americans need to delearn nationalism-it's an obstruction to globalism or something. Good for the elites, bad for the less than graduate degree Americans that can't all have a radio talk show.

3/6/14

Standards for Transparent Computer-Screens in Eyewear


Standards in transparent computer screen glass lenses ought to be made so that software apps writers can write programs that will work on anyone's Bluetooth wired eyewear in the years ahead. Its easy to imagine hunting apps that will find the deer in the valley below and put a red arrow on it. One would need a Bluetooth wired spotting scope and a deer body-recognition app. There should be a zillion applications for designer eyewear at low cost that provides a heads-up data paradigm without occluding the lenses so one can keep their eyes on the real world view simultaneously.

U.S. Legal Theory on Ukraine's Dibs Tribes


Since President Obama has said that Russia is on the wrong side of history in regard to the Ukraine it is incumbent upon the apprentices of wisdom to understand what he meant by that. Minerva-the wise old owl of historical legend takes flights of fancy around the Ukraine and without a chip implant it’s difficult to track the right and wrong course.
 
The Ukraine is the Russian homeland. They expanded north and east to Moscow along the rivers. So o.k. possession is 9/10ths of the law and the post cold war Dibs Tribe has a claim to all of it with the support of the U.S. Government aligned with the principles of the Plutocrat tribe of which Rush Limbaugh and Barrack Obama are members and aspiring members. Like the Perfects of  Cathars adapted to the evil side of the choice they are examples for the rest of us on right and wrongness in expanding  post-Soviet Dibs tribal lands.
 

Yet until 1918 when Trotsky and Lenin gave up the Ukraine to Germany in order to have peace and a little freedom to consolidate Soviet development the Ukraine was Russian for most of history. When the Treaty of Versailles was made later in 1918 the Soviet Union was given back the Eastern half of the Ukraine and the Dibs tribe took only the western half. That was the situation until Adolph Hitler’s Nazis invaded and conquered all of the Ukraine during the Second World War. Then the Russians with Soviet leaders that were themselves something of an illegal government the United States had sent troops to fight during the Russian Civil war defeated the Nazis and took the Ukraine back . The Dibs tribe was smoldering.
 

When the Soviet Union expired at last in 1991 there was no government. In theory while the new post-Soviet government was starting up there should have been a conservatorship on the lands of the former Soviet Union able to adjudicate with merit territorial claims. At any rate the Ukraine declared independence yet if there had been a Russian government strong enough to defend its right to the Ukraine obviously they would not have acquiesced in that choice. Freedom of choice politically speaking means being able to disagree with the Dibs tribe and even the U.S. Government now and then.
 

So the legal theory of the U.S. administration is that no part of the Ukraine has a right to revolt from the Dibs tribe that can be purchased for the Plutocracy. The end of revolutionary history occurs when the Dibs have Perfected global financial networking for the 1% The Crimea has no right of independence much less would the Russian Federation have a right to assert its historical possession of the Ukraine or even the western half although the last fair and impartial international body that adjudicated that dispute recognized that Russia in any form-even the losing Soviet side, had a right to the eastern half of the Ukraine.

 

The right side of history would seem to be that the eastern side of the Ukraine is Russian and the western half for pragmatic reason belongs to the Dibs tribe. The Obama administration has different values of right and wrong than most people however, as we have experienced in the U.S.A.

3/5/14

Select Regime Change Parameters in Global Plutocratic Developmental Econosystem


Contemporary regime change theory parameters entail elements of perennial modern revolution where today’s revolutionaries are tomorrow’s future bureaucratic establishment. Converging with instant revolutionary messaging and crowd sourcing of ideas spontaneous government control symmetry breaking is old hat. Instant revolutionary street movements with profusion of civil disobedience to pressurize unpopular leaders may be ordered up with the right elements of subtle provocation perhaps by foreign intelligence agency support. The motivation may be to shake down the ripe fruit of political power for the prosperity of global traders. More about the effects of deregulated capitalism transitioning nations to units of global plutocracy later.

 

One wonders about the Ukrainian situation. Encouraged by the U.S.A. and the incentive of financial support the over-the-horizon glimmer of hope and change becomes irresistible to the young revolutionary set. Purchase of local leaders with at least the glimmer of a future of rising to the top of a local bureaucracy isn’t new at all, yet the opportunities to control global food supplies major regions of grain production for the benefit of corporations owned by the 1% global oligarchy is.

