American
Presidential leadership nurtured the rise of ISIS. In a real sense
President Obama is the de facto leader of ISIS. U.S. policy
reinforces its increase drafting the latent populist Islamic forces
along. ISUL could not have reached its present scale it does without
his acts to develop the Syrian conflict, destroy Qaddafi in Libya ,
withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq and failure to support creation of
a Kurdish state in part of Turkey and Syria. The rise of ISIS as a
populist movement required U.S. military intervention in the Middle
East for growth. ISIS exists in the shadows of large scale political
destabilization and nullification of existing lawful governments in
the region. Wars send refugees to Europe, the United States and other
prosperous nations where intervening powers reside providing in turn
the kernels of terrorist potential. President Obama's policy of
removing the Syrian government is the catalyst for the transition of
Sunni populist anti-state, anti-Zionism and anti-western civilization
sentiments latent in the Muslim demographics of the Middle East
formerly common in the Muslim Brotherhood movement.
Supporters
of mass Muslim migration to the United States and Europe have
broadcast opinions that the refugees are vetted. One must wonder if
the intelligence of the immigration advocates was vetted. Large new
foreign Muslim. Creating an internal proletariat of Middle Eastern
Muslims in the United States, Europe and Canada provides a swamp in
which ISIS crocs may grow to swim and design future attacks on the
plump targets of enfeofed financial service sector office workers of
the west. Expansion of the Dar al Harb to the west requires large
numbers of potential support troops before the fighters arrive;
before Muslim spooks of the Saudi Wahhabist world flow through the
masses taking what support they require from the tens of thousands of
masses that may intentionally or through coercion provide support to
war actions in the United States.
Administration
policy support critics of critics of administration policy refer to
American extremists that might oppose Muslim immigration. One might
wonder if any of the founders of the United States would not be
regarded as extremists if they lived today and exercised common sense
to oppose relocation of imperialists or theocrats and their
supporters to the U.S.A. It is unimaginable that George Washington
would have been concerned about what the Saudis might think about an
American security policy banning Muslim migration to the United
States. George Washington prayed to God; not Mecca or Rome.
Providing
leadership for the growth of ISIS in the shadow of U.S. Middle East
regime removal is wrong policy from recent American administrations.
It seems as if Presidents and Secretaries of State are I.Q.
challenged or closet Muslim jihadists themselves. Ad hoc and
improvisational military units and political leadership in the past
century have nearly invariably generated the most undisciplined
warriors perpetrating atrocities.
In
the Vietnam conflict, after the volunteers in the Army from the 1950s
timed out and a conscript component increased the Defense Department
formed a just-for-the-war new Army division- the Americal Division
that lacked disciplined unit history-or any history for that matter.
Undisciplined circumstances evolved Lt. William Calley's My Lai
civilian massacre. Consider how undisciplined ad hoc ISIS fighting
units are and hence their propensity for butchery. The new
post-Soviet era Serb military had the same sort of lack of unit
discipline and cohesion and was known for famous war crimes. New
civilian government may have a comparable propensity for extremism or
corruption. The year zero Khmer Rouge wasn't the sole newly formed
monstrous government of modern history. Seldom have newly empowered
extremist governments shared land or resources with loyalists of the
dispossessed. Instead they have a tendency toward purges exemplified
in Iraq a few times, in Khomeini's Iran and Ukraine.
ISIS
terrorism and atrocities have developed in the chaos and indiscipline
created in the ad hoc military structure. From Libya to Syria ad hoc
Muslim killers armed generally with dumped military weapons from
states deposed through American foreign policy design. The civil
chaos and generation of new terrorists cannot be switched off through
a particular military battlefield victory. Economic conditions for
prosperity that require development or conservation of existing
physical infrastructure cannot generally be maintained or transition
with continuity to a hypothetical militant leadership that meets
theoretically 'vetted' standards of the U.S. government. The left
extolling the vetting of Muslim mass migrants may as well seek
membership in the American Legion for them. Though Muslims tended to
side with the 3rd
Reich in the war against Jews and the United States in my father's
generation.
It
is far easier to reinforce existing governments and encourage them
through positive engagement to evolve to a more fair and equal sort
of status with its citizens than to encourage and support rebellion
against the existing government. While the founders described in the
Declaration of Independence the situation wherein rebellion is
necessary, the godless atheist leadership of the west too often
simply increases short-term support for the increase of wars as a
long term policy as a kind of decoration or flower arranging activity
of the very powerful and advantaged that may require a little more
force to put down where thereafter it is thought the Muslim
population would settle true buy products and pay rent. Of course if
the Declaration where published in the Corporatist era it would be
censored for hate speech. One wonders if the advantaged don't have a
reciprocal of unreality in their personal political epistemology
because the knowledge that brought them to rise to the top of the
political toilet bowl hasn't anything to do with competence in
justice, sociology, political philosophy or history.