 

The Ukraine and other nations have a history of post revolutionary purges that make many citizens recalcitrant about sticking their neck out in public protests. A silent majority may remain at home while radicals flood then streets as activists describing themselves as the will of the people. The Bolshevik revolution was accomplished with a similar metric of non-representationalism consistent with the anarchist principle that any change of regime is acceptable regardless of the dynamic of the subsequent bureaucrats.

 

Ukrainian revolutionaries seem unaware that the historical civil liberties of the west aren’t what they used to be. While internet and cellular communications popularization has radically increased the transfer of information and access to it powers concentrating wealth have benefited from that as well as the populations of formerly repressed by authoritarian nations. While the former Soviet bloc nations have been liberated in part from the strictures and repression of the old communist powers, the young modernists have failed to realize that they are stepping into the snare of a modern global corporatism that has little respect for democracy and finesses that with consumerism pacifying the allegiant. Independent civil liberty in the corporatist and networked west can be as difficult as it was in the former Soviet Union. Without being remade in the image of the beast one may not be free to own real estate or pursue enlightened self-interests.

 

Revolutions that simply at a nation to the roster of global corporate vassals are not really upgrading much from the ancient Soviet bureaucratic model. Each avoids reinforcing individual civil liberty and exchanges freedom for comfort, depravity and network surveillance.  The continuing elite-owned broadcast media is a tool for concentrating wealth and power through concentrated wealth purchasing political control.  A new synthetic political economy without corporate or bureaucratic controlling power ought to be develo0ped in the corrupted states where revolutionary movements are attractive. In former era Christianity was the transcending element against which change was required-at lest where the church was not imperial or ruled by imperial authorities. African development without a Christian foundation is going to be challenging to stabilize. The Obama administration supports an atheist and immoral approach to civil reform and that makes it too easy for chauvinist Moslem radicals to plunder away against the vacuum of paganism and atheist unbelief.

 

The former Soviet Union withered away because it was spiritually dead and its revolutionaries old bureaucrats-at least those that survived Stalinist purges. He Ukraine today needs spiritual revival orthodox, Catholic and Protestant along with enlightened independent leaders on excellent terms with the new Russia encouraging its independence and libertarian development too.

 

Deregulated capitalism is the perfect marketing tool to draw disaffected citizens away from a moribund or repressive government into a new world order. Citizens dive headlong into the beautiful shining sea of global corporatism only to find later perhaps that it was too shallow and they broke their political neck. I

 

In the planetary economy that is increasing totalized as one world order concentrating wealth through networking recruiting the poor and minorities into the service of the global corporation is easy especially of they were excluded or repressed before. Such worker-citizen-proles are unaware that they have leapt into the twilight zone of a velvet prison that in time fades to black.

 

Uncorrected corporatism with the concentration of wealth leads to concentrated political power in Plutocrats that are the only real global citizens. Swine haven’t any rights except for some protections by animal rights groups and some trifling governing protections, and the citizen-proles will discover that they have the same license to have no personal boundaries in the corporatist-socialist evil empire that is still recruiting and building up power.


When Africa is saturated with Internet drones Plutocratic intelligence agencies will no ever bit of information and movement the 21st century African communicates intentionally or unintentionally.
Deregulated capitalism leads naturally to monopoly or discrete monopoly via stock ownership. While the creativity of free enterprise and capitalism are the better way for creativity in economic applications it is toxic if uncut by regulation as would the intake of pure heroin be fatal. Several regulatory steps need to be taken by any nation today to defend against the planetary Plutocracy and conserve individual freedom.

 

Ownership of any corporation in a nation must be at held by national citizens at least 51%. No individual should own stock in more than three corporations, and the take rate on the top income bracket should be at least 51% so they do not become oligarchs. With those simple legal protections being an ordinary citizen could still mean something and not decay into and Orwellian prole status in one of perhaps two planetary corporate-socialist networks if even that much competition exists.

Atheists May Hate Godel's Incompleteness Theorems

I believe the simple explanation for Godel's incompleteness theorems is that there cannot be a set of all sets including itself, with th...